Questions
Refer to the Baseball 2016 data, which reports information on the 2016 Major League Baseball season....

Refer to the Baseball 2016 data, which reports information on the 2016 Major League Baseball season. Let attendance be the dependent variable and total team salary be the independent variable. Determine the regression equation and answer the following questions.

Draw a scatter diagram. From the diagram, does there seem to be a direct relationship between the two variables?

What is the expected attendance for a team with a salary of $100.0 million?

If the owners pay an additional $30 million, how many more people could they expect to attend?

At the .05 significance level, can we conclude that the slope of the regression line is positive? Conduct the appropriate test of hypothesis.

What percentage of the variation in attendance is accounted for by salary?

Determine the correlation between attendance and team batting average and between attendance and team ERA. Which is stronger? Conduct an appropriate test of hypothesis for each set of variables.

Show all work in Excel

Team League Year Opened Team Salary Attendance Wins ERA BA HR Year Average salary
Arizona National 1998 65.80 2080145 79 4.04 0.264 154 2000 1988034
Atlanta National 1996 89.60 2001392 67 4.41 0.251 100 2001 2264403
Baltimore American 1992 118.90 2281202 81 4.05 0.250 217 2002 2383235
Boston American 1912 168.70 2880694 78 4.31 0.265 161 2003 2555476
Chicago Cubs National 1914 117.20 2959812 97 3.36 0.244 171 2004 2486609
Chicago Sox American 1991 110.70 1755810 76 3.98 0.250 136 2005 2632655
Cincinnati National 2003 117.70 2419506 64 4.33 0.248 167 2006 2866544
Cleveland American 1994 87.70 1388905 81 3.67 0.256 141 2007 2944556
Colorado National 1995 98.30 2506789 68 5.04 0.265 186 2008 3154845
Detroit American 2000 172.80 2726048 74 4.64 0.270 151 2009 3240206
Houston American 2000 69.10 2153585 86 3.57 0.250 230 2010 3297828
Kansas City American 1973 112.90 2708549 95 3.73 0.269 139 2011 3305393
LA Angels American 1966 146.40 3012765 85 3.94 0.246 176 2012 3440000
LA Dodgers National 1962 230.40 3764815 92 3.44 0.250 187 2013 3650000
Miami National 2012 84.60 1752235 71 4.02 0.260 120 2014 3950000
Milwaukee National 2001 98.70 2542558 68 4.28 0.251 145 2015 4250000
Minnesota American 2010 108.30 2220054 83 4.07 0.247 156
NY Mets National 2009 100.10 2569753 90 3.43 0.244 177
NY Yankees American 2009 213.50 3193795 87 4.05 0.251 212
Oakland American 1966 80.80 1768175 68 4.14 0.251 146
Philadelphia National 2004 133.00 1831080 63 4.69 0.249 130
Pittsburgh National 2001 85.90 2498596 98 3.21 0.260 140
San Diego National 2004 126.60 2459742 74 4.09 0.243 148
San Francisco National 2000 166.50 3375882 84 3.72 0.267 136
Seattle American 1999 123.20 2193581 76 4.16 0.249 198
St. Louis National 2006 120.30 3520889 100 2.94 0.253 137
Tampa Bay American 1990 74.80 1287054 80 3.74 0.252 167
Texas American 1994 144.80 2491875 88 4.24 0.257 172
Toronto American 1989 116.40 2794891 93 3.8 0.269 232
Washington National 2008 174.50 2619843 83 3.62 0.251 177

In: Math

Jamie and Cecilia Reyes are husband and wife and file a joint return. They live at...

Jamie and Cecilia Reyes are husband and wife and file a joint return. They live at 5677 Apple Cove Road, Boise ID 83722. Jaime’s social security number is 412-34-5670 (date of birth 6/15/1969) and Cecilia’s is 412-34-5671 (date of birth 4/12/1971). They provide more than half of the support of their daughter, Carmen (age 23). Social security number 412-34-5672. (date of birth 9/1/1995), who is a full-time veterinarian school student. Carmen received a $3,200 scholarship covering her room and board at college. She was not required to perform any services to receive the scholarship. Jaime and Cecilia furnish all of the support of Maria (Jamie’s grandmother), Social Security number 412-34-5673 (date of birth 11/6/1948), who is age 70 and lives in a nursing home. They also have a son, Gustavo (age 4), social security number 412-34-5674 (date of birth 3/14/2014). The Reyes and all of their dependents had qualifying health care coverage at all time during the tax year.

Jaime’s W-2 contained the following information:

Federal Wages (box 1) = $145,625.00

Federal W/H (box 2) = $ 16,112.25

Social Security wages (box 3) = $128,400.00

Social Security W/H (box 4) = $7,960.80

Medicare Wages (box 5) = $145,625.00

Medicare W/H (box 6) = $2,111.56

State Wages (box 16) = $145,625.00

State W/H (box 17) = $5.435.00

Other receipts for the couple were as follows:

Dividends (all qualified dividends) $2,500

Interest Income:

Union Bank $ 220

State of Idaho – Interest on tax refund $22

City of Boise School bonds $1,250

Interest from U.S savings bonds $410 (not used for educational purposes)

2017 federal income tax refund received in 2018 $2,007

2017 state income tax refund received in 2018 $218

Idaho lottery winnings $1,100

Casino slot machine winnings $2,250

Gambling losses at casino $6,500

Other information that the Reyeses provided for the 2018 tax year:

Mortgage interest on personal residence $11,081

Loan interest on fully equipped motor home $3,010

Doctor’s fee for a face lift for Mr. Reyes $8,800

Dentist’s fee for a new dental bridge for Mr. Reyes $3,500

Vitamins for the entire family $110

Real estate property taxes paid $5,025

DMV fees on motor home (tax portion) $1,044

DMV fees on family autos (tax portion) $436

Doctor’s bills for grandmother $2,960

Nursing Home for grandmother $10,200

Wheelchair for grandmother $1,030

Property Taxes on boat $134

Interest on personal credit card $550

Interest on loan to buy public school district bonds $270

Cash contributions to church (all contributions)    $6,100

Were in cash and none more than $250 at any one time)

Cash contribution to man at bottom of freeway off-ramp    $25

Contribution of furniture to Goodwill -cost basis    $4,000

Contribution of same furniture to listed above Goodwill -Fair market Value $410

Tax Return preparation fee for 2017 taxes $625

Required

Prepare a Form 1040 and appropriates schedules, Schedule A and Schedule B for the completion of the Reyes’s tax return. They do not want to contribute to the Presidential election campaign and do not want anyone to be a third-party designee. For any missing information, make reasonable assumptions. They had qualifying health coverage at all times during the year.

In: Accounting

WG is one of the world’s leading makers of mobile phones, with market share of approximately...

