QualSupport Corporation manufactures seats for automobiles, vans, trucks, and various recreational vehicles. The company has a number of plants around the world, including the Denver Cover Plant, which makes seat covers.

Ted Vosilo is the plant manager of the Denver Cover Plant but also serves as the regional production manager for the company. His budget as the regional manager is charged to the Denver Cover Plant.

Vosilo has just heard that QualSupport has received a bid from an outside vendor to supply the equivalent of the entire annual output of the Denver Cover Plant for $22.88 million. Vosilo was astonished at the low outside bid because the budget for the Denver Cover Plant’s operating costs for the upcoming year was set at $26.18 million. If this bid is accepted, the Denver Cover Plant will be closed down.

The budget for Denver Cover’s operating costs for the coming year is presented below.

*Fixed corporate expenses allocated to plants and other operating units based on total budgeted wage and salary costs.

Additional facts regarding the plant’s operations are as follows:

1. Due to Denver Cover’s commitment to use high-quality fabrics in all of its products, the Purchasing Department was instructed to place blanket purchase orders with major suppliers to ensure the receipt of sufficient materials for the coming year. If these orders are canceled as a consequence of the plant closing, termination charges would amount to 25% of the cost of direct materials.
2. Approximately 340 plant employees will lose their jobs if the plant is closed. This includes all of the direct laborers and supervisors as well as the plumbers, electricians, and other skilled workers classified as indirect plant workers. Some would be able to find new jobs while many others would have difficulty. All employees would have difficulty matching Denver Cover’s base pay of $12.20 per hour, which is the highest in the area. A clause in Denver Cover’s contract with the union may help some employees; the company must provide employment assistance to its former employees for 12 months after a plant closing. The estimated cost to administer this service would be $0.71 million for the year.
3. Some employees would probably choose early retirement because QualSupport has an excellent pension plan. In fact, $0.68 million of the annual pension expense would continue whether Denver Cover is open or not.
4. Vosilo and his staff would not be affected by the closing of Denver Cover. They would still be responsible for administering three other area plants.
5. If the Denver Cover Plant were closed, the company would realize about $2.1 million salvage value for the equipment and building. If the plant remains open, there are no plans to make any significant investments in new equipment or buildings. The old equipment is adequate and should last indefinitely.

Required:

2. QualSupport Corporation plans to prepare a financial analysis that will be used in deciding whether or not to close the Denver Cover Plant. Management has asked you to identify:

a. The annual budgeted costs that are relevant to the decision regarding closing the plant.

b. The annual budgeted costs that are not relevant to the decision regarding closing the plant.

c. Any nonrecurring costs that would arise due to the closing of the plant.

3. Looking at the data you have prepared in (2) above,

a. Calculate the financial advantage (disadvantage) of closing the plant.

b. Should the plant be closed?

QualSupport Corporation manufactures seats for automobiles, vans, trucks, and various recreational vehicles. The company has a number of plants around the world, including the Denver Cover Plant, which makes seat covers.

Ted Vosilo is the plant manager of the Denver Cover Plant but also serves as the regional production manager for the company. His budget as the regional manager is charged to the Denver Cover Plant.

Vosilo has just heard that QualSupport has received a bid from an outside vendor to supply the equivalent of the entire annual output of the Denver Cover Plant for $21.77 million. Vosilo was astonished at the low outside bid because the budget for the Denver Cover Plant’s operating costs for the upcoming year was set at $25.07 million. If this bid is accepted, the Denver Cover Plant will be closed down.

The budget for Denver Cover’s operating costs for the coming year is presented below.

*Fixed corporate expenses allocated to plants and other operating units based on total budgeted wage and salary costs.

Additional facts regarding the plant’s operations are as follows:

1. Due to Denver Cover’s commitment to use high-quality fabrics in all of its products, the Purchasing Department was instructed to place blanket purchase orders with major suppliers to ensure the receipt of sufficient materials for the coming year. If these orders are canceled as a consequence of the plant closing, termination charges would amount to 30% of the cost of direct materials.
2. Approximately 320 plant employees will lose their jobs if the plant is closed. This includes all of the direct laborers and supervisors as well as the plumbers, electricians, and other skilled workers classified as indirect plant workers. Some would be able to find new jobs while many others would have difficulty. All employees would have difficulty matching Denver Cover’s base pay of $13.20 per hour, which is the highest in the area. A clause in Denver Cover’s contract with the union may help some employees; the company must provide employment assistance to its former employees for 12 months after a plant closing. The estimated cost to administer this service would be $0.77 million for the year.
3. Some employees would probably choose early retirement because QualSupport has an excellent pension plan. In fact, $0.65 million of the annual pension expense would continue whether Denver Cover is open or not.
4. Vosilo and his staff would not be affected by the closing of Denver Cover. They would still be responsible for administering three other area plants.
5. If the Denver Cover Plant were closed, the company would realize about $2.58 million salvage value for the equipment and building. If the plant remains open, there are no plans to make any significant investments in new equipment or buildings. The old equipment is adequate and should last indefinitely.

