What is the average monthly return and standard deviation of returns for
(i) S&P 500:
| Date | Adj Close |
| 8/1/2015 | 1972.18 |
| 9/1/2015 | 1920.03 |
| ######## | 2079.36 |
| ######## | 2080.41 |
| ######## | 2043.94 |
| 1/1/2016 | 1940.24 |
| 2/1/2016 | 1932.23 |
| 3/1/2016 | 2059.74 |
| 4/1/2016 | 2065.3 |
| 5/1/2016 | 2096.95 |
| 6/1/2016 | 2098.86 |
| 7/1/2016 | 2173.6 |
| 8/1/2016 | 2170.95 |
| 9/1/2016 | 2168.27 |
| ######## | 2126.15 |
| ######## | 2198.81 |
| ######## | 2238.83 |
| 1/1/2017 | 2278.87 |
| 2/1/2017 | 2363.64 |
| 3/1/2017 | 2362.72 |
| 4/1/2017 | 2384.2 |
| 5/1/2017 | 2411.8 |
| 6/1/2017 | 2423.41 |
| 7/1/2017 | 2470.3 |
| 8/1/2017 | 2471.65 |
| 9/1/2017 | 2519.36 |
| ######## | 2575.26 |
| ######## | 2584.84 |
| ######## | 2673.61 |
| 1/1/2018 | 2823.81 |
| 2/1/2018 | 2713.83 |
| 3/1/2018 | 2640.87 |
| 4/1/2018 | 2648.05 |
| 5/1/2018 | 2705.27 |
| 6/1/2018 | 2718.37 |
| 7/1/2018 | 2816.29 |
| 8/1/2018 | 2901.52 |
| 9/1/2018 | 2913.98 |
| ######## | 2711.74 |
| ######## | 2760.17 |
| ######## | 2506.85 |
| 1/1/2019 | 2704.1 |
| 2/1/2019 | 2784.49 |
| 3/1/2019 | 2834.4 |
| 4/1/2019 | 2945.83 |
| 5/1/2019 | 2752.06 |
| 6/1/2019 | 2941.76 |
| 7/1/2019 | 2980.38 |
| 8/1/2019 | 2926.46 |
(ii) GE:
| Date | Adj Close |
| 8/1/2015 | 22.04931 |
| 9/1/2015 | 21.37927 |
| ######## | 24.7352 |
| ######## | 25.60761 |
| ######## | 26.64251 |
| 1/1/2016 | 25.07532 |
| 2/1/2016 | 25.10978 |
| 3/1/2016 | 27.61257 |
| 4/1/2016 | 26.70923 |
| 5/1/2016 | 26.25756 |
| 6/1/2016 | 27.3433 |
| 7/1/2016 | 27.25289 |
| 8/1/2016 | 27.34041 |
| 9/1/2016 | 25.92262 |
| ######## | 25.66629 |
| ######## | 27.13042 |
| ######## | 27.8713 |
| 1/1/2017 | 26.39264 |
| 2/1/2017 | 26.49039 |
| 3/1/2017 | 26.69272 |
| 4/1/2017 | 25.96718 |
| 5/1/2017 | 24.52506 |
| 6/1/2017 | 24.19364 |
| 7/1/2017 | 23.33439 |
| 8/1/2017 | 22.36858 |
| 9/1/2017 | 22.03145 |
| ######## | 18.55219 |
| ######## | 16.83133 |
| ######## | 16.05832 |
| 1/1/2018 | 15.08917 |
| 2/1/2018 | 13.16687 |
| 3/1/2018 | 12.68307 |
| 4/1/2018 | 13.23819 |
| 5/1/2018 | 13.2476 |
| 6/1/2018 | 12.80539 |
| 7/1/2018 | 12.93803 |
| 8/1/2018 | 12.28306 |
| 9/1/2018 | 10.71682 |
| ######## | 9.678614 |
| ######## | 7.187089 |
| ######## | 7.254169 |
| 1/1/2019 | 9.74951 |
| 2/1/2019 | 10.36903 |
| 3/1/2019 | 9.969832 |
| 4/1/2019 | 10.16022 |
| 5/1/2019 | 9.430923 |
| 6/1/2019 | 10.4899 |
| 7/1/2019 | 10.45 |
| 8/1/2019 | 8.25 |
In: Finance
Jensen and Meckling (1976) refers to the costs that arise due to the use of an agent by a principal in an agency relationship as agency cost. These costs include (1) the costs of opportunistic behaviour by the agent (such as when the agent places his own self-interest over that of the principal’s), (2) the costs to the principal of monitoring the agent; and (3) the “bonding” costs incurred by the agent to induce the principal to rely on it. Nonetheless, the opportunistic behaviour of the agent may work in the favour of principal when the agent contracts with other parties such as debtholder. This phenomenon has been explained as the agency cost of debt (Kim and Sorenson, 1986). Furthermore, Coffee, Jackson, Mitts and Bishop (2018) extend the agency cost argument to the relationship between the different types of shareholders associated with modern corporations. Specifically, Coffee et al., (2018) find that there is the tendency for strong and powerful shareholders to exploit less powerful shareholders. These empirical evidences suggest that any investor may be susceptible to some form of exploitation as result of the agency relationship and its associated agency problem.