WG is one of the world’s leading makers of mobile phones, with market share of approximately 20%.Unlike any of its major competitors, it is based in Narnia, a high-cost, developed country. Narnia has very limited natural resources, but has developed significant expertise over the decades in high-end precision engineering and efficient use of materials. WG is quoted on the Narnian stock exchange, where it is the largest company by market capitalisation. It has a wide shareholder base including most Narnian

institutional investors and private individuals. Its largest three shareholders are institutions who each own around 2% of the company.WG was founded in the 1960s to make telephone equipment and in the 1990s managers made a strategic decision to focus on the then-tiny mobile phone market. This was partly attributable to the Narnian government being among the first to fully deregulate their telecoms market, which lead to lower call costs. Narnia and its neighbouring countries are also fairly rural, and its populations were enthusiastic early adopters of mobile phones. WG was given a particular boost in 1995 when the transmission standard they had pioneered was adopted as the basis for calls by the government in Narnia and many other governments around the world.

Serving a rapidly growing market, WG quickly gained economies of scale that allowed cheaper production than competitors emerging later. WG then exploited these to open up export markets all over the world,enhancing their advantage further.

Unlike many of its competitors, who subcontract their manufacturing to others, WG assembles most of its own handsets. Its factories are mostly in Narnia, where it benefits from the highly educated population and the presence of high-quality local suppliers to carry out increasingly high-tech manufacturing processes. Narnia has very good communication links, which helps suppliers to deliver rapidly.

Technology is advancing all the time and WG regularly launches new, more sophisticated devices, most recently a suite of smartphones. However, the fastest-growing demand is for cheaper, basic models which just carry out voice calls and text messaging. This demand is driven by users in developing countries, who are concerned to keep costs down, but also want the status of using a well-known brand such as WG. WG has invested significant resources in building up a local sales presence in these markets, which allows it to spot trends and produce phones tailored to local tastes and languages.

Competition in the industry is intense, and has become more so due to a recent global economic downturn. The Narnian government has also announced new anti-pollution measures that will result in large-scale manufacturers having to pay more than previously to dispose of their waste products. Shortly afterwards, WG announced that they will increase the proportion of handsets manufactured in lower-cost countries from 15% to 40% over the next three years. Component manufacturers announced plans to follow them to the new locations. This will involve cutting over 1,000 jobs in Narnia. A spokesman for the

Narnian government called the decision “disappointing”. A trade union official said,

“WG has increasingly been putting pressure on its suppliers to lower costs and respond more quickly to market fluctuations. This has made it unprofitable for them to operate in Narnia and lead to decisions like this”.

Required: (a) Analyse WG’s environment using two appropriate models SWOT , 5 forces of Porter

(b) Discuss the main stakeholders in WG and how management could try to retain their support as it seeks to reduce costs.

In: Operations Management

The Boys of Summer Which baseball league has had the best hitters? Many of us have...

The Boys of Summer

Which baseball league has had the best hitters? Many of us have heard of baseball greats like Stan Musial, Hank Aaron, Roberto Clemente, and Pete Rose of the National League and Ty Cobb, Babe Ruth, Ted Williams, Rod Carew, and Wade Boggs of the American League. But have you ever heard of Willie Keeler, who batted .432 for the Baltimore Orioles, or Nap Lajoie, who batted .422 for the Philadelphia A’s? The batting averages for the batting champions of the National and American Leagues are given on the CourseMate Web site.

The batting averages for the National League begin in 1876 with Roscoe Barnes, whose batting average was .403 when he played with the Chicago Cubs. The last entry for the National League is for the year 2010, when Carlos Gonzalez of the Colorado Rockies averaged .336. The American League records begin in 1901 with Nap Lajoie of the Philadelphia A’s, who batted .422, and end in 2010 with Josh Hamilton of the Texas Rangers, who batted .359. How can we summarize the information in this data set?

Questions to be answered in your report –

1. Use MS Excel, MINITAB, or another statistical software package to describe the bat- ting averages for the American and National League batting champions. Generate any graphics that may help you in interpreting these data sets.
2. Does one league appear to have a higher percentage of hits than the other? Do the batting averages of one league appear to be more variable than the other?
3. Are there any outliers in either league?
4. Summarize your comparison of the two baseball leagues.

LEAGUE YEAR AVERAGE
0 1876 0.403
0 1877 0.385
0 1878 0.356
0 1879 0.407
0 1880 0.365
0 1881 0.399
0 1882 0.367
0 1883 0.371
0 1884 0.35
0 1885 0.371
0 1886 0.388
0 1887 0.421
0 1888 0.343
0 1889 0.373
0 1890 0.336
0 1891 0.338
0 1892 0.335
0 1893 0.378
0 1894 0.438
0 1895 0.423
0 1896 0.41
0 1897 0.432
0 1898 0.379
0 1899 0.408
0 1900 0.38
0 1901 0.382
0 1902 0.357
0 1903 0.355
0 1904 0.349
0 1905 0.377
0 1906 0.339
0 1907 0.35
0 1908 0.354
0 1909 0.339
0 1910 0.331
0 1911 0.334
0 1912 0.372
0 1913 0.35
0 1914 0.329
0 1915 0.32
0 1916 0.339
0 1917 0.341
0 1918 0.335
0 1919 0.321
0 1920 0.37
0 1921 0.397
0 1922 0.401
0 1923 0.384
0 1924 0.424
0 1925 0.403
0 1926 0.353
0 1927 0.38
0 1928 0.387
0 1929 0.398
0 1930 0.401
0 1931 0.349
0 1932 0.368
0 1933 0.368
0 1934 0.362
0 1935 0.385
0 1936 0.373
0 1937 0.374
0 1938 0.342
0 1939 0.349
0 1940 0.355
0 1941 0.343
0 1942 0.33
0 1943 0.357
0 1944 0.357
0 1945 0.355
0 1946 0.365
0 1947 0.363
0 1948 0.376
0 1949 0.342
0 1950 0.346
0 1951 0.355
0 1952 0.336
0 1953 0.344
0 1954 0.345
0 1955 0.338
0 1956 0.328
0 1957 0.351
0 1958 0.35
0 1959 0.355
0 1960 0.325
0 1961 0.351
0 1962 0.346
0 1963 0.326
0 1964 0.339
0 1965 0.329
0 1966 0.342
0 1967 0.357
0 1968 0.335
0 1969 0.348
0 1970 0.366
0 1971 0.363
0 1972 0.333
0 1973 0.338
0 1974 0.353
0 1975 0.354
0 1976 0.339
0 1977 0.338
0 1978 0.334
0 1979 0.344
0 1980 0.324
0 1981 0.341
0 1982 0.331
0 1983 0.323
0 1984 0.351
0 1985 0.353
0 1986 0.334
0 1987 0.37
0 1988 0.313
0 1989 0.336
0 1990 0.335
0 1991 0.319
0 1992 0.33
0 1993 0.37
0 1994 0.394
0 1995 0.368
0 1996 0.353
0 1997 0.372
0 1998 0.363
0 1999 0.379
0 2000 0.372
0 2001 0.35
0 2002 0.37
0 2003 0.359
0 2004 0.362
0 2005 0.335
0 2006 0.344
1 1901 0.422
1 1902 0.376
1 1903 0.355
1 1904 0.381
1 1905 0.306
1 1906 0.358
1 1907 0.35
1 1908 0.324
1 1909 0.377
1 1910 0.385
1 1911 0.42
1 1912 0.41
1 1913 0.39
1 1914 0.368
1 1915 0.37
1 1916 0.386
1 1917 0.383
1 1918 0.382
1 1919 0.407
1 1920 0.407
1 1921 0.394
1 1922 0.42
1 1923 0.403
1 1924 0.378
1 1925 0.393
1 1926 0.377
1 1927 0.398
1 1928 0.379
1 1929 0.369
1 1930 0.381
1 1931 0.39
1 1932 0.367
1 1933 0.356
1 1934 0.363
1 1935 0.349
1 1936 0.388
1 1937 0.371
1 1938 0.349
1 1939 0.381
1 1940 0.352
1 1941 0.406
1 1942 0.356
1 1943 0.328
1 1944 0.327
1 1945 0.309
1 1946 0.352
1 1947 0.343
1 1948 0.369
1 1949 0.343
1 1950 0.354
1 1951 0.344
1 1952 0.327
1 1953 0.337
1 1954 0.341
1 1955 0.34
1 1956 0.353
1 1957 0.388
1 1958 0.328
1 1959 0.353
1 1960 0.32
1 1961 0.361
1 1962 0.326
1 1963 0.321
1 1964 0.323
1 1965 0.321
1 1966 0.316
1 1967 0.326
1 1968 0.301
1 1969 0.332
1 1970 0.329
1 1971 0.337
1 1972 0.318
1 1973 0.35
1 1974 0.364
1 1975 0.359
1 1976 0.333
1 1977 0.388
1 1978 0.333
1 1979 0.333
1 1980 0.39
1 1981 0.336
1 1982 0.332
1 1983 0.361
1 1984 0.343
1 1985 0.368
1 1986 0.357
1 1987 0.363
1 1988 0.366
1 1989 0.339
1 1990 0.329
1 1991 0.341
1 1992 0.343
1 1993 0.363
1 1994 0.359
1 1995 0.356
1 1996 0.358
1 1997 0.347
1 1998 0.339
1 1999 0.357
1 2000 0.372
1 2001 0.35
1 2002 0.349
1 2003 0.326
1 2004 0.372
1 2005 0.331
1 2006 0.347