Required:

2. QualSupport Corporation plans to prepare a financial analysis that will be used in deciding whether or not to close the Denver Cover Plant. Management has asked you to identify:

a. The annual budgeted costs that are relevant to the decision regarding closing the plant.

b. The annual budgeted costs that are not relevant to the decision regarding closing the plant.

c. Any nonrecurring costs that would arise due to the closing of the plant.

3. Looking at the data you have prepared in (2) above,

a. Calculate the financial advantage (disadvantage) of closing the plant.

b. Should the plant be closed?

QualSupport Corporation manufactures seats for automobiles, vans, trucks, and various recreational vehicles. The company has a number of plants around the world, including the Denver Cover Plant, which makes seat covers.

Ted Vosilo is the plant manager of the Denver Cover Plant but also serves as the regional production manager for the company. His budget as the regional manager is charged to the Denver Cover Plant.

Vosilo has just heard that QualSupport has received a bid from an outside vendor to supply the equivalent of the entire annual output of the Denver Cover Plant for $20.75 million. Vosilo was astonished at the low outside bid because the budget for the Denver Cover Plant’s operating costs for the upcoming year was set at $24.05 million. If this bid is accepted, the Denver Cover Plant will be closed down.

The budget for Denver Cover’s operating costs for the coming year is presented below.

*Fixed corporate expenses allocated to plants and other operating units based on total budgeted wage and salary costs.

Additional facts regarding the plant’s operations are as follows:

1. Due to Denver Cover’s commitment to use high-quality fabrics in all of its products, the Purchasing Department was instructed to place blanket purchase orders with major suppliers to ensure the receipt of sufficient materials for the coming year. If these orders are canceled as a consequence of the plant closing, termination charges would amount to 25% of the cost of direct materials.
2. Approximately 360 plant employees will lose their jobs if the plant is closed. This includes all of the direct laborers and supervisors as well as the plumbers, electricians, and other skilled workers classified as indirect plant workers. Some would be able to find new jobs while many others would have difficulty. All employees would have difficulty matching Denver Cover’s base pay of $11.70 per hour, which is the highest in the area. A clause in Denver Cover’s contract with the union may help some employees; the company must provide employment assistance to its former employees for 12 months after a plant closing. The estimated cost to administer this service would be $0.84 million for the year.
3. Some employees would probably choose early retirement because QualSupport has an excellent pension plan. In fact, $0.62 million of the annual pension expense would continue whether Denver Cover is open or not.
4. Vosilo and his staff would not be affected by the closing of Denver Cover. They would still be responsible for administering three other area plants.
5. If the Denver Cover Plant were closed, the company would realize about $2.15 million salvage value for the equipment and building. If the plant remains open, there are no plans to make any significant investments in new equipment or buildings. The old equipment is adequate and should last indefinitely.

Required:

2. QualSupport Corporation plans to prepare a financial analysis that will be used in deciding whether or not to close the Denver Cover Plant. Management has asked you to identify:

a. The annual budgeted costs that are relevant to the decision regarding closing the plant.

b. The annual budgeted costs that are not relevant to the decision regarding closing the plant.

c. Any nonrecurring costs that would arise due to the closing of the plant.

3. Looking at the data you have prepared in (2) above,

a. Calculate the financial advantage (disadvantage) of closing the plant.

b. Should the plant be closed?

QualSupport Corporation manufactures seats for automobiles, vans, trucks, and various recreational vehicles. The company has a number of plants around the world, including the Denver Cover Plant, which makes seat covers.

Ted Vosilo is the plant manager of the Denver Cover Plant but also serves as the regional production manager for the company. His budget as the regional manager is charged to the Denver Cover Plant.

Vosilo has just heard that QualSupport has received a bid from an outside vendor to supply the equivalent of the entire annual output of the Denver Cover Plant for $23.09 million. Vosilo was astonished at the low outside bid because the budget for the Denver Cover Plant’s operating costs for the upcoming year was set at $26.39 million. If this bid is accepted, the Denver Cover Plant will be closed down.

The budget for Denver Cover’s operating costs for the coming year is presented below.

*Fixed corporate expenses allocated to plants and other operating units based on total budgeted wage and salary costs.

