Questions
The comparative balance sheets for 2021 and 2020 are given below for Surmise Company. Net income...

The comparative balance sheets for 2021 and 2020 are given below for Surmise Company. Net income for 2021 was $78 million.

SURMISE COMPANY
Comparative Balance Sheets
December 31, 2021 and 2020
($ in millions)
2021 2020
Assets
Cash $ 45 $ 55
Accounts receivable 88 104
Less: Allowance for uncollectible accounts (25 ) (6 )
Prepaid expenses 20 15
Inventory 121 100
Long-term investment 98 60
Land 96 96
Buildings and equipment 391 265
Less: Accumulated depreciation (134 ) (106 )
Patent 24 27
$ 724 $ 610
Liabilities
Accounts payable $ 18 $ 40
Accrued liabilities 3 19
Notes payable 46 0
Lease liability 119 0
Bonds payable 63 129
Shareholders’ Equity
Common stock 68 50
Paid-in capital—excess of par 259 205
Retained earnings 148 167
$ 724 $ 610


Required:
Prepare the statement of cash flows of Surmise Company for the year ended December 31, 2021. Use the indirect method to present cash flows from operating activities because you do not have sufficient information to use the direct method. You will need to make reasonable assumptions concerning the reasons for changes in some account balances. A spreadsheet or T-account analysis will be helpful. (Hint: The right to use a building was acquired with a seven-year lease agreement. Annual lease payments of $7 million are paid at January 1 of each year starting in 2021.) (Enter your answers in millions (i.e., 10,000,000 should be entered as 10). Amounts to be deducted should be indicated with a minus sign.)

SURMISE COMPANY
Statement of Cash Flows
For year ended December 31, 2021
($ in millions)
Cash flows from operating activities:   
Net income
Adjustments for noncash effects:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Net cash flows from operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net cash flows from investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net cash flows from financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash
Cash balance, January 1
Cash balance, December 31
Noncash investing and financing activities:

In: Accounting

Bruno Corporation is authorized to 20,000 shares of 6%, $100 par, cumulative, convertible preferred stock and...

Bruno Corporation is authorized to 20,000 shares of 6%, $100 par, cumulative, convertible preferred stock and 100,000 shares, $10 par value common stock. Bruno has outstanding 6,000 shares of preferred stock and 40,000 shares of common stock on the December 31, 2019 balance sheet. The following are selected transactions that occurred in 2020:

1. Bruno Corporation owes shares of Naple Corporation. At December 31, 2019, the securities were carried in Bruno’s accounting records at the cost of $875,000 which equaled the fair value. On April 1, when the fair of the securities was $990,000, Bruno declared a property dividend whereby the Naple securities are to be distributed on April 29, 2020 to common stockholders of record on April 15, 2020.

2. Acquired land by issuing 640 shares of preferred stock and 1,000 shares of common stock. The preferred and common stock are selling at $113 and $36 per share, respectively. The land was appraised at $112,000.

3. Bruno issued 3,000 shares of common stock and 1,000 shares of preferred stock for a lump sum of $220,000. The market price of the common stock was $38 and the preferred, $118.

4. Preferred shareholders, who originally paid the corporation $110 per share their stock converted 5,000 shares into common stock. Each preferred share is convertible into 3 shares of common stock. The current market price of the preferred stock and the common stock is $120 and $41 per share, respectively.

5. The company purchased 4,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $40 per share to be held in treasury. The company uses the cost method.

6. The company sold 500 shares of its common treasury stock for $42 per share.

7. The company sold 1,000 shares of its common treasury stock for $37 per share.

8. The board of directors declared a cash dividend for the year. The preferred and common shares outstanding on this date were 2,640 and 41,500 respectively. The common stock dividend was $2 per share. When you make this entry show separate liabilities for the preferred and common stock dividends.

Instructions: Prepare the journal entries to record the above events. *****Be sure to show calculations and note any assumptions when completing the entry.

In: Accounting

Do you agree that the current situation is as uncertain as it is portrayed in this...

