Questions
Year Money Supply (M2) Nominal GDP Velocity of Money(ratio) Consumer Price Index 1995 3,492.40 10543.644 2.155...

Year Money Supply (M2) Nominal GDP Velocity of Money(ratio) Consumer Price Index
1995 3,492.40 10543.644 2.155 2.87081
1996 3,647.90 10817.896 2.147 2.79070
1997 3,824.80 11284.587 2.179 3.03814
1998 4,046.30 11832.486 2.175 1.63112
1999 4,393.10 12403.293 2.135 1.66667
2000 4,656.30 12924.179 2.139 2.79296
2001 4,965.00 13222.690 2.090 3.72120
2002 5,440.10 13397.002 1.975 1.19590
2003 5,790.40 13634.253 1.921 2.75746
2004 6,061.10 14221.147 1.954 2.02629
2005 6,410.60 14771.602 1.988 2.84487
2006 6,709.90 15267.026 2.021 4.01879
2007 7,094.80 15493.328 1.997 2.07577
2008 7,491.10 15671.383 1.936 4.29470
2009 8,262.40 15155.940 1.733 -0.11359
2010 8,445.60 15415.145 1.736 2.62111
2011 8,825.80 15712.754 1.723 1.70078
2012 9,730.20 16129.418 1.639 3.00877
2013 10,471.40 16382.964 1.579 1.68406

We had two financial crises since 2000, 2000 dot.com bubble, 2008-2009 financial crisis. From FRED website, find the following data from 1995 to 2013, and make a graph. Explain the general trends of each series, and compare them between the two crises.

  1. Money supply (M2)
  2. Nominal GDP
  3. Velocity of Money
  4. Consumer Price Index

In: Economics

An economist with a major bank wants to learn, quantitatively, how much spending on luxury goods...

An economist with a major bank wants to learn, quantitatively, how much spending on luxury goods and services can be explained based on consumers’ perception about the current state of the economy and what do they expect in the near future (6 months ahead).  Consumers, of all income and wealth classes, were surveyed.  Every year, 1500 consumers were interviewed.  The bank having all of the data from the 1500 consumers interviewed every year, computed the average level of consumer confidence (an index ranging from 0 to 100, 100 being absolutely optimistic) and computed the average dollar amount spent on luxuries annually.  Below is the data shown for the last 24 years.

Date                 X                     Y (in thousands of dollars)

1994                79.1                 55.6

1995                79                    54.8

1996                80.2                 55.4

1997                80.5                 55.9

1998                81.2                 56.4

1999                80.8                 57.3

2000                81.2                 57

2001                80.7                 57.5

2002                80.3                 56.9

2003                79.4                 55.8

2004                78.6                 56.1

2005                78.3                 55.7

2006                78.3                 55.7

2007                77.8                 55

2008                77.7                 54.4

2009                77.6                 54

2010                77.6                 56

2011                78.5                 56.7

2012                78.3                 56.3

2013                78.5                 57.2

2014                78.9                 57.8

2015                79.8                 58.7

2016                80.4                 59.3

2017                80.7                 59.9

Question:

  1. Construct the linear regression model for the dollar amount spent on luxury goods and services.

In: Statistics and Probability

The data below is the total spending (in millions of dollars) on drugs and other non-durable...

The data below is the total spending (in millions of dollars) on drugs and other non-durable products for your assigned state (or DC). You need to convert this data to spending per capita in constant 2019 dollars.

Go to the FRED database at https://fred.stlouisfed.org/

Search for the PCEPI. Change the frequency to annual. Using that price index (this is a national index; there isn't a PCE index for each state), convert the following to 2019Q3 dollars.

Again using the FRED database, find the population for your state. The symbol is usually the two letter abbreviation for the state and POP. New York, for example, would be NYPOP.

Using this information, covert the spending below into spending per capita, in 2019Q3 dollars. Keep in mind that the values below are in millions of dollars and you want your answers in dollars.

Enter your results for every even-numbered year in the answer

Your assigned state:

Alaska

Year Total spending on drugs and other non-durable products (millions of dollars)
1991 142
1992 149
1993 153
1994 162
1995 156
1996 179
1997 209
1998 229
1999 262
2000 290
2001 317
2002 358
2003 411
2004 425
2005 455
2006 499
2007 531
2008 524
2009 503
2010 485
2011 480
2012 468
2013 430
2014 471

In: Economics

Grab a blank sheet of paper and try some inflation analysis on your own. Take a...

Grab a blank sheet of paper and try some inflation analysis on your own. Take a picture or scan your sheet, and upload it after you are finished. This contributes to your participation grade in the class.

