PLEASE MAKE THIS TWO DIFFERENT FILES. ONE FOR CLASS (temperature.h) AND ONE FOR temperature.cpp
Objective: This assignment will provide further practice with implementing classes.
Task: For this homework, you will write a class called Temperature, in the files temperature.h and temperature.cpp, for creating and using objects that will store temperatures (like for weather forecasting programs).
This class should be portable, so it should work with any up-to-date C++ compiler.
Program Details and Requirements:
1) An object of type Temperature should represent a temperature in terms of degrees and scale. Degrees should allow decimal precision (so use type double). The three scales possible are Celsius, Fahrenheit, and Kelvin. You may store the scale however you like inside the object, but for any keyboard input or function parameters, scales will come in as type char, where 'C', 'F', 'K' (as well as the lower case versions) are valid options. Your object must always represent a valid temperature -- remember that 0 Kelvin represents the lowest possible temperature in existence (the complete absence of heat). Your object should also store a format setting, to be used for display of temperatures to the screen. There will be more than one possible format. The class features (public interface) should work exactly as specified, regardless of what program might be using Temperature objects.
Note: For purposes of conversions between scales, please remember the following conversion relationships betweeen temperatures:
2) Your Temperature class must provide the following services (i.e. member functions) in its public section. These functions will make up the interface of the Temperature class. Make sure you use function prototypes as specified here. (You may write any other private functions you feel necessary, but the public interface must include all the functionality described here).
Examples: These declarations should be legal, and the comment gives the initialized temperature
Temperature t1; // initializes to 0 Celsius Temperature t2(23.5, 'F'); // initializes to 23.5 Fahrenheit Temperature t3(12.6, 'Z'); // invalid scale, initializes to 0 Celsius Temperature t4(-300, 'c'); // this is below 0 Kelvin, inits to 0 Celsius Temperature t5(15, 'k'); // initializes to 15 Kelvin
Legal: 43.6 k , 53.5 C , 100 F , -273.15 c Illegal: 12.3 q , -5 K , -278 C , -500 F // last 3 are below absolute zero
You may assume that the user entry will always be of the
form:
D S where D is a numeric value and S is a
character
| Name | Format | Example | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Default | D S | 50.4316 C | This will look mostly like the input from the Input
function. Print the degrees and scale as double and char, with default precision on the degrees, and the scale as an uppercase letter |
| Precision-1 | D.d S | 50.4 C | Degrees printed to 1 place after the decimal, fixed format, and scale printed as an uppercase letter. This output will need to make sure to put the output stream BACK to its original format settings when you are done, (so that output from a main program isn't now set to 1 decimal place for the caller, for example). See this notes addendum for more details on this kind of thing |
| Long | D scale | 50.4316 Celsius | This display format should show the degrees in default precision, and the scale as the full word "Celsius", "Fahrenheit", or "Kelvin" |
'D' = Default format 'P' = Precision-1 format 'L' = Long format
If an invalid setting code is passed in, do not alter the current format setting. This function should return true for successful format change, and false for failure (invalid setting given).
Temperature t1(68.9, 'F'); // 68.9 Fahrenheit
t1.Convert('T'); // invalid scale, no change. Returns false
t1.Convert('c'); // t1 is now 20.5 Celsius
t1.Convert('K'); // t1 is now 293.65 Kelvin
Temperature t1(0, 'C'); // 0 Celsius Temperature t2(31.5, 'F'); // 31.5 Fahrenheit t1.Compare(t2); // returns 1 (since t2 comes first) t2.Compare(t1); // returns -1 (calling object is t2, comes first)
3) General Requirements:
Testing Your Class:
You will need to test your class, which means you will need to write one or more main programs that will call upon the functionality (i.e. the public member functions) of the class and exercise all of the different cases for each function. You do not need to turn any test programs in, but you should write them to verify your class' features.
Here is the beginning of a sample test program to get you started:
// sample.cpp -- sample test program starter for Temperature class
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
#include <iostream>
#include "temperature.h"
using namespace std;
int main()
{
Temperature t1; // should default to 0 Celsius
Temperature t2(34.5, 'F'); // should init to 34.5 Fahrenheit
// display dates to the screen
cout << "\nTemperature t1 is: ";
t1.Show();
cout << "\nTemperature t2 is: ";
t2.Show();
t1.Input(); // Allow user to enter a temperature for t1
cout << "\nTemperature t1 is: ";
t1.Show();
t1.SetFormat('L'); // change format of t1 to "Long" format
cout << "\nTemperature t1 is: ";
t1.Show();
// and so on. Add your own tests to fully test the class'
// functionality.
}In: Computer Science
Write a paragraph (4 - 6 sentences) that summarizes the information that you have learned about Television. This summary should be in your own words, do not directly quote the source.
Write a thesis statement based on the information written in your summary. Be sure to create a thesis statement that is clear, specific, and thought-provoking. Create a thesis statement that argues a controversial position.
READ THIS ARTICLE:
Television is one of the most significant communications inventions. Television has fundamentally changed the political process, our use of leisure, as well as social relations among family and friends. Television was not developed by any single individual or even a group of people working together. Scientists and visionaries imagined a device that would capture images with sound and transmit them into homes since the 1880s. The word television was first used at the 1900 Exhibition in Paris. Scottish inventor John Logie Baird (1888â1946) was the first person to provide a television transmission in October 1925, and he subsequently demonstrated it to the British public on January 26, 1926. On December 25, 1926, Kenjiro Takayanagi (1899â1990) displayed the first image in Japan. The technology improved slowly with athletes participating in the 1936 Olympic games in Berlin able to see some poor quality images of the games. In 1936 France and Page 319 | Top of Article Germany began television programming. In Great Britain King George VIâs coronation from Hyde Park Corner on May 12, 1937, was the first broadcast of its kind, and the first U.S. election reported on television was on November 8, 1941, where news of Franklin Delano Rooseveltâs victory was transmitted to an estimated 7,500 sets. The development of television was halted during the Second World War in Europe and North America where manufacturers directed their attentions to munitions. Regular television service reached ninety-six countries by 1973. Many of the things we associate with modern television technology were patented or devised in televisionâs infancy. In 1928 Vladimir Zworyking (1889â1982) owned the first U.S. patent for an all-electronic color television; however, the development did not come to fruition for another twenty-five years. During the 1939 Worldâs Fair in New York, television could not only receive audio and video images, but it was also designed to record those images, foreshadowing video recording devices (VCRs). And Baird later patented a 600-line electronic high definition color system in Britain in 1945. TELEVISIONâS GOLDEN AGE The golden age of television is associated with the years 1949 to 1960 when American television viewing consisted of a variety of entertainment programming. The burgeoning prosperity and optimism of post-World War II influenced the spread of television. As more people were able to purchase televisions the demand for content grew. Early television programs offered revamped radio programs. There was some news and information programming, but those tended to be of short duration. A similar golden age is associated with British television. Early programs were reworked vaudeville acts and radio shows. Later situational comedies such as I Love Lucy and The Honeymooners would create new talent and genres. The shared experience of watching key television programming provided an avenue for discussion and next-day water cooler conversation. As television matured so did the content, with programs such as All in the Family offering political and social commentary on issues ranging from race relations to the Vietnam War. Televisionâs depiction of the family changed through time as well. While initial programming presented unified traditional families with bread-winning fathers and stay-at-home mothers, later programs depicted the breakdown of the traditional family dealing in both fiction and nonfiction with divorce, remarriage, blended families, and later, with same-sex unions. Not only did television provide scripted programming, but it also broadcasted major sporting events. The first televised hockey game between the Montreal Canadiens losing six-to-two to the New York Rangers in Madison Square Gardens was seen on February 25, 1940. Television is also closely associated with the increasing popularity of the Olympic games, soccer, American football, and baseball. With technological improvements, viewing time increased as well as televisionâs influence on the public and politics. In 1947 there were only 60,000 American homes with television sets; by 1950 this figure grew to 12.5 million. Televisions are now found in nearly every home in the United States and Europe. In the developing world, the allure of television is so great that some want television before other communications devices such as telephones. The hold of major networks on audiences soon dissipated with the advent of cable and specialty television programming. Rather than having a system where the networks catered to a common denominator of programming, the proliferation of specialty programs allowed people to view content that interested them specifically. Moving from analog to digital signals allowed for a so-called 500-channel universe where any specific interest could be satisfied, from golf to cooking; from sport to fashion; and from all news to pornography. As a result of these technological changes, the era of the mass audience was over. While there remain a few programs that can attain mass audiences, the market has been so fragmented that networks must compete for an ever-shrinking television audience. EFFECTS ON CHILDREN The rapid adoption of television fundamentally changed modern society. Television has been blamed for the decline in civil society, the breakdown of the family, suicide, mass murder, childhood obesity, and the trivializing of politics. Children have been the target of broadcasters since the 1950s. Initially American broadcasters provided twenty-seven hours a week of childrenâs television programming. By the 1990s there was twenty-four hour a day programming available to children. Children in Canada spend fourteen hours per week (Statistics Canada) watching television, while American children spend twenty-one hours per week (Roberts et al. 2005, p. 34). Some surveys suggest that British children have the highest rate of television viewing in the world. There are several concerns associated with television and childrenâs viewing patterns. Many researchers have noted the link between the advent of television and increasing obesity and other weight-related illnesses. The time spent watching television is time not spent playing outdoors or in other physically challenging activities. High television viewership of violence is linked to an increase in violent children. Prolonged exposure to violent Page 320 | Top of Article television programming has shown that children can become more aggressive, become desensitized to violence, become accepting of violence as a means to solve problems, imitate violence viewed on television, and identify with either victims or victimizers. Despite the negatives associated with television, it remains a powerful tool in shaping and educating children. While many point to the destructive nature of television, there are others who acknowledge televisionâs positive impact. Researchers and programmers have developed content that has positively influenced children. Early studies on the PBS program Sesame Street found that children who viewed the program were better readers in grade one than students who had not watched the program. Programs were developed not only to help with literacy, but with other subjects as well as socialization, problem solving, and civic culture. Notwithstanding the positive effects of children and television viewing, high television viewing has been associated with a decline in civic culture. As people have retreated to their homes to watch television, they have been less inclined to participate in politics either by voting or by joining political parties. In addition television viewing means that people are not interacting as much with friends or neighbors. What is more, television viewing also has been associated with an overall decline in group participation as well as volunteerism. ADVERTISING AND OWNERSHIP The issue of ownership of content and transmission was debated from televisionâs onset. In 1927 the U.S. Radio Act declared public ownership of the airways. They argued that the airwaves should âserve the PICNâpublic interest, convenience, and necessity.