Questions
Salary Years Age MBA? 35600 7.3 33 0 71100 24.1 61 0 42300 8.6 35 1...

Salary Years Age MBA?
35600 7.3 33 0
71100 24.1 61 0
42300 8.6 35 1
51200 11.5 43 1
41300 13.8 40 0
64900 18.1 55 0
54600 16.9 49 0
43800 9.4 37 1
46600 12.2 48 1
50100 16 50 0
32800 4.2 28 1
49300 11.5 49 0
38100 7.3 35 1
53500 14.4 52 1
46000 10.8 45 0

The data in the above table give the annual salary (Salary), number of years of employment (Years), employee's age (Age), and whether or not the employee has an MBA degree (1 = yes, 0 = no) for 15 workers in a particular industry and location.

In this location and industry, what is the predicted salary of a 40 year old employee who has 10 years of employment and holds an MBA degree? Use the MLR equation.

Question 7 options:

about $44,590

about $79,140

about $28,590

about $63150

about 35500

Salary Years Age MBA?
35600 7.3 33 0
71100 24.1 61 0
42300 8.6 35 1
51200 11.5 43 1
41300 13.8 40 0
64900 18.1 55 0
54600 16.9 49 0
43800 9.4 37 1
46600 12.2 48 1
50100 16 50 0
32800 4.2 28 1
49300 11.5 49 0
38100 7.3 35 1
53500 14.4 52 1
46000 10.8 45 0

The data in the above table give the annual salary (Salary), number of years of employment (Years), employee's age (Age), and whether or not the employee has an MBA degree (1 = yes, 0 = no) for 15 workers in a particular industry and location.

At the 0.10 level of significance, are any of the predictor variables making a statistically significant contribution to predicting Salary?

Question 8 options:

Yes -- both MBA? and Age make statistically significant contributions to predicting Salary.

Yes -- ALL THREE variables make statistically significant contributions to predicting Salary.

Yes -- both Years and MBA? make statistically significant contributions to predicting Salary.

No -- none of the three make a statistically significant contribution to predicting Salary.

Yes -- both Years and Age make statistically significant contributions to predicting Salary.

Yes -- Age makes a statistically significant contribution to predicting Salary.

Yes -- Years makes a statistically significant contribution to predicting Salary.

Yes -- MBA? makes a statistically significant contribution to predicting Salary.

In: Statistics and Probability

ABC Energy Corp. (the “Company”), an SEC registrant, operates three manufacturing facilities in the United States....

ABC Energy Corp. (the “Company”), an SEC registrant, operates three manufacturing facilities in the United States. The Company manufactures various household cleaning products at each facility, which are sold to retail customers. The U.S. government granted the Company emission allowances (EAs) of varying useable years (i.e., the years in which the allowance may be used) to be used between 2015 and 2030. Upon receipt of the EAs, the Company recorded the EAs as intangible assets with a cost basis of zero, in accordance with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) accounting guidance for EAs. The Company has a fiscal year end of December 31.

As background, in an effort to control or reduce the emission of pollutants and greenhouse gases, governing bodies typically issue rights or EAs to entities to emit a specified level of pollutants. Each individual EA has a useable year designation. EAs with the same useable year designation are fungible and can be used by any party to satisfy pollution control obligations. Entities can choose to buy EAs from, and sell EAs to, other entities. Such transactions are typically initiated through a broker. At the end of a compliance period, participating entities are required to either (1) deliver to the governing bodies EAs sufficient to offset the entity's actual emissions or (2) pay a fine. The Company currently emits a significant amount of greenhouse gases because of its antiquated manufacturing facilities. The Company plans to upgrade its facilities in 2024, which will decrease greenhouse gas emissions to a very low level. On the basis of the timing of the upgrade, the Company currently anticipates a need for additional EAs in fiscal years 2020–2024.