In: Statistics and Probability

Cisco Income Statements 2002 2001 2000 Sales 18,915 22,293 18,928 Cost of sales, reported 6,902 11,221...

Cisco Income Statements
2002 2001 2000
Sales 18,915 22,293 18,928
Cost of sales, reported 6,902 11,221 6,746
Gross margin 12,013 11,072 12,182
R&D 3,448 3,922 2,704
Sales and marketing 4,264 5,296 3,946
General and administrative 618 778 633
Restructuring charges --- 1,170 ---
Amortization of good will 690 154
Amortization of intagible assets 699 365 137
In-process R&D 65 855 1,373
total operating expenses 9,094 13,076 8,947
operating income from sales, before tax 2,919 -   (2,004) -   3,235
Investment income (209) 1,130 1,108
Income before tax 2,710 (874) 4,343
Taxes 817 140 1,675
Net income 1,893 -   (1,014) -   2,668
Cisco Balance Sheets
Assets 2002 2001 2000 1999
Current Assets:
Working Cash 9,484 4,873 4,234 913
Short-term investments 3,172 2,034 1,291 1,189
Accounts Receivable 1,105 1466 2299 1250
Inventories 880 1684 1232 658
Deferred tax assets 2,030 1809 1091 580
Lease receivables 239 405 -   -  
Prepaid expenses 523 564 963 171
total current assets 17,433 12,835 11,110 4,761
investments 8,800 10,346 13,688 7,032
restricted investments 1,264 1,286 1,080
Property and equipment 4,102 2,591 1,426 825
Goodwill 3,565 3,189 2,937 157
Lease receivables 39 253 527 500
Purchased intangibles 797 1,470 1,150 303
Other assets 3,059 3,290 746 235
Total assets 37,795 35,238 32,870 14,893
Liabilities
Current
Accounts payable 470 644 739 374
Income tax payable 579 241 233 630
Accrued compensation 1,365 1,058 1,317 679
Deferred revenue 3,892 3,214 1,386 724
Other accrued liabilities 2,496 2,553 2,653 631
Restructuring liabilities 322 386 --- ---
9,124 8,096 6,328 3,038
Minority interest 15 22 45 44
Common shareholders' equity 28,656 27,120 26,497 11,811
Cash Flow
Years Ended July 27, 2002 July 28, 2001 July 29, 2000
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $1,893.00 ($1,014.00) $2,668.00
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 1,957 2,236 863
Provision for doubtful accounts 91 268 40
Provision for inventory 149 2,775 339
Deferred income taxes ($573.00) ($924.00) ($782.00)
Tax benefits from employee stock option plans 61 1,397 2,495
Adjustment to conform fiscal year ends of pooled acquisitions - - ($18.00)
In-process research and development 53 739 1,279
Net (gains) losses on investments and provision for losses 1,127 43 ($92.00)
Restructuring costs and other special charges - 501 -
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 270 569 ($1,043.00)
Inventories 673 ($1,644.00) ($887.00)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets ($28.00) ($25.00) ($249.00)
Accounts payable ($174.00) ($105.00) 286
Income taxes payable 389 ($434.00) ($365.00)
Accrued compensation 307 ($256.00) 576
Deferred revenue 678 1,629 662
Other accrued liabilities ($222.00) 251 369
Restructuring liabilities ($64.00) 386 -
Net cash provided by operating activities 6,587 6,392 6,141
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of short-term investments ($5,473.00) ($4,594.00) ($2,473.00)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investments 5,868 4,370 2,481
Purchases of investments ($15,760.00) ($18,306.00) ($14,778.00)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments 15,317 15,579 13,240
Purchases of restricted investments ($291.00) ($941.00) ($458.00)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of restricted investments 1,471 1,082 206
Acquisition of property and equipment ($2,641.00) ($2,271.00) ($1,086.00)
Purchases of technology licenses - ($4.00) ($444.00)
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash and cash equivalents 16 ($13.00) 24
Change in lease receivables, net 380 457 ($535.00)
Purchases of investments in privately held companies ($58.00) ($1,161.00) ($130.00)
Lease deposits 320 ($320.00) -
Purchase of minority interest of Cisco Systems, K.K. (Japan) ($115.00) ($365.00) -
Other 159 ($516.00) ($424.00)
Net cash used in investing activities ($807.00) ($7,003.00) ($4,377.00)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Issuance of common stock 655 1,262 1,564
Repurchase of common stock ($1,854.00) - -
Other 30 ($12.00) ($7.00)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities ($1,169.00) 1,250 1,557
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 4,611 639 3,321
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of fiscal year 4,873 4,234 913
Cash and cash equivalents, end of fiscal year $9,484.00 $4,873.00 $4,234.00

Analysis of Changes in

Profitability and Growth: Cisco Systems, Inc.