â Because of this understanding of the public owning the airwaves, it set the stage for regulatory bodies around the world licensing stations according to content regulations. Taking the issue of public interest one step further, the British government founded the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) in 1927. Other countries followed establishing their own public broadcasting systems. The United States lagged behind other nations by adopting a Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) in 1968. With the increasing adoption of television, many countries found the need to create new regulatory agencies. In the United States, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was created as an act of Congress on June 19, 1934. The most successful television enterprises are closely associated with advertising. From the outset the way in which television content was funded was through the pursuit of advertising dollars. As a result it has often been said that television does not bring content to audiences, but instead it brings audiences to advertisers. The propaganda model of the media, coined by Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky in their 1988 publication Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media, argues that the media uphold the dominant ideology in America. The five pillars of the model focus on ownership, advertising, sourcing, flak, and anticommunism. This model has been linked to other western media systems, but is most fitting in the United States where the power of the media rests with the owners. Televisionâs hold on the public imagination stems in part because of its ease of transmission. No one needs any special skill to receive the messages. All that is required is a television that can pick up a signal. More important, television influences our view of the world precisely because images are transmitted into peopleâs homes. Since its inception, television transmissions have had the power to change our perceptions of world events. Starting with the Vietnam War and continuing to a myriad of events from the arms race to Tiananmen Square, and from the Civil Rights movement to the war in Iraq, television has become synonymous with the phrase âthe whole world is watching.â
In: Psychology
Scenario
Pigs R Us is a second generation, family-owned Richmond-based company with about 400 employees. It slaughters, manufactures, and sells pork food products. Pigs R Us (PRU) is a low-tech, hands-on, âbricks and mortarâ type of company with solid brand recognition, an impeccable reputation for high quality and ethical standards. The processes used in manufacturing are with the highest ISO20002 standards, and the plant is maintained immaculately. The personnel are comprised of an older work force (average employee age is late 40s). There is little staff turnover, though lately there have been a diverse group of younger workers joining the company. There has been an impressive record of speedy state and federal new-product approvals, and solid working relationships with their large and small customers.
The company prides itself on the close "southern family," culture of the business. The company logo features a pig with a smile on its face surrounded by small pictures of some of its oldest serving employees. The organization's structure is âold-fashionedâ. It is hierarchical with rigid management divisions and reporting policies. Research, manufacturing, and sales and marketing operate in traditional fashion, with employees reporting to supervisors or mid-level managers. By the 1990s, sales and distribution grew from Richmond into a regional market, establishing a competitive advantage throughout the US South. Despite downward economic times in the US and the South, the pork business does well. This is due largely to the fact that Pork is one of the cheaper meat products and there is a variety of ways it can be prepared.
Owned by the Morris family for the last 60 years, Pigs R Us is a key player in the Richmond based food industry. Various Morris family members sit on the board of charities throughout the city and it is not unusual to see the name at society events. Further, the Company sponsors its own Little League Team and has built a recreation center and assisted living facility for the elderly, guaranteeing space for all former 20+ year veteran workers of the company for free. So, it was no surprise, that the whole community was devastated when it was announced by the Morris family that Vance Morris the CEO of Pigs R Us was killed while driving back from a Pigs R US board meeting. The plant closed for a week to show respect and to determine how it would function until the family could make its succession decisions.
Vance Morris was the only son of James and Kathleen Morris. Vance took over the business 10 years before when his father had a heart attack and died. Fresh out of graduate school when his father died. He took over the business that he had known well much to the pleasure and keen eye of the workers. Vance made some marketing changes that allowed for the growth of the company and with the help of the employees brought the plant into its current state. Vance had just gotten married the year before to a young Richmond artist he had met at one of his charity benefits. He had no heirs and no plans for succession as he was in his mid-thirties and had just gotten married. While Vance had cousins in the area they were all professional people who knew nothing about business or pork. The workers could only surmise that the company would be sold, but speculation as to whom it might be did not include someone from out of the city.
Before the deal was announced publicly, Johnâs widow, Arleen, reported to the workers that a Chinese company, Shanghou (SHU), would be buying Pigs R US. Mrs. Morris assured the workers that the SHU promised not to cut workers' wages and benefits, and to keep the current management team in place. She said that SHU also promised to keep Pork R US headquarters in Richmond. Arleen assured the workers that SHU promised that there would be no changes for the first year and that almost everything would remain the same. From her talks with SHU, Arleen is a bit worried about future changes that SHU may implement.
SHU is a large manufacturer and distributor of food and beverages with, headquarters in Hong Kong. Manufacturing plants operate in mainland China, and the company has additional offices in Europe and Australia. By acquiring the smaller, well-respected Pork R US, SHU aims to diversify and expand its consumer base by including tailor-made pork products globally to meet market projections of a customer upsurge in sustainable, non-beef meats in the next decade. Given SHUâs current availability of telecommunications software and hardware, the deployment of the Pigs R US refrigeration trucks should not be an insurmountable issue.
Many PRU employees, especially the older workers and some of the older managers, are dispirited about the acquisition, and anxious about working for foreigners, downsizing, less face-to-face interaction, language differences, and more electronic systems that are to be put in place. Some of the of the more experienced workers are considering a move or an early retirement due to the ongoing rumors about the acquisition. To make matters worse, recent news media have printed stories about tainted food made by other companies in China. Employees fear loss of product quality and damage to PRUâs reputation as well as the loss of the family southern culture that was their pride and joy.
SHU has told PRU workers that for now, most employees will be retained. However, all employees will be evaluated, and reassigned to teams as the new flat structure is put in place. The new CEO is Harvard-educated Daniel Chinn. He supports increasing the company's competitive edge by discovering and developing existing individual potential through group collaboration and team synergy. Ever since his days as a brilliant, hard-driving MBA student; he has been known to be an enthusiastic supporter of job training and career growth. Like many of SHUâs employees, David is in his early thirties. He speaks four languages and is ambitious, self-directed, tech-savvy, accustomed to working remotely, and experienced with a culturally diverse staff. David is eager to make his newest acquisition a success. He wants to move forward on the integration of "Pork R USâ workers into SHU because Chinn believes they are the âgreatest asset have a rich knowledge base and experience can be tapped into to bring the company success." Chinn is concerned about the mix of culture and how his ideas of incorporating artificial intelligence and more robotics into the manufacturing processes will be received by management and the workers at the newly acquired plant.
Daniel Chinn is anxious to keep the âsouthern familyâ culture of Pigs R Us but at the same time wants to use the most modern of manufacturing techniques. He decided that the best way to do this was to start a pilot change operation in the packaging area to demonstrate to the workers the effectiveness of technology. He bought and set up for use 3D printers in the packaging room. The printers were able to create reusable shipping materials and operate in conjunction with the product conveyor for fast and easy packaging. He brought in two trained 3D printer operators from China to handle the work along with two robots that would move the package material and create shrink-wrapped pallets for loading on to the trucks.
The current packaging department employs 5 workers on day shift and 3 newer workers on the night shift. All the day shift workers are in their early fifties and have been working for Pigs R Us all their lives. John Mellon, the lead line man, exemplifies the group. He is 53 years old. He has a family of three children most all are grown. One works in the business with him as the manager of accounting department having gotten a college degree unlike his father. John rarely travels out of state and has never been abroad. He is not terribly familiar with technology. He has a Smart TV but his children have set it up for him to use Netflix.
When the new employees arrived, the packaging staff tried to get to know them but had little in common and found it hard to communicate with them. The new workers ate together at lunch and always with food they brought with them despite offers of food brought in by the older employees to show their âsouthern rootsâ. Things are strained between the groups because the older employees thought they were being snubbed and many are uncertain as to the customs and language unable to communicate their real feelings. This all operated to create a schism among the workers which escalated into job performance and employment commitment issues when the six-month results from the 3D/Robot pilot showed the following success in favor of new technology.
|
Measurable Factors Day Shift |
Standard |
3D Printing |
|
Cost |
5.56 |
5.01 |
|
Time |
2.36 |
2.69 |
|
Quality Control Problem Ratio (per 500 units) |
1 |
8.75 |
|
Training Time (per hour) |
30 |
25 |
|
Shipping Problems/Damage (per 10,000 units) |
1 |
0.4 |
|
Production Problems (per 10,000 units) |
0.2 |
0.4 |
|
Total Number of Pieces Produced per year |
375,000 |
525,000 |
|
Measurable Factors Night Shift |
Standard |
3D Printing |
|
Cost |
5.56 |
4.98 |
|
Time |
2.36 |
2.27 |
|
Quality Control Problem Ratio (per 500 units) |
1 |
5.75 |
|
Training Time (per hour) |
30 |
25 |
|
Shipping Problems/Damage (per 10,000 units) |
1 |
0.35 |
|
Production Problems (per 10,000 units) |
0.2 |
0.23.5 |
|
Total Number of Pieces Produced per year |
375,000 |
645,000 |
The results showed such a marked process improvement with the added benefit of creating materials that were sustainable. The immediate reaction among the older workers was fear for their jobs. The new workers suddenly were the enemy. Chinn was pleased with the new process and indicated that the 3D printing approach would be continued. The word of the decision spread among the families in the company and the âsouthern familyâ culture was now closing ranks on the newcomers both in the packaging room and in the other departments thus confirming their fears when news of the buyout surfaced.
