Questions
There are two traffic lights on the route used by a certain individual to go from...

There are two traffic lights on the route used by a certain individual to go from home to work. Let E denote the event that the individual must stop at the first light, and define the event F in a similar manner for the second light. Suppose that P(E) = 0.5, P(F) = 0.3, and P(EF) = 0.12.

(a) What is the probability that the individual must stop at at least one light; that is, what is the probability of the event P(EF)?


(b) What is the probability that the individual doesn't have to stop at either light?


(c) What is the probability that the individual must stop at exactly one of the two lights?


(d) What is the probability that the individual must stop just at the first light? (Hint: How is the probability of this event related to P(E) and P(EF)? A Venn diagram might help.)

In: Statistics and Probability

Perceptions differ from person to person. The perception of an individual is a strong indicator to...

Perceptions differ from person to person. The perception of an individual is a strong indicator to his/her decision making outcomes. Evaluate the role of perceptional influences under such circumstances.

In: Psychology

What is the benefit of studying culture from the anthropological perspective for the individual? For society?

What is the benefit of studying culture from the anthropological perspective for the individual? For society?

In: Psychology

Question 4. The probability that an individual will suffer from a bad reaction of a given...

Question 4. The probability that an individual will suffer from a bad reaction of a given serum is .003. Out of 10000 individuals, compute the following probabilities using both the Binomial and Poisson models.

Part 1. P (X = 0) where X is Binomial and then Poisson.

Part 2. P (X > 10) where X is Binomial and then Poisson.

In: Math

The Institute of Education Sciences measures the high school dropout rate as the percentage of 16-through...

The Institute of Education Sciences measures the high school dropout rate as the percentage of 16-through 24-year-olds who are not enrolled in school and have not earned a high school credential. Last year, the high school dropout rate was 8.1%. A polling company recently took a survey of 400 people between the ages of 16 and 24 and found that 26 of them are high school dropouts. The polling company would like to determine whether the dropout rate has decreased. Let α = 0.01. What is the decision?

Group of answer choices

Fail to reject Ho; we can conclude that the high school dropout rate has decreased.

Reject Ho; we can conclude that the high school dropout rate has decreased.

Reject Ho; we cannot conclude that the high school dropout rate has decreased

Fail to reject Ho; we cannot conclude that the high school dropout rate has decreased.

In: Statistics and Probability

CASE ONE: DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES LTD - CONQUERING THE WORLD WITH AFFORDABLE MEDICINE FOR THE MASSES...

CASE ONE:
DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES LTD - CONQUERING THE WORLD WITH AFFORDABLE MEDICINE FOR THE MASSES

Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. is a pharmaceutical company based in Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India. The company was founded by Anji Reddy. Dr. Reddy’s manufactures and markets a wide range of pharmaceuticals in India and overseas. The company’s portfolio includes over 190 medications, 60 APIs (active pharmaceutical ingredients) for drug manufacture, diagnostic kits and critical care and biotechnology products.

Dr. Reddy’s is not just a generic company, but an API company with a much broader activity. It is the only Indian company to have significant R&D activities being undertaken overseas. Dr. Reddy’s has enormous capabilities in chemistry, formulation development, manufacturing, environmental management and research. With this depth of capabilities as well as a history of continuous progress, a workforce of more than 12,000 employees, and a global orientation, Dr. Reddy’s represents a company with great potential to become a brand in Western (US and European) markets.
1984–1990: Taking the first steps. In 1984, Dr. Reddy’s originally launched the production of active pharmaceutical ingredients. In 1986, Reddy’s started operations on branded formulations. Within a year, Reddy’s had launched Norilet, the company’s first recognized brand in India. Soon, Dr. Reddy’s obtained another success with Omez, and Reddy’s became the first Indian company to export the active ingredients for pharmaceuticals to Europe. Reddy’s started to transform itself from a supplier of pharmaceutical ingredients to other manufacturers into a manufacturer of pharmaceutical products in 1987.

