Question 4.
Suppose that your firm has higher fixed cost-to-variable cost ratio than comparable firms. Explain how EBITDA multiple valuation would be influenced by the difference in this ratio.
In: Accounting
| Category | Dollars | Percent | ||
| Sales | 100% | |||
| Food Cost | $2,375 | 37% | ||
| Labor Cost | 29% | |||
| Overhead | 24% | |||
| Profit | 10% | |||
| Category | Dollars | Percent | ||
| Sales | 100% | |||
| Food Cost | 31% | |||
| Labor Cost | $17,322 | 34% | ||
| Overhead | 32% | |||
| Profit | 3% | |||
| Category | Dollars | Percent | ||
| Sales | 100% | |||
| Food Cost | 40% | |||
| Labor Cost | 29% | |||
| Overhead | $234 | 19% | ||
| Profit | 12% | |||
| Category | Dollars | Percent | ||
| Sales | $7,700 | 100% | ||
| Food Cost | 43% | |||
| Labor Cost | 32% | |||
| Overhead | 21% | |||
| Profit | 4% | |||
|
Using the figures provided below calculate the missing dollaramounts for each of the Simplified Profit and Loss Statements. |
In: Accounting
| Financial Break Even | Unit Price | Unit Variable Cost | Fixed Cost | Operating Cash Flow | Investment | Lifeo f Project | Discount Rate |
| h | 39 | 30 | 32,000 | g | 320,000 | 5 | 11% |
| j | 50 | 27 | 55,000 | i | 440,500 | 6 | 15% |
| l | 60 | 40 | 100,000 | k | 520,154 | 7 | 3% |
In each of the following case, find the unknown variables: be sure to show all work
In: Finance
|
Variable |
Fixed |
Product cost |
Non manuf. cost |
|
|
Materiales Director |
X |
|||
|
Mano de Obra Directa |
x |
|||
|
Alquiler Edificio |
X |
|||
|
Salarios de Supervisores |
X |
|||
|
Comisiones de Venta |
X |
|||
|
Utilidades ‘ Fabricas |
X |
|||
|
Oficina de Ventas de Alquiler |
X |
|||
|
Depresiacion ‘ Fabrica |
X |
|||
|
Depresaiacion Equipo de Ventas |
X |
|||
|
Publicidad |
X |
|||
|
Costo de Facturacion |
X |
|||
|
Costo de Envio |
X |
|||
|
Trabajador de Linea Salarial |
X |
In: Accounting
| Support-department cost allocations: single-department cost pools; direct, step-down, and reciprocal methods. | |||||
| 1 | a. | Allocate the total Support Department costs to the production departments under the Direct Allocation Method: | |||
| Clothing | Shoes | ||||
| Departmental Costs | $10,500 | $7,500 | |||
| From: | |||||
| Information Technology | |||||
| (5040/9000)*2600 | $1,456 | ||||
| (3960/9000)*2600 | $1,144 | ||||
| Human Resources | |||||
| (220/308)*1400 | $1,000 | ||||
| (22/308)*1400 | $400 | ||||
| Total Departmental Costs | $12,956 | $9,044 | |||
| Total Costs to account for: | $ 22,000 | ||||
| b. | Allocate the Support Department Costs to the Production Department under the Step-down (Sequential) Allocation Method IT first sequentially: | ||||
| To: | |||||
| IT | HR | Clothing | Shoes | ||
| Departmental Costs | $2,600 | $1,400 | $10,500 | $7,500 | |
| From: | |||||
| Information Technology | -$2,600 | ||||
| (3000/12000)*2600 | $650 | ||||