1

By any stretch of the imagination, Cisco System

s (CSCO) has been a strong growth company. A

darling of the Internet boom of

the late 1990s, it was one of the few technology companies tied to

the Internet and telecommunications

that prospered during that era.

Its products - networking and

communications equipment such as router and sw

itching devices - built the infrastructure of the

Internet. While most Internet

and telecommunications firms str

uggled and failed, their supplier,

Cisco, capitalized on the new technology. At one poi

nt in 2000, its market capitalization was over

half a trillion dollars, the largest market capitaliza

tion of any firm ever.

Its stock price increased

from $10 in 1995 to $80 in 2000, supported by sales growth from $2.0 billion in 1995 to $18.9

billion 2000.

In early 2000, Cisco’s P/E stood at 130 so investors

saw plenty of room for more earnings growth.

However, with the subsequent collapse

of the technology bubble

and the demise of

telecommunications firm such as WorldCom, Qwes

t, and AT&T, the anticipated growth failed to

materialize. Indeed, in 2001 Cisco wrote down

inventory by an astonish

ing $2.3 billion (under the

lower-of-cost-or-market rule), to reflect the dr

op in demand for its products and the emergence of

second-hand telecom equipment market.

Exhibit 1 presents Cisco’s income statements fo

r the fiscal years 2000-2002 and balance sheets for

1999-2002. The exhibit also includes

the cash flow from operations a

nd cash investing sections of

the cash flow statements. The 2000 sales of $18

.9 billion were up from $12.2 billion in 1999 and

$8.5 billion in 1998, a tremendous gr

owth record. But subsequent

sales growth was not as

impressive, as you can see, and led to declini

ng earnings. Indeed, Cisc

o posted a loss for 2001.

Lower earnings on increasing shareholders’ equity clea

rly implies that residual income is declining.

By the end of 2002, Cisco’s shares traded

at $15, well down from the 2000 high of $80.

Other information, most of the from the 10-K f

ootnotes, that was useful in reformulating the

financial statements is presented below. Note th

at the cash flow statements from Exhibit 1 are

particularly useful for identifying core income becau

se some of the items in the reconciliation of net

income to cash flow from operati

ng activities involve unusual items.

Questions:

1.

What adjustments are necessary to reformulate

the income statements and balance sheets to

properly separate financ

ing from operations?

2.

What adjustments are necessary to separate

core operations from othe

r sources of income?

What items are identified as

core in the Balance Sheet?

3.

Calculate Core RNOA and decompose the ratio for Cisco for 2002 and 2001.

In: Finance

Case Study I HAIER’s foray into International Markets : In the late 1990s, the Haier group...

Case Study I

HAIER’s foray into International Markets :

In the late 1990s, the Haier group (Haier) was the leader in the Chinese consumer appliances market (with a 39.7%, 50% and 37.1% market share in refrigerators, air-conditioners and washing machines respectively in December 1998). But deflation in the Chinese economy slowed sales.

ut deflation in the Chinese economy slowed sales growth from 50% in 1998 to around 30% in 1999. Haier decided to look for new markets. Since the US had a large demand for consumer appliances, Haier entered the US market in 1999. Analysts were doubtful about Haier's acceptability to American consumers, as there was a general perception in the US that Chinese goods were of low quality. Haier, however, was confident that with its product differentiation strategy it would be able to create a positive image for its products among the American public. In the early 2000s, the consumer appliances market in the US started hotting up as Haier entered the market. By 2009, Haier products were sold in 9 of the 10 top retail chains in the US.

With Wal-Mart agreeing to stock Haier products, many analysts believed that Haier would be able to shake up the US consumer appliances market. In 2009, Haier had a 6% market share in the US refrigerator market; it stated that it was aiming for a 15% market share by 2015.

The history of Haier dates back to 1984 when Ruimin Zhang (Zhang), a bureaucrat with the local government was asked to take charge of Qingdao General Refrigerator Factory, a state-owned enterprise that is manufacturing refrigerators for sale in China. When Zhang took over the management, the company was on the brink of bankruptcy, with no funds to pay the salaries of its employees or to invest in new product development. When Zhang took charge of the company, he realized that the company did not look after the quality of its products; nor did it bother about customer satisfaction. In 1985, Zhang started importing technology from a German firm and began manufacturing technically sophisticated refrigerators.

Zhang emphasized the elements of customer satisfaction and quality control in the company. In 1985, when a customer complained about the poor performance of his refrigerator, Zhang conducted a quality check and found that out of 400 refrigerators inspected, 76 were defective.

He had all the defective refrigerators destroyed with a sledge-hammer. According to Zhang, this made the workers realize that quality is of only two types - acceptable and unacceptable. In 1989, the company changed its name to Qindao Refrigerator Co. Ltd., and it was restructured with funds raised from banks and government agencies. In 1991, the company once again changed its name to Qindao Haier Group Co. and in the same year it merged with Qingdao Air-conditioner Plant and Qingdao Freezer General Plant. In 1992, the company set up Qingdao Freezing Equipment Co. In the same year, it merged with another previously state-owned enterprise Qingdao Condenser Factory, which manufactured refrigerator condensers.

In the same year it became the first company in China to get ISO 9001 certification, and the company's name was changed to the Haier Group. In 1993, Haier went in for an IPO of RMB 50 million and got listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE).

During the mid-1990s, Haier began to grow through mergers and acquisitions. In 1995, it merged with Red Star Electric Appliance Company (and five of its subsidiaries). This company manufactured washing machines. It also acquired Wuhan Elec-appliance Co., which manufactured freezers and air conditioners. Between 1995 and 1997, Haier acquired seven companies and started exporting its goods to foreign markets.

By 1997, Haier was the number one consumer appliances brand in China and the market leader in all its product segments, which included refrigerators, washing machines, microwave ovens and freezers and its revenues were reported at $1.15 billion (10 billion Yuan)...

Haier's Competitors in the US Market

USA was the world's largest and most competitive market for consumer appliances. The consumer appliances market can be segmented on the basis of products into kitchen appliances and home comfort products. Included in kitchen appliances are products such as dishwashers, disposers, compactors, food preservation appliances, refrigerators, freezers etc.

In the home comfort segment are included products such as room air-conditioners and dehumidifiers. The home appliances market in the US was dominated by American companies, namely GE Appliances (a subsidiary of General Electricals), Whirlpool and Maytag. The only strong foreign player in this market was Sweden's Electrolux. GE Appliances, Whirlpool, Maytag and Electrolux together accounted for around 98% of the 9 million standard refrigerators sales in the US every year. In the 1990s, many Asian players such as LG Electronics and Samsung entered the US market in a big way. The big four companies in the US market concentrated on the high- end market comprising full-size refrigerators and washing machines, since the margins in this segment were high...

