Test the claim that the proportion of men who own cats is larger
than 20% at the .05 significance level.
The null and alternative hypothesis would be:
H0:p=0.2H0:p=0.2
H1:p≠0.2H1:p≠0.2
H0:p=0.2H0:p=0.2
H1:p>0.2H1:p>0.2
H0:μ=0.2H0:μ=0.2
H1:μ≠0.2H1:μ≠0.2
H0:μ=0.2H0:μ=0.2
H1:μ<0.2H1:μ<0.2
H0:p=0.2H0:p=0.2
H1:p<0.2H1:p<0.2
H0:μ=0.2H0:μ=0.2
H1:μ>0.2H1:μ>0.2
The test is:
right-tailed
two-tailed
left-tailed
Based on a sample of 30 people, 29% owned cats
The test statistic is: (to 2 decimals)
The critical value is: (to 2 decimals)
Based on this we:
In: Math
Which assertion about stocks gamma, Hotel, India, and Juliet is true if PH > PJ > 0 and PI > PG > 0? And:
| A. |
The expected return of stock Hotel is greater than the expected return of stock Juliet and the next expected dividend of stock India is greater than the next expected dividend of stock Gamma. |
|
| B. |
Answer not listed or not possible. |
|
| C. |
The expected return of stock Juliet is greater than the expected return of stock Hotel and the next expected dividend of stock Gamma is greater than the next expected dividend of stock India. |
|
| D. |
The expected return of stock Juliet is greater than the expected return of stock Hotel and the next expected dividend of stock India is greater than the next expected dividend of stock Gamma. |
|
| E. |
The expected return of stock Hotel is greater than the expected return of stock Juliet and the next expected dividend of stock Gamma is greater than the next expected dividend of stock India. |
In: Finance
Playland at Pacific National Exhibition is an amusement park offering 31 different rides (including 4 rollercoasters and 1 water ride). The guests who are 48” or taller can go on any ride they want and so they get more value from visiting the park; let us say their individual demand is given by P = 5 – 0.25qO, where P is the price per ride ($ per ride) and qO is the number of the rides (per day) (the subscript O stands for “One Day;” that’s how the park calls its passes for the guests who are 48” or taller). The guests who are under 48” are not allowed on certain rides so they get less value from visiting the park; let us say their individual demand is given by P = 4 – 0.25qJ, where P is the price per ride ($ per ride) and qJ is the number of the rides (per day) (the subscript J stands for “Jr. One Day;” that’s how the park calls its passes for the guests under 48”). Assume it costs the park flat ¢25 per guest to operate a single ride, and it costs the park flat ¢75 to issue a single ticket to a ride. Assume there are 500 guests 48” or taller and 500 guests under 48” on an average day. We can consider Playland a monopolist in Vancouver
If Playland employed a second-degree price discrimination scheme (single ride tickets are issued, each rider receives a book of tickets [qO or qJ]),
what is Playland’s profit on an average day ($ per day)? Assume zero fixed cost
In: Economics
DataSpan, Inc., automated its plant at the start of the current year and installed a flexible manufacturing system. The company is also evaluating its suppliers and moving toward Lean Production. Many adjustment problems have been encountered, including problems relating to performance measurement. After much study, the company has decided to use the performance measures below, and it has gathered data relating to these measures for the first four months of operations.
| Month | ||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||||
| Throughput time (days) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||
| Delivery cycle time (days) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||
| Manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||
| Percentage of on-time deliveries | 88 | % | 83 | % | 80 | % | 77 | % |
| Total sales (units) | 2830 | 2709 | 2570 | 2473 | ||||
Management has asked for your help in computing throughput time, delivery cycle time, and MCE. The following average times have been logged over the last four months:
| Average per Month (in days) | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||||
| Move time per unit | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | |||||
| Process time per unit | 3.8 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.2 | |||||
| Wait time per order before start of production | 18.0 | 19.7 | 22.0 | 23.8 | |||||
| Queue time per unit | 4.5 | 5.1 | 5.8 | 6.6 | |||||
| Inspection time per unit | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | |||||
Required:
1-a. Compute the throughput time for each month.
1-b. Compute the delivery cycle time for each month.
1-c. Compute the manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE) for each month.
2. Evaluate the company’s performance over the last four months.
3-a. Refer to the move time, process time, and so forth, given for month 4. Assume that in month 5 the move time, process time, and so forth, are the same as in month 4, except that through the use of Lean Production the company is able to completely eliminate the queue time during production. Compute the new throughput time and MCE.