Do you agree that the current situation is as uncertain as it is portrayed in this statement? Why or why not?

This is the reading:

The toll the new coronavirus has taken on an economy that was healthy at the start of March came into clear relief when the government said Thursday that 6.6 million Americans had applied for unemployment benefits the week before.

No one weeps for the corporate bosses behind the decisions to lay off many of those people, but these bosses are struggling as they make the toughest calls of their careers. Marriott International Inc.'s CEO told analysts this surpasses the magnitude of 9/11 and the 2008 financial crisis combined. In a letter to employees , General Electric Co.'s CEO said this is an era where the unknowns outweigh the knowns.

Business leaders live by the calendar, attaching forecasts, projects and goals to a specific date or period of time. No one knows when state-issued mandates to stay at home will lift, and that renders a calendar about as useful in 2020 as an eight-track player. It is like stumbling around in the dark.

As quarterly earnings conference calls take place in the coming weeks, expect to hear a lot of "we don't know," "it's hard to say," and "I wish I had a crystal ball." These terms aren't typical for the managing class.

"CEOs are wired to take action," Jerry Colonna , a former venture capitalist who now counsels top executives, told me this week. "It's really hard when they don't really know what action to take. It's like taking a bucket to extinguish a fire and not knowing if the bucket is full of water or confetti."

Bahram Akradi, the Iranian-born founder of the Life Time Inc. health-club chain , is one of those CEOs looking for water in the bucket. I've talked with Mr. Akradi often in recent weeks about how his company is navigating the crisis.

The answer: It isn't pretty. Revenue has all but dried up, nearly $1 billion in new developments are on ice. "These are the facts," he told me during a Wednesday FaceTime session from his Chanhassen, Minn., office. "Empty parking lots are a fact."

Like many honchos I talk to, Mr. Akradi would like political leaders to set a firm date to reopen businesses and end rigid sheltering rules—even if that date is several weeks in the future. He also wants everyone's bills across the country to be postponed in April. For instance, mortgages or car payments due this month should be deferred to May.

Topping the list of concerns Mr. Akradi can control: the 38,000 people on his payroll. He likens Life Time to a boat in troubled waters. "We are in a big, massive storm," he told employees March 25. "We have no idea how long the storm is, or how bad it's going to get. What I'm trying to do is make sure I keep everybody on this ship staying intact and alive. That's all."

Eight days before, when he closed more than 150 clubs in 30 states, he recorded a video message telling employees Life Time could weather a two-week shutdown without breaking much of a sweat. After that, he'd have to get creative.

Last week came another video in which he had to explain why roughly 36,000, or about 90%, of employees were going on furlough as of Wednesday. The move included a commitment to pay 100% of affected workers' insurance premiums and an extra $10 million for a fund to help employees with essentials that unemployment checks won't cover.

This isn't how he wants it. "They've been with me 28 years, busting their rear ends." Now he's encouraging them to buy only the basics and try, if necessary, to negotiate favorable terms with potential creditors.

Mr. Akradi, 58, cut jobs before , during the financial crisis when a slowdown in discretionary income slammed several industries, including fitness. Even cutting under 200 jobs "felt like death, the ugliest thing I've had to do in my life." How much worse is it this time? "It is not even in the same orbit."

The day after my last chat with Mr. Akradi, I talked by phone with ZipRecruiter Inc. founder and CEO Ian Siegel as he kept an eye on two children at his home in Southern California. Mr. Siegel's had just finished a roller-coaster of a month that included laying off or indefinitely furloughing 500 people, roughly a third of the staff.

"All the way up to March 9 we were in a boom economy, and then literally overnight we were in a recession economy." Job seekers use ZipRecruiter to search and apply for jobs posted by companies on its website. Not all hiring has stopped, but listings rapidly declined starting March 10.

He had to decide whether the abrupt decline was a "shock to the system or the new normal." Without an accurate compass, he decided to plan for the worst-case scenario. "We knew we were going to have to make hard choices fast or harder choices later." He intentionally cut to the bone.