1. Write SWOT analysis
2. Write the current state of the company as supported by the SWOT and its relevance to the scenario.
3. Identifie the OD challenges in the case.
4. Recommend and describe the quantitative approach for diagnosing the situation at Pinyin Foods.
In: Operations Management
Starbucks after Schultz
This activity is important because, as a manager, you must be able to identify your companyâs core competency and select an appropriate business-level strategy to optimize its competitive value.
The goal of this exercise is to demonstrate your understanding of core competency and business-level strategies by applying these concepts to Starbucksâ recent experience in identifying and regaining its competitive advantage.
Read the case below and answer the questions that follow.
Case
Inspired by Italian coffee bars, Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz set out to provide a completely new consumer experience. The trademark of any Starbucks is its ambienceâwhere music and comfortable chairs and sofas encourage customers to sit and enjoy their beverages and, more recently, food and (at some locations) even wine. Customers can use the complimentary wireless service or just visit with friends. The barista seems to speak a foreign language as she rattles off the offerings: CaffĂ© Misto, Caramel Macchiato, Cinnamon Dolce Latte, Espresso Con Panna, or Mint Mocha Chip Frappuccino, among some 30 different coffee blends. Dazzled and enchanted, customers pay $4 or more for a venti-sized drink. Starbucks has been so successful in creating its ambience that customers keep coming back for more.
Starbucksâ core competency is to create a unique consumer experience the world over. Schultzâ strategic intent was to create a âthird place,â between home and work, where people wanted to visit, ideally daily. Customers are paying for the unique experience and ambience, not just for the cup of coffee. The consumer experience that Starbucks created is a valuable, rare, and costly to imitate intangible resource. This allowed Starbucks to gain a competitive advantage. Since 2000, Starbucksâ revenues have grown almost 15-fold, from less than $2 billion to some $27 billion in 2017.
While core competencies are often built through learning from experience, they can atrophy through forgetting. This is what happened to Starbucks. Between 2004 and 2008, Starbucks expanded operations rapidly by doubling the number of stores from 8,500 to almost 17,000 stores (see Exhibit MC8.1). It also branched out into ice cream, desserts, sandwiches, books, music, and other retail merchandise, straying from its core business.
Trying to keep up with its explosive growth in both number of stores and product offerings, Starbucks began to forget what made it unique. It lost the appeal that made it special, and its unique culture got diluted. For example, baristas used to grind beans throughout the day whenever a new pot of coffee had to be brewed (which was at least every eight minutes). The grinding sounds and fresh coffee aroma were trademarks of Starbucks stores. Instead, to accommodate its fast growth, many baristas began to grind all of the dayâs coffee beans early in the morning and store them for the rest of the day. New espresso machines, designed for efficiency, were so tall that they physically blocked interaction between baristas and customers. Although these and other operations changes allowed Starbucks to reduce costs and improve efficiency, they undercut Starbucksâ primary reason for successâthat going to Starbucks was not simply a stop for caffeine; it was a sensory experience. The negative impact of cost-reduction measures was underscored when Starbucks lost a blind taste-test to fast food giant McDonaldâs. Among six coffees tested, Starbucks came in last. Even run-of-the-mill supermarket coffees sold in huge cans were rated higher. Some customers donât like Starbucks coffee and gave the chain the nickname âCharbucksââbecause critics say that a lot of the coffee has an overly roasted quality, a dark and bitter taste.
To make matters worse, the global financial crisis (2008â2009) hit Starbucks hard. The first items consumers go without during recession are luxury items such as a $4 coffee at Starbucks (see revenue drop in Exhibit MC8.1).
Coming out of an eight-year retirement, Howard Schultz again took the reins as CEO in January 2008, attempting to re-create what had made Starbucks special. He immediately launched several strategic initiatives to turn the company around. Just a month after coming back, Schultz ordered more than 7,000 Starbucks stores across the United States to close for one day so that baristas could learn the perfect way to prepare coffee. The company lost over $6 million in revenue on that one day. This exacerbated investor jitters, but Schultz felt the importance of relearning how to create a unique Starbucks experience was key to bringing back its corporate culture.
In 2009, Starbucks introduced Via, its new instant coffee, a move that some worried might further dilute the brand. In 2010, Schultz rolled out new customer service guidelines: Baristas would no longer multitask, making multiple drinks at the same time, but would instead focus on no more than two drinks at a time, starting a second one while finishing the first. Schultz also focused on readjusting store managersâ goals. Before Schultzâ return, managers had been given a mandate to focus on sales growth. Schultz, however, knew that Starbucksâ main differentiator was its special customer experience. The CEO instructed managers to focus on what had made the Starbucks brand successful in the first place.
Although its earlier attempt to diversify away from its core business in the mid-2000s failed, under Schultz, Starbucks was able to successfully introduce food items. Attempting to drive more store traffic in other than the morning hours where customers need their daily caffeine shot, the chain has added baked goods, sandwiches, and other food items to its menu. To get more customers into its stores in the late afternoon and early eveningâtraditionally its slowest timeâStarbucks stores now offer items such as vegetables, flatbread pizza, plates of cheese, and desserts. It even introduced alcoholic beverages such as wine and beer, available after 4 p.m., as part of an âEveningsâ program.
Starbucks also continues its efforts to find new levels of luxury offerings catering to higher end customers within its existing customer base. Online and in stores it produces limited-run exclusive batches of varietal coffees for home use, at high price points. Some stores also offer individually brewed cups of the same higher-priced roasts. Since 2014 Starbucks has created something called a Starbucks Reserve Roastery and Tasting Room. The first of super high-end stores appeared in Starbucksâ home, in Seattle, with more planned domestically and around the world.
Most of these initiatives continue. It has retooled its Evenings program of alcohol, for example, and in 2017 announced such offerings would be scaled back to continue only at its Roastery locations. Otherwise its ambitions continue. Starbucksâ goal is to double its revenues from food over the next few years and to be seen as an evening food-and-wine destination. To symbolize its transition from a traditional coffeehouse, Starbucks dropped the word coffee from its logo.
Schultz also pushed the adoption of new technology to engage with customers more intimately and effectively. Starbucks now uses social media platforms Facebook and Twitter to communicate with customers more or less in real time. Its highly successful Starbucks loyalty program has over 12 million regular users. Some 27 percent of all transactions in U.S. stores are now made using mobile devices. The Starbucks app allows customers to order and pay for drinks and food ahead of time, so that they can bypass standing in line and just need to pick up their order.
Finally, as the U.S. market appears to be saturated with some 12,000 stores, Schultz believes that Starbucks has a great growth opportunity by opening more cafés overseas. Starbucks is planning to have more than 3,000 stores in China by 2019, up from 1,500 in 2015. Starbucks also plans to double its number of cafés elsewhere in Asia to more than 4,000 in the next few years.
As the creator of Starbucks, however, Schultz enjoyed a degree of freedom that an ordinary CEO would not have had. Howard Schultz is to Starbucks much like Steve Jobs was to Apple. Schultz has the reputation and power of personality to implement a change that reduces operational effectiveness in favor of delighting customers. Schultz was able to orchestrate a successful turnaround, and with it Starbucks was able to gain and sustain a competitive advantage. Exhibit MC8.2 shows that Starbucks outperformed the wider stock market by a huge margin.
1.The success of Starbucks lies in its ability to create for the customer a unique experience or âthird placeâ between home and work. This unique experience is also known as Starbucksâ
A. patch dependence
B. core competency
C. tangible resources
D. value chain
E. resource heterogeneity
2.Between 2004 and 2008, Starbucks expanded operations rapidly and attempted to diversity from its core business. These efforts diluted its core culture, resulting in competitive parity because the customer experience that was its core competency was no longer
A. tangible
B. rare
C. valuable
D. organized to capture value
E. imitable
3. Starbucksâ adoption of social media and an app that focuses on customer satisfaction suggests that competitive advantage is more likely to spring from ___________ resources than from __________ resources.
A.equivalent; substitutable
B.intangible; tangible
C. costly; reputational
D. visible; rare
E. tangible; intangible
4.One of Howard Schultzâs strategic initiatives after retaining the reins of Starbucks in 2008 was to shut the companyâs 7,000 stores for one day so baristas could relearn what makes the Starbucks brand unique. This initiative reflects a focus on which type of strategy?
A. Differentiation
B. cost leadership
C. blue ocean
D. industry effect
E. strategic tradeoff
In: Operations Management
Steps to making your Netbeans IDE (Interactive Development Environment):
Download and install Netbeans 8.2 IDE (Java SE version only). If you do not have the latest Java installation to match, Netbeans will direct you to download the needed version of Java.