However, upon completion of the upgrade, the Company believes it will have excess EAs in fiscal years subsequent to 2024 because of reduced emissions as a result of the upgrade. The Company currently has forecasted the updates to its facilities will cost approximately $15 million. As the Company operates in a capital intensive industry, analysts and investors focus on a number of important ratios and measures, including working capital, capital expenditures, cash flows from operations, and free cash flow. As a result, the board of directors and management provide forward-looking guidance on these ratios and measures and expend great effort managing these results in light of the Company’s operational needs. The Company entered into the following two separate transactions in fiscal year 2020, which will impact the Company’s results as presented in the statement of cash flows, which the Company prepares under the indirect method.

            1. To meet its need for additional EAs in fiscal years 2020–2024, on April 2, 2020, the Company spent $6.5 million to purchase EAs with a useable year of 2023 from XYZ Manufacturing Corp.

2. In an effort to offset the costs of the April 2, 2020, purchase of 2023 EAs, the Company sold EAs with a useable year of 2026 to DEF Chemical Corp. for $5 million.

Required:

1. What is the appropriate classification in the statement of cash flows in the Company’s December 31, 2020, financial statements for its purchase of 2023 EAs from XYZ Manufacturing Corp.?

2. What is the appropriate classification in the statement of cash flows in the Company’s December 31, 2020, financial statements for its sale of 2026 EAs to DEF Chemical Corp.?

3. Should these cash flows be reported at gross amounts or net amounts in the 2020 statement of cash flows?

Be sure to cite appropriate authoritative support for your answer from the Accounting Standards Codification.

In: Accounting

I. Contemporary Psychodynamic Founder(s): Philosophical Assumptions- What’s the Big Idea?: Model of Personality What Makes People...

I. Contemporary Psychodynamic

Founder(s):

Philosophical Assumptions- What’s the Big Idea?:

Model of Personality What Makes People Tick?:

Model of Abnormality- What Makes People Sick?:

Model of Health- What’s the Goal?:

Model of Psychotherapy- What Makes People Well?:

II. Behavior

Founder(s):

Philosophical Assumptions- What’s the Big Idea?:

Model of Personality- What Makes People Tick?:

Model of Abnormality- What Makes People Sick?:

Model of Health- What’s the Goal?:

Model of Psychotherapy- What Makes People Well?:

III. Rational- Emotive

Founder(s):

Philosophical Assumptions- What’s the Big Idea?:

Model of Personality- What Makes People Tick?:

Model of Abnormality- What Makes People Sick?:

Model of Health- What’s the Goal?:

Model of Psychotherapy- What Makes People Well?:

IV. Person-Centered

Founder(s): Carl Rogers

Philosophical Assumptions- What’s the Big Idea?:

Model of Personality- What Makes People Tick?:

Model of Abnormality- What Makes People Sick?:

Model of Health- What’s the Goal?:

Model of Psychotherapy- What Makes People Well?:

In: Psychology

1/ Imagine that you run a U.S. company based in New Jersey that lists only on...

1/ Imagine that you run a U.S. company based in New Jersey that lists only on the New York Stock exchange. Assume that the company has only one factory, located in New Jersey. All of the company’s workers are paid in U.S. dollars and the company buys all of its materials from U.S. suppliers (and pays in dollars). Also, all of the company’s other costs are paid for in U.S. dollars; however, assume that all of the country’s products are exported to Europe and that all of its sales are denominated in Euros. Further assume that all of these exports are sold by the company’ European sales office. This Office is a subsidiary of the U.S. Headquarters and consolidates its statements with the U.S. headquarters.

Questions: Assume that the dollar has been increasing in value against the Euro. For the U.S. company described above, what impact (if any) will the rising dollar have on the demand for the company’s products? If the U.S. company described above sells to European companies on credit contracts denominated in Euros, what impact will the rise in the dollar have on the U.S. company’s dollar valued Accounts Receivable? What is the reporting currency of the U.S. headquarters parent that lists on the NYSE. What is the functional current of the U.S. (headquarters) parent. What is the functional currency of the foreign (sales office) subsidiary?

