From a sample of 36 graduate​ students, the mean number of months of work experience prior to entering an MBA program was 36.95. The national standard deviation is known to be 19 months. What is a 95​% confidence interval for the population​ mean? A 95​% confidence interval for the population mean is left bracket nothing comma nothing right bracket . ​(Use ascending order. Round to two decimal places as​ needed.)

1. Compute the Mean and Median. Explain the meaning of these statistics. Which measure is  more appropriate for this sample? Explain why

The starting annual salaries of a sample of 20 recent MBA graduates are recorded. The data is presented below.

QUESTION 1

Read the two cases of Barbican Bank and Intermarket of Zimbabwe and answer the questions below:

Barbican Bank (BB)

Barbican Bank was formed in the late 1990s at the height of a rush into the financial services sector by domestic investors. It was born out of an asset management company. The founder
was a flamboyant businessman who was a public figure in the financial services sector. At formation the bank declared its focus would be the elite market. Its products were therefore
targeted specifically at the top market. The bank also declared an intention to operate a very small branch network, no more than five branches. Barbican started experiencing liquidity
problems in early 2003 and was placed under the curator in March 2003. Before being placed under the curator Barbican had been reporting fabulous profits most of them having come
from non interest transactions. According to the Central Bank, Barbican ‘‘was experiencing serious liquidity problems as a result of imprudent banking behaviours. There was no clear separation between various related entities within the group which led to cross funding of operations and excessive risk taking among other shortcomings.’’ The Central Bank also noted
that the bank was involved in ‘‘questionable cross-border foreign exchange activities.’’ The bank had shifted funds to South Africa from local operations with the object of establishing a
new company in South Africa. During its operation the bank introduced the derivatives (junk bonds) market, which had been non-existent in the country’s financial sector. When liquidity
problems besieged Barbican the Central Bank placed the banking division under the curator and the asset management company under liquidation. At the time of taking these measures
the Central Bank had injected money into the bank as liquidity support but the bank appeared to be on a serious slide. The bank has since failed to repay on time the loan from the Central
bank’s Troubled Bank Fund. On seeing his financial companies in difficulties, the Chief Executive (the founder) skipped the country. Despite problems in the home operations, the
founding chief executive was trying to set up another financial services company in South Africa. During his tenure the Chief Executive is said to have been so dominant the board
appeared clueless and powerless to restrain him. The bank has now been placed into liquidation by the Central Bank. It will be amalgamated into a merger of liquidated banks to form a new bank.

Intermarket (IM)

The founder established Intermarket Holdings during the late 1990s through acquisitions. At the time of inset of financial distress, the founder owned 72 percent of Intermarket Holdings
through an investment company called Transnational Holdings. Transnational Holdings comprised companies in banking and insurance among others. Its influence in the financial
services sector was in every sphere. Intermarket Banking Corporation one of the subsidiaries of the holding company started showing signs of liquidity problems in early 2004. This was
during the period of a cash crisis in the country. Much as all banking institutions were affected by the cash crisis, Intermarket appeared completely outstretched by the crisis. In March 2004
the bank was placed under the management of a curator by the Central Bank when it appeared it could not pay its creditors and depositors on demand. On investigation, the Central Bank
discovered that the Executive Chairman had loaned himself Z$90 billion of depositors’ money and the insider loans were not being serviced. The Executive Chairman was said to have been so dominant he had the veto power on everything that took place in the corporation. Investigations by the appointed curator have led to a rise in the figure for insider loans to
Z$174 billion. The Executive chairman fled the country when authorities appeared to point at him as the main contributor to financial distress in the institution. Intermarket has been trying
to enter into partnership with other banking institutions, in order to shore up its capital, without much success. Instead Finhold, another Zimbabwean financial institution whose banking
subsidiary is owed Z$100 billion is positioning itself to take over major shareholding in Intermarket Bank through a combination of cash and debt swap. Finhold’s strategy is an
attempt to protect possible collapse of Intermarket since it is a major creditor. Intermarket has to raise its capital base to Z$10 billion before 30 September 2004 as per regulatory authority
requirements. Fraud by some IM employees taking advantage of weak management systems has exacerbated financial distress in Intermarket. The curator has however opened the banking division for limited services to depositors.