If needed, download and install the latest Oracle Official Java Software Development Kit Standard Edition (Java SDK SE), and JUnit. I suggest you do this via the bundle referred to as The Java Development Kit (JDK). Download the architecture specific bundle for your computer. (When in doubt of your computerâs architecture (on a PC) itâs probably âWindows x86â)
Part 1: Create a new Java application Lab2Part1 and then enter the code below in the main routine. Be careful about cutting and pasting. The character representations from MS Word or other editors may not all work the same in NetBeans.
int item1 = 5;
int item2;
double num1 = 3.0;
double num2 = 24;
item2 = 6;
int titem = item2;
System.out.println("Printing values");
System.out.println("int item1 value = "+item1);
System.out.println("int item2 value = "+item2);
System.out.println("double num1 value = "+num1);
System.out.println("double num2 value = "+num2);
System.out.println();
item2 = item2 / item1;
System.out.println( "orig item2/item1 "+titem+"/"+item1+" = item2 = "+item2 );
item2 = 15;
System.out.println("resetting item2 value = "+item2);
System.out.println();
num2 = item2 / num1;
System.out.println( "item2/num1 "+item2+"/"+num1+" = num2 = "+num2 );
item1 = 8;
num2 = item1 * num1 / 2;
System.out.println( "item1* num1/2 "+item1+"*"+num1+"/2 = num2 = "+num2 );
System.out.println();
System.out.println("int item2 value = â+item2);
System.out.println("double num1 value = "+num1);
item2 = (item2 â 1) / 3;
num1 *= item2 + 2.1;
System.out.println(âafter item2=(item2-1) / 3: item2 value = "+item2);
System.out.println("after num1 *= item2+2.1: num1 value = "+num1);
System.out.println();
System.out.println("num1 < item1 is "+( num1 < item1));
System.out.println( "num2 != item2 is "+(num2 != item2));
System.out.println();
System.out.println("Printing values");
System.out.println("int item1 value = "+item1);
System.out.println("int item2 value = "+item2);
System.out.println("double num1 value = "+num1);
System.out.println("double num2 value = "+num2);
1.a) If you execute this program, what will be printed in the output window? (5 points)
1.b) Rewrite the statement num1 *= item2 + 2.1; to use only assignment and arithmetic operators. (5 pts)
1.c) Give three examples of shortcut arithmetic operators that are NOT used in the program above. Write the symbols for the operators and the names of the operations they are shortcuts for. (5 pts)
Put your answers for 1.a, 1.b, and 1.c in your answers file.
Part 2: Use the code below, including the comment section, in the main method of a new Java application called Lab2Part2a.
/** ** **
Declare the needed input object here using the names shown below in the program.
Also add any other needed lines to make the input object function.
** ** **/
//input here should be "1310 or 1320"
System.out.print("Please enter a 4-digit course number of 1310 or 1320: ");
String courseNum = input.next();
System.out.print("Please enter the current semester (Fall, Spring, or Summer): ");
String sem = input.next();
String dept = "CSE";
char comma = ',';
String sectionNum = "005";
char dash = '-';
int year = 2017;
String sp = " ";
String course; // output should be semester, year, comma, space,
// then dept, course number then section number
course = sem+sp+year+comma+sp+dept+courseNum+dash+sectionNum;
System.out.println("The course is "+course);
2.a) Add the needed code to the program above to make it run. There is one missing line of code in the main method and you need to add it at the location of the first comment. There will also be a line that needs to be added above the class declaration (NetBeans will help you with this). Save the program as Lab2Part2a.java . (5 pts)
2.b) In the answers file, show two of the six possible outputs produced by the program if all instructions in the program are followed. (4 pts)
2.c) What is different about variables dash and comma from the other variables in the program? How are they like Strings and how are they different from Strings? Put your answer in the answers file. (4 pts)
2.d) Rewrite the program so that it accepts the same inputs and produces the same output but variable course is removed from the program. Do not create a new variable to replace course. Save this modified program as Lab2Part2d.java . (7 pts)
Part 3: The code below does not work. Create a new Java program called Lab2Part3.java starting with this code (and answering questions 3.a and 3.b) and then modify the code so that it correctly calculates the area of a right triangle which has a vertex at (4, 5) â however :
You may not ADD any lines (if there are needed import statements, they may be added)
You may only modify Lines 1, 2, 3, and 4 as labeled below
you may NOT change the data type of variable base in Line 1
you may NOT change the data type of height in Line 2
you must add the area formula for Line 3
you must modify Line 4 so that is works and calculates the circumference
// code starting here should be put in main
double x1 = 4;
double y1 = 1;
double x2 = 1;
double y2 = 5;
double x3, y3;
int base = (x1 - x2); // Line 1
int height = (y1 - y2); // Line 2
double hypotenuse = Math.sqrt(Math.pow(base,2)+ Math.pow(height,2));
double area;
area = ; // Line 3 - Look up the formula for area and insert it here
System.out.printf("The base is length %d and the height is %3d \n", base, height);
System.out.print("The distance between ("+x1+","+y1+") and" );
System.out.printf("(%.0f,%2.0f) is %4.1f \n", x2, y2, hypotenuse);
System.out.print("The area of the right triangle is "+area);
circumference = ; // Line 4 - Insert correct calculation here and other as needed
System.out.print("The circumference of the right triangle is "+ circumference);
3.a) List each different type of error, giving the NetBeans error message, that you find after typing this program into Netbeans exactly as given. (Do not copy and paste.) Put these in your answer file. (4 pts)
3.b) Also, in your answers file, for each error, explain exactly (only a few words are needed) why the code, as given above, does not work, i.e. why did each error occur? (4 pts)
3.c) Now correct all the errors and run the program, debugging until it works properly. Only four lines of the program need to be modified to remove the compiling errors including one of the output statements. Be sure to follow any restrictions specified in the program comments. Once the program works, save it as Lab2Part3.java . (8 pts)
3.d) In your answers file, show the EXACT output that is produced by the program after it is fixed. (4 pts)
Part 4: Given the information below, write a Java program to implement this algorithm.
Define a variable called âboxHeightInFeetâ and give it the value 1.5 .
Define a variable called âboxWidthInFeetâ and give it the value 0.5 .
Define a variable called âboxDepthInFeetâ and give it the value 0.75 .
Define a variable called âboxWeightInKilogramsâ and give it the value 4.5.
Using a built-in Math function, increase the box height to the next higher whole number
value. [Hint: look at round, floor, and ceiling functions.]
// Remove the requirement below
//Using a built-in Math function change the box depth to the closest whole number.
Calculate the volume of the box in inches using the modified height, depth, and width.
Calculate the weight in Kg per cubic inch of the box. Also calculate other values as needed to produce the output below.
Your program should produce the following output (donât worry about the indentation level of the output) :
Box height in feet is 2.0 and Box height in inches is 24.0
Box width in feet is 0.5 and Box width in inches is 6.0
Box depth in feet is 0.75 and Box depth in inches is 9.0
Box volume in inches is 1296.00
Box weight in Kg is 4.50
Box weight in Kg per inch is 0.003472
Box weight in Lb is 9.90
4) Save your working program as Lab2Part4.java . (20 pts)
Part 5: Given the program you created for Part 4, modify that program in the following ways.
a. Accept user input values for height, depth, width and weight then do the same modifications and calculations.
b. Produce output that has the same titles and is spaced EXACTLY like the output below: [Your font does NOT have to be the same but it helps if your font is a monospaced or fixed-width font.] The first title is in a 10 char space length then has spaces separating it from the next 10 char title.
c. Have the user input values such that the output below is produced exactly. This means that the values that are put in the program must produce the table below:
Unit Height Width Depth Volume
Inches 24.0 6.0 9.0 1296.0
Feet 2.00 0.50 0.75 0.75
Weight in Pounds Kilograms Kg per In
9.9000 4.5000 0.0035
5.a) Save your working program as Lab2Part5.java . (13 pts)
5.b) Give two different sets of height, depth, and width input values that will produce the output shown above for volume where the height, depth, and width are not the same values as shown above. This means that the height cannot be 2.00, width cannot be 0.50, and the depth cannot be 0.75. Put your two sets of input values in your answers file. Write one set of three values for H, W, and D on one line then write the second set of three values (using a different height, width, and depth) on the next line in the answers file. (12 pts)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In: Computer Science
Scenario
Pigs R Us is a second generation, family-owned Richmond-based company with about 400 employees. It slaughters, manufactures, and sells pork food products. Pigs R Us (PRU) is a low-tech, hands-on, âbricks and mortarâ type of company with solid brand recognition, an impeccable reputation for high quality and ethical standards. The processes used in manufacturing are with the highest ISO20002 standards, and the plant is maintained immaculately. The personnel are comprised of an older work force (average employee age is late 40s). There is little staff turnover, though lately there have been a diverse group of younger workers joining the company. There has been an impressive record of speedy state and federal new-product approvals, and solid working relationships with their large and small customers.
The company prides itself on the close "southern family," culture of the business. The company logo features a pig with a smile on its face surrounded by small pictures of some of its oldest serving employees. The organization's structure is âold-fashionedâ. It is hierarchical with rigid management divisions and reporting policies. Research, manufacturing, and sales and marketing operate in traditional fashion, with employees reporting to supervisors or mid-level managers. By the 1990s, sales and distribution grew from Richmond into a regional market, establishing a competitive advantage throughout the US South. Despite downward economic times in the US and the South, the pork business does well. This is due largely to the fact that Pork is one of the cheaper meat products and there is a variety of ways it can be prepared.