2/ Imagine that you run a U.S. company based in New Jersey and lists only on the NYSE. Assume that the company’s main headquarters is in New Jersey, but that its only factory is in Germany. Thus, all of the company’s workers are paid in Euros and the company buys all of its materials from German firms (and pays Euros). Also, all of the company’s (i.e. factory’s) other costs are paid for in Euros. Also, assume that the company’s German factory operates as a separate foreign subsidiary that consolidates its financial statements with the U.S. headquarters that lists on the NYSE.

Question: Assume that the dollar has been rising in value against the Euro. For the U.S. company described above, what impact will the rising dollar have on the demand for the company’s products? If the U.S. company described above sells to German companies on credit contracts denominated in Euros, what impact will the increase in the dollar have on the U.S. company’s Accounts Receivable? ? What is the reporting currency of the U.S. headquarters parent that lists on the NYSE. What is the functional current of the U.S. (headquarters) parent. What is the functional currency of the foreign subsidiary?

In: Accounting

You are the chairman of the board of directors for an innovative technology company, and you...

You are the chairman of the board of directors for an innovative technology company, and you are looking to hire a new CEO. Your shareholders require an 8% return.
Your firm has 1,200 engineers who on average each contribute $240,000 to the annual revenue of the company and receive an average annual salary of $120,000.
The first candidate for the CEO position, Jane Doe, successfully increased the productive output of engineering employees at her last firm by 5%, and is asking for total annual compensation of $3,500,000 and a three year contract.
The second candidate for the CEO position is a bit of a technology superstar, Alan Musk, and at his last company inspired and increased productive output of engineering employees by 12%, but is asking for total annual compensation of $21,000,000.
What is the Present Cost of the Alan Musk’s three year contract?
If Alan Musk increases the output of your firm’s engineers by 12%, what is his contribution to the firm’s operating profit?
What is the Present Value of Alan Musk’s three year contribution to operating profits?
What is the Net Present Value of hiring Alan Musk?

Which CEO should you hire? Defend your answer.

In: Finance

P21.3 Leader Enterprises Ltd. follows IFRS and has provided the following information: In 2019, Leader was sued in a patent infringement suit, and in 2020, Leader lost the court case. Leader must now pay a competitor $50,000 to settle the suit. No previo

P21.3 Leader Enterprises Ltd. follows IFRS and has provided the following information: In 2019, Leader was sued in a patent infringement suit, and in 2020, Leader lost the court case. Leader must now pay a competitor $50,000 to settle the suit. No previo

P21.3 Leader Enterprises Ltd. follows IFRS and has provided the following information:

  1. In 2019, Leader was sued in a patent infringement suit, and in 2020, Leader lost the court case. Leader must now pay a competitor $50,000 to settle the suit. No previous entries had been recorded in the books relative to this case because Leader's management felt the company would win.

  2. A review of the company's provision for uncollectible accounts during 2020 resulted in a determination that 1.5% of sales is the appropriate amount of bad debt expense to be charged to operations, rather than the 2% used for the preceding two years. Bad debt expense recognized in 2019 and 2018 was $33,200 and $14,300, respectively. The company would have recorded $19,800 of bad debt expense under the old rate for 2020. No entry has yet been made in 2020 for bad debt expense.

  3. Leader acquired land on January 1, 2017, at a cost of $70,000. The land was charged to the Equipment account in error and has been depreciated since then on the basis of a five-year life with no residual value, using the straight-line method. Leader has already recorded the related 2020 depreciation expense using the straight-line method.

  4. During 2020, the company changed from the double-declining-balance method of depreciation for its building to the straight-line method because of a change in the pattern of benefits received. The building cost $1.4 million to build in early 2018, and no residual value is expected after its 40-year life. Total depreciation under both methods for the past three years is as follows. Double-declining-balance depreciation has been recorded for 2020.



    Straight-Line
    Double-Declining-Balance
    2018
    $35,000
    $70,000
    2019 35,000 66,500
    2020 35,000 63,175
  5. Late in 2020, Leader determined that a piece of specialized equipment purchased in January 2017 at a cost of $75,000 with an estimated useful life of five years and residual value of $5,000 is now expected to continue in use until the end of 2024 and have a residual value of $3,000 at that time. The company has been using straight-line depreciation for this equipment, and depreciation for 2020 has already been recognized based on the original estimates.