1991–1999: Expanding and Innovating. The company’s first international move in 1992 took it to Russia, where Dr. Reddy’s formed a joint venture with Biomed. Dr. Reddy’s Research Foundation was established to carry out research in the area of new drug discovery. The focus has since changed to innovative R&D, hiring new scientists, especially Indian students studying abroad in doctoral and post-doctoral courses. In 1994, Reddy’s started targeting the US generic market and in 1997, it was ready for the next major step. From being an API and bulk drug supplier to regulated markets like the USA and the UK, and a branded formulations supplier in unregulated markets like India and Russia, Reddy’s made the transition into generics by filing an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) in the USA. In the same year, Reddy’s out-licensed a molecule for clinical trials to Novo Nordisk, a Danish pharmaceutical company. Reddy’s strengthened its Indian manufacturing operations in 1999 by acquiring American Remedies Ltd.

2000–2009: Growing Globally. In 2000, Dr. Reddy’s Research Foundation set up an American laboratory in Atlanta which was dedicated to discovery and design of novel therapeutics. The laboratory is called Reddy US Therapeutics Inc. and its main aim is the discovery of next-generation drugs. Reddy’s research thrust focused on large niche areas in Western markets: anti-cancer, anti-diabetes, cardiovascular and anti-infection drugs. In the year 2001, it became the first non-Japanese pharmaceutical company from the Asia-Pacific region to obtain a New York Stock Exchange listing, a ground-breaking achievement for the Indian pharmaceutical industry.

Reddy’s started its European operations in 2002 by acquiring two pharmaceutical firms in the United Kingdom. The acquisition of BMS Laboratories and its wholly owned subsidiary, Meridian UK, allowed Reddy’s to expand geographically into the European market. The American launch of Reddy’s house-branded ibuprofen tablets in 400, 600 and 800 mg strengthened in 2003. Direct marketing under the Reddy’s brand name represented a significant step in the company’s efforts to build a strong and sustainable US generic business. It was the first step in building Reddy’s fully-fledged distribution network in the US market. In 2005, Dr. Reddy’s entered into a marketing agreement with Eurodrug Laboratories, a pharmaceutical company based in the Netherlands, to improve its product portfolio for respiratory diseases. Dr. Reddy’s acquired Betapharm Arzneimittel GmbH from 3i for €480 million in March 2006. This is one of the largest-ever foreign acquisitions by an Indian pharmaceutical company. Betapharm is Germany’s fourth-largest generics pharmaceutical company. In 2008, Reddy’s also acquired Dowpharma’s small molecule business in the UK. Dr. Reddy’s announced in 2009 that it had entered into a strategic partnership with GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK) to develop and market select products across emerging markets outside India.

Having started in 1984 as an API manufacturer, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories are currently offering over 150 patented medications and more than 60 APIs, with more than 500 DFM fillings, and assuring safety and quality of the medicinal products. The main business of Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, however, is the production and distribution of generic drugs: drugs that can be legally reproduced after the branded drug goes off-patent, which is usually after a time period ranging from 20 to 25 years, as well as biologically-similar alternatives, new chemical entities, and differentiated formulations. In other words, Dr. Reddy’s is mostly involved in cheap and efficient reproduction of medications which are no longer protected by patents. Thus, they can be sold under the brand-name price since expensive steps such as research and innovation of the drug have already taken place.

Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories offers more than 200 generic drugs which are distributed to countries in the West and to Asia. The production of generic drugs is more cost efficient since the drugs have already been developed and tested. Therefore, based on the original price of the off-patent drug, generic drugs are substantially cheaper to purchase, in agreement with Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories’ philosophy of making crucial pharmaceuticals available for everyone. These generic drugs are mostly offered in the major therapeutic areas of cardiological diseases, pain management and anti-infection drugs, as well as those used in dermatology and oncology. Generic and biologically-similar pharmaceuticals are sold under brand names, also known as branded generics, in order to supply people, who are willing to pay a small premium in order to get an efficient and recognizable product, with high quality yet affordable drugs. Well known generic brands by Dr. Reddy’s include Omez, Ciprolet, and Nise, which are holding leadership positions in various key markets, especially in India, Russia, and Commonwealth of Independent States countries.