Owned by the Morris family for the last 60 years, Pigs R Us is a key player in the Richmond based food industry. Various Morris family members sit on the board of charities throughout the city and it is not unusual to see the name at society events. Further, the Company sponsors its own Little League Team and has built a recreation center and assisted living facility for the elderly, guaranteeing space for all former 20+ year veteran workers of the company for free. So, it was no surprise, that the whole community was devastated when it was announced by the Morris family that Vance Morris the CEO of Pigs R Us was killed while driving back from a Pigs R US board meeting. The plant closed for a week to show respect and to determine how it would function until the family could make its succession decisions.
Vance Morris was the only son of James and Kathleen Morris. Vance took over the business 10 years before when his father had a heart attack and died. Fresh out of graduate school when his father died. He took over the business that he had known well much to the pleasure and keen eye of the workers. Vance made some marketing changes that allowed for the growth of the company and with the help of the employees brought the plant into its current state. Vance had just gotten married the year before to a young Richmond artist he had met at one of his charity benefits. He had no heirs and no plans for succession as he was in his mid-thirties and had just gotten married. While Vance had cousins in the area they were all professional people who knew nothing about business or pork. The workers could only surmise that the company would be sold, but speculation as to whom it might be did not include someone from out of the city.
Before the deal was announced publicly, Johnâs widow, Arleen, reported to the workers that a Chinese company, Shanghou (SHU), would be buying Pigs R US. Mrs. Morris assured the workers that the SHU promised not to cut workers' wages and benefits, and to keep the current management team in place. She said that SHU also promised to keep Pork R US headquarters in Richmond. Arleen assured the workers that SHU promised that there would be no changes for the first year and that almost everything would remain the same. From her talks with SHU, Arleen is a bit worried about future changes that SHU may implement.
SHU is a large manufacturer and distributor of food and beverages with, headquarters in Hong Kong. Manufacturing plants operate in mainland China, and the company has additional offices in Europe and Australia. By acquiring the smaller, well-respected Pork R US, SHU aims to diversify and expand its consumer base by including tailor-made pork products globally to meet market projections of a customer upsurge in sustainable, non-beef meats in the next decade. Given SHUâs current availability of telecommunications software and hardware, the deployment of the Pigs R US refrigeration trucks should not be an insurmountable issue.
Many PRU employees, especially the older workers and some of the older managers, are dispirited about the acquisition, and anxious about working for foreigners, downsizing, less face-to-face interaction, language differences, and more electronic systems that are to be put in place. Some of the of the more experienced workers are considering a move or an early retirement due to the ongoing rumors about the acquisition. To make matters worse, recent news media have printed stories about tainted food made by other companies in China. Employees fear loss of product quality and damage to PRUâs reputation as well as the loss of the family southern culture that was their pride and joy.
SHU has told PRU workers that for now, most employees will be retained. However, all employees will be evaluated, and reassigned to teams as the new flat structure is put in place. The new CEO is Harvard-educated Daniel Chinn. He supports increasing the company's competitive edge by discovering and developing existing individual potential through group collaboration and team synergy. Ever since his days as a brilliant, hard-driving MBA student; he has been known to be an enthusiastic supporter of job training and career growth. Like many of SHUâs employees, David is in his early thirties. He speaks four languages and is ambitious, self-directed, tech-savvy, accustomed to working remotely, and experienced with a culturally diverse staff. David is eager to make his newest acquisition a success. He wants to move forward on the integration of "Pork R USâ workers into SHU because Chinn believes they are the âgreatest asset have a rich knowledge base and experience can be tapped into to bring the company success." Chinn is concerned about the mix of culture and how his ideas of incorporating artificial intelligence and more robotics into the manufacturing processes will be received by management and the workers at the newly acquired plant.
Daniel Chinn is anxious to keep the âsouthern familyâ culture of Pigs R Us but at the same time wants to use the most modern of manufacturing techniques. He decided that the best way to do this was to start a pilot change operation in the packaging area to demonstrate to the workers the effectiveness of technology. He bought and set up for use 3D printers in the packaging room. The printers were able to create reusable shipping materials and operate in conjunction with the product conveyor for fast and easy packaging. He brought in two trained 3D printer operators from China to handle the work along with two robots that would move the package material and create shrink-wrapped pallets for loading on to the trucks.
The current packaging department employs 5 workers on day shift and 3 newer workers on the night shift. All the day shift workers are in their early fifties and have been working for Pigs R Us all their lives. John Mellon, the lead line man, exemplifies the group. He is 53 years old. He has a family of three children most all are grown. One works in the business with him as the manager of accounting department having gotten a college degree unlike his father. John rarely travels out of state and has never been abroad. He is not terribly familiar with technology. He has a Smart TV but his children have set it up for him to use Netflix.
When the new employees arrived, the packaging staff tried to get to know them but had little in common and found it hard to communicate with them. The new workers ate together at lunch and always with food they brought with them despite offers of food brought in by the older employees to show their âsouthern rootsâ. Things are strained between the groups because the older employees thought they were being snubbed and many are uncertain as to the customs and language unable to communicate their real feelings. This all operated to create a schism among the workers which escalated into job performance and employment commitment issues when the six-month results from the 3D/Robot pilot showed the following success in favor of new technology.
|
Measurable Factors Day Shift |
Standard |
3D Printing |
|
Cost |
5.56 |
5.01 |
|
Time |
2.36 |
2.69 |
|
Quality Control Problem Ratio (per 500 units) |
1 |
8.75 |
|
Training Time (per hour) |
30 |
25 |
|
Shipping Problems/Damage (per 10,000 units) |
1 |
0.4 |
|
Production Problems (per 10,000 units) |
0.2 |
0.4 |
|
Total Number of Pieces Produced per year |
375,000 |
525,000 |
|
Measurable Factors Night Shift |
Standard |
3D Printing |
|
Cost |
5.56 |
4.98 |
|
Time |
2.36 |
2.27 |
|
Quality Control Problem Ratio (per 500 units) |
1 |
5.75 |
|
Training Time (per hour) |
30 |
25 |
|
Shipping Problems/Damage (per 10,000 units) |
1 |
0.35 |
|
Production Problems (per 10,000 units) |
0.2 |
0.23.5 |
|
Total Number of Pieces Produced per year |
375,000 |
645,000 |
The results showed such a marked process improvement with the added benefit of creating materials that were sustainable. The immediate reaction among the older workers was fear for their jobs. The new workers suddenly were the enemy. Chinn was pleased with the new process and indicated that the 3D printing approach would be continued. The word of the decision spread among the families in the company and the âsouthern familyâ culture was now closing ranks on the newcomers both in the packaging room and in the other departments thus confirming their fears when news of the buyout surfaced.
TO DO:
Summarize the situational analysis including your approach(s) and diagnosis of the situation.
Here is not enough space to load more information
In: Operations Management
PLEASE READ AND ANSWER QUESTIONS
Global View: International Privacy Laws
Todayâs online world, including the increasing use of the cloud to store data on remote third-party servers, offers unprecedented opportunities for the global storage and transfer of personal information. To address the risks associated with the unregulated exchange of personal information, many jurisdictions around the world have enacted privacy laws, regulations, and rules dealing with data collection, processing, storage, disclosure, and use. Although definitions of the term privacy vary, common elements include freedom or protection of individuals and sometimes groups from unauthorized or unwanted intrusion into, or observation of, their personal information and from violation of the integrity of this information.
The type of protection, as well as the speed, level of completeness, and depth of regulation and implementation, varies from country to country. Increasingly, countries have addressed the cross-border transfer of personal information and taken steps to prevent the circumvention of existing national laws governing the storage, processing, and disclosure of information through the âoff-shoringâ of these activities. Accordingly, when multinational companies do business outside their home country, including offering products or services on the Internet, and collect personal information from residents of a foreign country, they are likely to fall under the privacy laws and regulations in that country.
The following is a brief overview of privacy laws and regulations in several key jurisdictions.
European Union
The European Union (EU) Data Protection Directive (Directive 95/46/EC), adopted in 1995, requires its Member States to safeguard the privacy of personal data by
(1)
giving notice to individuals about how their information will be used;
(2)
offering a choice when disclosing information to third parties (with opt-in consent required for sensitive information);
(3)
maintaining the security of personal information;
(4)
ensuring that the data are reliable, accurate, and current; and
(5)
giving individuals access to examine, correct, and delete information about themselves.
Because each EU Member State had to incorporate the provisions of the Data Protection Directive into national law for them to be binding, there is some variation in the privacy laws among the states.
The EU adopted the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in 2016. It will enter into full force across all Member States on May 25, 2018. The GDPR will replace Directive 95/46/EC and affect organizations based within the EU, as well as foreign organizations doing business there. Although the GDPR is intended to make it easier for multinational entities operating across the EU to comply with data protection law, certain aspects of the regulation permit Member States to enact their own legislation, so inconsistencies in application may exist.
An important principle of both the Data Protection Directive and the GDPR is that personal information generally should not be collected unless the collection is
(1)
proportional (meaning adequate and not excessive relative to its purpose),
(2)
transparent (meaning that the affected individual must be informed as to the circumstances of the collection and consent to it), and
(3)
for a legitimate purpose.
The GDPR will make it easier for individuals to access and control their own data, including information on how their data are processed; make it easier to transfer personal data between service providers; clarify the âright to be forgotten,â which allows an individual to require that certain personal data be deleted (the subject of the âInside Storyâ in Chapter 24); and, under certain circumstances, require notification when data have been hacked (e.g., if the breach is likely to result in a âhigh riskâ to the data subject). Additionally, a data subjectâs consent to process personal data must be âas easy to withdraw as to give.â In the case of âsensitive data,â consent must be explicit.