Critically examine the following scenarios and state with explanation;
Whether an investor has a high, medium or low level of agency cost
The type of agency cost likely to be assume an investor
The type of corporate governance mechanism which would be appropriate in addressing the type of agency cost
Note: the following scenarios are independent of each other.
SCENARIO ONE
ABC Ltd, an Australian based firm is a large manufacturing firms with 25 subsidiaries which operates from different part of the world. On 30th July 2018, Birim Equity fund acquired an additional 25% of shares of ABC Ltd resulting in its total shareholding of 48%. The Herald Sun in its business segment described the acquisition as one which makes Birim Equity a dominant shareholder. How would this situation affect agency cost for prospective investor if
Birim Equity is separated from management
Birim Equity is not separated from management
SCENARIO TWO
Michael Bloomberg, a recent graduate of La Trobe University received $0.5 million cash as his inheritance after the death of his father. Michael has decided to invest his wealth in a listed firm which characterised by many shareholders with each shareholder having a small amount of shares
SCENARIO THREE
Tori, a small-time investor, has decided to invest in Dada PLC. Dada PLC has a large bank loan on its books.
Please use the following papers to critically examine the scenarios:
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Kim, W. S., & Sorensen, E. H. (1986). Evidence on the impact of the agency costs of debt on corporate debt policy. Journal of Financial and quantitative analysis, 21(2), 131-144.
Coffee, J. C., Jackson, R. J., Mitts, J., & Bishop, R. (2018). Activist Directors and Agency Costs: What Happens When an Activist Director Goes on the Board?
Required Length: 500 words excluding the references.
Marking criteria
Marks will be allocated to:
Clear and concise discussion of the key points
Relevance to the topic and evidence of wide reading/research
Presentation – format, spelling, vocabulary, readability
Appropriate referencing, including in-text referencing and a reference listStudents may follow either:
Harvard referencing style or ;
APA 6 referencing style
In: Accounting
The CPI is 110 on January 1, 2018, and 114 on January 1, 2019. John’s nominal wage is $1,000 per month on January 1, 2018, and $1,100 per month on January 1, 2019.
In: Economics
Duluth Ranch, Inc. purchased a machine on January 1, 2018. The
cost of the machine was $30,500. Its estimated residual value was
$9,500 at the end of an estimated 5-year life. The company expects
to produce a total of 10,000 units. The company produced 1,150
units in 2018 and 1,600 units in 2019.
Required:
a. Calculate depreciation expense for 2018 and 2019 using the straight-line method.
b. Calculate the depreciation expense for 2018 and 2019 using the units-of-production method.
c. Calculate depreciation expense for 2018 through 2022 using the double-declining balance method.
