Please translate from Latin to English:

Olim erant tres socii qui peregrinabantur. Ita accidit ut cibum praeter unum panem invenire non possent. Itaque, [coom] essent valde famelici, invicem dixerunt: "Si ille panis in tres partes dividatur, uni quique tertia pars non sufficiat ad nos saturandos. Capiamus ergo sanum consilium quomodo debeamus panem distribuere."

Ait unus: "Hic in via dormiamus, et quilibet mirabilissimum somnium habuerit, ille totum panem habeat."

Responderunt alii: "Bonum est consilium." Et coeperunt dormire. At ille qui consilium dederat surrexit et, [coom] alii dormirent, panem omnino comedit, nec unicam micam solicis suis reliquit. Hoc facto, socios suos excitavit, dicen: "Surgite velociter! Nunc somnium cuique narrandum est."

Ait primus: "Carissimi, mirabile somnium vidi, scilicet scalam auream de caelo pendentem, per quam angeli descendebant et ascendebant; et animam meam usque ad caelum de corpore meo extraxerunt. Quando eo perveni, Patrem et Filium et Spiritum Sanctum vidi, et tantum gaudium circa animam meam erat ut neque oculus videre, neque auris audire posset quod ibidem percepi; circa animam meam erat ut neque oculus videre, neque auris audire posset quod ibidem percepi; tale equidem est somnium meum."

Ait secnudus: "Et ego vidi daemones [coom] instrumentis ferreis igneisque animam meam de corpore meo extrahere. Me autem male tractabant, dicentes: 'Quamidiu deus regnat in caelo, permanebis in hoc loco.'"

Ait tertius: "Audite somnium meum! Videbatur mihi quendam angelum ad me venietem dicere: 'Carissime, nonne vis videre quibus in locis sint socii tui?'

"Respondi: Etiam, domine; quia unus panis nobis distribuendus est, timeo ne [coom] pane recesserint."

"At ille: 'Non est ita; sed panis iuxta te est; sequere me.' Duxit me ad portam caeli. Tum caput meum secundum praeceptum eius infra portam posui; subinde te vidi; mihi vero videbatur te ad caelum raptum esse et sedere in throno sureo et multum cibum vinaque optima esse ante te.

"Mihi dixit angelus: 'Ecce, socius tuus abundat omni gaudio et cibo, et ibidem aeternum permanebit, quia, qui semel regnum caeleste intraverit, exire non npoterit. Mecum veni, et tibi ostendam quo in loco alter socius tuus sit.'

"[coom] vero secutus illum essem, duxit me ad inferni portas, et ibi te vidi, sicut dixisti, afflictum poenis gravissimis, et tibi non licebat cinum edere. Tunc tibi dixit: "O carissime soci, mihi displicet te in his poenis iacere.'

"Tu vero mihi respondisti, 'Quamdiu deus regnat in caelo, hic permanebo, quia hoc merui. Surge ergo cito, totu, panem comede, quia rursus nec me nec socium nostrum videbis'

"Ego vero [coom] hoc audivissem surrexi et, ut mihi imperaveras, panem comedi."

Sondra and Jason, a wealthy married couple, won $96 million in a 2017 Powerball drawing. They decided to share some of this new wealth immediately with some of their friends and family. They paid $1,800,000 on a new home for Sondra’s parents, titling the home jointly in the parents’ names; bought a condominium on Captiva Island for Jason’s widowed mother for $950,000; gave $1 million to a local charity that provides homes and job training for homeless families; sent $150,000 to Stanford University to be used for their nephew’s college tuition for his next 4 years in school; gave $500,000 each to Sondra’s sister and Jason’s brother for new homes; gave $750,000 to the best man at their wedding last year to defray the costs of a needed kidney transplant; and finally donated $250,000 to their church to build a wedding chapel. The only taxable gift previously made by either Sondra or Jason was a $200,000 gift in 2014 by Jason to the widow of an employee who had been killed in an auto accident. This gift was made prior to their marriage. Sondra and Jason elected gift splitting. Determine their separate taxable gifts and the gift taxes they will owe applying each of their unified credits.

conduct a post hoc test (Bonferroni test) to find out which difference contributes the most to the F ratio (i.e., F(obtained)). Interpret the Bonferroni test results. (5 points)

Need help with interpreting the results posted below please.

pairwise.t.test(EP.$POLVIEWS, EP.$DEGREE, p.adj = "bonf")

            Pairwise comparisons using t tests with pooled SD

data: EP.$POLVIEWS and EP.$DEGREE

                         BACHELOR      GRADUATE      HIGH SCHOOL             JUNIOR COLLEGE

GRADUATE       2.2e-06           -                       -                                        -            

HIGH SCHOOL    0.21                1.0e-13            -                                      -            

JUNIOR COLLEGE 1.00             1.0e-06           1.00                                           -            

LT HIGH SCHOOL 1.00             1.7e-07            1.00                               1.00         

P value adjustment method: bonferroni

1. For a sample of 100 honors students at a particular college, a sociologist collected the following information on the year of school and the willingness to help the school raise donations by making telephone calls to alumni:

Using these data, test the null hypothesis that willingness to help raise donations does not differ by year in school. Use a .05 confidence level for your test and be sure to report (a) the critical value of the test statistic, (b) the obtained value of the test statistic, (c) your decision about the null hypothesis, and (d) an interpretation of the meaning of your decision.