By modernizing and unifying the rules, cutting red tape, and reinforcing consumer trust, the GDPR will help businesses reap the benefits of the âDigital Single Market.â The legislation will create a âone-stop-shopâ so that businesses can deal with only one privacy supervisory authority, making it less costly to do business in the EU; require companies based abroad to apply the same rules as EU-based firms when offering services inside the EU; provide for a ârisk-based approachâ to incorporating the rules; and require firms to build in data protection safeguards when developing products and services in the beginning stages of development (so-called data protection by design).
The GDPR broadened the definition of personal and sensitive data to include political opinions, religious and philosophical beliefs, health and sex life, and genetic and biometric data. The regulation applies both to data controllers (the entities determining how and why personal data are processed) in the EU and to data processors (the entities that process the personal data on behalf of data controllers) in the EU. The GDPR also applies to controllers and processors outside of the EU whose processing activities involve offering goods or services to EU data subjects or monitoring these subjectsâ behavior within the EU.Penalties for breaching the GDPR can be significant.
Unlike the Data Protection Directive, the GDPR does not require a company that processes personal information (âpersonal dataâ) to register or notify data protection supervisory authorities before it starts collecting personal information. Instead, data controllers are required to maintain appropriate records to evidence compliance with the GDPR. Personal information may be transferred into third countries (countries outside the EU) only if the third country provides an adequate level of protection for the information.
Although the United States is not regarded as providing adequate protection, the EU and the United States adopted the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield in 2016 to permit the transfer of personal information from any EU member state to the United States under certain circumstances. The EU-U.S. Privacy Shield requires U.S. companies to ensure that individualsâ digital information, âfrom social media posts and search queries to information about workersâ pensions and payroll,â is not misused. Companies must adhere to seven principles: notice; choice; accountability for onward transfer; security; data integrity and purpose limitation; access; and recourse, enforcement, and liability, all as determined by self-assessment or assessment of a third party, with recertification required each year. The rules apply to all companies regardless of whether they are social media platforms, pharmaceutical companies, or industrial conglomerates subject to the jurisdiction of the FTC or the U.S Department of Transportation. In addition, the agreement requires the United States to provide an annual guarantee that its intelligence agencies will not have âindiscriminate accessâ to Europeansâ digital data when these data are sent to the United States. The agreement enables about $260 billion of trade in digital services, with nearly 2,000 companies (including Facebook, Google, and Microsoft) relying on the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield to store data about EU citizens on U.S. servers. A separate Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield became effective in April 2017 and covers data transfers from Switzerland.
In January 2017, the European Commission proposed a revision to the ePrivacy Directive that aims to reinforce the right to privacy and control of data for European citizens. (Directive 2002/58/EC, referred to as the ePrivacy Directive, protects the privacy of communications over public electronic networks.) The revision would require messaging, email, and voice service providers to guarantee the âconfidentiality of conversations and metadata around the time, place and other factors of those conversations.â The rules would prohibit service providers, such as Facebook Messenger, Google, WhatsApp, Skype, and others, from listening to, tapping, intercepting, scanning, or storing communications without usersâ consent (except for certain âcriticalâ functions); require âexplicit consentâ before data could be used for advertising; and eliminate consent requirements for cookies that do not affect privacy (âprivacy intrusiveâ cookies would still require consent). As with the GDPR, the fines for noncompliance would be significant. The proposed rule was designed to close the âperceived regulation gap between traditional telecom[] companies and predominantly US-based internet communications companiesâ and to also allow telecom companies to use certain metadataâfor example, the length and location of callsâto provide more services and earn more revenue. Although one EU regulator asserted that the proposed regulation is balanced because it gives consumers a high level of protection while also permitting businesses to innovate, others have stated that the EU is âon the verge of a regulation overload,â as this proposal follows shortly after the adoption of the GDPR.Further, an industry spokesperson representing Google and other companies argued that the proposed revision risks âincoherence and confusionâ because the GDPR requires one approach to safeguarding privacy and ePrivacy calls for another approach.
Exercise:
Read Global View article on international privacy laws [pages 247-249 of textbook.]
Note especially the European Union General Data Protection Regulation [GDPR] which entered into force on May 25, 2018. Note that the EU approach to data privacy is that the data is a digital asset of the owner and that organizations seeking to use your data must secure your affirmative consent and that the consent needs to be proportionate, transparent and for a legitimate purpose, including the right to be forgotten. The regulation applies to organizations outside the EU to the extent that they handle the data of EU nationals.
You are the Chief Privacy Officer of Facebook. Facebook accumulates and analyzes the data of persons accessing its service [even if open on your computer when doing other activities.] Facebook then sells advertising to third parties based on the data. Facebook currently considers your accession to their service as consent for the collection and use of your data. Facebook currently benefits from increased use. This is called a network effect. 'Network effect' is a phenomenon whereby a product or service gains additional value as more people use it.
Write a one [1] paragraph response in Word format and post to the Course Discussion Board:
If data is a digital asset owned by the individual, do individuals in the EU have the right to charge Facebook for each use of the individual's data? If so, what impact will this have on the market value of Facebook's stock
In: Operations Management
WRITTEN CASE ANALYSIS SECTIONS At a minimum, the following sections are to be included in each written case analysis. Full discussions, explanations, reasoning, and support are to be included as to demonstrate to the reader the studentâs complete understanding, knowledge, and competencies of all areas of business.
Complete SWOT Analysis
Competitors âdirect and indirect
CHRISTOPOHER A. BARTLETT
Microsoft: Competing on Talent (A)
In the summer of 1999, a front-page Wall Street Journal article was attracting attention on the
Redmond campus. Under the headline âAs Microsoft Matures, Some Top Talent Chooses to Go Off
Line,â the article reported: âTired of grueling deadlines, frustrated by the bureaucracy that has
accompanied Microsoftâs explosive growth, or lured away by the boom in high-tech start-ups, dozens
of the companyâs most capable leaders, all around 40, have opted outâat least temporarily . . .âi (See
Exhibit 1 for the articleâs list of senior level departures.)
Steve Ballmer, the companyâs recently appointed president and COO, was quoted as saying that
some of the departures were voluntary and some were not, opening opportunities for fresher,
smarter replacements. âWe have a bench that is very deep,â he said. âWe have people who are fired
upâdrivenâto lead the next generation.âii Yet despite the positive outlook, Ballmer clearly
recognized that Microsoft had to change or adapt some of the human resource practices that had
allowed it to assemble and retain what CEO Bill Gates proudly called âthe best team of software
professionals the world has ever seen.â Just six weeks before the WSJ article was published, Ballmer
had announced a package of changes that sweetened salaries, allowed more frequent promotions,
and softened some of the pressures that had long been part of theâ hard-coreâ Microsoft culture.
Still, there were some who wondered if the rumblings in the senior management ranks reported
by the WSJ were not the signs of larger looming problems for Microsoft. It was a question taken very
seriously by Gates and Ballmer who understood very well that the companyâs enormous success was
largely due to its ability to recruit, motivate, and retain extraordinary talent.
the companyâs growth led to changes in the way such policies were managed in the 1990sâand
sometimes to changes in the policies themselves. (See Exhibit 2 for Microsoftâs growth profile.)
Recruiting: Attracting the Best and Brightest
Gates had long recognized that it took exceptional people to write outstanding software. His
preference for hiring extremely intelligent, not necessarily experienced, new college graduates dated
from Microsoftâs start-up days, when he and co-founder Paul Allen recruited the brightest people
they knew from schoolâtheir âsmart friends.â In subsequent years, the importance of recruiting well was constantly reinforced by Gates, who considered helping his managers hire the best of all possible
candidates as his greatest accomplishment. âWeâre in the intellectual property business,â he told
them. âItâs the effectiveness of our developers that determines our success.â Underlining the
importance of hiring and retaining superior talent, in 1992 Gates acknowledged: âTake our 20 best
people away, and I will tell you that Microsoft will become an unimportant company.âiii
For Gates, acquired knowledge was less important than âsmartsââthe ability to think creatively;
and experience was less important than ambitionâthe drive to get things done. Above all, however,
he wanted to use recruiting to continually raise the bar. âIâd have to say my best business decisions
have had to do with picking people,â he said. âDeciding to go into business with Paul Allen is
probably at the top of the list, and subsequently, hiring a friendâSteve Ballmerâwho has been my
primary business partner ever since.â As Fortune magazine once observed, âMicrosoft has been led
by a man widely recognized as a genius in his own right, who has had the foresight to recognize the
genius in others.âiv Almost from the day he was hired as assistant to the president in 1980, one of Steve Ballmerâs
primary responsibilities was to act as recruiting coordinator. It was an assignment he particularly
relished. According to one senior manager, âSteveâs mantra was, âWe want people who are smart,
who work hard, and who get things done.â That simple mantra is something that people still talk
about today.â And once the smartest, most driven were identified, Ballmer and his team were
relentless in getting them on board. âThereâs a standing policy here,â said Ballmer, âwhenever you
meet a kick-ass guy, get him. . . . There are some people you meet only once in a lifetime. So why
screw around?â In Fortuneâs assessment, âThe deliberate way in which [Gates] has fashioned an
organization that prizes smart people is the single most important, and the most consistently
overlooked aspect of Microsoftâs success.âv
Although the need for experienced managers led the company to recruit some key people from
other companies, in the early days Microsoftâs favorite recruiting grounds were elite educational
institutions, particularly Harvard, Yale, MIT, Carnegie-Melon, Stanford, and a few highly targeted
others. As growth increased recruiting needs, the net spread wider, eventually targeting 15
universities in the United States, four in Canada, and six in Japan. Microsoft recruiters made visits to
each of these schools in search of the most brilliant, driven studentsââonce-in-a-lifetimeâ peopleâ
paying little attention to prior experience. Indeed the company preferred people who didnât have to
unlearn different company values, work habits, or technological approaches.
