Questions
Part 2: Transforming data and computing descriptive statistics Create a quarterly real GDP series by dividing...

Part 2: Transforming data and computing descriptive statistics

Create a quarterly real GDP series by dividing nominal GDP by the GDP deflator. Also, create a money velocity series as PY/M where P is the price level, Y is real GDP, and M is the M3 money supply measure.

a. Plot the velocity of money (produce a graph similar to Figure 8.2 on page 212 of the textbook). Has velocity risen or fallen over the sample period? b. What is the mean and standard deviation of M3 velocity?

picture from textbook: https://media.cheggcdn.com/media%2Fb3d%2Fb3d56712-5053-405f-83e0-88009e1d6240%2FphpGAezM0.png

data to be used:

observation_date MABMM301CAQ189S observation_date CANGDPDEFQISMEI Quarterly v62295562 - Gross domestic product at market prices (x 1,000,000)
1981-01-01 2.04311E+11 1981-01-01 42.69811116 Q1 1981 354,784
1981-04-01 2.07984E+11 1981-04-01 43.66104146 Q2 1981 366,788
1981-07-01 2.16848E+11 1981-07-01 44.62899825 Q3 1981 371,560
1981-10-01 2.18082E+11 1981-10-01 45.29084386 Q4 1981 375,352
1982-01-01 2.17479E+11 1982-01-01 46.60831697 Q1 1982 381,676
1982-04-01 2.19886E+11 1982-04-01 47.57980057 Q2 1982 385,140
1982-07-01 2.2233E+11 1982-07-01 48.37395895 Q3 1982 388,116
1982-10-01 2.24304E+11 1982-10-01 49.3332838 Q4 1982 392,160
1983-01-01 2.2614E+11 1983-01-01 49.71327644 Q1 1983 401,680
1983-04-01 2.24478E+11 1983-04-01 50.26292877 Q2 1983 414,192
1983-07-01 2.25279E+11 1983-07-01 51.27358864 Q3 1983 427,308
1983-10-01 2.27179E+11 1983-10-01 51.61005878 Q4 1983 435,584
1984-01-01 2.283E+11 1984-01-01 51.97043324 Q1 1984 446,148
1984-04-01 2.32617E+11 1984-04-01 52.30782428 Q2 1984 457,828
1984-07-01 2.37141E+11 1984-07-01 52.72343939 Q3 1984 463,424
1984-10-01 2.40677E+11 1984-10-01 53.04197052 Q4 1984 473,572
1985-01-01 2.44981E+11 1985-01-01 53.42486468 Q1 1985 484,236
1985-04-01 2.48915E+11 1985-04-01 54.26513634 Q2 1985 493,432
1985-07-01 2.5245E+11 1985-07-01 54.50504061 Q3 1985 501,888
1985-10-01 2.5701E+11 1985-10-01 54.84025435 Q4 1985 512,744
1986-01-01 2.64237E+11 1986-01-01 55.25634718 Q1 1986 516,520
1986-04-01 2.68411E+11 1986-04-01 55.49059389 Q2 1986 521,696
1986-07-01 2.71948E+11 1986-07-01 56.09128688 Q3 1986 528,016
1986-10-01 2.8153E+11 1986-10-01 56.87836721 Q4 1986 531,568
1987-01-01 2.91177E+11 1987-01-01 57.53317263 Q1 1987 550,140
1987-04-01 2.99965E+11 1987-04-01 58.33295861 Q2 1987 565,020
1987-07-01 3.05585E+11 1987-07-01 58.89916591 Q3 1987 579,244
