Questions
On January 1, 2020, Digital, Inc. leased heavy machinery from Young Leasing Company. The terms of...

On January 1, 2020, Digital, Inc. leased heavy machinery from Young Leasing
Company. The terms of the lease require annual payments of $25,000 for 20
years beginning on December 31, 2020. The interest rate on the lease is 10%.
Assume the lease qualifies as a capital lease and Digital, Inc. employs the
double-declining balance method to depreciate its assets. 

Calculate the book value of the leased asset at December 31, 2022.

Use the time value of money factors posted in carmen to answer this question.
To access these factors, click modules and then scroll to week 12. Click on
the link labeled present & future value table factors. No credit will be
awarded for this question using a means other than these table factors to
answer this question.

In: Accounting

Question 4 Accounting for Foreign Currency Transactions                    Coastal Surf Ltd is a manufacturer of surfboards in...

Question 4 Accounting for Foreign Currency Transactions                   

Coastal Surf Ltd is a manufacturer of surfboards in Australia. The company sells surfboards to a Japanese company.

The company received an order from the Japanese company to buy 20 surfboards for a value of ¥9,600,000 Japanese Yen. Under the conditions of the contract, surfboards were sold FOB Sydney and were shipped to Osaka on 20 April 2020. The payment for these surfboards was agreed to be paid by three equal instalments on 30 April, 31 May and 30 June. The company’s financial year ends on 30 June 2020.

The following exchange rates were applicable:

20 April                        A$1.00 = JPY¥990

30 April                        A$1.00 = JPY¥998

31 May                        A$1.00 = JPY¥1005

30 June                       A$1.00 = JPY¥1100

Required:

Prepare relevant journal entries to record the above transactions in accordance with AASB 139. (Narrations are required)

In: Accounting

1) Consider two countries, M and N. The value of export of country M is 400...

1) Consider two countries, M and N. The value of export of country M is 400 billion US dollar and its GDP is 800 billion US dollar. The value of export of country N is 300 billion US dollar, and its GDP is 900 billion US dollar. Which country has more openness to international trade?
a) Country N
b) Country M
c) It is not possible to know this
d) The two countries are equally open

2) What is the effect of an import tariff imposed by a government on a traded good?
a) Government tariff revenue
b) Change in producer benefits
c) Change in consumer benefits
d) All of the above

3) Suppose that a country imports a product which is also produced by its domestic producers. If tariff is imposed on the import product, what are the effects on domestic producers?
a) It is difficult to know the effect
b) Producer surplus or producer benefits will increase
c) Producer surplus or producer benefits will decrease
d) Domestic producers will get higher price for their product
e) b and d

4) Suppose that company K in the UAE imports 5,000 tonnes of banana from Indonesia for 400 US dollar per tonne. If company K pays an ad-valorem tariff of 10% on the banana imports, how much is the total tariff revenue collected by the UAE government?
a) 500 US dollar
b) 2,000,000 Dirhams
c) 200,000 US dollar
d) 40 US dollar

5) In 2018 UAE imported 200,000 metric tonnes of milk from other countries. The international import price of milk was 1000 US dollars per metric tonne. Domestic consumption of milk in UAE was 250,000 metric tonnes out of which 50,000 metric tonnes was produced in the country. Suppose that the UAE government imposes a 5% tariff on imported milk. The tariff has the following effects: local production increases by 10%; domestic consumption reduces by 10%. After the tariff, how much is the change in domestic consumers’ benefit, the domestic producers’ surplus, the government tax revenue, and deadweight costs, respectively? (use the graph).
a) 2.5 million, 2.65 million, 0.625 million and 0.125 million (in US$)
b) 0.125 million, 0.625 million, 2.5 million and 8.5 million (in US$)
c) -11.875 million, 2.625 million, 8.5 million, and -750,000 (in US$)
d) - 11.875 million, 2.5 million, -0.75 million, and 8.5 million (in US$)
e) 11.875 million, 2.625 million, - 8.5 million, 750,000 (US$)

In: Economics

Briefly summarize both the Chinese and African markets. What's happening in China's labor market and colleges...

Briefly summarize both the Chinese and African markets. What's happening in China's labor market and colleges and the impact on Africa. Remember: relative prices matter!