3-b. Refer to the move time, process time, and so forth, given for month 4. Assume in month 6 that the move time, process time, and so forth, are again the same as in month 4, except that the company is able to completely eliminate both the queue time during production and the inspection time. Compute the new throughput time and MCE.
In: Accounting
DataSpan, Inc., automated its plant at the start of the current year and installed a flexible manufacturing system. The company is also evaluating its suppliers and moving toward Lean Production. Many adjustment problems have been encountered, including problems relating to performance measurement. After much study, the company has decided to use the performance measures below, and it has gathered data relating to these measures for the first four months of operations.
|
Month |
||||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|||||
|
Throughput time (days) |
? |
? |
? |
? |
||||
|
Delivery cycle time (days) |
? |
? |
? |
? |
||||
|
Manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE) |
? |
? |
? |
? |
||||
|
Percentage of on-time deliveries |
88 |
% |
83 |
% |
80 |
% |
77 |
% |
|
Total sales (units) |
2830 |
2709 |
2570 |
2473 |
||||
Management has asked for your help in computing throughput time, delivery cycle time, and MCE. The following average times have been logged over the last four months:
|
Average per Month (in days) |
|||||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||||||
|
Move time per unit |
0.9 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
|||||
|
Process time per unit |
3.8 |
3.6 |
3.4 |
3.2 |
|||||
|
Wait time per order before start of production |
18.0 |
19.7 |
22.0 |
23.8 |
|||||
|
Queue time per unit |
4.5 |
5.1 |
5.8 |
6.6 |
|||||
|
Inspection time per unit |
0.8 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
|||||
Required:
1-a. Compute the throughput time for each month.
1-b. Compute the delivery cycle time for each month.
1-c. Compute the manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE) for each month.
2. Evaluate the company’s performance over the last four months.
3-a. Refer to the move time, process time, and so forth, given for month 4. Assume that in month 5 the move time, process time, and so forth, are the same as in month 4, except that through the use of Lean Production the company is able to completely eliminate the queue time during production. Compute the new throughput time and MCE.
3-b. Refer to the move time, process time, and so forth, given for month 4. Assume in month 6 that the move time, process time, and so forth, are again the same as in month 4, except that the company is able to completely eliminate both the queue time during production and the inspection time. Compute the new throughput time and MCE.
In: Accounting
DataSpan, Inc., automated its plant at the start of the current year and installed a flexible manufacturing system. The company is also evaluating its suppliers and moving toward Lean Production. Many adjustment problems have been encountered, including problems relating to performance measurement. After much study, the company has decided to use the performance measures below, and it has gathered data relating to these measures for the first four months of operations.
| Month | ||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||||
| Throughput time (days) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||
| Delivery cycle time (days) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||
| Manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||
| Percentage of on-time deliveries | 88 | % | 83 | % | 80 | % | 77 | % |
| Total sales (units) | 2830 | 2709 | 2570 | 2473 | ||||
Management has asked for your help in computing throughput time, delivery cycle time, and MCE. The following average times have been logged over the last four months:
| Average per Month (in days) | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||||
| Move time per unit | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | |||||
| Process time per unit | 3.8 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.2 | |||||
| Wait time per order before start of production | 18.0 | 19.7 | 22.0 | 23.8 | |||||
| Queue time per unit | 4.5 | 5.1 | 5.8 | 6.6 | |||||
| Inspection time per unit | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | |||||
Required:
1-a. Compute the throughput time for each month.
1-b. Compute the delivery cycle time for each month.
1-c. Compute the manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE) for each month.
2. Evaluate the company’s performance over the last four months.
3-a. Refer to the move time, process time, and so forth, given for month 4. Assume that in month 5 the move time, process time, and so forth, are the same as in month 4, except that through the use of Lean Production the company is able to completely eliminate the queue time during production. Compute the new throughput time and MCE.
3-b. Refer to the move time, process time, and so forth, given for month 4. Assume in month 6 that the move time, process time, and so forth, are again the same as in month 4, except that the company is able to completely eliminate both the queue time during production and the inspection time. Compute the new throughput time and MCE.
In: Accounting
DataSpan, Inc., automated its plant at the start of the current year and installed a flexible manufacturing system. The company is also evaluating its suppliers and moving toward Lean Production. Many adjustment problems have been encountered, including problems relating to performance measurement. After much study, the company has decided to use the performance measures below, and it has gathered data relating to these measures for the first four months of operations.
| Month | ||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||||
| Throughput time (days) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||
| Delivery cycle time (days) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||
| Manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||
| Percentage of on-time deliveries | 88 | % | 83 | % | 80 | % | 77 | % |
| Total sales (units) | 2830 | 2709 | 2570 | 2473 | ||||
Management has asked for your help in computing throughput time, delivery cycle time, and MCE. The following average times have been logged over the last four months:
| Average per Month (in days) | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||||
| Move time per unit | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | |||||
| Process time per unit | 3.8 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.2 | |||||
| Wait time per order before start of production | 18.0 | 19.7 | 22.0 | 23.8 | |||||
| Queue time per unit | 4.5 | 5.1 | 5.8 | 6.6 | |||||
| Inspection time per unit | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | |||||
Required:
1-a. Compute the throughput time for each month.
