On January 1, 2005, a person’s savings account was worth $250,000. Every month thereafter, this person makes a cash contribution of $750 to the account. If the fund is expected to be worth $500,000 on January 1, 2010, what annual rate of interest is being earned on this fund?
In: Finance
In: Nursing
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
In: Accounting
OCloud Corportation's suite of software products and services provides secure and scalable solutions for global companies. The following is an extract from the company's 2020 and 2019 comparative income statements and statement of financial position. The market price of OCloud's common shares was $41.12 and $38.20 on June 30, 2020, and June 30, 2019, respectively. OCloud declared dividends per common share of $0.476 and $0.412 for 2020 and 2019, respectively.
OCLOUD CORPORTATION
Years Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019
(in thousands)
| Comparative Income Statement | 2020 | 2019 |
| Total revenues | $2,276,557 | $1,828,767 |
| Total cost of revenues | 766,850 | 569,174 |
| Total operating expenses | 1,169,419 | 874,972 |
| Net Income | $1,009,546 | $300,221 |
| Statement of Financial Position | 2020 | 2019 |
| Total assets | $7,490,691 | $5,175,412 |
| Total liabilities | 3,960,177 | 3,762,299 |
| Common share capital | 1,436,263 | 821,380 |
| Total shareholders' equity | $3,530,514 | $1,413,113 |
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 253,195 | 242,375 |
Calculate the return on shareholders' equity for OCloud in 2020. Note that OCloud's articles of incorporation authorize only common shares. The average return for the shares listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange in a comparable period was 19.8%. (Round answer to 1 decimal place)
Return on shareholders' equity:___%
Calculate earnings per share for the years 2020 and 2019 (Round answers to 2 decimal places)
2020 2019
Earnings per share $ per share $ per share
Calculate the dividend payout ratio and the dividend yield for 2020 and 2019. (Round answers to 1 decimal place)
2020 2019
Dividend payout ratio % %
Dividend yield % %
In: Accounting
Villa Corporation (VC) is a private company that follows ASPE. The company’s policy is to report all cash flows arising from interest and dividends as operating activities. The company’s activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 included the following:
Required:
Cash Flow Statement (Partial)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2020 (Indirect Method)
|
Net Cash Flow from Operating Activities |
||
In: Accounting
Figure 1
BMD, Inc. Income Statements (in 000s)
Current Pro-Forma
Year Statements
|
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
||
|
Net sales (all credit) |
$797 |
$2,893 |
$3,679 |
$5,138 |
$7,392 |
$9,953 |
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
278 |
981 |
1021 |
1582 |
2154 |
3685 |
|
|
Gross profit |
519 |
1912 |
2658 |
3556 |
5238 |
6268 |
|
|
Selling and admin expenses |
602 |
644 |
876 |
1387 |
2120 |
2597 |
|
|
Other income (expenses)* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
700 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Operating profit |
-83 |
1268 |
1782 |
2869 |
3118 |
3671 |
|
|
Interest expense |
13 |
47 |
56 |
194 |
201 |
243 |
|
|
Income before taxes |
-96 |
1221 |
1726 |
2675 |
2917 |
3428 |
|
|
Income taxes |
0 |
488 |
432 |
669 |
729 |
857 |
|
|
(40% in 2018; 25% thereafter) |
|||||||
|
Net income |
($96) |
$733 |
$1,295 |
$2,006 |
$2,188 |
$2,571 |
|
|
Dividends paid |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Increase in retained earnings |
($96) |
$733 |
$1,295 |
$2,006 |
$2,188 |
$2,571 |
|
|
Average number of shares** |
2326 |
2326 |
2347 |
2347 |
2347 |
2347 |
|
|
Earnings per share |
($0.04) |
$0.31 |
$0.55 |
$0.85 |
$0.93 |
$1.10 |
|
|
*Other income (expenses) refers to extraordinary gains and losses. In 2020 $700,000 is expected in |
|||||||
|
settlement of their suit - no final agreement yet. |
|||||||
|
**Shares are not publicly traded. |
|||||||
Is projected net income growing faster or more slowly than projected sales? Discuss any differences. You should carefully review the 2020 Income Statement data to see if you want to recommend or make any adjustments.
In: Finance
Suppose that Dom began a landscaping
business in 2020. In that year, he adopted the last-in first-out
(LIFO) inventory-flow method for his business inventory of
shrubbery by using it for the year on his tax return.
In 2019, he purchased the following four batches of shrubs (total
cost per batch below).
Shrubs Purchase
Date Direct Cost
Other Inventoriable
Costs Total Cost
200
July
21
$
2,000
$
200
$ 2,200
150
August
15
$
2,000
$
100
$ 2,100
100
October
30
$
2,200
$
400
$ 2,600
140
November
10
$
2,700
$
100
$ 2,800
In 2020, Dom sold 200 shrubs. In 2021, Dom purchased three more
batches of shrubs at the following total cost per batch below. Just
before year end in 2021, he also sold 50 shrubs:
Shrubs
Purchase
Date
Total Cost
100
Early
spring
$ 2,400
125
Summer
$ 2,500
100
Fall
$ 2,600
a. (10 points) What cost of goods sold and ending inventory would Dom record if he elects to use the LIFO method in 2020?
b. (10 points) What will be his cost of goods sold and ending inventory in 2021 under the LIFO method?
c. (10 points) How would you answer (a) change if Dom had initially selected the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method instead of LIFO?
d. (10 points) How would you answer (b) change if Dom had initially selected the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method instead of LIFO?