Additional facts regarding the plant’s operations are as follows:

1. Due to Denver Cover’s commitment to use high-quality fabrics in all of its products, the Purchasing Department was instructed to place blanket purchase orders with major suppliers to ensure the receipt of sufficient materials for the coming year. If these orders are canceled as a consequence of the plant closing, termination charges would amount to 25% of the cost of direct materials.
2. Approximately 390 plant employees will lose their jobs if the plant is closed. This includes all of the direct laborers and supervisors as well as the plumbers, electricians, and other skilled workers classified as indirect plant workers. Some would be able to find new jobs while many others would have difficulty. All employees would have difficulty matching Denver Cover’s base pay of $13.20 per hour, which is the highest in the area. A clause in Denver Cover’s contract with the union may help some employees; the company must provide employment assistance to its former employees for 12 months after a plant closing. The estimated cost to administer this service would be $0.83 million for the year.
3. Some employees would probably choose early retirement because QualSupport has an excellent pension plan. In fact, $0.7 million of the annual pension expense would continue whether Denver Cover is open or not.
4. Vosilo and his staff would not be affected by the closing of Denver Cover. They would still be responsible for administering three other area plants.
5. If the Denver Cover Plant were closed, the company would realize about $2.25 million salvage value for the equipment and building. If the plant remains open, there are no plans to make any significant investments in new equipment or buildings. The old equipment is adequate and should last indefinitely.

Required:

2. QualSupport Corporation plans to prepare a financial analysis that will be used in deciding whether or not to close the Denver Cover Plant. Management has asked you to identify:

a. The annual budgeted costs that are relevant to the decision regarding closing the plant.

b. The annual budgeted costs that are not relevant to the decision regarding closing the plant.

c. Any nonrecurring costs that would arise due to the closing of the plant.

3. Looking at the data you have prepared in (2) above,

a. Calculate the financial advantage (disadvantage) of closing the plant.

b. Should the plant be closed?

QualSupport Corporation manufactures seats for automobiles, vans, trucks, and various recreational vehicles. The company has a number of plants around the world, including the Denver Cover Plant, which makes seat covers.

Ted Vosilo is the plant manager of the Denver Cover Plant but also serves as the regional production manager for the company. His budget as the regional manager is charged to the Denver Cover Plant.

Vosilo has just heard that QualSupport has received a bid from an outside vendor to supply the equivalent of the entire annual output of the Denver Cover Plant for $18.58 million. Vosilo was astonished at the low outside bid because the budget for the Denver Cover Plant’s operating costs for the upcoming year was set at $21.88 million. If this bid is accepted, the Denver Cover Plant will be closed down.

The budget for Denver Cover’s operating costs for the coming year is presented below.

*Fixed corporate expenses allocated to plants and other operating units based on total budgeted wage and salary costs.

Additional facts regarding the plant’s operations are as follows:

1. Due to Denver Cover’s commitment to use high-quality fabrics in all of its products, the Purchasing Department was instructed to place blanket purchase orders with major suppliers to ensure the receipt of sufficient materials for the coming year. If these orders are canceled as a consequence of the plant closing, termination charges would amount to 25% of the cost of direct materials.
2. Approximately 340 plant employees will lose their jobs if the plant is closed. This includes all of the direct laborers and supervisors as well as the plumbers, electricians, and other skilled workers classified as indirect plant workers. Some would be able to find new jobs while many others would have difficulty. All employees would have difficulty matching Denver Cover’s base pay of $11.80 per hour, which is the highest in the area. A clause in Denver Cover’s contract with the union may help some employees; the company must provide employment assistance to its former employees for 12 months after a plant closing. The estimated cost to administer this service would be $0.8 million for the year.
3. Some employees would probably choose early retirement because QualSupport has an excellent pension plan. In fact, $0.72 million of the annual pension expense would continue whether Denver Cover is open or not.
4. Vosilo and his staff would not be affected by the closing of Denver Cover. They would still be responsible for administering three other area plants.
5. If the Denver Cover Plant were closed, the company would realize about $1.9 million salvage value for the equipment and building. If the plant remains open, there are no plans to make any significant investments in new equipment or buildings. The old equipment is adequate and should last indefinitely.

Required:

2. QualSupport Corporation plans to prepare a financial analysis that will be used in deciding whether or not to close the Denver Cover Plant. Management has asked you to identify:

a. The annual budgeted costs that are relevant to the decision regarding closing the plant.

b. The annual budgeted costs that are not relevant to the decision regarding closing the plant.

c. Any nonrecurring costs that would arise due to the closing of the plant.

3. Looking at the data you have prepared in (2) above,

a. Calculate the financial advantage (disadvantage) of closing the plant.

b. Should the plant be closed?