| (5040/12000)*2600 | $1,092 | ||||
| (3960/12000)*2600 | $858 | ||||
| Human Resources | -$2,050 | ||||
| (220/308)*2050 | $1,464 | ||||
| (88/308)*2050 | $586 | ||||
| Total Departmental Costs | $0 | $0 | $13,056 | $8,944 | |
| Total Costs to account for: | $ 22,000 | ||||
| c. | Allocate the Support Department Costs to the Production Department under the Step-down (Sequential) Allocation Method HR first sequentially: | ||||
| To: | |||||
| HR | IT | Clothing | Shoes | ||
| Departmental Costs | $1,400 | $2,600 | $10,500 | $7,500 | |
| From: | |||||
| Human Resources | -$1,400 | ||||
| (92/400) _ $1,400 | $322 | ||||
| (220/400) _ $1,400 | $770 | ||||
| (88/400) _ $1,400 | $308 | ||||
| Information Technology | -$2,922 | ||||
| (5,040/9,000) _ $2,922 | $1,636 | ||||
| (3,960/9,000) _ $2,922 | $1,286 | ||||
| Total Departmental Costs | $0 | $0 | $12,906 | $9,094 | |
| Total Costs to account for: | $ 22,000 | ||||
| d. | Allocate the Support Department Costs to the Production Department under the Reciprocal Allocation Method: | ||||
| i. Assign reciprocal equations to the support departments | |||||
| IT=(2600+92 employees/400 employees*HR) | |||||
| IT = | $2,600+0.23HR | ||||
| HR = | ($1,400+.025 IT) | ||||
| HR=($1,400+3,000 hours/1,200 hours IT) | |||||
| ii. Solve the equation to complete the reciprocal costs of the support departments | |||||
| IT=$2,600+.023($1,400+0.25 IT) | |||||
| IT= $2,600+$322+0.0575IT | |||||
| 0.9425 IT = $2,922 | |||||
| IT = | $ 3,100 | ||||
| HR= $1,400+0.25 IT | |||||
| HR= $1,400+0.25(3,100) | |||||
| HR= $1,400+775 | |||||
| HR = | $2,175 | ||||
| iii. Allocate Reciprocal costs to departments (all numbers rounded to nearest dollar) | |||||
| IT | HR | Clothing | Shoes | ||
| Departmental Costs | $2,600 | $1,400 | $10,500 | $7,500 | |
| Information Technology | -$3,100 | ||||
| (3000/12000)*$3,100 | $775 | ||||
| (5040/12000)*$3,100 | $1,302 | ||||
| (3960/12000)*$3,100 | $1,023 | ||||
| Human Resources | -$2,175 | ||||
| (92/400)*$2,175 | $500 | ||||
| (220/400)*$2,175 | $1,196 | ||||
| (88/400)*$2,175 | $479 | ||||
| Total Departmental Costs | $0 | $0 | $12,998 | $9,002 | |
| $ 22,000 | |||||
| Reciprocal Method of Allocating Support Department Costs for Sportz, Inc. Using Repeated Iterations. | |||||
| Support Departments | Operating Departments | ||||
| IT | HR | Clothing | Shoes | ||
| Budgeted manufacturing overhead costs before any interdepartmental cost allocations | |||||
| 1st Allocation of IT Dept. | |||||
| (0.25, 0.42, 0.33)b | |||||
| 1st Allocation of HR Dept. | |||||
| 2nd Allocation of IT Dept. | |||||
| 2nd Allocation of HR Dept. | |||||
| 3rd Allocation of IT Dept. | |||||
| 3rd Allocation of HR Dept. | |||||
| 4th Allocation of IT Dept. | |||||
| Total budgeted manufacturing | |||||
| overhead of operating departments | |||||
I understand the first half just not the both half.