  1. Because inflation increased by only 1.7% in 2008, the American Association of Retired Persons comments that this is “an unfortunate side effect of inflation, since Social Security payments, which are indexed to inflation, will increase by only 1.7% in 2008.” Comment on whether this is an “unfortunate side effect of inflation” or not.
  2. The Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) can impact the economy through changes in the Federal funds rate, because changes in this interest rate will change all interest rates throughout the economy. The Federal funds rate was constant at 5.25% from 1996–1998, a time of falling inflation. What impact did this have on real interest rates during this time? What was likely to happen to investment spending?
  3. “Traveling in Turkey is much cheaper now than it was 10 years ago,” says a friend. "Ten years ago, a dollar bought 1,000 lira; this year, a dollar buys 1,500 lira.” Total inflation over this period was 25% in the United States and 100% in Turkey. Is your friend right or wrong—has it become more or less expensive to travel in Turkey?

Upload your file below. Naming convention should be "Last Name_First Name."

In: Economics

The general fund budget (in billions of dollars) for a U.S. state for 1988 (period 1)...

The general fund budget (in billions of dollars) for a U.S. state for 1988 (period 1) to 2011 (period 24) follows.

Year Period Budget
($ billions)
1988 1 3.03
1989 2 3.29
1990 3 3.56
1991 4 4.41
1992 5 4.36
1993 6 4.51
1994 7 4.65
1995 8 5.15
1996 9 5.34
1997 10 5.66
1998 11 6.01
1999 12 6.30
2000 13 6.58
2001 14 6.75
2002 15 6.56
2003 16 6.78
2004 17 6.98
2005 18 7.65
2006 19 8.38
2007 20 8.57
2008 21 8.76
2009 22 8.43
2010 23 8.33
2011 24 8.76

(a)

Construct a time series plot.

What type of pattern exists in the data?

The time series plot shows a horizontal pattern.

The time series plot shows a nonlinear trend.    

The time series plot shows a seasonal pattern.

The time series plot shows a linear trend.

(b)

Develop a linear trend equation for this time series to forecast the budget (in billions of dollars). (Round your numerical values to three decimal places.)

Tt =

(c)

What is the forecast (in billions of dollars) for period 25? (Round your answer to two decimal places.)

$ _______ billion

In: Statistics and Probability

The following table repeats the annual total returns on the MSCI Germany Index previously given and...

The following table repeats the annual total returns on the MSCI Germany Index previously given and also gives the annual total returns on the JP Morgan Germany five- to seven-year government bond index (JPM 5–7 Year GBI, for short). During the period given in the table, the International Monetary Fund Germany Money Market Index (IMF Germany MMI, for short) had a mean annual total return of 4.33 percent. Use that information and the information in the table to answer the following questions.

Year MSCI Germany Index (%) JPM Germany 5-7 Year GBI (%)
1993 46.21 15.74
1994 -6.81 -3.40
1995 8.04 18.30
1996 22.87 8.35
1997 45.90 6.65
1998 20.32 12.45
1999 41.20 -2.19
2000 -9.53 7.44
2001 -17.75 5.55
2002 -43.06 10.27

a) Using the IMF Germany MMI as a proxy for the risk-free return, calculate the Sharpe ratio for:

(i) the 60/40 equity/bond portfolio described in Problem 12.

(ii) the MSCI Germany Index.

(iii) the JPM Germany 5–7 Year GBI.

b) Contrast the risk-adjusted performance of the 60/40 equity/bond portfolio, the MSCI Germany Index, and the JPM Germany 5–7 Year GBI, as measured by the Sharpe ratio.

In: Finance

Use the procedure outlined in Section 11.6.2 on p.262 of textbook and the annual percentage default...

Use the procedure outlined in Section 11.6.2 on p.262 of textbook and the annual percentage default rate for all rated companies in Table 11.6 on p.259,

a. Estimate the probability of default (PD) and default correlation (ρ) for the period 1970-1993, and for the period 1994-2016 separately.

b. Plot the probability distribution of default rate (similar to Figure 11.6 on p.263) for the time period 1970-1993 and 1994-2016 together on the same graph.

970 2.631
1971 0.286
1972 0.453
1973 0.456
1974 0.275
1975 0.361
1976 0.176
1977 0.354
1978 0.354
1979 0.088
1980 0.344
1981 0.162
1982 1.04
1983 0.9
1984 0.869
1985 0.952
1986 1.83
1987 1.423
1988 1.393
1989 2.226
1990 3.572
1991 2.803
1992 1.337
1993 0.899
1994 0.651
1995 0.899
1996 0.506
1997 0.616
1998 1.137
1999 2.123
2000 2.455
2001 3.679
2002 2.924
2003 1.828
2004 0.834
2005 0.647
2006 0.593
2007 0.349
2008 2.507
2009 4.996
2010 1.232
2011 0.906
2012 1.23
2013 1.232
2014 0.939
2015 1.732
2016 2.149

Textbook Risk Management and Financial Institutions, 5th Edition

In: Finance

The table contains real data for the first two decades of AIDS reporting. Adults and Adolescents...