  6. The company has determined that a $350,000 note payable that it issued in 2018 has been incorrectly classified on its statement of financial position. The note is payable in annual instalments of $50,000, but the full amount of the note has been shown as a long-term liability with no portion shown in current liabilities. Interest expense relating to the note has been properly recorded.

Instructions

a. For each of the accounting changes, errors, or transactions, present the journal entry(ies) that Leader needs to make to correct or adjust the accounts, assuming the accounts for 2020 have not yet been closed. If no entry is required, write “none” and briefly explain why. Ignore income tax considerations.

b. Prepare the entries required in part (a) but, where retrospective adjustments are made, adjust the entry to include taxes at 25%.

c.  For each of the accounting changes, identify the type of change involved and whether retrospective or prospective treatment is required.



In: Accounting

Problem 23-01 The following are Marigold Corp.’s comparative balance sheet accounts at December 31, 2020 and...

Problem 23-01

The following are Marigold Corp.’s comparative balance sheet accounts at December 31, 2020 and 2019, with a column showing the increase (decrease) from 2019 to 2020.

COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEETS

2020

2019

Increase
(Decrease)

Cash

$810,600

$701,400

$109,200

Accounts receivable

1,135,300

1,156,300

(21,000

)

Inventory

1,850,800

1,708,800

142,000

Property, plant, and equipment

3,318,800

2,955,300

363,500

Accumulated depreciation

(1,164,400

)

(1,035,600

)

(128,800

)

Investment in Myers Co.

307,400

277,400

30,000

Loan receivable

248,800

248,800

   Total assets

$6,507,300

$5,763,600

$743,700

Accounts payable

$1,015,700

$949,200

$66,500

Income taxes payable

30,200

50,000

(19,800

)

Dividends payable

79,500

100,400

(20,900

)

Lease liabililty

423,200

423,200

Common stock, $1 par

500,000

500,000

Paid-in capital in excess of par—common stock

1,499,000

1,499,000

Retained earnings

2,959,700

2,665,000

294,700

   Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$6,507,300

$5,763,600

$743,700


Additional information:

1. On December 31, 2019, Marigold acquired 25% of Myers Co.’s common stock for $277,400. On that date, the carrying value of Myers’s assets and liabilities, which approximated their fair values, was $1,109,600. Myers reported income of $120,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020. No dividend was paid on Myers’s common stock during the year.
2. During 2020, Marigold loaned $323,600 to TLC Co., an unrelated company. TLC made the first semiannual principal repayment of $74,800, plus interest at 10%, on December 31, 2020.
3. On January 2, 2020, Marigold sold equipment costing $59,700, with a carrying amount of $37,700, for $39,900 cash.
4. On December 31, 2020, Marigold entered into a capital lease for an office building. The present value of the annual rental payments is $423,200, which equals the fair value of the building. Marigold made the first rental payment of $60,000 when due on January 2, 2021.
5. Net income for 2020 was $374,200.
6. Marigold declared and paid the following cash dividends for 2020 and 2019.

2020

2019

Declared

December 15, 2020 December 15, 2019

Paid

February 28, 2021 February 28, 2020

Amount

$79,500 $100,400


Prepare a statement of cash flows for Marigold Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2020, using the indirect method.

In: Accounting

Problem 23-01 The following are Shamrock Corp.’s comparative balance sheet accounts at December 31, 2020 and...

Problem 23-01

The following are Shamrock Corp.’s comparative balance sheet accounts at December 31, 2020 and 2019, with a column showing the increase (decrease) from 2019 to 2020.

COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEETS

2020

2019

Increase
(Decrease)

Cash

$811,100

$702,700

$108,400

Accounts receivable

1,139,100

1,176,000

(36,900

)

Inventory

1,847,000

1,704,500

142,500

Property, plant, and equipment

3,317,700

2,945,400

372,300

Accumulated depreciation

(1,158,000

)

(1,048,400

)

(109,600

)

Investment in Myers Co.