Before being hired, however, every candidate had to survive an intense interview process that
many found quite harrowing. Each candidate was interviewed by at least 3, and sometimes up to 10,
Microsoft employees. During the interview, the candidates were tested more on their thought
processes, problem-solving abilities, and work habits than on specific knowledge or experience. And
because developers played such an important role in Microsoftâwriting the lines of code that were
Microsoft productsâtheir recruiting process was particularly rigorous.
Technical interviews typically focused on programming problems that candidates were expected
to answer by writing code. Some managers posed scenarios with key information missing to see if
the candidate would ask for data or just move straight to a solution. Then they might throw in an
oddball question like, âHow many times does the average person use the word âtheâ in a day?â meant
to test the candidateâs deductive reasoning, creative problem solving, and composure. If a candidate
gave such questions 30 seconds of thought and said they didnât know, the interview was effectively
over. If they were incapable of creative problem solving, they were not an appropriate candidate.
Next, an unfamiliar but practical problemâfor example, describe the perfect TV remote controlâ
might be thrown in to see how the candidates broke down the problem, how simple or complex they
made the solution, and if that solution solved customer needs.
As soon as the interview was over, each interviewer would send e-mail to all other interviewers,
starting with the words âHireâ or âNo Hire,â followed by specific feedback and suggestions for
follow-up. There was no âgray areaââa good candidate who just cleared the bar was a âNo Hire.â
Based on earlier e-mails, people interviewing later in the afternoon would refine their questions to
drill down in areas where the earlier interviewers thought the candidate was weak. The purpose of
the interviews was to push the candidates until they failed, to get a full understanding of both their
strengths and their limitations. (See Exhibit 3 for an interview feedback email.)
After all the input was in, the hiring decision had to pass two screens. If the reviews were
favorable overall, a final, end-of-the-day interview with the candidateâs prospective manager was
scheduled. Based on his or her own impressions and the comments from other people in the group,
the prospective manager then made the hire/no hire recommendation. But to assure that only top
candidates were hired, a so-called âas appropriateâ interviewer was also involved in the interviewing
process. A senior manager explained:
Very often, the âas appropriateâ interviewer is a person who is outside the hiring group, a
person really solidly grounded in Microsoft culture and committed to making sure that we hire
only those who are going to be good Microsoft people, not just good people for specific jobs.
That person has veto power, which puts a system of checks and balances in, because the hiring
manager may feel a lot of pressure to fill a job, while the âas appropriateâ interviewer doesnât.
Microsoftâs tight control on headcount further reinforced the pressure to resist settling for the
merely satisfactory candidate. Even in the early days, when the company was growing extremely
rapidly, Gates and Ballmer insisted on hiring fewer employees than were actually required to carry
out the work. The internal code for this philosophy was ân minus 1,â where n was the number of
people really needed. Said one senior HR manager:
[Beyond hiring smart, driven people] the second principle Steve Ballmer was preaching was
that the default decision on a candidate is âno-hire.â In other words, unless you can identify a
clear reason why we should hire this person, we should not hire him or her. . . . That principle
has been really important in keeping the bar high and our selection ratio very low.
The companyâs credo was that an adequate but not outstanding new employee was worse than a
disastrous appointment. âIf you have somebody whoâs mediocre, who just sort of gets by on the
job,â Gates explained to Microsoft managers, âthen weâre in big trouble.â The âbig troubleâ Gates
saw was that, while poor performers were quickly weeded out, a mediocre employee might continue
to occupy a place that could be filled by someone brilliant.
In: Operations Management
Gravity Payments
In April 2015, Dan Price, the 30-year-old chief executive officer (CEO), and founder of Gravity Payments, announced an increase in every employeeâs wage to US$70,000. Every employee, including the lowest-paid clerk and newly hired staff, would receive a minimum annual salary of $70,000 over the next three years. The announcement stunned the employees and triggered a wave of high-fiving and clapping. With this decision, one young entrepreneur in Seattle, Washington, became an instant hero when he issued a direct and adventurous challenge to the long-standing problem of U.S. income inequality. However, at the same time, he was experiencing unexpected challenges from different people only a few months after his bold move.
Income inequality has been racing in the wrong direction. I want to fight for the idea that if someone is intelligent, hard-working and does a good job, then they are entitled to live a middle-class lifestyle.
COMPANY OVERVIEW
Gravity Payments was a private credit card processing and financial services company. It was founded in February 2004 by brothers, Dan and Lucas Price.
Gravity Payments provided a variety of processing and financial services, including credit card processing, POS (point of Sales) systems, mobile payments, working capital financing, and gift and loyalty cards. The companyâs customers were mostly small and medium-sized businesses. By 2009, the company became the largest credit card processor in the state of Washington, serving more than 15 percent of small businesses in the Seattle area. The companyâs success was mainly due to its low-cost strategy and word of mouth publicity. The company charged less than half of the industry-average processing rate.
Gravity Payments had had a philanthropic mandate since its beginning, and launched the âGravity Givesâ program in March, 2008. Through this program, 2 percent of the companyâs revenue had been donated to charities, including World Vision, the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Northwest Harvest. Price believed strongly in fighting poverty on both a global and locale scale.
THE DECISION
It was the right thing to do. I want everybody that Iâm partnered with at Gravity to really live the fullest, best life they can⊠I think thatâs the [income level] where you can start to check off those lifeâs goal boxes â saving for college, buying a home, some of the basics, starting a family. I want everyone to have those basic opportunities.
Announcement of the $70,000 Minimum Salary
In April 2015, Price set a new minimum salary of $70,000 for all of his 120 employees at Gravity Payments. The idea struck him when one of his friends shared her worries about trying to pay her bills and student loans on an annual income of $40,000. Some of Priceâs own employees earned that amount or less.
Price decided upon the amount of $70,000 based upon a 2010 study conducted at Princeton University by economist, Angus Deaton and psychologist, Daniel Kahneman, a Nobel Laureate. According to the study, those who made less that $75,000 were likely to experience emotional pain and job dissatisfaction. However, even if people made more than $75,000, they did not feel any greater level of happiness. Simply put, the study suggested that emotional well-being increased with economic compensation, but only up to the amount of about $75,000. The study concluded that âlow income exacerbates the emotional pain associated with such misfortunes as divorce, ill health, and being alone. We conclude that high income buys life satisfaction but not happiness, and that low income is associated with both with low life evaluation and low emotional well-being.â
Before Price initiated the salary increase, the average salary at Gravity Payments was about $48,000, with the lowest salary at around $34,000. Due to Priceâs decision, about 30 employees had their paycheques nearly double overnight, and others also received raises to reach the $70,000 level. Ryan Pirkle, the spokesman for Gravity Payments, mentioned that this new minimum wage policy would increase the salary of about 70 employees. The ground-breaking move was met with applause and shouts of joy by many employees. Kevin, a customer operations associate, said in an interview with the media, âI was there at the meeting⊠honestly, I could not believe what I heard, and I think thatâs what a lot of people felt. I kind of felt that we needed to get that repeated.â Phillip Akhavan, a staff member in the merchant relations team, who earned an annual salary of $43,000, also said, âMy jaw just dropped⊠This is going to make a difference to everyone around me.â Jaime June, in the marking department, said, âDan is just an incredible man in general. He has a really amazing moral compass.â
The new salary would change employeesâ lives. Maria Harley, vice-president of operations said, âIâve heard things from, âI can finally afford to move out of my parentâs home,â [to] âI can finally afford to have a baby,â we have some people that are parents and really want a good education for their children and feel like they can finally afford that.â
Huge publicity from all major national media had generated clear public-relations benefits for the company. After Gravity Payments became a front-page media story, it received more than 5,000 resumes in just one day. Before the announcement, Gravity Payments added 200 clients per month on average. In June 2015, the number grew to 350.
The Downside of the $70,000 Minimum Salary Plan
Thereâs no perfect way to do this and no way to handle complex workplace issues that doesnât have any downsides or trade-offs. I came up with the best solution I could⊠I know the decision to pay everyone a living wage is controversial.
The implementation of this wage increase was not easy. In order to pay for the increases in employeesâ salaries, Price cut his own remuneration from $1 million to $70,000. Also, about 75 to 80 percent of the companyâs $2.2 million profits had to be uses.
Many questions were raised. Was this a social experiment? Was it a public relations stunt? Or was Price just a nice guy? In addition, not everyone was pleased with his move. Other local business owners and some entrepreneurial CEOs in the same, close-knit, entrepreneurial network complained that his decision made them look stingy. Steve Duffield, CEO of DACO Corp., who had met Price through the Entrepreneursâ Organization in the Seattle area, said, âI worry how thatâs going to impact other businesses. We canât afford to do that. For most businesses, employees are the biggest expense and they need to manage those costs in order to survive.â
Some customers were against the âsocialistâ gesture and stopped their business with Gravity Payments. Others customers withdrew their business due to an anticipation of a fee increase, in spite of the repeated assurances from the company that this would not happen.