1987-10-01 3.08066E+11 1987-10-01 59.55513344 Q4 1987 593,300
1988-01-01 3.12459E+11 1988-01-01 60.19836959 Q1 1988 608,480
1988-04-01 3.22487E+11 1988-04-01 60.66882712 Q2 1988 618,684
1988-07-01 3.34801E+11 1988-07-01 61.66399317 Q3 1988 628,884
1988-10-01 3.42958E+11 1988-10-01 62.46758329 Q4 1988 641,556
1989-01-01 3.51835E+11 1989-01-01 62.92301878 Q1 1989 653,604
1989-04-01 3.62677E+11 1989-04-01 63.98918575 Q2 1989 667,232
1989-07-01 3.73418E+11 1989-07-01 64.65157352 Q3 1989 676,572
1989-10-01 3.85482E+11 1989-10-01 64.99380354 Q4 1989 678,696
1990-01-01 3.95554E+11 1990-01-01 65.40531748 Q1 1990 689,404
1990-04-01 4.0366E+11 1990-04-01 66.03354097 Q2 1990 693,132
1990-07-01 4.10993E+11 1990-07-01 66.70745429 Q3 1990 695,180
1990-10-01 4.1872E+11 1990-10-01 67.22290923 Q4 1990 694,272
1991-01-01 4.27352E+11 1991-01-01 67.93588676 Q1 1991 691,484
1991-04-01 4.32806E+11 1991-04-01 68.36517541 Q2 1991 699,036
1991-07-01 4.33277E+11 1991-07-01 68.59406171 Q3 1991 702,272
1991-10-01 4.39453E+11 1991-10-01 68.66059067 Q4 1991 704,220
1992-01-01 4.45823E+11 1992-01-01 68.94091388 Q1 1992 707,560
1992-04-01 4.50337E+11 1992-04-01 69.32202186 Q2 1992 712,328
1992-07-01 4.57429E+11 1992-07-01 69.62116203 Q3 1992 719,252
1992-10-01 4.64677E+11 1992-10-01 69.77651809 Q4 1992 724,936
1993-01-01 4.70009E+11 1993-01-01 69.96565871 Q1 1993 731,528
1993-04-01 4.72942E+11 1993-04-01 70.41575784 Q2 1993 742,932
1993-07-01 4.75799E+11 1993-07-01 70.19167988 Q3 1993 747,640
1993-10-01 4.79652E+11 1993-10-01 70.70364286 Q4 1993 756,332
1994-01-01 4.8357E+11 1994-01-01 70.95633662 Q1 1994 770,204
1994-04-01 4.89883E+11 1994-04-01 70.93029423 Q2 1994 781,204
1994-07-01 5.00109E+11 1994-07-01 71.5711307 Q3 1994 798,332
1994-10-01 5.03525E+11 1994-10-01 71.94169718 Q4 1994 808,288
1995-01-01 5.07562E+11 1995-01-01 72.43909165 Q1 1995 821,384
1995-04-01 5.15417E+11 1995-04-01 72.8401001 Q2 1995 826,212
1995-07-01 5.24551E+11 1995-07-01 73.10778253 Q3 1995 830,332
1995-10-01 5.29711E+11 1995-10-01 73.48182065 Q4 1995 837,964
1996-01-01 5.39297E+11 1996-01-01 73.73975025 Q1 1996 841,428
1996-04-01 5.45922E+11 1996-04-01 73.98403847 Q2 1996 850,092
1996-07-01 5.50767E+11 1996-07-01 74.34930978 Q3 1996 861,784
1996-10-01 5.55781E+11 1996-10-01 74.87572976 Q4 1996 874,788
1997-01-01 5.65662E+11 1997-01-01 75.08368347 Q1 1997 888,792
1997-04-01 5.70634E+11 1997-04-01 74.88081067 Q2 1997 896,372
1997-07-01 5.75825E+11 1997-07-01 75.08607625 Q3 1997 909,568
1997-10-01 5.85016E+11 1997-10-01 75.29788696 Q4 1997 920,876