Strategies in the US Market

Haier decided to compete with the US brands on the quality plank rather than on price. However, analysts felt that it would be very difficult for the company to win over American consumers who associated Chinese goods with low quality. To strengthen its presence in the US market, Haier adopted a localization strategy.

It opened a design center in the Los Angeles and employed US designers for designing its products for the US market. Haier also opened a marketing center in New York. The company focused on enhancing consumer awareness about the company and its products. Commenting on Haier's strategy, Zhang said, "We want consumers to feel that Haier is the one company that comes closest to satisfying their needs." For instance, none of the consumer appliances companies in the US offered a compact refrigerator to satisfy demand from college students who could not afford normal size refrigerators...

Going High-End

Most analysts felt that Haier would feel the real competition only when it entered the high-end market. In the compact refrigerator segment, Haier did not face much competition from established players in the US, who did not focus on the low margin segment.

However, the major US players were keeping track of Haier's activities. Commenting on the competition from Haier, GE Appliances Chief Executive, Jim Campbell said, "I take it very seriously. They may be producing only 200,000 refrigerators per year now, but that's going to get bigger."

On the negative side, some analysts felt that Haier lacked the brand image to make a dent in the high-end segment. They pointed out that in general US consumers were brand-conscious, and this was especially true in the case of high-end products. The lack of a positive brand image in this consumer segment would probably make it difficult for Haier to succeed in the high-end markets. Analysts felt that Haier had an additional weakness in its distribution and service centers...

Future Prospects

Despite a few reservations, analysts too were, by and large, upbeat about the company because of its strong performance in breaking into the American market in a short time.

Said Nicholas Heymann of Prudential Securities, "Over five years, it could become a force." With quality products and lower prices, it was felt that Haier would be able to garner a sizeable market share in the US. Haier's experience in the geographically vast and diversified Chinese market would serve it well in catering to the US market.

However, a major worry for Haier is how to fund its expansion plans. Increasing competition in the domestic markets is bringing Haier's finances under pressure.

Questions 4:

What should be the marketing strategies that Haier should employ in Emerging Markets, Maturing Markets and Declining Markets ? Explain the reasons behind it.

In: Operations Management

Case Study I HAIER’s foray into International Markets : In the late 1990s, the Haier group...

Case Study I

HAIER’s foray into International Markets :

In the late 1990s, the Haier group (Haier) was the leader in the Chinese consumer appliances market (with a 39.7%, 50% and 37.1% market share in refrigerators, air-conditioners and washing machines respectively in December 1998). But deflation in the Chinese economy slowed sales.

ut deflation in the Chinese economy slowed sales growth from 50% in 1998 to around 30% in 1999. Haier decided to look for new markets. Since the US had a large demand for consumer appliances, Haier entered the US market in 1999. Analysts were doubtful about Haier's acceptability to American consumers, as there was a general perception in the US that Chinese goods were of low quality. Haier, however, was confident that with its product differentiation strategy it would be able to create a positive image for its products among the American public. In the early 2000s, the consumer appliances market in the US started hotting up as Haier entered the market. By 2009, Haier products were sold in 9 of the 10 top retail chains in the US.

With Wal-Mart agreeing to stock Haier products, many analysts believed that Haier would be able to shake up the US consumer appliances market. In 2009, Haier had a 6% market share in the US refrigerator market; it stated that it was aiming for a 15% market share by 2015.

The history of Haier dates back to 1984 when Ruimin Zhang (Zhang), a bureaucrat with the local government was asked to take charge of Qingdao General Refrigerator Factory, a state-owned enterprise that is manufacturing refrigerators for sale in China. When Zhang took over the management, the company was on the brink of bankruptcy, with no funds to pay the salaries of its employees or to invest in new product development. When Zhang took charge of the company, he realized that the company did not look after the quality of its products; nor did it bother about customer satisfaction. In 1985, Zhang started importing technology from a German firm and began manufacturing technically sophisticated refrigerators.

Zhang emphasized the elements of customer satisfaction and quality control in the company. In 1985, when a customer complained about the poor performance of his refrigerator, Zhang conducted a quality check and found that out of 400 refrigerators inspected, 76 were defective.

He had all the defective refrigerators destroyed with a sledge-hammer. According to Zhang, this made the workers realize that quality is of only two types - acceptable and unacceptable. In 1989, the company changed its name to Qindao Refrigerator Co. Ltd., and it was restructured with funds raised from banks and government agencies. In 1991, the company once again changed its name to Qindao Haier Group Co. and in the same year it merged with Qingdao Air-conditioner Plant and Qingdao Freezer General Plant. In 1992, the company set up Qingdao Freezing Equipment Co. In the same year, it merged with another previously state-owned enterprise Qingdao Condenser Factory, which manufactured refrigerator condensers.

In the same year it became the first company in China to get ISO 9001 certification, and the company's name was changed to the Haier Group. In 1993, Haier went in for an IPO of RMB 50 million and got listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE).

During the mid-1990s, Haier began to grow through mergers and acquisitions. In 1995, it merged with Red Star Electric Appliance Company (and five of its subsidiaries). This company manufactured washing machines. It also acquired Wuhan Elec-appliance Co., which manufactured freezers and air conditioners. Between 1995 and 1997, Haier acquired seven companies and started exporting its goods to foreign markets.

By 1997, Haier was the number one consumer appliances brand in China and the market leader in all its product segments, which included refrigerators, washing machines, microwave ovens and freezers and its revenues were reported at $1.15 billion (10 billion Yuan)...

Haier's Competitors in the US Market

USA was the world's largest and most competitive market for consumer appliances. The consumer appliances market can be segmented on the basis of products into kitchen appliances and home comfort products. Included in kitchen appliances are products such as dishwashers, disposers, compactors, food preservation appliances, refrigerators, freezers etc.

In the home comfort segment are included products such as room air-conditioners and dehumidifiers. The home appliances market in the US was dominated by American companies, namely GE Appliances (a subsidiary of General Electricals), Whirlpool and Maytag. The only strong foreign player in this market was Sweden's Electrolux. GE Appliances, Whirlpool, Maytag and Electrolux together accounted for around 98% of the 9 million standard refrigerators sales in the US every year. In the 1990s, many Asian players such as LG Electronics and Samsung entered the US market in a big way. The big four companies in the US market concentrated on the high- end market comprising full-size refrigerators and washing machines, since the margins in this segment were high...

Strategies in the US Market

Haier decided to compete with the US brands on the quality plank rather than on price. However, analysts felt that it would be very difficult for the company to win over American consumers who associated Chinese goods with low quality. To strengthen its presence in the US market, Haier adopted a localization strategy.