In: Accounting
Cussatt Construction Company had a contract starting April 2018, to construct a $48,000,000 building that is expected to be completed in September 2020, at an estimated cost of $44,000,000. At the end of 2018, the costs to date were $20,240,000 and the estimated total costs to complete had not changed. The progress billings during 2018 were $4,800,000 and the cash collected during 2018 was $6,400,000. Cussatt uses the percentage-of-completion method. For the year ended December 31, 2018, Cussatt would recognize gross profit on the building of: A) $ 1,840,000 B) $ 1,686,666 C) $ 2,160,000 D) $ 0
In: Accounting
Duluth Ranch, Inc. purchased a machine on January 1, 2018. The
cost of the machine was $32,000. Its estimated residual value was
$10,000 at the end of an estimated 5-year life. The company expects
to produce a total of 20,000 units. The company produced 1,200
units in 2018 and 1,650 units in 2019.
Required:
In: Accounting
Duluth Ranch, Inc. purchased a machine on January 1, 2018. The
cost of the machine was $38,000. Its estimated residual value was
$12,000 at the end of an estimated 5-year life. The company expects
to produce a total of 20,000 units. The company produced 1,400
units in 2018 and 1,850 units in 2019.
Required:
Calculate depreciation expense for 2018 and 2019 using the straight-line method.
Calculate the depreciation expense for 2018 and 2019 using the units-of-production method.
Calculate depreciation expense for 2018 through 2022 using the double-declining balance method.
In: Accounting
On January 1, 2018, Dreamworld Co. began construction of a new warehouse. The building was finished and ready for use on September 30, 2019. Expenditures on the project were as follows:
|
January 1, 2018 |
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
September 1, 2018 |
$ |
450,000 |
|
|
December 31, 2018 |
$ |
450,000 |
|
|
March 31, 2019 |
$ |
450,000 |
Dreamworld had the following debt obligations outstanding during both years:
Construction loan, 10% $500,000
Long-term note, 12% $2,500,000
Required: What would Dreamworld's capitalized interest be in 2018?
|
$50,000 |
||
|
None of the above |
||
|
$134,000 |
||
|
$45,000 |
||
|
$52,500 |
In: Finance
1)The trial balance for unearned compensation for 2018 is 15,000 and 2019 is 5,000. What would the journal entry look like for this problem?
2)The trial balance for land in 2018 is 100,000 and 2019 is 232,000. What would the journal entry look like for this problem if it is paid with cash?
3)The trial balance for Plant Assets in 2018 is 555,000 and 2019 is 783,072. What would the journal entry look like for this problem if the
trial balance reports A/D of 250,000 in 2018 and in 2019 is 275,000? There is also a trial balance in 2018 of 70,000 and in 2019 of 238,072 for Notes Payable.
In: Accounting
The profit before tax, as reported in the Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income of Diamond Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2019, amounted to $50,000 including the following revenue and expense items.
|
June 2019 |
|
|---|---|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest revenue |
4,000 |
|
Bad debts expense |
4,000 |
|
Depreciation expense - plant |
5,000 |
|
Annual Leave Expense |
3,000 |
|
Long service leave expense |
2,500 |
|
Fines and Penalties (non-deductible) |
600 |
|
Depreciation expense - buildings (non-deductible) |
1,000 |
|
Government grant (exempt from tax) |
3,000 |
The Statement of Financial Position of the company at 30 June 2019 showed the following assets and liabilities.
|
2019 |
2018 |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Assets |
$ |
$ |
|
Cash |
7,000 |
5,500 |
|
Accounts receivables |
55,000 |
42,000 |
|
Allowance for doubtful debts |
(6,500) |
(3,000) |
|
Inventory |
17,000 |
15,500 |
|
Interest Receivable |
3,000 |
6,000 |
|
Plant |
70,000 |
70,000 |
|
Accumulated Depreciation - Plant |
(36,000) |
(31,000) |
|
Buildings |
40,000 |
40,000 |
|
Accumulated Depreciation – Buildings |
(16,000) |
(15,000) |
|
Deferred Tax Asset |
? |
1,200 |
|
Liabilities |
||
|
Accounts Payable |
29,000 |
26,000 |
|
Provision for long service leave |
7,000 |
4,500 |
|
Provision for annual leave |
7,500 |
7,000 |
|
Deferred Tax Liability |
? |
2,500 |
Additional information
· Accumulated depreciation of plant for tax purposes was $42,000 at 30 June 2019, and depreciation for tax purposes for the year ended 30 June 2019 amounted to $7,000.
· The tax rate is 30%.
Required
In: Accounting