Mr. Siegel, 46, and his management team took about a week to figure out what to do. Keeping 700 employees would be manageable considering the company's liquidity and revenue levels. It likely gives ZipRecruiter enough head count to pivot back to growth if there is a sharp boost in hiring at the end of this crisis.

The process was gut wrenching; "definitely the hardest decision I've had to make." Mr. Siegel informed each displaced employee individually via videoconference, making it clear that each one was considered valuable. He hopes to rehire many of them.

Here's an important thing Mr. Siegel takes away from this process: A red hot startup like the decade-old ZipRecruiter can be sobered at a moment's notice.

"I really thought we were hardened, that we were operationally invulnerable," he said. The steps he took last month were "humbling."

These CEOs believe they will emerge and their businesses will eventually resemble what they looked like a month ago. Mr. Siegel said making necessary cuts now means the enterprise can continue to live another day and Mr. Akradi says CEOs like him are as crafty as they are tenacious.

"I'm never going to be faster than the bear," Mr. Akradi told me. "I just have to be faster than a lot of other folks."

Good advice, but outrunning the other guy just got a lot harder to do.

In: Operations Management

As a leader facing the COVID-19 pandemic, in which of these two directions would you lean...

As a leader facing the COVID-19 pandemic, in which of these two directions would you lean in your strategic messaging and why?

Do you agree that the current situation is as uncertain as it is portrayed in this statement? Why or why not?

This is the reading:

The toll the new coronavirus has taken on an economy that was healthy at the start of March came into clear relief when the government said Thursday that 6.6 million Americans had applied for unemployment benefits the week before.

No one weeps for the corporate bosses behind the decisions to lay off many of those people, but these bosses are struggling as they make the toughest calls of their careers. Marriott International Inc.'s CEO told analysts this surpasses the magnitude of 9/11 and the 2008 financial crisis combined. In a letter to employees , General Electric Co.'s CEO said this is an era where the unknowns outweigh the knowns.

Business leaders live by the calendar, attaching forecasts, projects and goals to a specific date or period of time. No one knows when state-issued mandates to stay at home will lift, and that renders a calendar about as useful in 2020 as an eight-track player. It is like stumbling around in the dark.

As quarterly earnings conference calls take place in the coming weeks, expect to hear a lot of "we don't know," "it's hard to say," and "I wish I had a crystal ball." These terms aren't typical for the managing class.

"CEOs are wired to take action," Jerry Colonna , a former venture capitalist who now counsels top executives, told me this week. "It's really hard when they don't really know what action to take. It's like taking a bucket to extinguish a fire and not knowing if the bucket is full of water or confetti."

Bahram Akradi, the Iranian-born founder of the Life Time Inc. health-club chain , is one of those CEOs looking for water in the bucket. I've talked with Mr. Akradi often in recent weeks about how his company is navigating the crisis.

The answer: It isn't pretty. Revenue has all but dried up, nearly $1 billion in new developments are on ice. "These are the facts," he told me during a Wednesday FaceTime session from his Chanhassen, Minn., office. "Empty parking lots are a fact."

Like many honchos I talk to, Mr. Akradi would like political leaders to set a firm date to reopen businesses and end rigid sheltering rules—even if that date is several weeks in the future. He also wants everyone's bills across the country to be postponed in April. For instance, mortgages or car payments due this month should be deferred to May.

Topping the list of concerns Mr. Akradi can control: the 38,000 people on his payroll. He likens Life Time to a boat in troubled waters. "We are in a big, massive storm," he told employees March 25. "We have no idea how long the storm is, or how bad it's going to get. What I'm trying to do is make sure I keep everybody on this ship staying intact and alive. That's all."

Eight days before, when he closed more than 150 clubs in 30 states, he recorded a video message telling employees Life Time could weather a two-week shutdown without breaking much of a sweat. After that, he'd have to get creative.