Questions:

a) The liquidity problems experience by Barbican Bank and Intermarket bank were as a result of poor risk management. Discuss?

b) Identify the speculative risk that was taken by Barbican Bank?

c) Lack of board independence inadvertently creates an epicentre for corporate governance failures. Discuss using the two cases and outline the ideal role of a board in corporate governance and risk management

Question-----Which carmakers are most likely to benefit from the elimination of the North American Free Trade Agreement? Which will be most negatively impacted? Please help me answer question-+- Read article "It’s Not Just Ford: Trump’s Trade Barbs Threaten VW, Toyota Too" Ford Motor Co. was a favorite target of Donald Trump, who lambasted the company for producing cars south of the border throughout his campaign. Toyota Motor Corp., Volkswagen AG and other U.S. carmakers are just as exposed. Toyota and Nissan Motor Co., Japan’s largest automakers, were spared from Trump’s critique by name on the campaign trail. Yet, along with General Motors Co. and VW, they all rely on Mexican plants for millions of vehicles and a high volume of parts. That puts them at risk if the president-elect makes good on his threat to levy hefty taxes on cars assembled across the Rio Grande. “Trump could, or will, try to set up trade barriers,” said Ferdinand Dudenhoeffer, director of the Center for Automotive Research at the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany. “Automakers with U.S. factories will therefore be on the winning side. Mexico, the new El Dorado of the auto industry, could suffer.” Since 2010, nine global automakers, including GM, Ford and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV, have announced more than $24 billion in Mexican investments. VW’s Audi, BMW AG and Daimler AG each build or plan to assemble luxury vehicles, engines or heavy trucks in the low-cost country, which Trump says has benefited at the expense of the American voters who propelled him to victory. Output in Mexico may more than double this decade, from 2 million to 5 million vehicles, according to the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The Republican candidate and real-estate developer grabbed headlines during his campaign by threatening to slap a 35 percent tariff on any cars Ford builds in Mexico and ships back to the U.S. He called Ford’s plans for a new plant in Mexico “an absolute disgrace.” A levy would lead to higher prices and hurt demand, said Joe Spak, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets. Trump would “start a worldwide trade war” if he decides to end trade pacts and uses anti-dumping provisions to impose widespread tariffs on other countries, said Donald Grimes, an economist at the Institute for Research on Labor, Employment and the Economy at the University of Michigan. The North American Free Trade Agreement, for example, requires only six months’ notice of termination to Canada and Mexico and doesn’t specify that the president would need congressional approval, he said. Read more: Gadfly looks at which carmakers build the most vehicles in Mexico “These other countries would retaliate. Prices consumers would pay would increase sharply. The Federal Reserve would then increase interest rates. It would be ugly,” Grimes said. Despite that threat, U.S. automakers and the United Auto Workers union extended an olive branch to the president-elect. “We agree with Mr. Trump that it is really important to unite the country -- and we look forward to working together to support economic growth and jobs,” Ford said in a statement. The company’s plan to shift small-car production from a factory in Michigan to Mexico was attacked by Trump during his first answer of the initial debate with Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton in September. GM and Fiat Chrysler said in separate statements they would work with Trump and the new Congress on policies that support U.S. manufacturing. UAW President Dennis Williams, whose union endorsed Clinton, told reporters at a roundtable Thursday that “I’m prepared to sit down and talk to him on trade. NAFTA is a huge problem to the American people.” German executives attending an industry conference in Munich on Wednesday also expressed concerns about Trump’s views. BMW is building a new car plant in Mexico’s San Luis Potosi that’s due to start production in 2019, while Audi started assembling autos in San Jose Chiapa in September. “We need open trade,” said BMW CEO Harald Krueger. The luxury automaker ships many of the SUVs assembled at its South Carolina factory to markets around the world and in turn exports sedans and Mini cars to the U.S. from Europe. “We live off exports and imports. The U.S. market is fundamental for us.” NAFTA has created a “highly integrated” auto market in North America that is critical to the fortunes of all global carmakers operating in it, said Sean McAlinden, an automotive economist based in Ann Arbor. “To interrupt the flow of trade across either border, Canadian or Mexican, would really throw more than a monkey wrench into the machine,” McAlinden said. “It would create a very, very noncompetitive North American auto industry.” Conciliation Hopes Daimler CEO Dieter Zetsche and James Verrier, who heads supplier BorgWarner Inc., are among executives who held out hope that much of Trump’s trade talk was campaign rhetoric and would soften with the practicalities needed to govern. “Many things get said during the heat of an election campaign,” Zetsche said. “I hope and believe this is also the case here.” For Bob Lutz, the retired vice chairman of GM, Trump’s victory could ultimately help the auto industry if his advisers and Congress keep him from pushing his protectionist agenda too far. “He’s not a dictator,” Lutz said in an interview. “No one can go in and abrogate trade deals. There are some aspects of NAFTA that will probably be re-negotiated, but he will probably be talked out of his crazier ideas.” Rather than threaten Japan auto imports with tariffs, Trump has pointed to wealth generated from the cars being sold in the U.S. to bolster his argument for America to pay a smaller share of the costs related to stationing troops in its biggest Asian ally’s territory. “Japan is ripping us off with the cars,” Trump said at an Oct. 12 campaign event in Florida. In remarks to Ohio volunteers in July, he spoke of “massive ships” delivering vehicles to the U.S. from Japan, which he told Americans was “rich because of us.” Representatives for Toyota, Nissan and Honda Motor Co. declined to comment. Japan’s automakers have combined capacity to build about 1.36 million vehicles annually in Mexico and have announced plans for new plants capable of assembling another 430,000 vehicles a year. Models built or planned for Mexican production and sale in the U.S. include the Toyota Corolla, the Nissan Versa and Sentra, and the Honda Fit and HR-V. “If NAFTA is going to be up for discussion somewhere down the line, that would affect Japanese companies very much, especially auto-related investments in Mexico,” said Bob Takai, president and CEO of Sumitomo Global Research Co. “If the trading and investing is going to be very difficult because of the new presidency, we may go somewhere else.”

