"Deferred Taxes" Please respond to the following:
Are deferred taxes an unfair loophole that must be closed? Provide a rationale for your response.
In: Accounting
In: Advanced Math
How does the demand multiplier in the open economy compare with the one in the closed economy (smaller, bigger or the same)? Explain briefly.
In: Economics
What do you understand by closed-loop marketing, and how might this be better applied in an organization with which you are familiar?
In: Operations Management
Turing Machine and Closure Operations
Show that Turing-decidable languages are closed under the following operations:
union
concatenation
star
In: Computer Science
The financial statements for the Nitai’s Nail Supplies for the past two years are presented below.
|
Nitai’s nail SUPPLIES Comparative Income Statements for the year ended 30 June |
||||||||||
|
2019 |
2020 |
|||||||||
|
Sales Cost of sales |
$400 000 350 000 |
$ 500 000 458 000 |
||||||||
|
Gross profit Interest income Loss on sale of fixtures |
50 000 1 000
|
42 000 2 000 800 |
||||||||
|
51 000 |
43 200 |
|||||||||
|
Office supplies used Other expenses |
10 000 29 000 |
11 000 29 000 |
||||||||
|
39 000 |
42 000 |
|||||||||
|
Profit |
$ 12 000 |
$ 3 200 |
||||||||
|
Nitai’s nail SUPPLIES Comparative Statements of Financial Position as at 30 June |
||||||||||||
|
2019 |
2020 |
|||||||||||
|
ASSETS Cash at bank Accounts receivable Inventory Office supplies Freehold property Fixtures Accumulated depreciation – fixtures Investments |
$ 4 400 42 000 80 000 2 000 60 000 40 000 (16 000) 6 000 |
— $60 000 40 000 5 000 80 000 46 000 (20 200) 16 000 |
||||||||||
|
$218 400 |
$226 800 |
|||||||||||
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY Bank overdraft Accounts payable Nitai, Capital |
— $ 26 000 192 400 |
$ 4 000 40 000 182 800 |
||||||||||
|
$218 400 |
$226 800 |
|||||||||||
Additional information
(a) All purchases and sales of inventories are on credit. All purchases of office supplies are for cash.
(b) The bank overdraft is considered to be part of the entity’s cash management function.
(c) During the year ended 30 June 2020, the owner, Nitai, withdrew $12 800 in cash for personal use.
(d) The entity sold some fixtures for $1200 cash during the current year. These fixtures initially cost $4200 and had been written down to a carrying amount at the date of sale of $2000.
(e) Depreciation of fixtures has been included in ‘other expenses’ for the year ended 30 June 2020. All remaining other expenses were paid in cash.
Required
In: Accounting
Whiskey Industries Ltd., a Nanaimo, British Columbia–based company, has a December 31 year end. The company’s comparative statement of financial position and its statement of income for the most recent fiscal year are presented here, along with some additional information:
| 1. | During the year, Whiskey Industries sold, for $470 cash, equipment that had an original cost of $940 and a net carrying amount of $190. | |
| 2. | Whiskey Industries borrowed an additional $7,520 by issuing notes payable in 2020. | |
| 3. | During the year, the company purchased a piece of land for a future manufacturing site for $188,000. The land was purchased with no money down and the company entered into a mortgage payable for the full amount. |
| WHISKEY INDUSTRIES LTD. Statement of Financial Position As at December 31, 2020 |
|||||
| 2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Assets | |||||
| Current assets | |||||
| Cash | $5,690 | $18,330 | |||
| Accounts receivable | 9,400 | 18,800 | |||
| Prepaid rent | 560 | 470 | |||
| Inventory | 37,600 | 28,200 | |||
| Total current assets | 53,250 | 65,800 | |||
| Manufacturing equipment | 149,460 | 94,000 | |||
| Accumulated depreciation, manufacturing equipment | (65,050 | ) | (47,000 | ) | |
| Land | 188,000 | 0 | |||
| Total assets | $325,660 | $112,800 | |||
| Liabilities and shareholders’ equity | |||||
| Current liabilities | |||||
| Accounts payable | $10,340 | $5,640 | |||
| Wages payable | 560 | 380 | |||
| Dividends payable | 440 | 280 | |||
| Total current liabilities | 11,340 | 6,300 | |||
| Mortgage payable | 188,000 | 0 | |||
| Notes payable | 43,240 | 37,600 | |||
| Common shares | 27,260 | 23,500 | |||
| Retained earnings | 55,820 | 45,400 | |||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $325,660 | $112,800 | |||
| WHISKEY INDUSTRIES LTD. Statement of Income For the year ended December 31, 2020 |
|||
| Sales | $122,200 | ||
| Cost of goods sold | 75,200 | ||
| Gross margin | 47,000 | ||
| Expenses | |||
| Rent expense | 6,670 | ||
| Wages expense | 9,020 | ||
| Depreciation expense | 18,800 | ||
| Interest expense | 560 | ||
| Income tax expense | 490 | ||
| Gain on sale of equipment | (280) | ||
| Net income | $11,740 | ||
(a)
Using the information above, prepare the statement of cash flows for Whiskey Industries Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2020, using the indirect method. (Show amounts that decrease cash flow with either a - sign e.g. -15,000 or in parenthesis e.g. (15,000).)
| Supplementary disclosures: | |||||
| Cash paid for interest | $ | ||||
| Cash paid for income tax | $ |
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
During the year, land with a value of $ was acquired by
signing a mortgage payable for the full amount.
In: Accounting
Question : Healthcare startups struggle to navigate a business world that’s set up for them to fail them
Challenge 1: Institutional policies and hierarchical systems stunt innovation
Challenge 2: Healthcare doesn’t understand early-stage tech companies
Challenge 3: Pilots are set up to hurt more than help.
Promising opportunities ahead
Please explain those context
In: Accounting
c. Diffusion.
i. Define it,
ii. Explain how it works,
iii. Give 3 examples involving firms that have lead diffusion of
some innovation and why these represent good examples of
diffusion,
iv. Discuss how diffusion might be affected by a slow growth / no
growth economy.
1. Since diffusion is not free, how might it be impacted by
economies that are not growing or only growing slowly?
In: Economics
What are the best arguments for awarding a "property right" specifically a patent, to the discoverer of any new and useful idea? Please state clearly atleast one objection to allowing ideas to be privately owned. And also is there an alternative government policy to encourage innovation that avoids the stated problem? Which is superior, from a law and economics perspective - the patent/property right solution or your alternative?
Please explain in detail.
In: Economics