QualSupport Corporation manufactures seats for automobiles, vans, trucks, and various recreational vehicles. The company has a number of plants around the world, including the Denver Cover Plant, which makes seat covers.

Ted Vosilo is the plant manager of the Denver Cover Plant but also serves as the regional production manager for the company. His budget as the regional manager is charged to the Denver Cover Plant.

Vosilo has just heard that QualSupport has received a bid from an outside vendor to supply the equivalent of the entire annual output of the Denver Cover Plant for $21.2 million. Vosilo was astonished at the low outside bid because the budget for the Denver Cover Plant’s operating costs for the upcoming year was set at $24.5 million. If this bid is accepted, the Denver Cover Plant will be closed down.

The budget for Denver Cover’s operating costs for the coming year is presented below.

*Fixed corporate expenses allocated to plants and other operating units based on total budgeted wage and salary costs.

Additional facts regarding the plant’s operations are as follows:

1. Due to Denver Cover’s commitment to use high-quality fabrics in all of its products, the Purchasing Department was instructed to place blanket purchase orders with major suppliers to ensure the receipt of sufficient materials for the coming year. If these orders are canceled as a consequence of the plant closing, termination charges would amount to 25% of the cost of direct materials.
2. Approximately 330 plant employees will lose their jobs if the plant is closed. This includes all of the direct laborers and supervisors as well as the plumbers, electricians, and other skilled workers classified as indirect plant workers. Some would be able to find new jobs while many others would have difficulty. All employees would have difficulty matching Denver Cover’s base pay of $12.80 per hour, which is the highest in the area. A clause in Denver Cover’s contract with the union may help some employees; the company must provide employment assistance to its former employees for 12 months after a plant closing. The estimated cost to administer this service would be $0.72 million for the year.
3. Some employees would probably choose early retirement because QualSupport has an excellent pension plan. In fact, $0.69 million of the annual pension expense would continue whether Denver Cover is open or not.
4. Vosilo and his staff would not be affected by the closing of Denver Cover. They would still be responsible for administering three other area plants.
5. If the Denver Cover Plant were closed, the company would realize about $1.9 million salvage value for the equipment and building. If the plant remains open, there are no plans to make any significant investments in new equipment or buildings. The old equipment is adequate and should last indefinitely.

Required:

2. QualSupport Corporation plans to prepare a financial analysis that will be used in deciding whether or not to close the Denver Cover Plant. Management has asked you to identify:

a. The annual budgeted costs that are relevant to the decision regarding closing the plant.

b. The annual budgeted costs that are not relevant to the decision regarding closing the plant.

c. Any nonrecurring costs that would arise due to the closing of the plant.

3. Looking at the data you have prepared in (2) above,

a. Calculate the financial advantage (disadvantage) of closing the plant.

b. Should the plant be closed?

QualSupport Corporation manufactures seats for automobiles, vans, trucks, and various recreational vehicles. The company has a number of plants around the world, including the Denver Cover Plant, which makes seat covers.

Ted Vosilo is the plant manager of the Denver Cover Plant but also serves as the regional production manager for the company. His budget as the regional manager is charged to the Denver Cover Plant.

Vosilo has just heard that QualSupport has received a bid from an outside vendor to supply the equivalent of the entire annual output of the Denver Cover Plant for $21.66 million. Vosilo was astonished at the low outside bid because the budget for the Denver Cover Plant’s operating costs for the upcoming year was set at $24.96 million. If this bid is accepted, the Denver Cover Plant will be closed down.

The budget for Denver Cover’s operating costs for the coming year is presented below.

*Fixed corporate expenses allocated to plants and other operating units based on total budgeted wage and salary costs.

Additional facts regarding the plant’s operations are as follows:

1. Due to Denver Cover’s commitment to use high-quality fabrics in all of its products, the Purchasing Department was instructed to place blanket purchase orders with major suppliers to ensure the receipt of sufficient materials for the coming year. If these orders are canceled as a consequence of the plant closing, termination charges would amount to 25% of the cost of direct materials.
2. Approximately 360 plant employees will lose their jobs if the plant is closed. This includes all of the direct laborers and supervisors as well as the plumbers, electricians, and other skilled workers classified as indirect plant workers. Some would be able to find new jobs while many others would have difficulty. All employees would have difficulty matching Denver Cover’s base pay of $12.90 per hour, which is the highest in the area. A clause in Denver Cover’s contract with the union may help some employees; the company must provide employment assistance to its former employees for 12 months after a plant closing. The estimated cost to administer this service would be $0.86 million for the year.
3. Some employees would probably choose early retirement because QualSupport has an excellent pension plan. In fact, $0.79 million of the annual pension expense would continue whether Denver Cover is open or not.
4. Vosilo and his staff would not be affected by the closing of Denver Cover. They would still be responsible for administering three other area plants.
5. If the Denver Cover Plant were closed, the company would realize about $2.15 million salvage value for the equipment and building. If the plant remains open, there are no plans to make any significant investments in new equipment or buildings. The old equipment is adequate and should last indefinitely.