1998-01-01 5.88563E+11 1998-01-01 75.10463509 Q1 1998 931,392
1998-04-01 5.92121E+11 1998-04-01 75.11357127 Q2 1998 931,908
1998-07-01 5.97459E+11 1998-07-01 74.72571561 Q3 1998 935,696
1998-10-01 6.02599E+11 1998-10-01 74.87131258 Q4 1998 950,184
1999-01-01 6.02129E+11 1999-01-01 75.21325796 Q1 1999 971,824
1999-04-01 6.13187E+11 1999-04-01 76.03927032 Q2 1999 990,748
1999-07-01 6.21062E+11 1999-07-01 76.91249304 Q3 1999 1,017,736
1999-10-01 6.32911E+11 1999-10-01 77.30843557 Q4 1999 1,037,516
2000-01-01 6.48037E+11 2000-01-01 78.22530767 Q1 2000 1,066,576
2000-04-01 6.58564E+11 2000-04-01 79.42312702 Q2 2000 1,095,808
2000-07-01 6.74681E+11 2000-07-01 80.21978873 Q3 2000 1,117,980
2000-10-01 6.83844E+11 2000-10-01 80.87774982 Q4 2000 1,129,156
2001-01-01 6.93689E+11 2001-01-01 81.65841791 Q1 2001 1,145,988
2001-04-01 6.96378E+11 2001-04-01 81.65117527 Q2 2001 1,148,844
2001-07-01 7.0454E+11 2001-07-01 80.70759895 Q3 2001 1,134,708
2001-10-01 7.1682E+11 2001-10-01 80.0583262 Q4 2001 1,132,480
2002-01-01 7.29263E+11 2002-01-01 80.41861287 Q1 2002 1,154,524
2002-04-01 7.34895E+11 2002-04-01 81.83423125 Q2 2002 1,181,544
2002-07-01 7.50367E+11 2002-07-01 82.38631683 Q3 2002 1,199,908
2002-10-01 7.58437E+11 2002-10-01 83.42950962 Q4 2002 1,221,832
2003-01-01 7.61874E+11 2003-01-01 84.59159619 Q1 2003 1,245,676
2003-04-01 7.82063E+11 2003-04-01 83.87561141 Q2 2003 1,233,300
2003-07-01 7.96029E+11 2003-07-01 84.95635352 Q3 2003 1,253,900
2003-10-01 8.07003E+11 2003-10-01 85.3524376 Q4 2003 1,268,384
2004-01-01 8.30867E+11 2004-01-01 86.29841734 Q1 2004 1,291,688
2004-04-01 8.50393E+11 2004-04-01 87.39335372 Q2 2004 1,323,544
2004-07-01 8.63961E+11 2004-07-01 87.89404677 Q3 2004 1,346,952
2004-10-01 8.85819E+11 2004-10-01 88.27669893 Q4 2004 1,362,528
2005-01-01 9.14545E+11 2005-01-01 88.82847112 Q1 2005 1,375,720
2005-04-01 9.38963E+11 2005-04-01 89.42817592 Q2 2005 1,394,868
2005-07-01 9.54247E+11 2005-07-01 90.72483988 Q3 2005 1,432,508
2005-10-01 9.62155E+11 2005-10-01 91.87374486 Q4 2005 1,465,016
2006-01-01 9.81505E+11 2006-01-01 91.54859597 Q1 2006 1,471,532
2006-04-01 9.99682E+11 2006-04-01 92.42400195 Q2 2006 1,486,320
2006-07-01 1.02234E+12 2006-07-01 93.05784619 Q3 2006 1,500,672
2006-10-01 1.04904E+12 2006-10-01 93.3031751 Q4 2006 1,510,304
2007-01-01 1.07602E+12 2007-01-01 94.71213816 Q1 2007 1,543,024
2007-04-01 1.10249E+12 2007-04-01 95.59095835 Q2 2007 1,572,372
2007-07-01 1.14279E+12 2007-07-01 95.53638302 Q3 2007 1,578,004