Chinese Maker of Ivanka Trump’s Shoes Looks for Cheaper Labor By KEITH BRADSHER (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., JUNE 1, 2017 DONGGUAN, China — The Chinese factory workers who make shoes for Ivanka Trump (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and other designers gather at 7:40 every morning to sing songs. Sometimes, they extol worker solidarity. Usually, they trumpet ties between China and Africa, the theme of their employer’s corporate anthem. That’s no accident. With many workers here complaining about excessive hours and seeking higher pay, the factory owner wants to send their jobs to Ethiopia. The employer, Huajian International, now faces scrutiny from labor activists for how it treats workers. Chinese authorities this week detained an activist (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. who went undercover in the company’s factory here for a labor rights group. Two other activists who worked at Huajian are missing; it’s unclear whether they were detained. Zhang Huarong, center, Huajian’s founder, singing the company’s song with employees. Credit Gilles Sabrié for The New York Times Ms. Trump’s father campaigned for the United States presidency on a platform of bringing back (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. overseas manufacturing jobs. But deep (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.economic (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and demographic shifts mean a lot of low-end work — like making shoes — doesn’t offer huge profit in China. As President Trump accuses (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.China of stealing jobs (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., those jobs are now leaving for other shores. Huajian, which also makes shoes for a number of American brands, was a major beneficiary of the decades-long shift of manufacturing jobs away from the United States. Global brands flocked to China to tap into the country’s cheap and willing labor pool. Today, Chinese workers are less cheap and less willing. More young people are going to college and want office jobs. The blue-collar work force is aging. Long workdays in a factory no longer appeal to those older workers, even with the promise of overtime pay. In interviews in December and again on Sunday and Monday outside Huajian’s vast industrial complex in this southern Chinese factory city, numerous workers interviewed by The New York Times complained about 14-hour days. While many liked the overtime pay, they said the days were too long, especially since they often included up to three hours of unpaid breaks for lunch and dinner. The workers insisted on anonymity for fear of retaliation by management. Shoes on a conveyor belt in Dongguan. Many Huajian workers have complained about excessive hours and are seeking higher pay. Credit Gilles Sabrié for The New York Times China Labor Watch, the advocacy group investigating the factories, said it found that employees had worked longer weeks than Chinese labor law allows, even excluding breaks. Such violations are common in Chinese factories. A Huajian spokesman, Wei Xuegang, said the company knew nothing about the activists. Asked about the accusation from China Labor Watch, he said Huajian scheduled extra hours during busy times but paid workers according to the law. In a December interview, Zhang Huarong, the company’s founder and chairman, said Huajian followed overtime laws. The Ivanka Trump brand declined to comment on the labor conditions or the activists. In terms of bringing jobs back to the United States, the company said, it was “looking forward to being a part of the conversation.” Such tensions are fueling the drive of Huajian’s founder, Mr. Zhang, to move work to Ethiopia. A former drill sergeant in the Chinese military who sometimes leads his workers on parade-ground drills, Mr. Zhang says work like making shoes will never return to the United States and is increasingly difficult in China as well. “Do Americans really like to work, to do these simple and repetitive tasks?” said Mr. Zhang, in the December interview. “Young Chinese also don’t want to do this after they graduate from college.” In many respects, China’s economy is maturing. The number of people who turn 18 each year and do not enroll in college — the group that might consider factory work — had plummeted to 10.5 million by 2015 from 18.5 million in 2000, government data shows. Because of the effects from China’s former “one child” policy, the figure is on track to fall below seven million by 2020. Costs are rising too, as the government raises minimum wages and benefits in an effort to shift China’s economy away from cheap manufacturing. Wages in Dongguan have increased ninefold since the late 1990s, Mr. Zhang said. Workers said they resented the hours, especially the unpaid breaks. One employee’s printed schedule in December showed that the factory required 60 hours and 10 minutes of paid work per week. Chinese laws require that workweeks average no more than 44 hours and limit overtime to 36 hours per month. On Monday, in the middle of China’s three-day Dragon Boat Festival holiday, throngs of workers filed into the factory. Asked whether he would be eating zongzi, the traditional rice dumpling served during the holiday, one worker replied that they don’t get to celebrate. Another said Huajian gave each worker two small dumplings and an egg for the holiday. One worker, a middle-aged woman with the surname Du, said her children had gone home to central China. Ms. Du wished for time off to celebrate, so she could make rice dumplings for them. Mr. Zhang said that his company kept working hours within legal limits, despite workers who want more overtime pay. “We cannot let them work extra hours just because they have low pay,” Mr. Zhang said in a lengthy interview in December. “We have thought about it, but we want to do business well.” Many workers have said their days were too long, especially since they often include up to three hours of unpaid breaks for lunch and dinner. Credit Gilles Sabrié for The New York Times China Labor Watch said on Tuesday that it had lost contact with three undercover activists (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. at Huajian factories. The wife of one in the factory in Dongguan said he had been detained by the police. Li Qiang, who started China Labor Watch 17 years ago, said the group’s activists had never before been detained by the police. “I’m very worried about their safety,” he said. “The longer I’ve lost contact with them, the more I worry.” Huajian peaked at 26,000 employees in China in 2006. Staffing is now down to between 7,000 and 8,000 thanks to automation and the shift to Ethiopia, Mr. Zhang said. Huajian produces 100,000 to 200,000 pairs of Ivanka Trump shoes each year, a small fraction of the eight million pairs of shoes it produces annually. The Dongguan factory makes the heels while a second factory completes the shoes. Marc Fisher Footwear, which licenses the Ivanka Trump brand for shoes manufactured by Huijian, has said it was looking into the allegations. Mr. Zhang has had occasional brushes with Chinese labor laws, although no more than many employers in this increasingly litigious society. In 2014, Li Jianguo, a worker, sued Huajian, saying he worked 104 hours of overtime per month and was not paid for it. Huajian acknowledged in that case that the worker had been putting in 52 hours of overtime per month, according to the text of the court verdict, and agreed to pay him for that. Mr. Zhang said that workers currently earn $525 to $580 per month, including overtime pay but not including company-paid benefits like medical insurance and housing subsidies. Workers said that pay ranged from $380 to $580 per month. The money can go a long way in a factory city like Dongguan. Workers said that a 215-square-foot apartment in the neighborhood costs $29 a month to rent. The company provides a monthly housing subsidy of $11.60. A worker at the Huajian factory that produces heels for Ivanka Trump shoes, which are completed at another factory. Credit Gilles Sabrié for The New York Times Citing labor costs and the country’s foreign investment push, Huajian is building a sprawling complex of factories, office buildings and a hotel on the southern outskirts of Ethiopia’s capital, Addis Ababa. Mr. Zhang’s shoe factories there already have 5,000 employees. When finished in four years, the Addis Ababa complex will be ringed by a replica of the Great Wall of China. Some interviewed Huajian workers said they were not concerned about jobs being moved to Ethiopia, given the plentiful number of jobs in China’s southern manufacturing zone. Still, many longtime workers face age discrimination if they leave, as other factories prefer workers under 35. Shoemaking is not strenuous and poses few physical dangers, making it more appealing to older workers. “I really couldn’t get used to these long working hours at the beginning,” one worker said, “but I don’t really have a choice.”