Last week came another video in which he had to explain why roughly 36,000, or about 90%, of employees were going on furlough as of Wednesday. The move included a commitment to pay 100% of affected workers' insurance premiums and an extra $10 million for a fund to help employees with essentials that unemployment checks won't cover.

This isn't how he wants it. "They've been with me 28 years, busting their rear ends." Now he's encouraging them to buy only the basics and try, if necessary, to negotiate favorable terms with potential creditors.

Mr. Akradi, 58, cut jobs before , during the financial crisis when a slowdown in discretionary income slammed several industries, including fitness. Even cutting under 200 jobs "felt like death, the ugliest thing I've had to do in my life." How much worse is it this time? "It is not even in the same orbit."

The day after my last chat with Mr. Akradi, I talked by phone with ZipRecruiter Inc. founder and CEO Ian Siegel as he kept an eye on two children at his home in Southern California. Mr. Siegel's had just finished a roller-coaster of a month that included laying off or indefinitely furloughing 500 people, roughly a third of the staff.

"All the way up to March 9 we were in a boom economy, and then literally overnight we were in a recession economy." Job seekers use ZipRecruiter to search and apply for jobs posted by companies on its website. Not all hiring has stopped, but listings rapidly declined starting March 10.

He had to decide whether the abrupt decline was a "shock to the system or the new normal." Without an accurate compass, he decided to plan for the worst-case scenario. "We knew we were going to have to make hard choices fast or harder choices later." He intentionally cut to the bone.

Mr. Siegel, 46, and his management team took about a week to figure out what to do. Keeping 700 employees would be manageable considering the company's liquidity and revenue levels. It likely gives ZipRecruiter enough head count to pivot back to growth if there is a sharp boost in hiring at the end of this crisis.

The process was gut wrenching; "definitely the hardest decision I've had to make." Mr. Siegel informed each displaced employee individually via videoconference, making it clear that each one was considered valuable. He hopes to rehire many of them.

Here's an important thing Mr. Siegel takes away from this process: A red hot startup like the decade-old ZipRecruiter can be sobered at a moment's notice.

"I really thought we were hardened, that we were operationally invulnerable," he said. The steps he took last month were "humbling."

These CEOs believe they will emerge and their businesses will eventually resemble what they looked like a month ago. Mr. Siegel said making necessary cuts now means the enterprise can continue to live another day and Mr. Akradi says CEOs like him are as crafty as they are tenacious.

"I'm never going to be faster than the bear," Mr. Akradi told me. "I just have to be faster than a lot of other folks."

Good advice, but outrunning the other guy just got a lot harder to do.

In: Operations Management

1.) On March 1, 2020, Jefferson Company purchased factory equipment with an invoice price of $90,000....

1.) On March 1, 2020, Jefferson Company purchased factory equipment with an invoice price of $90,000. Other costs incurred were freight costs, $2,100; installation wiring and foundation, $2,200; material and labor costs in testing equipment, $700; oil lubricants and supplies to be used with equipment during the life of the asset, $500; fire insurance policy covering equipment for three years, $1,400. The equipment is estimated to have a $5,000 salvage value at the end of its 8-year useful service life.

(A) Find the Cost of the Equipment.

2.) On March 1, 2020, Soprano Co. purchased factory equipment with an invoice price of $90,000. The equipment is estimated to have a $5,000 salvage value at the end of its 8-year useful service life.

(B) What is depreciation for 2020 using the double-declining balance method? _______________

What is the book value? ___________ Show all work.

3.) On March 1, 2020, Jefferson Company purchased factory equipment with an invoice price of $90,000. The equipment is estimated to have a $5,000 salvage value at the end of its 8-year useful service life. Using your calculations from Question #2, calculate depreciation using the double-declining balance method for:

2021 Depreciation _______________________                                     

2021 Book Value ________________________                                      

4.) Ronald Company purchased equipment on May 1, 2020, for $90,000. It is estimated that the equipment will have a $5,000 salvage value at the end of its 5-year useful life. It is also estimated that the equipment will produce 100,000 units over its 5-year life. Show all Calculations:

(1) The company uses straight-line depreciation. ___________________

What is depreciation for 2020? ___________________                                      

What is the Accumulated Depreciation in the year 2022? __________________                                  

5.) Ronald Company purchased equipment on May 1, 2020, for $90,000. It is estimated that the equipment will have a $5,000 salvage value at the end of its 5-year useful life. It is also estimated that the equipment will produce 100,000 units over its 5-year life.