312,200

274,000

38,200

Loan receivable

250,000

250,000

   Total assets

$6,519,100

$5,754,200

$764,900

Accounts payable

$1,010,900

$960,700

$50,200

Income taxes payable

29,900

50,500

(20,600

)

Dividends payable

80,600

100,700

(20,100

)

Lease liabililty

432,100

432,100

Common stock, $1 par

500,000

500,000

Paid-in capital in excess of par—common stock

1,499,300

1,499,300

Retained earnings

2,966,300

2,643,000

323,300

   Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$6,519,100

$5,754,200

$764,900

Additional information:

1.

On December 31, 2019, Shamrock acquired 25% of Myers Co.’s common stock for $274,000. On that date, the carrying value of Myers’s assets and liabilities, which approximated their fair values, was $1,096,000. Myers reported income of $152,800 for the year ended December 31, 2020. No dividend was paid on Myers’s common stock during the year.

2.

During 2020, Shamrock loaned $332,200 to TLC Co., an unrelated company. TLC made the first semiannual principal repayment of $82,200, plus interest at 10%, on December 31, 2020.

3.

On January 2, 2020, Shamrock sold equipment costing $59,800, with a carrying amount of $38,000, for $40,100 cash.

4.

On December 31, 2020, Shamrock entered into a capital lease for an office building. The present value of the annual rental payments is $432,100, which equals the fair value of the building. Shamrock made the first rental payment of $60,300 when due on January 2, 2021.

5.

Net income for 2020 was $403,900.

6.

Shamrock declared and paid the following cash dividends for 2020 and 2019.

2020

2019

Declared

December 15, 2020

December 15, 2019

Paid

February 28, 2021

February 28, 2020

Amount

$80,600

$100,700


Prepare a statement of cash flows for Shamrock Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2020, using the indirect method

In: Accounting

(b) On 1 July 2018, Maxwell Chemical Ltd acquired a plant at a cost of $1,000,000....

(b) On 1 July 2018, Maxwell Chemical Ltd acquired a plant at a cost of $1,000,000. Maxwell depreciated the assets on a straight line basis. As at 30 June 2020, the machinery had accumulated depreciation of $200,000 and an expected remaining useful life of four years. On 30 June 2020, Maxwell Chemical Ltd conducted an impairment test on asset. It was assessed that the plant could be sold to other entities for $600,000 with costs of disposal of $25,000. The management expect to use the plant for another four years and it is expected that net cash flow to be generated by the plant would be $195,000 over each of the next four years. The rate of return by the market on this plant is 8% as at 30 June 2020.

Note: The present value of an annuity of $1 for four years discounted at 8 per cent is $3.3121

Required: (a) Determine whether the plant is impaired. If so, provide appropriate journal entry at 30 June 2020.

(b) Provide the journal entry to account for the depreciation in 2021.

In: Accounting

On 1 July 2018, Maxwell Chemical Ltd acquired a plant at a cost of $1,000,000. Maxwell...

On 1 July 2018, Maxwell Chemical Ltd acquired a plant at a cost of $1,000,000. Maxwell depreciated the assets on a straight line basis. As at 30 June 2020, the machinery had accumulated depreciation of $200,000 and an expected remaining useful life of four years. On 30 June 2020, Maxwell Chemical Ltd conducted an impairment test on asset. It was assessed that the plant could be sold to other entities for $600,000 with costs of disposal of $25,000. The management expect to use the plant for another four years and it is expected that net cash flow to be generated by the plant would be $195,000 over each of the next four years.

The rate of return by the market on this plant is 8% as at 30 June 2020.

Note: The present value of an annuity of $1 for four years discounted at 8 per cent is $3.3121

Required:

(a)  Determine whether the plant is impaired. If so, provide appropriate journal entry at 30 June 2020.                                                                                                         

(b) Provide the journal entry to account for the depreciation in 2021.   

In: Accounting