In: Economics

Briefly summarize both the Chinese and African markets. What's happening in China's labor market and colleges...

Briefly summarize both the Chinese and African markets. What's happening in China's labor market and colleges and the impact on Africa. Remember: relative prices matter!

Chinese Maker of Ivanka Trump’s Shoes Looks for Cheaper Labor

By KEITH BRADSHER (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., JUNE 1, 2017

DONGGUAN, China — The Chinese factory workers who make shoes for Ivanka Trump and other designers gather at 7:40 every morning to sing songs. Sometimes, they extol worker solidarity. Usually, they trumpet ties between China and Africa, the theme of their employer’s corporate anthem. That’s no accident. With many workers here complaining about excessive hours and seeking higher pay, the factory owner wants to send their jobs to Ethiopia. The employer, Huajian International, now faces scrutiny from labor activists for how it treats workers. Chinese authorities this week detained an activist who went undercover in the company’s factory here for a labor rights group. Two other activists who worked at Huajian are missing; it’s unclear whether they were detained. Zhang Huarong, center, Huajian’s founder, singing the company’s song with employees. Credit Gilles Sabrié for The New York Times Ms. Trump’s father campaigned for the United States presidency on a platform of bringing back overseas manufacturing jobs. But deep and demographic shifts mean a lot of low-end work — like making shoes — doesn’t offer huge profit in China. As President Trump accuses China of stealing jobs those jobs are now leaving for other shores. Huajian, which also makes shoes for a number of American brands, was a major beneficiary of the decades-long shift of manufacturing jobs away from the United States. Global brands flocked to China to tap into the country’s cheap and willing labor pool. Today, Chinese workers are less cheap and less willing. More young people are going to college and want office jobs. The blue-collar work force is aging. Long workdays in a factory no longer appeal to those older workers, even with the promise of overtime pay. In interviews in December and again on Sunday and Monday outside Huajian’s vast industrial complex in this southern Chinese factory city, numerous workers interviewed by The New York Times complained about 14-hour days. While many liked the overtime pay, they said the days were too long, especially since they often included up to three hours of unpaid breaks for lunch and dinner. The workers insisted on anonymity for fear of retaliation by management. Shoes on a conveyor belt in Dongguan. Many Huajian workers have complained about excessive hours and are seeking higher pay. Credit Gilles Sabrié for The New York Times China Labor Watch, the advocacy group investigating the factories, said it found that employees had worked longer weeks than Chinese labor law allows, even excluding breaks. Such violations are common in Chinese factories. A Huajian spokesman, Wei Xuegang, said the company knew nothing about the activists. Asked about the accusation from China Labor Watch, he said Huajian scheduled extra hours during busy times but paid workers according to the law. In a December interview, Zhang Huarong, the company’s founder and chairman, said Huajian followed overtime laws. The Ivanka Trump brand declined to comment on the labor conditions or the activists. In terms of bringing jobs back to the United States, the company said, it was “looking forward to being a part of the conversation.” Such tensions are fueling the drive of Huajian’s founder, Mr. Zhang, to move work to Ethiopia. A former drill sergeant in the Chinese military who sometimes leads his workers on parade-ground drills, Mr. Zhang says work like making shoes will never return to the United States and is increasingly difficult in China as well. “Do Americans really like to work, to do these simple and repetitive tasks?” said Mr. Zhang, in the December interview. “Young Chinese also don’t want to do this after they graduate from college.” In many respects, China’s economy is maturing. The number of people who turn 18 each year and do not enroll in college — the group that might consider factory work — had plummeted to 10.5 million by 2015 from 18.5 million in 2000, government data shows. Because of the effects from China’s former “one child” policy, the figure is on track to fall below