It opened a design center in the Los Angeles and employed US designers for designing its products for the US market. Haier also opened a marketing center in New York. The company focused on enhancing consumer awareness about the company and its products. Commenting on Haier's strategy, Zhang said, "We want consumers to feel that Haier is the one company that comes closest to satisfying their needs." For instance, none of the consumer appliances companies in the US offered a compact refrigerator to satisfy demand from college students who could not afford normal size refrigerators...

Going High-End

Most analysts felt that Haier would feel the real competition only when it entered the high-end market. In the compact refrigerator segment, Haier did not face much competition from established players in the US, who did not focus on the low margin segment.

However, the major US players were keeping track of Haier's activities. Commenting on the competition from Haier, GE Appliances Chief Executive, Jim Campbell said, "I take it very seriously. They may be producing only 200,000 refrigerators per year now, but that's going to get bigger."

On the negative side, some analysts felt that Haier lacked the brand image to make a dent in the high-end segment. They pointed out that in general US consumers were brand-conscious, and this was especially true in the case of high-end products. The lack of a positive brand image in this consumer segment would probably make it difficult for Haier to succeed in the high-end markets. Analysts felt that Haier had an additional weakness in its distribution and service centers...

Future Prospects

Despite a few reservations, analysts too were, by and large, upbeat about the company because of its strong performance in breaking into the American market in a short time.

Said Nicholas Heymann of Prudential Securities, "Over five years, it could become a force." With quality products and lower prices, it was felt that Haier would be able to garner a sizeable market share in the US. Haier's experience in the geographically vast and diversified Chinese market would serve it well in catering to the US market.

However, a major worry for Haier is how to fund its expansion plans. Increasing competition in the domestic markets is bringing Haier's finances under pressure.

Questions 2:

Is it possible for an organization like Haier to sustain its competition in brand conscious and quality conscious markets such as US and other countries?

Questions 3:

What are the countries that you would suggest Haier should concentrate upon? Why?

In: Operations Management

Read the case below and answer the questions that follow. P&G's Joy Makes an Unlikely Splash...

Read the case below and answer the questions that follow. P&G's Joy Makes an Unlikely Splash in Japan Anyone who thinks Japan doesn't offer opportunities for U.S consumer products should look at how quickly Procter & Gamble Co. has cleaned up in the country's dish-soap market. Until 1995, P&G, didn't sell dish soap in Japan at all. A few years later, it had Japans best-selling brand, Joy, which commanded a fifth of the nation's $400 million dish- soap market. That's astounding progress, given that the market had appeared to be classically "mature"-both shrinking and dominated by giant Japanese companies. "Joy surprised us all," says Tatsuo Ishii, dish-soap brand manager for one of those giants, Kao Corp. "It was brilliant." How the Cincinnati company executed its coup provides lessons that transcend the kitchen sink. One big lesson: "Mature" Japanese markets can be surprisingly complacent. P&G offered new technology, something the two incumbents hadn't bothered to do for years. It developed packaging that let stores make more money. And it spent heavily on oddball commercials that created a buzz among consumers. Joy offers "potent lessons" for foreign companies, says Hiroshi Tanaka, a marketing professor at Tokyo's Josai University. "At the least, Joy should tell you that Japan's got a lot more good opportunities for foreign companies than they might assume," he says. "Those opportunities are often disguised as unattractive markets suffering from saturation and oligopoly." Just two years ago, two powerful consumer-product concerns, Kao and Lion Corp., each controlled nearly 40% of the kitchen-soap market with several brands and had essentially declared a truce. The rest of the market was cornered by private brands at chain stores. Meanwhile, the Japanese were cooking less at home and thus buying less dish soap every year. P&G actually washed out of the Japanese kitchen detergent market during an earlier attempt. It withdrew in the late 1970s after failing to make a dent with Orange Joy, a product that it transplanted from the U.S. But by 1992, it had succeeded in marketing other products, such as Pampers, in Japan. The home office told its Japanese unit to find new markets for products in which P&G was strong elsewhere in the world. So that year P&G sent out researchers to study Japanese dish-washing rituals. They discovered one odd habit: Japanese homemakers, one after another, squirted out more detergent than needed. It was "a clear sign of frustration" with existing Japanese products, says Robert A. McDonald, head of P&G's Japanese operations. He saw the research as a sign that an "unarticulated consumer need" was more powerful soap. "We knew we had something to go after," he says.' Some P&G executives wert: concerned about entering such a mature market, says Mr. McDonald. But P&G's lab in Kobe went to work to create a highly concentrated soap formula, based on a new technology developed by the company's scientists in Europe, specifically for Japan. The first hint that Joy was a hit carne in March 1995 in the region around Hiroshima, 400 miles west of Tokyo, where P&G started test-marketing it. Four weeks into the test, Joy had become the most popular dish soap in the region with a 30% market share. P&G's marketing pitch was deceptively simple: A little bit of Joy cleans better, yet it's easier on the hands. The message hit a chord, says Ayumi Osaki, a 31-year-old homemaker who rushed off to buy Joy after seeing pilot commercials. "Grease on Tupperware, that's the toughest thing to wash off," says Ms. Osaki, a mother of three in Hiroshima. "I had to try it." Emboldened, P&G finished a nationwide introduction in March 1996, when Joy had attained a 10% market share, Three months later it had a 15% share. A year later it had 18%, and now its share is up to 20%, according to industry statistics, The results astounded even P&G. "Everybody in Japan wanted it," says P&G's Mr, McDonald. "Every retailer in Japan wanted to get his hands on Joy." Retailers clamored for Joy because P&G had built in "fat margins," explains Masaharu Kubo, a buyer for Daiei Inc" which operates 383 supermarkets in Japan, P&G had exploited a weakness in the Japanese giants' products. Their long-necked bottles wasted space, P&G's containers were compact cylinders that took less space in stores, warehouses and delivery trucks, Joy improved the efficiency of Daiei's distribution by about 40%, Kubo estimates, "Before Joy, dish soap was a sleepy category; [the containers] were bulky and took up a lot of shelf space, and their unit prices were falling every year," he says, "Joy freed up a lot of space for other products, pushed up prices of dish soaps as a whole, and gave us bigger margins, It was revolutionary." P&G's advertising binge also delighted retailers, Kubo says. To look for ideas, P&G marketers had watched more than a hundred commercials from around the world from P&G and its rivals. They settled on a documentary-style TV ad used in Britain by P&G for a laundry soap called Daz. P&G's advertising agency, Dentsu Inc. created commercials in which a famous comedian dropped in on homemakers, unannounced, with a camera crew to test Joy on the household's dirty dishes. The camera homed in on a patch of oil in a pan full If water, Then, after a drop of Joy, the oil dramatically disappeared. Japanese soap makers were alarmed by the campaign. Kao's Mr. Ishii says he ordered up research into Joy and concluded that more than 70% of Joy users began using it because of the commercials. "We had mistakenly assumed Japanese didn’t care much about grease-fighting power In dish soaps.” Mr. Ishii says. “The reality was people are eating more meat and fried food and are frustrated about grease stains on their plastic dishes and storage containers." Kao and Lion are now playing catch-up, turning out products that unabashedly mimic Joy, from its package and color (green) to its grease-fighting Technology. Successes like Joy have given P&G a change of heart about Japan, "For a long time, P&,G's approach was to dump in Japan what sells in the U.S.,” says a P&G manager who declined to be named. Now, he says, P&G generates ideas in Japan that it uses in other markets. It has begun selling Joy, for example, in the Philippines and is considering it for other Asian markets, It has also started to use a leak-free cap in the U. S. that it designed for Joy in Japan. The Japanese consumer is “among the world’s most educated and the most perceptive and articulate evaluators,: says P&G’s Mr. McDonald. “I’ve worked in a lot of countries but never been anywhere else where I can have a scientific discussion with the consumer like I can do here about dish soap.