2007-10-01 1.17806E+12 2007-10-01 96.77660407 Q4 2007 1,600,728
2008-01-01 1.21117E+12 2008-01-01 98.67959821 Q1 2008 1,633,172
2008-04-01 1.25192E+12 2008-04-01 100.7423479 Q2 2008 1,673,096
2008-07-01 1.28028E+12 2008-07-01 100.9439217 Q3 2008 1,690,428
2008-10-01 1.30447E+12 2008-10-01 97.56793201 Q4 2008 1,614,996
2009-01-01 1.29867E+12 2009-01-01 96.02749385 Q1 2009 1,553,180
2009-04-01 1.29828E+12 2009-04-01 96.54850348 Q2 2009 1,544,376
2009-07-01 1.3059E+12 2009-07-01 97.33262931 Q3 2009 1,563,964
2009-10-01 1.31498E+12 2009-10-01 98.90114935 Q4 2009 1,607,940
2010-01-01 1.32874E+12 2010-01-01 99.68889426 Q1 2010 1,640,056
2010-04-01 1.36292E+12 2010-04-01 99.73092225 Q2 2010 1,649,184
2010-07-01 1.39202E+12 2010-07-01 99.76256572 Q3 2010 1,661,488
2010-10-01 1.40577E+12 2010-10-01 100.8028477 Q4 2010 1,697,792
2011-01-01 1.43135E+12 2011-01-01 102.1875932 Q1 2011 1,733,840
2011-04-01 1.45784E+12 2011-04-01 103.2762484 Q2 2011 1,755,640
2011-07-01 1.48928E+12 2011-07-01 103.3687047 Q3 2011 1,781,600
2011-10-01 1.52151E+12 2011-10-01 104.1128451 Q4 2011 1,808,604
2012-01-01 1.55116E+12 2012-01-01 104.2014187 Q1 2012 1,810,720
2012-04-01 1.57589E+12 2012-04-01 104.0827415 Q2 2012 1,814,628
2012-07-01 1.59536E+12 2012-07-01 104.5453546 Q3 2012 1,826,288
2012-10-01 1.61098E+12 2012-10-01 105.1788905 Q4 2012 1,839,596
2013-01-01 1.63607E+12 2013-01-01 105.9475736 Q1 2013 1,872,136
2013-04-01 1.67053E+12 2013-04-01 105.8155098 Q2 2013 1,881,924
2013-07-01 1.69833E+12 2013-07-01 106.3926058 Q3 2013 1,907,692
2013-10-01 1.75066E+12 2013-10-01 106.4727711 Q4 2013 1,928,372
2014-01-01 1.78916E+12 2014-01-01 108.0058207 Q1 2014 1,958,572
2014-04-01 1.81251E+12 2014-04-01 108.0948485 Q2 2014 1,983,684
2014-07-01 1.85501E+12 2014-07-01 108.6916969 Q3 2014 2,009,164
2014-10-01 1.89181E+12 2014-10-01 108.2081793 Q4 2014 2,009,312
2015-01-01 1.92827E+12 2015-01-01 107.1608189 Q1 2015 1,985,880
2015-04-01 1.95461E+12 2015-04-01 107.4289334 Q2 2015 1,987,968
2015-07-01 2.01857E+12 2015-07-01 107.7699516 Q3 2015 2,005,556
2015-10-01 2.05577E+12 2015-10-01 107.3727069 Q4 2015 2,000,240
2016-01-01 2.09906E+12 2016-01-01 107.1804261 Q1 2016 2,008,964
2016-04-01 2.14464E+12 2016-04-01 107.4862374 Q2 2016 2,009,416
2016-07-01 2.19735E+12 2016-07-01 108.2285573 Q3 2016 2,044,564
2016-10-01 2.2347E+12 2016-10-01 109.4481763 Q4 2016 2,079,080
2017-01-01 2.25137E+12 2017-01-01 110.2520312 Q1 2017 2,115,064
2017-04-01 2.30112E+12 2017-04-01 110.1958834 Q2 2017 2,136,712
2017-07-01 2.29036E+12 2017-07-01 110.2431625 Q3 2017