The company uses the units-of-activity depreciation method. If 16,000 units are produced in 2020 and 24,000 units are produced in 2021, answer the following; show all work.

2020 Depreciation __________________                                  

2021 Depreciation __________________                                  

12/31/2021 Book Value ____________________                        

6.) Ronald Company purchased equipment on May 1, 2020 for $90,000. It is estimated that the equipment will have a $5,000 salvage value at the end of its 5-year useful life. It is also estimated that the equipment will produce 100,000 units over its 5-year life. The company uses the double declining balance method of depreciation; answer the following:

2020 Depreciation ______________

2021 Depreciation ______________

2021 Accumulated Depreciation ________

In: Accounting

7–2. Ethical Conduct. Internet giant Zoidle, a U.S. company, generated sales of £2.5 billion in the...

7–2. Ethical Conduct. Internet giant Zoidle, a U.S. company, generated sales of £2.5 billion in the United Kingdom in 2013 (approximately $4 billion in U.S. dollars). Its net profits before taxes on these sales were £200 million, and it paid £6 million in corporate tax, resulting in a tax rate of 3 percent. The corporate tax rate in the United Kingdom is between 20 percent and 24 percent.

The CEO of Zoidle held a press conference stating that he was proud of his company for taking advantage of tax loopholes and for sheltering profits in other nations to avoid paying taxes. He called this practice “capitalism at its finest.” He further stated that it would be unethical for Zoidle not to take advantage of loopholes and that it would be verging on illegal to tell shareholders that the company paid more taxes than it had to pay because it felt that it should.

Zoidle receives significant benefits for doing business in the United Kingdom, including tremendous sales tax exemptions and some property tax breaks. The United Kingdom relies on the corporate income tax to provide services to the poor and to help run the agency that regulates corporations. Is it ethical for Zoidle to avoid paying taxes? Why or why not?

PLEASE FORMAT IT LIKE THIS:

FACTS- (This should be real easy- they come right from the book)

ISSUE- (What is the dispute between the parties? What is question to be discussed?)

LAW- (What is the applicable law?) Research the law in the chapter, cite and define/explain which laws are applicable.

DISCUSSION- (This is your analysis-include major and minor points and opposing points of view or counterpoints to add depth to your analysis. Remember, use proper paragraphs. Submissions should be at least 2/3 paragraphs.)

CONCLUSION -(Sometimes referred to as the Resolution-I should be able to know your conclusion by the way your framed your issue and by your Discussion-go back to your Issue- see if you answered the question(s) posed in a sentence or two at best.)

In: Economics

CASE # 3 (Crisis Planning at Livestrong Foundation) In 1996, Lance Armstrong, the now-disgraced pro cyclist,...