Case Questions

1. What lessons can international marketers learn from Procter & Gamble’s experiences in Japan?

2. Identify and describe the roles of product policy, pricing, promotion and distribution in marketing Joy in Japan.

3. What lessons from Japan might benefit Procter & Gamble in other markets?

In: Operations Management

Answer all Case Study I HAIER’s foray into International Markets : In the late 1990s, the...

Answer all

Case Study I

HAIER’s foray into International Markets :

In the late 1990s, the Haier group (Haier) was the leader in the Chinese consumer appliances market (with a 39.7%, 50% and 37.1% market share in refrigerators, air-conditioners and washing machines respectively in December 1998). But deflation in the Chinese economy slowed sales.

ut deflation in the Chinese economy slowed sales growth from 50% in 1998 to around 30% in 1999. Haier decided to look for new markets. Since the US had a large demand for consumer appliances, Haier entered the US market in 1999. Analysts were doubtful about Haier's acceptability to American consumers, as there was a general perception in the US that Chinese goods were of low quality. Haier, however, was confident that with its product differentiation strategy it would be able to create a positive image for its products among the American public. In the early 2000s, the consumer appliances market in the US started hotting up as Haier entered the market. By 2009, Haier products were sold in 9 of the 10 top retail chains in the US.

With Wal-Mart agreeing to stock Haier products, many analysts believed that Haier would be able to shake up the US consumer appliances market. In 2009, Haier had a 6% market share in the US refrigerator market; it stated that it was aiming for a 15% market share by 2015.

The history of Haier dates back to 1984 when Ruimin Zhang (Zhang), a bureaucrat with the local government was asked to take charge of Qingdao General Refrigerator Factory, a state-owned enterprise that is manufacturing refrigerators for sale in China. When Zhang took over the management, the company was on the brink of bankruptcy, with no funds to pay the salaries of its employees or to invest in new product development. When Zhang took charge of the company, he realized that the company did not look after the quality of its products; nor did it bother about customer satisfaction. In 1985, Zhang started importing technology from a German firm and began manufacturing technically sophisticated refrigerators.

Zhang emphasized the elements of customer satisfaction and quality control in the company. In 1985, when a customer complained about the poor performance of his refrigerator, Zhang conducted a quality check and found that out of 400 refrigerators inspected, 76 were defective.

He had all the defective refrigerators destroyed with a sledge-hammer. According to Zhang, this made the workers realize that quality is of only two types - acceptable and unacceptable. In 1989, the company changed its name to Qindao Refrigerator Co. Ltd., and it was restructured with funds raised from banks and government agencies. In 1991, the company once again changed its name to Qindao Haier Group Co. and in the same year it merged with Qingdao Air-conditioner Plant and Qingdao Freezer General Plant. In 1992, the company set up Qingdao Freezing Equipment Co. In the same year, it merged with another previously state-owned enterprise Qingdao Condenser Factory, which manufactured refrigerator condensers.

In the same year it became the first company in China to get ISO 9001 certification, and the company's name was changed to the Haier Group. In 1993, Haier went in for an IPO of RMB 50 million and got listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE).

During the mid-1990s, Haier began to grow through mergers and acquisitions. In 1995, it merged with Red Star Electric Appliance Company (and five of its subsidiaries). This company manufactured washing machines. It also acquired Wuhan Elec-appliance Co., which manufactured freezers and air conditioners. Between 1995 and 1997, Haier acquired seven companies and started exporting its goods to foreign markets.

By 1997, Haier was the number one consumer appliances brand in China and the market leader in all its product segments, which included refrigerators, washing machines, microwave ovens and freezers and its revenues were reported at $1.15 billion (10 billion Yuan)...

Haier's Competitors in the US Market

USA was the world's largest and most competitive market for consumer appliances. The consumer appliances market can be segmented on the basis of products into kitchen appliances and home comfort products. Included in kitchen appliances are products such as dishwashers, disposers, compactors, food preservation appliances, refrigerators, freezers etc.

In the home comfort segment are included products such as room air-conditioners and dehumidifiers. The home appliances market in the US was dominated by American companies, namely GE Appliances (a subsidiary of General Electricals), Whirlpool and Maytag. The only strong foreign player in this market was Sweden's Electrolux. GE Appliances, Whirlpool, Maytag and Electrolux together accounted for around 98% of the 9 million standard refrigerators sales in the US every year. In the 1990s, many Asian players such as LG Electronics and Samsung entered the US market in a big way. The big four companies in the US market concentrated on the high- end market comprising full-size refrigerators and washing machines, since the margins in this segment were high...

Strategies in the US Market

Haier decided to compete with the US brands on the quality plank rather than on price. However, analysts felt that it would be very difficult for the company to win over American consumers who associated Chinese goods with low quality. To strengthen its presence in the US market, Haier adopted a localization strategy.

It opened a design center in the Los Angeles and employed US designers for designing its products for the US market. Haier also opened a marketing center in New York. The company focused on enhancing consumer awareness about the company and its products. Commenting on Haier's strategy, Zhang said, "We want consumers to feel that Haier is the one company that comes closest to satisfying their needs." For instance, none of the consumer appliances companies in the US offered a compact refrigerator to satisfy demand from college students who could not afford normal size refrigerators...

Going High-End

Most analysts felt that Haier would feel the real competition only when it entered the high-end market. In the compact refrigerator segment, Haier did not face much competition from established players in the US, who did not focus on the low margin segment.

However, the major US players were keeping track of Haier's activities. Commenting on the competition from Haier, GE Appliances Chief Executive, Jim Campbell said, "I take it very seriously. They may be producing only 200,000 refrigerators per year now, but that's going to get bigger."

On the negative side, some analysts felt that Haier lacked the brand image to make a dent in the high-end segment. They pointed out that in general US consumers were brand-conscious, and this was especially true in the case of high-end products. The lack of a positive brand image in this consumer segment would probably make it difficult for Haier to succeed in the high-end markets. Analysts felt that Haier had an additional weakness in its distribution and service centers...