Required:

2. QualSupport Corporation plans to prepare a financial analysis that will be used in deciding whether or not to close the Denver Cover Plant. Management has asked you to identify:

a. The annual budgeted costs that are relevant to the decision regarding closing the plant.

b. The annual budgeted costs that are not relevant to the decision regarding closing the plant.

c. Any nonrecurring costs that would arise due to the closing of the plant.

3. Looking at the data you have prepared in (2) above,

a. Calculate the financial advantage (disadvantage) of closing the plant.

b. Should the plant be closed?

qwertrtwrgwegwge.woegjorwgwj,rgwe1234

A. Fill in the blank

- cyclical - countervailing            - medium of exchange

           - expansionary        -expansionary monetary policy                 - trough

            - bank rate      - required reserve ratio                                        - frictional

              - dumping                                    - contractionary monetary policy      - automatic

             - excess reserve ratio           - store of value                          - contraction

a) Commercial banks hold a fraction of their deposits in cash in their vaults (or as deposits with the central bank). This fraction is known as the

b) The most direct way in which money replaces barter is through its use as a

c) A company of the Kenya has excess products that it does not want to sell into the Kenya market because it will bring down the domestic price and instead sells it in another country at below the cost of production. This situation is referred to as

d) The period of the business cycle in which real GDP is decreasing is called the

e) Workers at a steel plant are laid off because the economy is weak and the demand for       products         requiring         steel    has      is         an example   of unemployment.    

f) Declining oil prices from 2008 through the second quarter of 2010 has caused many economies to slow down. This has caused bank profits to decline, making Canadian banks vulnerable to a recession. The appropriate policy to be implemented is fiscal policy.

g) As housing prices began to drop and the economy slowed, the central bank began cutting its discount rate from 5.25% in June 2005 all the way to 0% by the end of 2006. With the economy still weak, it embarked on purchases of government securities from January 2007 until August 2012, for a total of $3.7 trillion. This is an example of

B. State the type of discretionary fiscal policy implemented or to be implemented by the government of Lota in the following events:

Q.2 ABC Ltd., has been facing cash shortage problem for many years. You have just joined the company and made the proposal to prepare cash budget for controlling of cash shortage problem. Management has given you the green signal to prepare the cash budget and made the projection for requirement of cash through commercial bank channel in the coming period. The following information were gathered for preparing the cash budget. 1. Sales budgets November, 2019…………………………. Rs.200,000 December, 2019…………………………… 300,000 January, 2020…………………………….. 400,000 February, 2020…………………………… 500,000 March, 2020……………………………….. 600,000 All sales are made on credit basis and customers follow the following patter to pay; A) 40 % pay in the month of sales. B) 50 % in the following month of sales. C) 10 % pay in the second month of sales. 2. Purchase budgets 3. Purchases are made equal to 60 % of the respective month sales at beginning of the month. 50% of purchase amount is paid in the month of purchases and 50% in the following month of purchases 4. Cash operating expenses per month is estimated Rs.80,000. 5. Dividend is expected to be paid Rs.100,000 in the month of January, 2020. 6. Tax is to be paid Rs.50,000 in the month of march, 2020. 7. A new plant costing Rs. 250,000 to be purchased in the month of Feb.,2020. 8. Cash on hand on 1st January, 2020 is Rs.100,000. 9. A minimum cash balance of Rs.150,000 to be maintained from 31st January,2020 on ward, company has made arrangement with the local bank a line of credit to meet its cash requirement and if excess cash available it would be paid to bank to pay the loan. Required: Prepare a cash budget for the month of January, February, March, 2020. (Marks-10)

1)    Use the below table of share price for TSLA and index level for the S&P 500 for the CAPM questions that follow related to TSLA. You can copy this table and paste it completely into Excel to avoid typing it out. Calculate the beta of TSLA.  

2) Using the beta you just calculated above, a risk free rate of 0.70%, and a market return of 5.5%, what is the required rate of return for TSLA?

3) If the current share price of TSLA is $380, it pays no dividend, and the consensus estimated share price in one year is $400, what is the estimated return for this stock? Should you invest in it based on comparing the estimated return you just calculated to its required return?