In: Economics

Using the circular flow of income model, supported by a diagram, show the effect on an...

Using the circular flow of income model, supported by a diagram, show the effect on an economy such as the UK, of a fall in investment by British firms and a reluctance by Chinese companies to buy goods from the UK.


Word Limit: 200 words

In: Operations Management

On 27 March 2020, the Fitch credit rating agency downgraded UK sovereign credit rating to AA-...

On 27 March 2020, the Fitch credit rating agency downgraded UK sovereign credit rating to AA- with a ‘negative’ outlook. What are the potential effects of this downgrade on the UK yield curve and GDP? Explain your answer.

In: Economics

The UK’s decision to leave the EU was the result of: Group of answer choices An...

The UK’s decision to leave the EU was the result of:

Group of answer choices

An overwhelming vote in Parliament.

A referendum.

An order from Queen Elizabeth.

A "kick-them-out" vote by the other EU members.

Flag this Question

Question 591 pts

As discussed in the lecture on Brexit:

Group of answer choices

The UK has now officially left the EU.

The UK has not yet left the EU

Brexit is currently in limbo awaiting a new UK vote on whether to go through with it

None of the above.

Flag this Question

Question 601 pts

As noted in lecture, a major sticking point in the Brexit negotiations is

Group of answer choices

Concern that the UK will gain a competitive advantage by lowering its regulatory standards

Fishing

Both A and B

None of the above

In: Economics

In 2016 UK residents voted in favor of Brexit, a proposal to leave the European Union...

In 2016 UK residents voted in favor of Brexit, a proposal to leave the European Union and thereby cancel the UK’s free trade arrangement with the EU. Pro-Brexit analysts have argued that, if the UK now signs a free trade agreement (FTA) with the United States, this U.S.-UK FTA would offset any UK trade losses due to Brexit.

Basing your answer on the simplest gravity model of international trade, do you think the pro-Brexit analysts are correct? The economies of the European Union and the United States were approximately the same size, at $18.8 trillion and $19.4 trillion, respectively, in 2017.

What are some other factors you might want to add to your gravity model in order to strengthen your analysis?

In: Economics

Europeans Consume 45% of all gasoline produced worldwide - With the law of demand, you would...

Europeans Consume 45% of all gasoline produced worldwide
- With the law of demand, you would expect that when gas prices continue to rise, the demand would fall, but this isn’t necessarily the case, especially in the short term. (10% increase in gas is associated with a 1-2% decrease in quantity of gas purchased.
- In 2004-2005, avg gas price went from up 55% ($1.87 -> 2.90), but consumption only went down 3.5% (9.15 mill barrels to 8.83 mill barrels)
- From 1998 to 2004, average gas went up 53%, but consumption also went up 10% when you would normally think it would go down by 26-53%.

a) The above are estimates of 1 year and 6 year response of gas quantities purchased to changes in gas prices. Utilizing the above data, what are the estimates (expressed in rages) for the 1 year (short term) and 6 year (long term) price elasticities of demand for European Gasoline.
b) Using your answer from a), what will happen in the short run to European consumer’s total expenditures on gas as the price of gasoline rises. Will it stay the same, increase or decrease?
c) The figures from 2004-05 may overstate the drop in consumption because the head of energy in Europe measures gas before it reaches the retailer, and retailers may have used more of their inventories when there was a disruption in the supply chain. This implies a different short run price elasticity of demand for European gas than earlier studies estimate. What is this short run price elasticity?

In: Economics

What is a market boundary and how is it determined?

What is a market boundary and how is it determined?

In: Economics

Janice Corporation UK is public corporation which manufactures a technology. Janice uses fair value measurement for...

Janice Corporation UK is public corporation which manufactures a technology. Janice uses fair value measurement for the measurement of all assets of its business. Required: In regard to the Janice Corporation UK, discuss the economic consequences concept which holds that economic practices which a company adopts may affect its security price and value. Discuss the pros and cons of fair value and make a recommendation to Janice Corporation UK and support your decisions regarding the measurement of company assets.

In: Accounting

Twinings (a UK firm) buys £1 billion of tea leaves from India using money from its...

Twinings (a UK firm) buys £1 billion of tea leaves from India using money from its Indian bank account. It brings the tea to the UK. In the UK, it uses the tea leaves to make boxes of tea, and sells 500 million boxes back to India, each for a price of £2. It then credits the resulting revenue of £1 billion back into its Indian bank account. What happens to the UK’s balance of payments as a result of this transaction?

Please provide a full answer.

In: Finance

2. (8 marks) In a model of dynamic increasing returns, illustrate an alternate scenario to what...

2. In a model of dynamic increasing returns, illustrate an alternate scenario to what we discussed in class and briefly explain using words. In this scenario, France protects its cotton industry with a temporary blockade, but after the blockade ends the protection is not enough for France to retain an advantage in cotton production, and once UK cotton is no longer blockaded, that the UK will recover its initial advantage. Be sure to draw and label any necessary learning curves (UK and France), and any relevant points on the curves.

In: Economics