Sportz, Inc., manufactures athletic shoes and athletic clothing for both amateur and professional athletes. The company has two product lines (clothing and shoes), which are produced in separate manufacturing facilities; however, both manufacturing facilities share the same support services for information technology and human resources. The following shows total costs for each manufacturing facility and for each support department.
| Variable Costs | Fixed Costs | Total Costs by Department | ||
| Information Technology | 600 | 2,000 | 2,600 | |
| Human Resources | 400 | 1,000 | 1,400 | |
| Clothing | 2,500 | 8,000 | 10,500 | |
| Shoes | 3,000 | 4,500 | 7,500 | |
| Total Costs | 6,500 | 15,500 | 22,000 |
The total costs of the support departments (IT and HR) are allocated to the production departments (clothing and shoes) using a single rate based on the following:
Information technology: Number of IT labor-hours worked by
department
Human resources: Number of employees supported by department
Data on the bases, by department, are given as follows:
|
Department |
IT Hours Used |
Number of Employees |
||
|
Clothing |
5,040 |
220 |
||
|
Shoes |
3,960 |
88 |
||
|
Information technology |
- |
92 |
||
|
Human resources |
3,000 |
- |
What are the total costs of the production departments (clothing and shoes) after the support department costs of information technology and human resources have been allocated using (a) the direct method, (b) the step-down method (allocate information technology first), (c) the step-down method (allocate human resources first), and (d) the reciprocal method?
Assume that all of the work of the IT department could be outsourced to an independent company for $97.50 per hour. If Sportz no longer operated its own IT department, 30% of the fixed costs of the IT department could be eliminated. Should Sportz outsource its IT services?
In: Accounting
| Units | Per unit cost | Total cost | |
| 5,000 units | 5000 | 17.00 | 85000 |
| 7,500 units | 7500 | 13.00 | 97500 |
| Difference | 2500 | 12500 | |
| Unit variable cost | 5 | =12500/2500 | |
| Fixed cost | 60000 | =85000-(5000*5) | |
| Y = $60,000 + $5X |
what is that X suppose to mean ?is the answer 60,005?
In: Accounting
| Turbine | United Hydro Services | Kiser Hydro, LLC |
| Initial Cost | $200,000 | $1,500,000 |
| Maintenance Cost | $200 per year, increasing by 4% per year | $1,000 per year for the first ten years, then $2,000 per year thereafter |
| Overhaul Cost | $50,000 at year ten | $750,000 at year thirty |
| Income | $20,000 per year | $25,000 per year |
| Salvage Value | $15,000 | $50,000 |
| Life | 20 Years | Infinite |
. Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division is exploring the possibility of installing hydrokinetic turbines in the Mississippi River to generate power for the Memphis and Shelby County area. Consulting engineers have identified two potential types of hydrokinetic turbines to meet the needs of MLG&W. The costs and expected income for the two types of turbines are shown in the table below. Using a perpetual annual worth analysis and a MARR of 6% per year, determine which type of hydrokinetic turbine, if any, should be selected. Complete all calculations to the nearest dollar.
In: Economics
| Data | |||||||
| Manufactured in-house | |||||||
| Fixed cost | $50,000 | ||||||
| Unit variable cost | $125 | Payoff Table | |||||
| Demand | |||||||
| Purchased from supplier | 800 | 1,000 | 1,200 | 1,400 | |||
| Unit cost | $175 | Manufacture | $150,000 | $175,000 | $200,000 | $225,000 | |
| Outsource | $140,000 | $175,000 | $210,000 | $245,000 | |||
| Production volume | 1500 | ||||||
| Model | ANSWER | Manufacture/Outsource | Value | ||||
| Average Payoff | |||||||
| Total manufacturing cost | $237,500 | Aggressive | |||||
| Total purchased cost | $262,500 | Conservative | |||||
| Cost difference (Manufacture - Purchase) | -$25,000 | ||||||
| Best Decision | Manufacture | ||||||
Problem 16A Payoff Tables
Based on the cost model and payoff table provided, determine the average payoff strategy, aggressive, and conservative recommendation. Remember that this payoff table is based on cost so you will want to recommend decisions under each strategy which minimize cost.
Enter your answer in the table by stating whether manufacturing or outsources would be the best choice for each strategy and the value associated with that option.