CASE # 3 (Crisis Planning at Livestrong Foundation)
In 1996, Lance Armstrong, the now-disgraced pro cyclist, was diagnosed with testicular cancer. Only 25 years old when he found out he had cancer, Armstrong chose to focus on being a survivor, not a victim. During his personal battle with cancer, he soon realized there was a critical lack of resources for individuals facing this disease. He decided to start a foundation devoted to helping others manage their lives on the cancer journey. Since 1998, the Livestrong Foundation has served millions of people affected by cancer. But in October 2012, everything turned upside down for the organization. That’s when the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency released its report that “concluded once and for all that Lance Armstrong, the cancer charity’s founder and chairman, was guilty of doping during his legendary cycling career.”
Doug Ulman, CEO and president of the Livestrong Foundation at the time, said he remembers that day clearly. In fact, he had anticipated for months that this day would come. As good friends, Ulman had believed Armstrong’s statements of innocence over the years. But now, “there was no more hiding.” After the news broke, Ulman called a meeting of every one of the foundation’s 100-person staff, all squeezing into the foundation’s boardroom. There, shoulder to shoulder and crammed together, the suspicions and tingling uncertainties all of a sudden became all too real. When Ulman announced that the organization could no longer “defend” its founder, it was a defining, watershed moment. Livestrong, the once highflying charity which had raised half a billion dollars over the years, was now facing a crisis—maybe even a life-or death crisis— of its own. Now, Livestrong would be operating in “life without Lance” mode.
Although it might be tempting to write off Livestrong as a hopeless case, Ulman and the rest of Livestrong’s staff have worked hard to keep the foundation viable and focused on its purpose. It’s not to ignore the challenges facing the Crisis Planning at Livestrong Foundation organization, because those challenges are significant. But in managing through the crisis, Ulman had to keep staff morale up and make plans to transform and distance itself from Mr. Armstrong. One piece of advice he received from a crisis communications firm was to take the opportunity to get the foundation’s message out. Like many of the cancer sufferers it helps, Livestrong wanted to come out on the other side stronger than ever. It’s not been easy. The foundation has lost some of its biggest sponsors, including Nike and RadioShack. Revenues fell in 2012 and 2013. But in addition to his “crisis management” responsibilities, Ulman has been formulating plans and strategies. He says, “It’s so ironic—we are in the business of survivorship, that’s what we do. Now we find ourselves dealing with the same circumstances in a totally different place.”
Page 6 of 8

A new phase in Livestrong’s history began in early 2015. The foundation’s Board of Directors announced a new president and CEO, Chandini Portteus. She comes to Livestrong from Susan G. Komen, the most widely known, largest, and best funded breast cancer organization in the United States. With her extensive knowledge and skills in fundraising, global programming, and advocacy, Livestrong has an individual well-versed in the challenges of leading this organization into the future.
Case # 3- Discussion Questions
1. Could an organization even plan for this type of situation? If yes, how? If not, why not?
2. How would goals be useful in this type of situation? What types of goals might be
necessary?
3. What types of plans will be useful to Livestrong? Explain why you think these plans
would be important.
4. What lessons about planning can managers learn from what Livestrong has endured?

In: Economics

Suppose you have just joined a startup drug delivery company as the President and CEO. What...

Suppose you have just joined a startup drug delivery company as the President and CEO. What will be your possible strategies to run this company so that you can bring an antisense oligonucleotide product in the market from the treatment of liver fibrosis? Remember, you need to generate money by attracting investors, you need to take care of the stock price of your company and moral of your employees.

In: Operations Management

As a result of COVID-19 pandemic, company XYZ (Pty) Ltd is considering the introduction of the...

As a result of COVID-19 pandemic, company XYZ (Pty) Ltd is considering the introduction of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. They consider the industrial Internet of Things to be the way to go for the company. However, you are hired as a consultant to advise the CEO of XYZ wether 4.0 is the best option for the company. In your report after benchmarking, you need to also consider the challenges and benefits that can be derived by implementing 4.0.

In: Economics

4b. On June 30, 2020, Lansing Company was notified by its only customer that the Customer...

4b. On June 30, 2020, Lansing Company was notified by its only customer that the

Customer will no longer order its product. All existing orders are expected to be completed by May 2021. From July through December 2020, Lansing Company continued efforts to raise additional financing from venture capital groups and secure new customers. By December 15, 2020, it was evident that these efforts would not be successful.

On March 1, 2021, Lansing Company obtains the required shareholder approval for a plan of liquidation that will be completed by May 2021. Upon ceasing its operations, all employees will be terminated, and Lansing Company’s assets will be liquidated to repay its creditors. The criteria for liquidation being imminent are met under FASB ASC 205 on October 29, 2021.

Required:

a. How should Lansing Company report these facts on its December 31, 2020 financial

statements?

b. How should Lansing Company report these facts during 2021?

In: Accounting