In Case 15, GoPro’s Struggle for Survival in 2016, the following is mention:
As GoPro moved into 2015, it appeared to be the poster child for American entrepreneurial success, going from a humble beginning as a homemade camera tether and plastic case vendor in 2004, to an action camera vendor with $350,000 in sales in 2005 (its first full year of operation), to revenue of $1.6 billion in 2015. The company had gone public in June, 2014, and at its peak in October, 2014, GoPro stock traded at over $98.00. In 2014, GoPro was ranked #1 most popular brand on YouTube with more than 640 million views, and an average of 845 thousand views daily. In 2015, the average daily views were up to 1.01 million. Abruptly, in the third quarter of 2015, GoPro’s magic disappeared. Fourth quarter, 2015 revenue dropped by 31 percent from the prior year, and net income (loss) fell by 128 percent to a net loss of $34.5 million. By the end of December, 2015, the stock traded at less than $20.00. GoPro’s sales continued to slip in 2016. The newly introduced HERO4 camera performed poorly, and the company cut its price by half and reduced its product line to three cameras. The Karma camera drone, set for release in the first half of 2016, was inexplicably pushed back to winter, and there was no date for release of the HERO5 action camera. After the first quarter 2016 results were released, GoPro’s stock dropped below $9.00. According to Investor Place (28 March, 2016), GoPro had “essentially erased its once coveted title of Wall Street’s darling and is now loathed by Wall Street.”
What is your assessment of GoPro’s business model and competitive strategy? Does its approach to deliver customer value contribute to a sustainable competitive advantage?
One of the competitive strategies to consider is whether to be a “first-mover,” “first-follower,” or “slow-mover.” Which strategy do you believe Go-Pro has embraced? Is your chosen strategy the right course of action for Go-pro all of the time? Please explain
In: Operations Management
BUSINESS DECISION: FINANCIAL RATIOS
The years 2005 to 2009 saw a coffe company's revenues grow by more than 50%. Use the following financial data to answer the questions below.
| Starbucks - Selected Financial Data | ||||||||||
| (In millions, except earnings per share) | ||||||||||
| Sept. 27, | Sept. 28, | Sept. 30, | Oct. 1, | Oct. 2, | ||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
| As of and for the fiscal year ended | (52 wks) | (52 wks) | (52 wks) | (52 wks) | (52 wks) | |||||
| Results of Operations | ||||||||||
| Net revenues: | ||||||||||
| Company-operated retail | $8,180.3 | $8,771.6 | $7,998.3 | $6,583.1 | $5,391.7 | |||||
| Specialty: | ||||||||||
| Licensing | $1,222.1 | $1,171.8 | $1,026.1 | $860.7 | $673.3 | |||||
| Food service and other | $372.2 | $439.5 | $386.6 | $343.2 | $304.3 | |||||
| Total specialty | $1,594.3 | $1,611.3 | $1,412.7 | $1,203.9 | $977.6 | |||||
| Total net revenues | $9,774.6 | $10,382.9 | $9,411.0 | $7,787.0 | $6,369.3 | |||||
| Operating income | $562.1 | $503.7 | $1,053.6 | $894.2 | $780.6 | |||||
| Earnings before cumulative effect of change in | $390.5 | $315.5 | $672.7 | $581.7 | $494.1 | |||||
| accounting principle | ||||||||||
| Cumulative effect of accounting change for asset | ||||||||||
| retirement obligations, net of taxes | _ | _ | _ | 17.4 | _ | |||||
| Net earnings | $390.5 | $315.5 | $672.7 | $564.3 | $494.1 | |||||
| Earnings per common share before cumulative | ||||||||||
| effect of change in accounting principle - diluted ("EPS") | $0.53 | $0.46 | $0.81 | $0.71 | $0.67 | |||||
| Cumulative effect of accounting change for asset | ||||||||||
| retirement obligations, net of taxes - per common share | _ | _ | _ | 0.08 | _ | |||||
| EPS - diluted | $0.53 | $0.46 | $0.81 | $0.63 | $0.67 | |||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $1,389.4 | $1,258.9 | $1,331.4 | $1,331.8 | $922.5 | |||||
| Capital ependitures (additions to property, plant | ||||||||||
| and equipment) | $445.7 | $984.6 | $1,080.3 | $771.3 | $643.2 | |||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||
| Total assets | $5,576.5 | $5,672.7 | $5,343.5 | $4,428.5 | $3,513.9 | |||||
| Short-term borrowings | 0.0 | 713.2 | 710.2 | 700.2 | 277.3 | |||||
| Long-term debt (including current portion) | 549.7 | 550.2 | 550.8 | 2.6 | 3.6 | |||||
| Shareholders' equity | $3,045.7 | $2,490.9 | $2,284.1 | $2,228.8 | $2,090.2 | |||||
a. Calculate the asset turnover ratio for 2008 and 2009. Round to the nearest hundredth.
2008:
2009:
b. Calculate the net profit margin for 2007, 2008, and 2009. Round to the nearest tenth.
Do not enter the percent symbol in your answer.
2007: %
2008: %
2009: %
c. Calculate the return on investment for 2007, 2008, and 2009. Round to the nearest tenth.
Do not enter the percent symbol in your answer.