In developed markets such as the USA, Germany, UK, and Australia, however, the drugs are not sold under branded names but their generic names, also called pure generics, in order to keep costs low in the production stage and lower the healthcare costs for the patients. Furthermore, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories’ product range does not only contain copycat or generic drugs but also includes APIs and is the second largest provider of APIs since it distributes to more than 75 countries in the world. Being a world leader in generic APIs also has multiple advantages, such as keeping prices low and making it available for patients in the shortest amount of time.

Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories has performed very well in the past two years. It made revenues of more than 96,737,323.00 Indian Rupees (€1.3 billion) during the fiscal year 2012 with a gross profit of more than 55 %. The year 2013 followed with a remarkable growth of 20 % in revenues, which demonstrates the quick growth the company is experiencing due to their successful business strategies mentioned above. Because Dr. Reddy’s LTD is listed on NASDAQ, the past years were very beneficial for the stockholders due to a strong increase in earnings per share as well as dividend pay-out. The company’s stock was strongly bullish and share prices have risen significantly when compared to other indexes within the last 5 years and this has made Dr. Reddy’s a stable and efficient investment opportunity.

“If one analyses why we have been so successful, the single most important fact is our strength in the R&D and our ability to commercialize technologies developed in a quick and efficient manner”.
This quote by the Chairman and CEO of Dr. Reddy’s, G.V. Prasad, states why the company was able to become a world pharmaceutical company in less than 30 years: the fact that high priority was put on the R&D sector.

There are multiple daughter companies wholly owned by Dr. Reddy’s, such as Promius Pharma, which focus solely on innovation and new product development which are positioned not only to produce generic drugs but also to research new and affordable alternatives. Another important fact, which greatly contributed and still contributes to the company’s success, is the patient-friendliness of the company. Dr Reddy’s is different from other pharmaceutical companies because it does not exploit the end-consumer by exaggerating medicinal products but puts efforts into making medicine affordable for everyone. This fact almost instantly provided the company with a good reputation. Furthermore, Dr. Reddy’s was the first pharmaceutical company in India that approached the end-consumer directly, providing in depth customer services and using it as a tool to keep patients both satisfied and updated on upcoming products.

Another major point contributing to the success of the company is the very diverse manufacturing and distribution of medicinal products in emerging and developed markets. In emerging markets, generic drugs by Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories are sold under branded names, whereas the opposite approach is taken when acting in developed markets: that is, distributing the product solely under the generic name to make it more competitive in Western markets in particular. Hence, a focus on R&D, the right marketing efforts, and the company’s philosophy that healthcare must be affordable, made Dr. Reddy’s a world leading pharmaceutical company in less than 30 years.

Through multiple R&D laboratories all over the world, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories assures high quality standards for all their products. Targeting Western specialty generics in order to establish a foundation for drug production constituted the first step for the company towards its own innovation and research. The company has multiple research and development institutes in India and North America which are pioneering next generation pharmaceuticals using genomics and proteomics. The laboratory, Reddy US Therapeutics Inc., located in Atlanta, is only doing research on next-generation drugs, and focuses on Western niche markets such as anti-cancer, anti-diabetes, and anti-infection drugs. Additionally, more and more new medical products are developed on a biologically similar basis, focusing more on the conversion of natural ingredients rather than just on synthetic ones. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories are also strongly engaging in novel molecule innovations which are crucial in developing new treatments for therapeutic use.

Dr Reddy’s Laboratories capitalized on the regulatory troubles of Indian rivals to post its highest ever quarterly income and operating profit during October-December 2013. India’s largest pharmaceutical company by sales announced in January 2014 that net profit in the third quarter swelled by 70% compared to the previous year whilst revenue grew by 23%.” (Economic Times 2014) Based on this citation written by The Economic Times in February 2014, it become clear what a huge growth potential and thus growth development Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories has displayed in the past year especially, but also in general, since it was founded in 1984.