Future Prospects

Despite a few reservations, analysts too were, by and large, upbeat about the company because of its strong performance in breaking into the American market in a short time.

Said Nicholas Heymann of Prudential Securities, "Over five years, it could become a force." With quality products and lower prices, it was felt that Haier would be able to garner a sizeable market share in the US. Haier's experience in the geographically vast and diversified Chinese market would serve it well in catering to the US market.

However, a major worry for Haier is how to fund its expansion plans. Increasing competition in the domestic markets is bringing Haier's finances under pressure.

Questions 1:

What in your opinion is the significance of an organization entering into International Markets for business? Is it advantageous or disadvantageous?

In: Operations Management

Case Study I HAIER’s foray into International Markets : In the late 1990s, the Haier group...

Case Study I

HAIER’s foray into International Markets :

In the late 1990s, the Haier group (Haier) was the leader in the Chinese consumer appliances market (with a 39.7%, 50% and 37.1% market share in refrigerators, air-conditioners and washing machines respectively in December 1998). But deflation in the Chinese economy slowed sales.

ut deflation in the Chinese economy slowed sales growth from 50% in 1998 to around 30% in 1999. Haier decided to look for new markets. Since the US had a large demand for consumer appliances, Haier entered the US market in 1999. Analysts were doubtful about Haier's acceptability to American consumers, as there was a general perception in the US that Chinese goods were of low quality. Haier, however, was confident that with its product differentiation strategy it would be able to create a positive image for its products among the American public. In the early 2000s, the consumer appliances market in the US started hotting up as Haier entered the market. By 2009, Haier products were sold in 9 of the 10 top retail chains in the US.

With Wal-Mart agreeing to stock Haier products, many analysts believed that Haier would be able to shake up the US consumer appliances market. In 2009, Haier had a 6% market share in the US refrigerator market; it stated that it was aiming for a 15% market share by 2015.

The history of Haier dates back to 1984 when Ruimin Zhang (Zhang), a bureaucrat with the local government was asked to take charge of Qingdao General Refrigerator Factory, a state-owned enterprise that is manufacturing refrigerators for sale in China. When Zhang took over the management, the company was on the brink of bankruptcy, with no funds to pay the salaries of its employees or to invest in new product development. When Zhang took charge of the company, he realized that the company did not look after the quality of its products; nor did it bother about customer satisfaction. In 1985, Zhang started importing technology from a German firm and began manufacturing technically sophisticated refrigerators.

Zhang emphasized the elements of customer satisfaction and quality control in the company. In 1985, when a customer complained about the poor performance of his refrigerator, Zhang conducted a quality check and found that out of 400 refrigerators inspected, 76 were defective.

He had all the defective refrigerators destroyed with a sledge-hammer. According to Zhang, this made the workers realize that quality is of only two types - acceptable and unacceptable. In 1989, the company changed its name to Qindao Refrigerator Co. Ltd., and it was restructured with funds raised from banks and government agencies. In 1991, the company once again changed its name to Qindao Haier Group Co. and in the same year it merged with Qingdao Air-conditioner Plant and Qingdao Freezer General Plant. In 1992, the company set up Qingdao Freezing Equipment Co. In the same year, it merged with another previously state-owned enterprise Qingdao Condenser Factory, which manufactured refrigerator condensers.

In the same year it became the first company in China to get ISO 9001 certification, and the company's name was changed to the Haier Group. In 1993, Haier went in for an IPO of RMB 50 million and got listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE).

During the mid-1990s, Haier began to grow through mergers and acquisitions. In 1995, it merged with Red Star Electric Appliance Company (and five of its subsidiaries). This company manufactured washing machines. It also acquired Wuhan Elec-appliance Co., which manufactured freezers and air conditioners. Between 1995 and 1997, Haier acquired seven companies and started exporting its goods to foreign markets.

By 1997, Haier was the number one consumer appliances brand in China and the market leader in all its product segments, which included refrigerators, washing machines, microwave ovens and freezers and its revenues were reported at $1.15 billion (10 billion Yuan)...

Haier's Competitors in the US Market

USA was the world's largest and most competitive market for consumer appliances. The consumer appliances market can be segmented on the basis of products into kitchen appliances and home comfort products. Included in kitchen appliances are products such as dishwashers, disposers, compactors, food preservation appliances, refrigerators, freezers etc.

In the home comfort segment are included products such as room air-conditioners and dehumidifiers. The home appliances market in the US was dominated by American companies, namely GE Appliances (a subsidiary of General Electricals), Whirlpool and Maytag. The only strong foreign player in this market was Sweden's Electrolux. GE Appliances, Whirlpool, Maytag and Electrolux together accounted for around 98% of the 9 million standard refrigerators sales in the US every year. In the 1990s, many Asian players such as LG Electronics and Samsung entered the US market in a big way. The big four companies in the US market concentrated on the high- end market comprising full-size refrigerators and washing machines, since the margins in this segment were high...

Strategies in the US Market

Haier decided to compete with the US brands on the quality plank rather than on price. However, analysts felt that it would be very difficult for the company to win over American consumers who associated Chinese goods with low quality. To strengthen its presence in the US market, Haier adopted a localization strategy.

It opened a design center in the Los Angeles and employed US designers for designing its products for the US market. Haier also opened a marketing center in New York. The company focused on enhancing consumer awareness about the company and its products. Commenting on Haier's strategy, Zhang said, "We want consumers to feel that Haier is the one company that comes closest to satisfying their needs." For instance, none of the consumer appliances companies in the US offered a compact refrigerator to satisfy demand from college students who could not afford normal size refrigerators...

Going High-End

Most analysts felt that Haier would feel the real competition only when it entered the high-end market. In the compact refrigerator segment, Haier did not face much competition from established players in the US, who did not focus on the low margin segment.

However, the major US players were keeping track of Haier's activities. Commenting on the competition from Haier, GE Appliances Chief Executive, Jim Campbell said, "I take it very seriously. They may be producing only 200,000 refrigerators per year now, but that's going to get bigger."

On the negative side, some analysts felt that Haier lacked the brand image to make a dent in the high-end segment. They pointed out that in general US consumers were brand-conscious, and this was especially true in the case of high-end products. The lack of a positive brand image in this consumer segment would probably make it difficult for Haier to succeed in the high-end markets. Analysts felt that Haier had an additional weakness in its distribution and service centers...

Future Prospects

Despite a few reservations, analysts too were, by and large, upbeat about the company because of its strong performance in breaking into the American market in a short time.

Said Nicholas Heymann of Prudential Securities, "Over five years, it could become a force." With quality products and lower prices, it was felt that Haier would be able to garner a sizeable market share in the US. Haier's experience in the geographically vast and diversified Chinese market would serve it well in catering to the US market.

However, a major worry for Haier is how to fund its expansion plans. Increasing competition in the domestic markets is bringing Haier's finances under pressure.

Questions 3:

What are the countries that you would suggest Haier should concentrate upon? Why?

In: Operations Management