1-b. Compute the delivery cycle time for each month.
1-c. Compute the manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE) for each month.
2. Evaluate the company’s performance over the last four months.
3-a. Refer to the move time, process time, and so forth, given for month 4. Assume that in month 5 the move time, process time, and so forth, are the same as in month 4, except that through the use of Lean Production the company is able to completely eliminate the queue time during production. Compute the new throughput time and MCE.
3-b. Refer to the move time, process time, and so forth, given for month 4. Assume in month 6 that the move time, process time, and so forth, are again the same as in month 4, except that the company is able to completely eliminate both the queue time during production and the inspection time. Compute the new throughput time and MCE.
In: Accounting
QUESTION: Mr. Horwell is unsure that NOBU has the resources to support the entire IMC you suggested in Q3(advertising, personal selling, public relations, social media marketing, sales promotion). Please rank the promotional mix tools (1= highest priority to 4= lowest priority) and justify.
Traveling in Nobu Style: Converting Restaurant Patrons to Hotel Guests The name “Nobu” is synonymous with an exceptional Japanese dining experience, perfected by chef Nobu Matsuhisa over a more than 30-year career. Matsuhisa, together with actor Robert De Niro and restaurateur Drew Nieporent, opened the first Nobu restaurant in 1994 and to date, there are now 38 Nobu restaurants worldwide. But if you talk to Trevor Horwell, the CEO of Nobu Hospitality, Nobu represents much more than just a restaurant experience. It’s a true lifestyle brand that also encompasses a relatively small, but growing portfolio of luxury hotels, too — eight of which are open now, and eight more are in the pipeline. Horwell’s primary focus as CEO is to continue to grow the Nobu Hotels brand and as he opens up diners’ eyes to the fact that cannot only eat at a Nobu but stay at one, too, he hasn’t forgotten the brand’s origins in the process. “We don’t normally do a hotel unless we think that a Nobu Restaurant can do well in that location,” said Horwell. “That’s very important because what we want to do first and foremost is to make sure there is a draw for locals, and that really comes down to the Nobu Restaurant.” Horwell said the majority of his Nobu hotel restaurant diners — 80 percent on average — are local residents, not hotel guests. “It’s not like a tourist restaurant. We like to attract the locals. We want that built-in customer.” “We are defined by the restaurant, in a way,” he said. “We play to our strengths. If you look at the hotel business today, the majority of hotels are suffering because they don’t lead with food and beverage. don’t have strong food-and-beverage concepts, and a lot of hotels are losing money. Today, we play to our strengths because that is one area that we do very, very well, and we bring in locals.” The idea to launch Nobu Hotels, he said, came from the fact that when Nobu Restaurants were located inside of a hotel, they “were the draw for the hotel and we were bringing in customers.” “If I only convert 5 percent of my customers in Nobu Restaurant to stay in our hotels, then at the end of the day, we’re filling out hotels. It’s not a tall order to do that, and you can do that very well and very quickly if you offer the right product.” Nobu Hotels has the advantage of having built its brand over a 24-year period with its restaurants first, followed by the first Nobu hotel that opened within Caesars Palace Las Vegas in 2013. “The first focus for us, really, is to expose the brand to our restaurant customers,” Horwell said. “We touch all types of Nobu customers. And we also provide instant identity. If you put ‘Nobu Hotel’ on a hotel, the word ‘Nobu’ says something and it attracts a certain type of customer.” Horwell said that, for example, when the first Nobu opened, the hotel had “more than one billion media impressions.” So, what’s next for the brand, and how does Horwell plan to grow Nobu Hotels? He explained, “We’re not driven by reservations systems because we’re small. It isn’t as if we need a huge reservations system to fill a 400-room hotel. That’s why a lot of these corporations do well, because they have the reservations platform to fill the big hotels.” Nobu Hotels, by comparison, average anywhere from 100 to 150 rooms generally. “The reason why those young lifestyle brands have emerged is because they’re like us. They are entrepreneurial, they’re unique because it’s a concept that’s come from the heart, from whoever is the original founder. But when it’s absorbed by a corporation, the whole thing changes. At the end of the day, the specialness is lost because then the corporation’s running it, and then, I think you lose what your original concept was all about. I think that’s the biggest issue.” Horwell also doesn’t necessarily think of Nobu Hotels as occupying a place in luxury hospitality, instead referring to the brand as “special.” “I look at our hotels not as luxury,” he said. “I look at them as special. I like us to be special, in each location we’re in. ‘Luxury’ is a word that’s used too much in terms of ‘everything is luxury today.’ For us, we’re ‘special.'” “That’s why I’m saying, from a company perspective, we’re very entrepreneurial. Today’s evolving luxury traveler is seeking “youthfulness” no matter what age they are, and they are “very curious and very adventurous. Because of that, it’s important for hospitality brands, Nobu included, to not just say they’re unique but to really offer unique experiences. He pointed to Nobu Ryokan Malibu in California as an example. The 16-room retreat overlooks the beach and is right by the ocean, and right next door to the Nobu Restaurant in Malibu. It becomes a destination, and that’s something Nobu wants to offer. It’s also a different concept from what the other Nobu Hotels have. While Nobu Hotels are places where there’s an emphasis on bringing in the locals, the Ryokans are meant to be more private. “The Ryokan is actually a place where people don’t want to necessarily be seen,” Horwell explained. “It’s a hideaway, a retreat. You can only book through a general manager and it’s a special place.” He added, “We will do more Ryokans, definitely, in locations that we think is right.” A major focus for Nobu Hotels is to grow the company and the brand with the right talent and partners, as well as make sure that the Nobu Hotels brand is reaching the right consumers. “The most important thing, from our perspective, is to build a relationship with our existing customers,” he said. “It’s about, first and foremost, on digital, working our databases. We like to do that through email, through a lot of channels. We just brought on a new head of digital. Capturing data is very, very important now, and that’s something that is a main focus and her team.” “I think the main thing for us is the customer relationship management (CRM) because you can do so much with it,” he said. “You can know your customer. It’s one part of the business that we are heavily focused in in and we can extract a lot of information from that.” In addition to beefing up its customer relationship management system, Nobu is also testing out a loyalty partnership, of sorts. The Nobu London Shoreditch joined Design Hotels last year, giving the property access to distribution on Design Hotels’ site, as well as a connection to the Starwood Preferred Guest loyalty program. Three Nobu hotels are also members of Leading Hotels of the World. “A lot of our customers aren’t driven by points,” he said. “When I travel, I don’t go for points. I want to stay in a hotel where I enjoy the staff, the food and beverage, the products — all of that — and I will pay a premium for it.” Appendix A Additional Information about NOBU Nobu Hotels "A Place to go and be seen" By “wrapping” the concept of a luxurious boutique hotel around energized public spaces, Nobu Hotels creates powerful stages for shared experiences of excitement and escapism. Featuring the best of everything with imaginative new restaurants, high- energy bars, relaxing rejuvenation, distinctive service, remarkable retail and an air of celebrity, Nobu Hotels will afford guests and privileged owners the most exclusive entry into unparalleled experiences that lay at the crossroads of innovation and imagination. Source: Excerpted from ‘Nobu Hotels CEO on a Restaurant-First Approach to Hospitality’ by D. Ting. Skift – March 22, 2018. +Experts and image from Nobu restaurant and hotel website
In: Operations Management
Describe briefly the principle of the Rational method and the limitation of this method for runoff estimation. A sub-catchment of area 0.1km2 is built on gently sloping land. The average slope of the land is 0.001. The length of the longest natural flow path L is 276.3m. The flow time tf in the drainage system is 3min. Determine the 50yr design discharge for the subdivision using the rational method, given that the average runoff coefficient of the subdivision is C=0.7.
The above sub-catchment is drained by a pipe system which is also used to drain the second sub-catchment. The second sub-catchment is of area 0.2km2, average slope 0.002, L=300m, and tf=3min, C=0.5. If the pipe system is designed for the 50-yr rainfall event, what is the appropriate duration to be used? Explain briefly. Hence determine the 50yr design discharge of the drainage system.
The 50-yr rainfall intensity i can be calculated from
i(mm/hr)=a/(td+b)c, where a=687, b=4.2, c=0.42,
td(min)=duration.
In: Civil Engineering
November 21, 1980, was the day of a tragic fire in the MGM Grand Hotel in Las Vegas. At the time of the fire, the hotel had only $30 million of liability insurance. One month after the fire, the hotel bought an extra $170 million of liability coverage for a premium of $37.5 million, retroactive to November 1, 1980 (before the fire). Based on your knowledge of present value concepts, why would insurers be willing to issue insurance to MGM under these conditions?
In: Finance