The biggest growth in market size and capitalization has been made primarily in the US market as a result of several crucial factors. The business benefited the most from the launch of new products in the generic business and the expansion of key products with limited competition due to patenting and complex development. Additionally, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories was able to increase its market share in the US because competing pharmaceutical companies, such as Wockhardt and Ranbaxy, had been dealing with legal issues concerning the safety of a new plant and so production was unable to meet the market demand.

Dr. Reddy’s has a long history of being guided by principles. The strong belief that they can make medicines of higher quality and lower prices compared to Western companies was a driving factor for the company to enter the overseas market as an API supplier in 1986. At that time, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories was one of the first suppliers in the overseas market. It gained more and more attention when it became the biggest supplier of methyldopa to the German pharmaceutical giant Merck. By delivering high quality for low prices and by getting US FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approval for their plants, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories was able to supply ibuprofen to the US market shortly thereafter. Hence, within a short time, Dr. Reddy’s made a name in the European and North American markets.

This reputation began to grow as the company also launched several products for which they had gained marketing exclusivity rights: that is, being able to make extra revenues of more than 200 million US$ just by having exclusive selling rights due to patenting and FTF regulations (Mahalingam, 2013). Not only has Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories been successful in expanding into the European and US market, but it also has been reaching out to the emerging markets. It has become a trustworthy partner with Russia, which is currently the biggest growing market of the pharmaceutical company. Through the company’s willingness to strive to its best potential and to take on new challenges by entering into such difficult markets as the US, it inspired other smaller Indian companies and became a benchmark for success.

Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories has a strong position in the global market. While playing a minor role in the domestic market, it established itself in the global market with its generic business and over-the-counter drugs in North America, West Europe, and in Russia, its fastest growing market. The pharma market accounts currently for more than 65 % of Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories total revenues. The main business of the company in the North American market is the development and production of global generics, whereas a pipeline with more than 200 generic drugs are on file in order to instantly replace products which are going off-patent within the next few years. In addition to those generics which have yet to be launched, other key products with limited competition have been constantly introduced to the market over the previous years and are expected to continue to build high market share with little price erosion.

The strongest growing market for Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, however, is the Russian market, which is currently experiencing a strong restructuring of their pharmaceutical sector as it is trying to reach a level of 50 % in domestic production of pharmaceuticals. The huge increase in demand is mainly in the middle to low cost generics produced by Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories as well as over-the-counter drugs. Since the company already has strong business connections with Russia since 1988, it was able to increase its revenues significantly (20 % on average) during the past years. Even if Russia passes a specific law which requires generic and innovative companies to have a manufacturing presence when selling its products, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories has already stated that they are willing to locate production facilities in Russia, and the only thing to evaluate is whether to acquire existing facilities or build new ones.

Despite the generally strong growth of Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories in the USA, Russia, and the emerging markets, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories is not one of the biggest players in the domestic Indian market; it does not even rank in the top 10 in the domestic pharma market although it is ranked as the second largest pharmaceutical company in India. The strong focus on profitable foreign markets is surely to some extent a reason for the lack of performance in the domestic market. The Indian pharmaceutical market is flooded with several new products from companies such as Sun Pharma and Cipla, whereas Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories had been focusing on a few selected brands which limits the company’s portfolio to a much greater extent and thus makes it difficult to acquire additional market share.

Therefore, in the past four years, the company has invested heavily in boosting the sales force by 50 % and marketing efforts have been expanded into rural areas, as they are seen as an emerging market in India itself. Furthermore, through the development of new product lines and the extension of existing key brands in the area of gastrointestinal or cardiovascular, which account for more than 50 % of its revenues, the company will have new possibilities to gain a bigger market share. However, as Dr. Reddy’s has been showing so little effort in the domestic market as compared to foreign markets, it will be very challenging for the company to gain acceptance within the Indian medical community and therefore increase sales since time has shown that the Indian pharma community is hesitant when it comes to new portfolios, unlike the North American community. Furthermore, Dr. Reddy’s may also be influenced by the new Drug Pricing Controls, which will increase the prices for some of its essential products perhaps causing a decent loss in profits in the home market (Economic Times, 2014). Since the medical portfolio of the company is relatively small compared to its competitors, another way of gaining market share more quickly is by acquisition of other medical businesses, individual brands, or entire portfolios.

However, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories has far more possibilities than only acquiring other businesses or expanding their existing portfolio, including making use of the huge R&D facilities in developing biologically similar products. These products have little competition in the domestic market and are expected to increase from US$2 billion to US$ 4–6 billion through 2016. Since the possibility of new entrants remains small due to the complexity of the products and production processes in this new emerging pharmaceutical sector, Dr. Reddy’s may use this favourable position to grow its market share.
Additionally, by entering into a partnership with Merck Sereno, a division of the pharmaceutical company Merck, Dr. Reddy’s will lower the risk by splitting development costs, which are estimated to be at more than US$200 million. The fact that the company is already heavily engaged in the development of biologically-similar products, and that developed countries are still far from launching biologically-similar products to such an extent, gives Dr. Reddy’s a crucial advantage in its home market among its Indian competitors. High entry barriers and the difficulty of domestic companies to increase their capabilities also work in Dr. Reddy’s favour. Thus, the key driver for the company to gain market share with little competition within its domestic market is its high expenditure in R&D.

Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories is a multinational pharma company, which provides high amounts of tax yearly to the government from producing, importing or exporting products. The new regulations in the Indian Drug Pricing Policy will most likely lead to higher prices and to shrinking profit margins, and also to having to pay more taxes, which is a clear disadvantage for the company as well as for the whole pharma sector in India. Furthermore, Russia passed a law which would force pharmaceutical suppliers to build domestic plants in order to be able to distribute their products to the Russian market. This would lead to higher taxation as well in the Russian market, although the good, general relationship between Russia and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories would suggest that both parties would be in favour of such an idea since having production facilities in Russia opens new supply channels towards Eastern European countries. A special-purpose program will support the restructuring of the Russian pharmaceutical industry, which might provide beneficial incentives for companies such as Dr. Reddy’s to produce in this market in the near future. Nevertheless, the general advantages and benefits, which Dr. Reddy’s already possesses and seeks to expand over the coming years, are primarily their own successes in technology, long term thinking, and a high degree of innovation.

As one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in India, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories averages 200 orders a day alone for its US generic pharmaceutical and over-the-counter products. A triple-digit percentage revenue increase in the past year (2013) demonstrates the agility of the company’s move into the generic marketplace. Getting to market first following US FDA approval is a key with generics. Dr. Reddy’s needed a streamlined supply chain and the flexibility to position its new products against the large number of prescription drugs due to come off patent protection. Since it manufactures in India, Dr. Reddy’s must plan for additional lead times to get products to the USA. When drugs move from branded to generic, pharmaceutical companies face a host of regulatory and supply chain challenges to get products to clinicians and retail pharmacies. Since the FDA approves the sale of branded drugs as generic as late as the day of patent expiration, acting quickly and efficiently means being first out of the gate, sometimes even getting products to the drug wholesalers or store distribution centres the next day. That drives critical planning for the right warehousing and distribution solutions linked with transportation. Further complicating the process, the FDA also may require label and packaging changes to some medicines prior to approval for generic sales.

Since Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories’ company mission is to make “affordable medicine for everybody,” the challenge is going to be how to remain sustainable in the low pricing class in order to build and keep their customer base. Newly imposed regulations are obstacles which have to be overcome by the company using even more technological advantages in order to still make profit by keeping costs low throughout the production process. In addition, Dr. Reddy’s has to show initiative and strong cooperation with the new ‘healthcare project’ in order to gain a favourable position in the Russian pharmaceutical market. As Dr. Reddy’s plays more of a minor role in their domestic Indian drug market due to the intense competition, a different approach, such as the production of highly technological medicine, rather than lower costing has to be found in order to retain a leading position in the Indian market.

CASE ONE QUESTIONS:
A. Critically discuss the strategy/strategies adopted by Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. to become a global company.
B. Discuss the issues and challenges Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. faced in its march to become a global company.
C. With reference to strategic management concepts/tools, discuss how the company dealt with the issues and challenges it faced.