The table contains real data for the first two decades of AIDS reporting.

Adults and Adolescents only, United States
Year # AIDS cases diagnosed # AIDS deaths
Pre-1981 91 29
1981 319 121
1982 1,170 453
1983 3,076 1,482
1984 6,240 3,466
1985 11,776 6,878
1986 19,032 11,987
1987 28,564 16,162
1988 35,447 20,868
1989 42,674 27,591
1990 48,634 31,335
1991 59,660 36,560
1992 78,530 41,055
1993 78,834 44,730
1994 71,874 49,095
1995 68,505 49,456
1996 59,347 38,510
1997 47,149 20,736
1998 38,393 19,005
1999 25,174 18,454
2000 25,522 17,347
2001 25,643 17,402
2002 26,464 16,371
Total 802,118 489,093

1.) Graph “year” versus “# AIDS cases diagnosed” (plot the scatter plot). Do not include pre-1981 data. In excel using formula's

2.) Find the regression equation, Interpret slope, Find r. and Describe linear correlation.

3.) When x = 1985, ŷ = _____

When x = 1990, ŷ =_____

When x = 1970, ŷ =______ Why doesn’t this answer make sense?

4.)  What does the correlation imply about the relationship between time (years) and the number of diagnosed AIDS cases reported in the U.S.?

In: Statistics and Probability

Basic Unix Commands Objective: The objective of this lab is to work with files of UNIX...

Basic Unix Commands

Objective:
The objective of this lab is to work with files of UNIX file system.

Procedure:
1. OpenyourUnixshellandtrythesecommands:

Ø Create a new file and add some text in it vcat > filename

  • Ø View a file
    vcat /etc/passwd vmore /etc/passwd vmore filename

  • Ø Copy file, making file2 vcp file1 file2

  • Ø Move/rename file1 as file2 vmv file1 file2

  • Ø Delete file1 as file2 vrm file

//Deletefile //Double-checkfirst

vrm -i file
Ø Counts the lines, words, characters in file

vwc file
Ø Search file for a string

v Grep lubuntu /etc/passwd v grep 'else' /etc/profile
v grep ^united ~/myFile

// List lines containing ‘lubuntu’ in /etc/passwd

//Lines containing ‘else‘ in /etc/profile

//Lines starting with ‘united’ in ~/myFile

1

  • Ø Output can be redirected to a file with’>’ vls > dir.txt
    vcal 1997 > year1997

  • Ø Output can be appended to a file with ’>>’ vcal 1997 > years
    vcal 1998 >> years

  • Ø Concatenate two files vcat f1 f2 > fs

  • Ø Input redirection (less common) uses ‘<‘ vwc < years

  • Ø Combine input and output redirection vwc < years > year-counts

    *Do screenshot of each steps you have completed* ((using lubuntu))

In: Computer Science

Q1: Explain why Engineering Controls (Barriers / Isolation) are more effective than Administrative Controls for reducing...

Q1: Explain why Engineering Controls (Barriers / Isolation) are more effective than Administrative Controls for reducing accidents? Is this true in ALL cases?

Q2: Is it easier to audit and validate the ongoing safety of a system that uses Engineering Controls than one that uses Administrative Controls?

Q3: How do you identify the candidate components or functions for the an FMEA? How do I know I have ALL the necessary components or Functions?

Q4: Explain why a Preliminary Hazard Analysis (Preliminary Risk Analysis) cannot be used to calculate the overall safety of the design (total likelihood x total consequences)? Does an FMEA solve this problem?

Q5: Should my team use the Severity, Occurrence and Detection table from an industry recommended standard, or should my team generate their own? Does my business manager / my customer need to agree to these tables? Why should I include the Severity, Occurrence and Detection tables in my design document recording the FMEA analysis?

Q6: One of the differences between a Preliminary Hazard Analysis (Preliminary Risk Analysis) and an FMEA is to assess the Detectability of a failure. Why would analysing this lead to a safer / more reliable design?

Q7: "Systems are analyzed to identify their hazards and those hazards are assessed as to their risks for a single reason: to support management decision-making" [NIOSH, 1998]. Name three important management decisions that are 'documented' in the course of performing a fully completed FMEA.

In: Civil Engineering