seven million by 2020. Costs are rising too, as the government raises minimum wages and benefits in an effort to shift China’s economy away from cheap manufacturing. Wages in Dongguan have increased ninefold since the late 1990s, Mr. Zhang said. Workers said they resented the hours, especially the unpaid breaks. One employee’s printed schedule in December showed that the factory required 60 hours and 10 minutes of paid work per week. Chinese laws require that workweeks average no more than 44 hours and limit overtime to 36 hours per month. On Monday, in the middle of China’s three-day Dragon Boat Festival holiday, throngs of workers filed into the factory. Asked whether he would be eating zongzi, the traditional rice dumpling served during the holiday, one worker replied that they don’t get to celebrate. Another said Huajian gave each worker two small dumplings and an egg for the holiday. One worker, a middle-aged woman with the surname Du, said her children had gone home to central China. Ms. Du wished for time off to celebrate, so she could make rice dumplings for them. Mr. Zhang said that his company kept working hours within legal limits, despite workers who want more overtime pay. “We cannot let them work extra hours just because they have low pay,” Mr. Zhang said in a lengthy interview in December. “We have thought about it, but we want to do business well.” Many workers have said their days were too long, especially since they often include up to three hours of unpaid breaks for lunch and dinner. Credit Gilles Sabrié for The New York Times China Labor Watch said on Tuesday that it had lost contact with three undercover activists at Huajian factories. The wife of one in the factory in Dongguan said he had been detained by the police. Li Qiang, who started China Labor Watch 17 years ago, said the group’s activists had never before been detained by the police. “I’m very worried about their safety,” he said. “The longer I’ve lost contact with them, the more I worry.” Huajian peaked at 26,000 employees in China in 2006. Staffing is now down to between 7,000 and 8,000 thanks to automation and the shift to Ethiopia, Mr. Zhang said. Huajian produces 100,000 to 200,000 pairs of Ivanka Trump shoes each year, a small fraction of the eight million pairs of shoes it produces annually. The Dongguan factory makes the heels while a second factory completes the shoes. Marc Fisher Footwear, which licenses the Ivanka Trump brand for shoes manufactured by Huijian, has said it was looking into the allegations. Mr. Zhang has had occasional brushes with Chinese labor laws, although no more than many employers in this increasingly litigious society. In 2014, Li Jianguo, a worker, sued Huajian, saying he worked 104 hours of overtime per month and was not paid for it. Huajian acknowledged in that case that the worker had been putting in 52 hours of overtime per month, according to the text of the court verdict, and agreed to pay him for that. Mr. Zhang said that workers currently earn $525 to $580 per month, including overtime pay but not including company-paid benefits like medical insurance and housing subsidies. Workers said that pay ranged from $380 to $580 per month. The money can go a long way in a factory city like Dongguan. Workers said that a 215-square-foot apartment in the neighborhood costs $29 a month to rent. The company provides a monthly housing subsidy of $11.60. A worker at the Huajian factory that produces heels for Ivanka Trump shoes, which are completed at another factory. Credit Gilles Sabrié for The New York Times Citing labor costs and the country’s foreign investment push, Huajian is building a sprawling complex of factories, office buildings and a hotel on the southern outskirts of Ethiopia’s capital, Addis Ababa. Mr. Zhang’s shoe factories there already have 5,000 employees. When finished in four years, the Addis Ababa complex will be ringed by a replica of the Great Wall of China. Some interviewed Huajian workers said they were not concerned about jobs being moved to Ethiopia, given the plentiful number of jobs in China’s southern manufacturing zone. Still, many longtime workers face age discrimination if they leave, as other factories prefer workers under 35. Shoemaking is not strenuous and poses few physical dangers, making it more appealing to older workers. “I really couldn’t get used to these long working hours at the beginning,” one worker said, “but I don’t really have a choice.