In: Operations Management

Problem 10-1A On January 1, 2017, the ledger of Crane Company contained these liability accounts. Accounts...

Problem 10-1A On January 1, 2017, the ledger of Crane Company contained these liability accounts. Accounts Payable $42,700 Sales Taxes Payable 6,700 Unearned Service Revenue 19,200 During January, the following selected transactions occurred. Jan. 1 Borrowed $18,000 in cash from Apex Bank on a 4-month, 5%, $18,000 note. 5 Sold merchandise for cash totaling $7,314, which includes 6% sales taxes. 12 Performed services for customers who had made advance payments of $11,100. (Credit Service Revenue.) 14 Paid state treasurer’s department for sales taxes collected in December 2016, $6,700. 20 Sold 520 units of a new product on credit at $46 per unit, plus 6% sales tax. During January, the company’s employees earned wages of $79,400. Withholdings related to these wages were $6,074 for Social Security (FICA), $5,671 for federal income tax, and $1,701 for state income tax. The company owed no money related to these earnings for federal or state unemployment tax. Assume that wages earned during January will be paid during February. No entry had been recorded for wages or payroll tax expense as of January 31.

a) Journalize the January transactions. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent manually. Record journal entries in the order presented in the problem. Round answers to nearest whole dollar amount, e.g. 5,275.)

b) Journalize the adjusting entries at January 31 for the outstanding note payable and for salaries and wages expense and payroll tax expense. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent manually.)


c) Prepare the current liabilities section of the balance sheet at January 31, 2017. Assume no change in Accounts Payable.

In: Accounting

Developing a Promising Manager Training and development are the second components of the human resource management...

Developing a Promising Manager

Training and development are the second components of the human resource management system and are used to ensure that organizational members develop the skills and abilities that will enable them to perform their jobs effectively in the present and the future. Training and development are ongoing processes because changes in technology and the environment, as well as in an organization's goals and strategies, often require that organizational members learn new techniques, gain new knowledge, and develop new abilities.

In this activity, you will take on the role of Janel, a training and development manager, as she tries to decide on the most appropriate training program for a promising young manager at the hypothetical company, Acme International. Review the training and development section in the text before beginning this activity.

Janel is a training and development specialist at the hypothetical company, Acme International. Acme's organizational goals include continued international expansion and becoming the market leader in their industry for new products. Over the last week, Janel has had several discussions with the West Coast divisional manager about a promising employee, Dena.

Dena earned two bachelor's degrees from a prestigious university five years ago, one in Art and Design and the other in Psychology and Social Behavior. She worked for a marketing firm before joining the West Coast division of Acme International as an assistant manager two years ago. She has impressed her supervisors and moved up steadily in the division. She has shown strong aptitude for leadership and teamwork as well as being a regular contributor of innovative new product and marketing ideas. Although she grew up in New York and attended school in California, her experience with other countries and cultures has been limited to one semester studying in Spain.

The divisional manager initiated the discussions with Janel in order to start mapping out a development plan for Dena. Janel has been reviewing Dena's history and the various development possibilities provided by Acme. Janel's main goal is to prepare Dena to move up in the international product development division. A single developmental program will probably not be enough. What combination of programs will be most effective at filling the gaps in Janel's background and preparing her to manage an international development team?

8.Does Janel need to build a development program for Dena that will provide her with the education necessary to take on new responsibilities and more challenging positions?

A.Yes. Her bachelor’s degrees provide a good foundation, but she’d probably benefit from an MBA.

B.Yes. Her bachelor’s degrees provide a good foundation, but she’d probably benefit from another undergraduate degree in international management.

C. No. Her bachelor’s degrees provide more than enough formal education for direction in which she’s headed.

9.

Dena’s variety of job experiences with Acme and other firms likely has provided her with

A.sufficient technical skill for her advancement with Acme.

B.a chance to broaden her horizons and see the big picture.

C.a background that will help her deal with ethical dilemmas.

10.Dena mostly has worked in line positons. Should Janel rotate her through a staff position?

A.No. The career they envision for her is in line positions.