2007: %
2008: %
2009: %
d. Prepare a trend analysis of the net revenue and total assets for 2005 through 2009.
Round to the nearest tenth. Do not enter the percent symbol in your answer.
| 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |
| Net Revenue | % | % | % | % | % |
| Total Assets | % | % | % | % | % |
e. Prepare a trend analysis multiple-line chart for the information in part d.
In: Finance
A magazine published data on the best small firms in a certain year. These were firms which had been publicly traded for at least a year, have a stock price of at least $5 per share, and have reported annual revenue between $5 million and $1 billion. The table below shows the ages of the chief executive officers for the first 68 ranked firms.
| Age | Frequency | Relative Frequency | Cumulative
Relative Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40-44 | 9 | ||
| 45-49 | 11 | ||
| 50-54 | 13 | ||
| 55-59 | 16 | ||
| 60-64 | 10 | ||
| 65-69 | 8 | ||
| 70-74 | 1 |
(a) What is the frequency for CEO ages between (but not
including) 54 and 65? (Enter your answer as a whole number.)
(b) What percentage of CEOs are 65 years or older? (Round your
answer to the nearest whole number.)
%
(c) What is the relative frequency of ages under 50? (Round your
answer to two decimal places.)
(d) What is the cumulative relative frequency for CEOs younger than
55? (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
In: Statistics and Probability
In: Finance
From the following balance sheet and additional information given, prepare cash flow statement.
Balance Sheet as on March 31, 2005 and 2006
|
Particulars |
2005 Rs. |
2006 Rs. |
Particulars |
2005 Rs. |
2006 Rs. |
|
Share Capital |
9,00,000 |
9,00,000 |
Fixed Assets |
8,00,000 |
6,40,000 |
|
General Reserve |
6,00,000 |
6,20,000 |
Investments |
1,00,000 |
1,20,000 |
|
Profit & loss a/c |
1,12,000 |
1,36,000 |
Stock |
4,80,000 |
4,20,000 |
|
Creditors |
3,36,000 |
2,68,000 |
Debtors |
4,20,000 |
9,10,000 |
|
Provision for tax |
1,50,000 |
20,000 |
Bank |
2,98,000 |
3,94,000 |
|
Mortgage loan |
- |
5,40,000 |
|||
|
20,98,000 |
24,84,000 |
20,98,000 |
24,84,000 |
Additional Information:
(a) Investments costing Rs.16,000 were sold during the year for Rs.17,000 (b) Provision for tax made out of profit was Rs.18,000 for the year (c) During the year, a part of the fixed assets costing Rs.20,000 was sold for Rs.24,000 and the
profit was included in Profit and Loss account (d) Dividends paid amounted to Rs.80,000
In: Accounting
In: Economics
Describe the various "mechanisms" that are supposed to keep publicly traded companies well governed.
In: Accounting
In 2006?
In 2006?
In 2006?
|
Year: |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
|
CPI: |
100 |
99 |
125 |
140 |
Suppose in the year 2007 you are considering a job offer that pays $50,000 in 2007, plus a 10% (compounding) raise in each of the next three years.
|
Year: |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
|
Nominal Salary |
|
Year: |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
|
Salary in 2007$ |
|
Year: |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
|
Salary in 2010$ |
|
Year: |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
|
Nominal Salary |
In what years is this contract better than the original one?
In: Economics
Listed below is the net sales in $ million for Home Depot Inc. and its subsidiaries from 1993 to 2015. Remember to code the years starting at 1 for year 1993.
| Year | Net Sales | ||
| 1993 | $ | 9,239 | |
| 1994 | 11,836 | ||
| 1995 | 14,804 | ||
| 1996 | 18,165 | ||
| 1997 | 24,326 | ||
| 1998 | 31,349 | ||
| 1999 | 36,687 | ||
| 2000 | 47,660 | ||
| 2001 | 54,509 | ||
| 2002 | 57,861 | ||
| 2003 | 66,293 | ||
| 2004 | 75,025 | ||
| 2005 | 83,503 | ||
| 2006 | 90,116 | ||
| 2007 | 78,278 | ||
| 2008 | 70,438 | ||
| 2009 | 65,346 | ||
| 2010 | 67,300 | ||
| 2011 | 69,847 | ||
| 2012 | 75,519 | ||
| 2013 | 80,383 | ||
| 2014 | 83,101 | ||
| 2015 | 88,293 | ||
Determine the least squares equation. On the basis of this information, what are the estimated sales for 2016 and 2017? (Round your final answers to 2 decimal places.)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
In: Statistics and Probability
You are estimating the beta of the stock of Calico,Inc. using historical return information. The following information is available:
Historical return %:
Year Calico,Inc. Viprot, inc. LCK Index ( Market proxy)
2009 28 24 18
2008 18 -20 15
2007 15 18 22
2006 13 15 19
2005 -6 -8 -12
2004 24 15 36
2003 -20 -18 -28
2002 -8 -6 -13
Using the historical return data and simple linear regression ( may use calculator, showing calculator entries or Excel or any Statistical Package, showing work):
a. Estimate the betas for Calico,Inc. Viprot,Inc. & LCK Index.
b. Using the formula in the book: Adjusted beta = 0.67(historical beta) + 0.35(1.0), find the adjusted beta of Calico,Inc and Viprot,Inc
In: Finance