In: Accounting
Problem A, Income Taxes Harms Way Company (HWC) provides you with the following information for the year ended October 31, 2020. Your assignment is to calculate income tax expense, income taxes payable, and deferred income tax assets/liabilities. The end result will be a journal entry to record all of that. In addition, you must calculate HWC’s effective tax rate and prepare a reconciliation to the federal statutory rate of 21%. You can explain the difference in words, if you wish.
Information provided:
1. Income before tax, as shown on HWC’s GAAP statement of income = $2,440,000
2. Depreciation calculated under GAAP = $300,000. Depreciation as will be shown on the tax return = $475,000.
3. Interest income on municipal bonds, which is not subject to federal income tax = $150,000.
4. Fines recorded and paid during the year to the EPA for environmental violations = $450,000. Fines are not tax deductible.
5. Meals and entertainment expenses recorded during the year = $375,000. Only one-half (50%) of those expenses may be deducted for tax purposes.
6. At the end of the fiscal year (in October 2020), HWC received a payment of $750,000 from a client for a product to be delivered in November 2020. Under the tax law, that payment is taxable when received, not when the product is delivered.
Your Assignment: Calculate:
1. Income tax expense (GAAP).
2. Income taxes currently payable.
3. Deferred income taxes resulting from this year’s operations.
Be sure to show your work, I give partial credit (full credit, too, of course), but I must be able to see how you calculated amounts used in your answer
In: Accounting
In spite of inflation increasing most prices, the price of solar power declining. Also in contrast to fossil fuels, the cost of generating electricity from solar energy is driven by the infrastructure costs instead of the cost of the natural resource. Therefore the costs and prices are more stable, particularly for large-scale electricity generation.
Historically, solar technologies have had high upfront infrastructure costs but low operating costs. The SunShot program launched in 2011 by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) seeks to make solar energy economically competitive by 2020. To achieve this goal, the cost of solar power will have to be reduced by roughly 75% relative to 2010 prices. The U.S. DOE has reported that cumulative adoption of solar technologies has increased over tenfold since 2008. It is expected that achieving the price reduction set by the SunShot initiative could lead to solar representing 14% of the electricity demand in the U.S. by 2030 and 27% by 2050.
According to a study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, reported prices of both residential and commercial photovoltaic systems decreased on average from 6% to 12% annually between 1998 and 2014. At the end of 2014, photovoltaic prices ranged from $4.27/W for residential systems with a median installed capacity of 6kW to $2.08/W for utility-scale systems. Costs for utility scale systems are projected to fall $1.00/W to $1.75/W by 2020. It is expected that within the next two decades, the cost of solar technologies will be lower than the costs of conventional fossil fuel electricity technologies. These lower electricity prices can decrease inflation and contribute to increased economic activity and growth.
Interestingly, the deployment of solar technologies continues to increase despite the 2015 plunge in oil prices. Solar was the third most added electricity-generation capacity in 2015, after wind and natural gas. However, the share of solar compared to the total U.S. electricity capacity in 2015 was 2%, while its generation share was only 0.9%. So it remains to be seen if the goal of the SunShot initiative will be met.
In: Economics
In spite of inflation increasing most prices, the price of solar power declining. Also in contrast to fossil fuels, the cost of generating electricity from solar energy is driven by the infrastructure costs instead of the cost of the natural resource. Therefore the costs and prices are more stable, particularly for large-scale electricity generation.
Historically, solar technologies have had high upfront infrastructure costs but low operating costs. The SunShot program launched in 2011 by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) seeks to make solar energy economically competitive by 2020. To achieve this goal, the cost of solar power will have to be reduced by roughly 75% relative to 2010 prices. The U.S. DOE has reported that cumulative adoption of solar technologies has increased over tenfold since 2008. It is expected that achieving the price reduction set by the SunShot initiative could lead to solar representing 14% of the electricity demand in the U.S. by 2030 and 27% by 2050.
According to a study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, reported prices of both residential and commercial photovoltaic systems decreased on average from 6% to 12% annually between 1998 and 2014. At the end of 2014, photovoltaic prices ranged from $4.27/W for residential systems with a median installed capacity of 6kW to $2.08/W for utility-scale systems. Costs for utility scale systems are projected to fall $1.00/W to $1.75/W by 2020. It is expected that within the next two decades, the cost of solar technologies will be lower than the costs of conventional fossil fuel electricity technologies. These lower electricity prices can decrease inflation and contribute to increased economic activity and growth.
Interestingly, the deployment of solar technologies continues to increase despite the 2015 plunge in oil prices. Solar was the third most added electricity-generation capacity in 2015, after wind and natural gas. However, the share of solar compared to the total U.S. electricity capacity in 2015 was 2%, while its generation share was only 0.9%. So it remains to be seen if the goal of the SunShot initiative will be met.
In: Economics