B.Yes. The career they envision for her is in staff positions.

C.Yes. The career they envision for her requires understanding of all aspects of the organization.

11.If Dena is to be the manager of an international development team, the best thing Janel should try to get Dena is

A.lessons in a foreign language.

B.intensive cross-cultural training.

C.an overseas posting for a few years.

12.Janel sets up a meeting with Dena, and says, “I’ve reviewed your history and qualifications. Based on this _____, I have designed a development plan for you.”

A.needs assessment

B.performance review

C. background check

In: Operations Management

Business transactions completed by Hannah Venedict during the month of September are as follows. Venedict invested...

Business transactions completed by Hannah Venedict during the month of September are as follows.

  1. Venedict invested $80,000 cash along with office equipment valued at $24,000 in a new business named HV Consulting in exchange for common stock.
  2. The company purchased land valued at $45,000 and a building valued at $155,000. The purchase is paid with $30,000 cash and a long-term note payable for $170,000.
  3. The company purchased $1,600 of office supplies on credit.
  4. Venedict invested her personal automobile in the company in exchange for more common stock. The automobile has a value of $16,600 and is to be used exclusively in the business.
  5. The company purchased $5,200 of additional office equipment on credit.
  6. The company paid $2,000 cash salary to an assistant.
  7. The company provided services to a client and collected $7,800 cash.
  8. The company paid $640 cash for this month’s utilities.
  9. The company paid $1,600 cash to settle the account payable created in transaction c.
  10. The company purchased $20,200 of new office equipment by paying $20,200 cash.
  11. The company completed $6,000 of services for a client, who must pay within 30 days.
  12. The company paid $1,700 cash salary to an assistant.
  13. The company received $3,000 cash in partial payment on the receivable created in transaction k.
  14. The company paid a $2,900 cash dividend.


Required:
1. Prepare general journal entries to record these transactions using the following titles: Cash (101); Accounts Receivable (106); Office Supplies (108); Office Equipment (163); Automobiles (164); Building (170); Land (172); Accounts Payable (201); Notes Payable (250); Common Stock (307); Dividends (319); Fees Earned (402); Salaries Expense (601); and Utilities Expense (602).
2. Post the journal entries from part 1 to the ledger accounts.
3. Prepare a trial balance as of the end of September.

In: Accounting

Business transactions completed by Hannah Venedict during the month of September are as follows. Venedict invested...

Business transactions completed by Hannah Venedict during the month of September are as follows.

  1. Venedict invested $80,000 cash along with office equipment valued at $24,000 in a new business named HV Consulting in exchange for common stock.
  2. The company purchased land valued at $45,000 and a building valued at $160,000. The purchase is paid with $25,000 cash and a long-term note payable for $180,000.
  3. The company purchased $2,400 of office supplies on credit.
  4. Venedict invested her personal automobile in the company in exchange for more common stock. The automobile has a value of $16,500 and is to be used exclusively in the business.
  5. The company purchased $5,900 of additional office equipment on credit.
  6. The company paid $1,600 cash salary to an assistant.
  7. The company provided services to a client and collected $7,400 cash.
  8. The company paid $645 cash for this month’s utilities.
  9. The company paid $2,400 cash to settle the account payable created in transaction c.
  10. The company purchased $20,100 of new office equipment by paying $20,100 cash.
  11. The company completed $7,000 of services for a client, who must pay within 30 days.
  12. The company paid $1,600 cash salary to an assistant.
  13. The company received $3,500 cash in partial payment on the receivable created in transaction k.
  14. The company paid a $2,800 cash dividend.


Required:
1. Prepare general journal entries to record these transactions using the following titles: Cash (101); Accounts Receivable (106); Office Supplies (108); Office Equipment (163); Automobiles (164); Building (170); Land (172); Accounts Payable (201); Notes Payable (250); Common Stock (307); Dividends (319); Fees Earned (402); Salaries Expense (601); and Utilities Expense (602).
2. Post the journal entries from part 1 to the ledger accounts.
3. Prepare a trial balance as of the end of September.

In: Accounting