Splish Corp. has 150,240 shares of common stock outstanding. In 2020, the company reports income from continuing operations before income tax of $1,210,400. Additional transactions not considered in the $1,210,400 are as follows.

Analyze the above information and prepare an income statement for the year 2020, starting with income from continuing operations before income tax. Compute earnings per share as it should be shown on the face of the income statement. (Assume a total effective tax rate of 19% on all items, unless otherwise indicated.) (Round earnings per share to 2 decimal places, e.g. 1.47.)

Mueller Company purchased equipment on January 1, 2015 for $2,000,000. Because of the unique kind of equipment and the possibility of radioactivity from its components, the equipment will require very special disposal at the end of its useful life of 15 years. Mueller estimates the cost of disposal at $250,000 (ARO). The equipment is depreciated using the straight line method. Mueller's operations have experienced significant losses for the past 2 years and, as a result, the company has decided that the equipment should be evaluated for possible impairment at the beginning of 2020. The management of Mueller Company estimates that the equipment has a remaining useful life of 7 years. Net cash inflow from the equipment will be $157,000 per year.The fair value of the equipment and the ARO is determined using a 12% discount rate or cost of capital.

1. Show the journal entry needed in 2015 to record the purchase of the equipment and the related disposal liability.
2. Show the adjusting entry needed for the asset and liability at the end of 2015.
3. Determine whether the equipment is impaired as of the beginning of 2020.
4. Show any journal entry needed to record the loss on impairment if needed at the beginning of 2020.

Free cash flow valuation   Nabor Industries is considering going public but is unsure of a fair offering price for the company. Before hiring an investment banker to assist in making the public​ offering, managers at Nabor have decided to make their own estimate of the​ firm's common stock value. The​ firm's CFO has gathered data for performing the valuation using the free cash flow valuation model.

The​ firm's weighted average cost of capital is

13 %

and it has

$2,480,000

of debt at market value and

$500,000

of preferred stock at its assumed market value. The estimated free cash flows over the next 5​ years, 2016 through​2020, are given in the​ table,

. Beyond 2020 to​ infinity, the firm expects its free cash flow to grow by

5 %

annually.

a.  Estimate the value of Nabor​ Industries' entire company by using the free cash flow valuation

model.

a.  The value of Nabor​ Industries' entire company is

​$ ? nothing.​(Round to the nearest​ dollar.)

5. Following information is available for two companies. Analyze the information and answer the questions: a. M G Industries manufactures various types of industrial chemicals. The company had a total asset turnover of 2.5 times for the year ended 31st March 2019. The sales for the year were ₹ 35,50,000. Total assets were ₹ 12,35,890 as on 31st March 2018. Assume that compared to 31st March 2019, total assets were projected to increase by 12% by 31st March 2020. The company projected a total asset turnover of 2.8 times for the year ending 31st March 2020. Given this information, what are the projected sales for year ending 31st March 2020? b. An airline company has taken many aircrafts on lease. Its EBIT for the year ended 31st March 2019 was ₹124.68 crores. Interest coverage ratio was impressive at 5.6 times. However its fixed charges coverage ratio was only 1.4 times. The fixed charges were lease rentals for the aircrafts. Given this information, calculate the lease rentals for the year.