You are a school nurse. A 7-year-old boy has what looks like impetigo on his right forearm. You call the mother at work at 10:00 a.m. and ask her to come immediately and pick up her son and seek medical attention.

1. What did you see that made you suspect impetigo?

2. Why should the child not be sent home on the bus with a note for the mother?

3. How will the mother be expected to care for her son at home? What teaching will the school nurse need to tell mom?

4. What are the primary goals in treating impetigo?

5. When do you expect the child to return to school?

In a survey of 100 U.S. residents with a high school diploma as their highest educational degree (Group 1) had an average yearly income was $35,621. Another 120 U.S. residents with a GED (Group 2) had an average yearly income of $33,498. The population standard deviation for both populations is known to be $4,310. At a 0.01 level of significance, can it be concluded that U.S. residents with a high school diploma make significantly more than those with a GED?

Enter the test statistic - round to 4 decimal places.

Enter the P-Value - round to 4 decimal places.

Can you conclude that U.S. residents with a high school diploma make significantly more than those with a GED?

1. Which of the folloiwng statements are true
   1. A sample t test is used to test the differences between a sample mean and a population mean to determin statistical significance
   2. One sample t test is used to test the difference between two sample means from one sample
2. SAT verbal scores are normally distributed with the population mean of. An 500. A local high school has instituted a new program to engage students in reading. A sample 90 students from this high school is randomly selected following their participation in this reading program and their SAT verbal score mean of 520 was compared to the national mean. Discuss how this would require a One Sample t Test.
3. For the above example, how would you set up a two-tailed alternative hypothesis and what would you conclude whether the null hypothesis was rejected.
4. How would you set up a one-tailed alternative hypothesis for the above example and what would you conclude if the null hypothesis was rejected.
5. Assume that one sample t Test showed the following results (t(49) = 21, p < .01). Answer the following questions.
   1. What is the probability that the null hypothesis is true?
   2. What is the df of the study
   3. What is the n of the study

What would you conclude

Marie earned her bachelor’s degree in HIM. After working intraditional HIM roles for a few years, she decided that she wanted tobe involved in the selection and implementation of the EHR andother healthcare information systems. Marie went back to school andearned her master’s degree in health informatics. After graduation,Marie worked for an information system vendor for several years.She decided to take another turn in her career path and become aprofessor in an accredited HIM program. She took a position as afaculty member in a bachelor’s-level HIM program. Marie nowteaches the information system courses for the HIM program and isable to give the students real world examples from her experience inthe traditional HIM departments and the information system vendor.Marie enjoyed her position so much that after teaching for a while,Marie went back to school again to earn her doctorate degree inadult education.

1. Identify how this Real-World Case ties to this chapter.

2. In the Real-World Case, Marie earned a bachelor’s degree, a master’s degree, and a doctoral degree. Do you think that some or all of the new roles discussed in this chapter will require graduate education? Why or why not? How do these roles tie into HIM Reimagined?

Mr. Charlie Brown has spent his entire career with the Peanuts Manufacturing Company. He is located in Sarnia, Ontario and started with the company as a production line manager. He has since moved up the ranks of the company, and most recently has been supervising the entire production department. In early 2020, Charlie was offered an opportunity to oversee the construction of a new manufacturing operation in Jacksonville, Florida, USA. If Mr. Brown takes the position, he would move to the United States on May 1, 2020 and when the facility is completed, Mr. Brown would remain as the senior vice president in charge of all of the Florida operations. Mr. Brown and his wife have 2 school age children who are enrolled at the local elementary school in grades 3 and 5. The Browns own a home in Sarnia and are involved in their community. They belong to their local church and a local recreational club where their children take swimming lessons and the family enjoys socializing. The Brown Family is considering the offer to move and is looking for advice on how their Canadian residency for tax purposes would be affected by this potential move. Mr. Brown has been told by the American payroll department that his tax rate will be lower if he is taxed in the United States. Mr. Brown would leave on May 1st, but the Browns are considering having Mrs. Brown and the children stay in Sarnia to finish out the school year which finishes at the end of June.

Required: Create a short (one page) memo explaining the tax policy to your client. Keep in mind that he will have limited understanding of income taxation, so you need to analyze the issue at a high level and then clearly describe the options available to Mr. Brown so that he can make an informed decision about his move and the tax consequences.