In: Economics

On January 1, 2020, Sharp Company purchased $50,000 of Sox Company 6% bonds, at a time...

On January 1, 2020, Sharp Company purchased $50,000 of Sox Company 6% bonds, at a time when the market rate was 5%. The bonds mature on December 31, 2024, and pay interest annually on December 31. Sharp plans to and has the ability to hold the bonds until maturity. Assume that Sharp uses the effective interest method to amortize any premium or discount on investments in bonds. At December 31, 2020, the bonds are quoted at 98. a. Prepare the entry for the purchase of the debt investment on January 1, 2020. b. Prepare the entry for the receipt of interest on December 31, 2020. c. Record the entry to adjust the investment to fair value on December 31, 2020, if applicable

In: Accounting

A 59 year-old calendar year individual taxpayer purchased an annuity from an insurance company for $100,000...

A 59 year-old calendar year individual taxpayer purchased an annuity from an insurance company for $100,000 in 2019. The terms of the annuity were that the company would pay him $5,000 a year to T for the rest of T’s life. How much income will he include in his personal income tax return as a result of receiving the $5,000 payment

in 2020?   _____________

In 2050? ______________

In: Accounting

Henry, a tax resident of Australia, was a famous jazz singer who passed away recently. Jack,...

Henry, a tax resident of Australia, was a famous jazz singer who passed away recently. Jack, a publisher was interested on Henry's life story and wanted to write a bibliography on Henry's life. Jack approached Henry's wife, Jenny (also a tax resident of Australia) to interview her on Henry's life story. She was offered $1 million for Henry story. Jenny was paid $500,000 deposit before the interview. After the interview she was paid the balance of the money. Would the tax consequences have changed if Jenny had written the book herself?

Required: Advise Jenny on her tax consequences. You must cite the relevant case law and legislation

In: Accounting

Henry, a tax resident of Australia, was a famous jazz singer who passed away recently. Jack,...

Henry, a tax resident of Australia, was a famous jazz singer who passed away recently. Jack, a publisher was interested on Henry's life story and wanted to write a bibliography on Henry's life. Jack approached Henry's wife, Jenny (also a tax resident of Australia) to interview her on Henry's life story. She was offered $1 million for Henry story. Jenny was paid $500,000 deposit before the interview. After the interview she was paid the balance of the money. Would the tax consequences have changed if Jenny had written the book herself? Required Advise Jenny on her tax consequences.

Follow ILAC model based on Australian legal environment

In: Accounting

Please correct my grammar's mistakes :) Please correct my grammar's mistakes, thanks! I chose to interview...

Please correct my grammar's mistakes :)

Please correct my grammar's mistakes, thanks!

I chose to interview Dinh, who is an active, assertive person and a business major at ACC. Although he is not a math and science major, he has already taken a lot of different science and math classes. These classes include algebra, general chemistry one and two, general physics one and two, and geometry, etc. Right now, he is taking statistics and investments. Dinh told me that he likes business world, where he has a chance to meet and communicate with different kinds of people and where winners and losers are determined every day. He thinks that the harshness and competition in the business world will make him progress every day to perfect himself in life and he enjoys that. Dinh is open and friendly in my view. He is not a close friend, but he was willing to help me when I invited him to my interview for math’s real world examples. He seemed very excited for the interview, and he said that he is confident in his abilities to answer my questions. Dinh likes real world’s examples and so he says that he can start to answer questions now.

Before conducting the interview, I told Dinh that he will be a main character of the interview and my job is just asking him questions and no more than that. The purpose of the interview discovers and knows about his thinking and thought process when he answers questions. Therefore, he has a right to express his thoughts, whatever he thinks that describes correct answers to questions; feel free to share his ideas and don’t be shy to explain questions.

In: Biology