In: Accounting
| Total Product | Total Fixed Cost | Total Variable Cost |
| 0 | $150 | $0 |
| 1 | 150 | 50 |
| 2 | 150 | 75 |
| 3 | 150 | 105 |
| 4 | 150 | 145 |
| 5 | 150 | 200 |
| 6 | 150 | 270 |
| 7 | 150 | 360 |
| 8 | 150 | 475 |
| 9 | 150 | 620 |
| 10 | 150 | 800 |
The first table shows cost data for a single firm. Now suppose that there are 600 identical firms in this industry, each with the same cost data. Suppose, too, that the demand curve for this industry is as shown in the second table.
| Price | Quantity Demanded |
| $20 | 6,800 |
| 30 | 5,975 |
| 45 | 5,500 |
| 60 | 5,125 |
| 75 | 4,500 |
| 95 | 4,200 |
| 120 | 3,600 |
| 150 | 2,400 |
Based on all these data, the equilibrium price of the product in the market will be
Multiple Choice
$95.
$75.
$120.
$60.
In: Economics
| School Type | Cost | 30 Year ROI | Annual ROI | School Type | Cost | 30 Year ROI | Annual ROI | ||
| Private | $222,700.00 | $1,786,000.00 | 7.70% | Private | $221,700.00 | $2,412,000.00 | 8.70% | ||
| Private | $176,400.00 | $1,758,000.00 | 8.40% | Private | $213,000.00 | $2,064,000.00 | 8.30% | ||
| Private | $212,200.00 | $1,714,000.00 | 7.80% | Private | $230,100.00 | $1,949,000.00 | 7.90% | ||
| Public | $125,100.00 | $1,535,000.00 | 9.10% | Private | $222,600.00 | $1,947,000.00 | 8.00% | ||
| Private | $212,700.00 | $1,529,000.00 | 7.40% | Private | $225,800.00 | $1,938,000.00 | 8.00% | ||
| Public | $92,910.00 | $1,501,000.00 | 10.10% | Public | $87,660.00 | $1,937,000.00 | 11.20% | ||
| Private | $214,900.00 | $1,485,000.00 | 7.30% | Private | $224,900.00 | $1,915,000.00 | 7.90% | ||
| Private | $217,800.00 | $1,483,000.00 | 7.20% | Private | $221,600.00 | $1,878,000.00 | 7.90% | ||
| Private | $225,600.00 | $1,444,000.00 | 7.00% | Public | $125,100.00 | $1,854,000.00 | 9.80% | ||
| Private | $217,300.00 | $1,442,000.00 | 7.10% | Private | $215,700.00 | $1,794,000.00 | 7.90% | ||
| Private | $226,500.00 | $1,441,000.00 | 7.00% | Public | $92,530.00 | $1,761,000.00 | 10.60% | ||
| Private | $215,500.00 | $1,438,000.00 | 7.20% | Private | $217,800.00 | $1,752,000.00 | 7.70% | ||
| Private | $223,500.00 | $1,428,000.00 | 7.00% | Public | $89,700.00 | $1,727,000.00 | 10.70% | ||
| Private | $226,600.00 | $1,414,000.00 | 7.00% | Private | $229,600.00 | $1,716,000.00 | 7.50% | ||
| Private | $189,300.00 | $1,397,000.00 | 7.50% | Public | $101,500.00 | $1,703,000.00 | 10.20% | ||
| Public | $89,700.00 | $1,382,000.00 | 9.90% | Public | $115,500.00 | $1,694,000.00 | 9.70% | ||
| Public | $87,030.00 | $1,376,000.00 | 10.00% | Public | $104,500.00 | $1,690,000.00 | 10.10% | ||
| Private | $218,200.00 | $1,343,000.00 | 6.90% | Public | $69,980.00 | $1,685,000.00 | 11.50% | ||
| Private | $229,900.00 | $1,339,000.00 | 6.70% | Private | $219,400.00 | $1,676,000.00 | 7.60% | ||
| Private | $148,800.00 | $1,321,000.00 | 8.10% | Public | $64,930.00 | $1,668,000.00 | 11.70% |
In: Statistics and Probability