Complaints even came from Priceâs own employees. While 30 or so employees would see their pay nearly double overnight, and about 70 employees also go raises, the remaining 50 were already paid more than $70,000. In fact, according to the New York Times, the companyâs two best employees left the company because of Priceâs decision. For example, Maisey McMaster, who joined Gravity Payments five years earlier and had worked long hours that left little time for her family, was one of them. She said, âHe gave raises to people who have the least skills and are the least equipped to do the job, and the ones who were taking on the most didnât get much of a bump.â McMaster talked to Price after contemplating a fairer proposal. From her view, a fairer proposal was offering small raises with the opportunity to gain a future increase with more experience. âHe treated me as if I was being selfish and only thinking about myself,â she said. âThat really hurt me. I was talking about not only me, but about everyone in my position.â
Grant Moral, a web developer whose salary increased from $41,000 to $50,000 (due to the first stage of pay increase), also expressed concerns, even though he would receive a substantial pay increase from this plan. He opted to leave the company. âI had a lot of mixed emotions. Now the people who were just clocking in and out were making the same as me. It shackles high performers to less motivated team members.â He added, âI was kind of uncomfortable and didnât like having my wage advertised so publicly and so blatantly. It changed perspectives and expectations of you, whether itâs the amount you tip on a cup of coffee that day or family and friends now calling you for a loan.â From McMaster and Moranâs points of view, it was not fair to double the paycheque of someone with the lowest skills, while the longest-serving and highest-skilled employees received a small or no salary increase.
Furthermore, even employees who were exhilarated by the raises had new concerns and indicated they were facing a lot of pressure. âAm I doing my job well enough to deserve this? I didnât earn it,â said Stephanie Brooks, 23, who joined the company as an administrative assistant two months before the decision.
Question:
In: Operations Management
Since the beginning of European settlement, Australian culture has been shaped by the successive waves of immigration, and our culinary culture is much the richer for it. From the stodgy and predictable Anglo cuisine that dominated our eating habits well into the 1960s, Australians now enjoy some of the most diverse, exotic and interesting food and beverage choices available anywhere in the world â and the options are continually expanding. One of the interesting beverage options available are Asian âbubbleâ teas (so-called because the fruit- and milk-based drinks are recognisable by the chewy tapioca âpearlsâ or âbubblesâ). Originating in Taiwan, the bubble tea craze spread throughout Asia before arriving in Australia. Among the fastest growing of the competing franchises is Chatime. Founded in Taiwan in 2003, Chatime is an international franchise with over 800 stores worldwide. From its launch in Australia in 2009, the chain has grown to over 45 stores across Australia, with further ambitious growth planned. Chatime is not alone in this regard â the market leader in the Asian tea market is EasyWay, but other brands such as GongCha have recently opened stores. Chatimeâs local master franchisor Charlley Zhao would be happy for the company to emulate the Australian success of Boost Juice and the international success of Starbucks. Chatimeâs business model and its success have much in common with the Starbucks and Boost approaches: Chatime tea is brewed fresh in store using the highest quality natural ingredients with no added preservatives. It is against the companyâs policy to use pre-made tea or tea powders and we are proud to support Australian farmers, with fresh milk delivered to Chatime stores daily by Dairy Farmers and Pura. Freshly brewed tea has more flavour and fragrance. Chatime draws from Page 5 of 6 traditional Taiwanese tea concepts to create their delicious fusion of flavours and continuously develop many new and innovative drinks, while keeping true to the delicious Taiwanese tea flavour.13 To date, Chatime has concentrated its marketing on AsianâAustralians and focused in geographic locations with high concentrations of Asian residents. The first store opened in the Sydney suburb of Hurstville, which has a population of 47.5 per cent Chinese according to the 2011 Census. Chatimeâs marketing has focused on Mandarin-language media and sponsoring concerts by Chinese pop stars. Zhao has also targeted Asian franchisees. âObviously if we were targeting mainstream in the beginning, it would be a lot harder than targeting Asians. We used the strategy to go that way,â he says.14 For Chatime, however, there are currently limitations and challenges typical of any business that has expanded to the practical limits of its ânaturalâ market niche. Now Zhao wants to open more outlets â but he needs to expand beyond the traditionally Asian suburbs populated by first- and second-generation immigrant families together with international (mostly Chinese) students. He is confident that a mainstream audience will embrace the tea brand, but the franchisees are not easily convinced. Many of the 29 franchisees are keen to open additional outlets but are not convinced that AngloâEuropean suburbs and towns are ready for the product. Zhao says: We do all the research to tell them that the other areas may be good but . . . theyâre maybe not confident in thinking that local mainstream markets will love this drink.15 For Chatime, the current limits to growth are the size and geographic concentration of the ChineseâAustralian population and the issue is whether this niche will provide sufficient revenue and growth to satisfy the aspirations of the parent company, Zhao and franchisees. To expand beyond the current customer base will inevitably require Chatime to capture a viable share of the mainstream (predominantly AngloâEuropean) Australian market. The challenge is not insurmountable, however. After all, no Australian suburb or town would be complete without its local Chinese restaurant, although this assimilation occurred over decades, which wouldnât suit Zhaoâs ambitious plans. Australian appetites for introduced and exotic cuisines and beverages give encouragement that âpearl teasâ will eventually become as much a part of the vernacular as âskim caramel mochaccino lattĂ©â (if such a drink exists!). Zhao is confronting three common, and related, problems: First, he needs to ensure Chatimeâs product fits the local, mainstream market. Then he needs to focus on an educative marketing campaign that changes consumersâ perceptions about the brand. Finally, he needs to persuade franchisees to open outlets outside the Asian-heavy suburbs.16 In relation to the first issue, the challenge is in recognising the distinctive characteristics of the local market and in deciding how far the local product should be adapted to local tastes. Zhao says: Just as McDonaldâs introduced the Aloo Tikki burger when it expanded to India, catering to localsâ taste for the spiced potato patty snack of the same name, franchises need to be prepared to adjust their products to fit new markets. Chatime has introduced skim and soy milk and also allows consumers to customise their sugar levels.17 Although premium pearl milk tea is Chatimeâs bestseller globally, fruit-based teas and smoothies perform more strongly in Australia than they do in Taiwan. This is because the Australian marketplace likes âmore fresh and more healthyâ products, Zhao says. Of course, modifying mass-market fast foods and beverages to suit the tastes of local markets is both sensible and widely practiced. McDonaldâs, Hungry Jackâs (Burger King), KFC Page 6 of 6 and Pizza Hut have all specially developed and marketed âAussieâ versions of their staples, although typically only for brief promotional periods (such as leading up to Australia Day). In a move that is similar to Australian fresh juice providers and taps into a broad-based perception of âfreshnessâ, Zhao has overhauled the look of Chatime. A bright, cartoonish purple was the launch colour, but now the store interiors are a pale green with bamboo details. âPurple doesnât give people any feeling of freshâ, he says. Tea leaves are on display to show the ânaturalâ side of the brand. Zhao wants to court a mature customer and leave the teenagers to his competitors, so he avoids the moniker of âbubble teaâ. He also wants Chatime to be known as the âtea expertsâ. âWe really want to focus on people who are well educated, who know the benefits of drinking tea,â he says. âThatâs why our branding and wording is quite mature and serious. Weâre trying to tell people, âYes, we are the experts, trust us, drink our tea, youâll get healthyâ.â This repositioning should see Chatime better attuned to both its original Chinese and local non-Chinese customers. At the same time, Chatime must be careful not to radically adapt its core âbubble teaâ product offering and service experience so that it alienates its core customer groups. After all, these customers have several alternative providers such as EasyWay and GongCha, who can still provide the âauthenticâ product. Itâs a juggling act that often challenges companies seeking to capture more of the mainstream market. Expert marketing opinion, however, is not universally in favour of the logic of broadening and adapting niche products to meet the needs of ever-wider markets. Rod Young, franchise guru and managing director of DC Strategy, has sober advice for such plans. âI think that these niche markets are creating terrific opportunities and I would encourage any organisations to not be all things to all people,â he says. âThereâs nothing invalid about focusing on a particular ethnic market and maximising the market penetration in those markets.â18 Having resolved the issues of product adaptation, there is clearly also a need to create product awareness, particularly among the new mainstream Australian target customers who may have noticed the new stores at their local shopping malls but are unaware of the pleasures and health benefits of âpearl teasâ. This suggests the need for a product and brand awareness campaign, which may demand an increased marketing communications budget to capture the attention of the targeted new users. Of course, word-of-mouth, enhanced by social media, can also play a central role in this campaign. Expanding beyond major Australian cities and suburbs with large Chinese populations will be central to the aspirations of Chatime, who wants to become the âStarbucks of teaâ. However, the Starbucks experience in Australia, and elsewhere, also demonstrates that such aspirations are not always enough, and that competition and the diverse tastes of the local market can frustrate ambitious and optimistic plans. The challenge for Chatime and its competitors is to move the product from being a fad and a craze â albeit an exotic and pleasurable one â to being a product of universal appeal and a permanent fixture in the Australian beverage landscape. The keys to success will be the attractive idea, a sufficient budget, excellent execution and patience.
1.What are the key elements that have contributed to Chatimeâs success in Australia to date?
2.What product attributes should Chatime emphasise in its promotion to maximise its appeal?
3.Describe the Chatime brand and outline what Chatime can do to encourage brand loyalty.
4.Do you believe Chatime should target ânon-Chineseâ locations at this stage of its development, or should it stick to its existing location strategy? Why/why not?
In: Economics