Questions
Q.No. 3 Evaluate any 3 Companies which is considered as “Marketing Myopia” along with their Market...

Q.No. 3

Evaluate any 3 Companies which is considered as “Marketing Myopia” along with their Market share/Users Graph.

Max Marks    10

Answer :

1) Company Name :

Year Start :

Founder Name :

Graph :-

(Graph must show the high and low point of Market Share/users)

2) Company Name :

Year Start :

Founder Name :

Graph :-

(Graph must show the high and low point of Market Share/users)

3) Company Name :

Year Start :

Founder Name :

Graph :-

(Graph must show the high and low point of Market Share/users)

In: Economics

Garnett Jackson, the founder, and CEO of Tech Tune-Ups, stared out the window as he finished...

Garnett Jackson, the founder, and CEO of Tech Tune-Ups, stared out the window as he finished his customary peanut butter and jelly sandwich, contemplating the dilemma currently facing his firm. Tech Tune-Ups is a start-up firm, offering a wide range of computer services to its clients, including online technical assistance, remote maintenance, and backup of client computers through the Internet, and virus prevention and recovery. The firm has been successful in the 2 years since it was founded; its reputation for fair pricing and good service is spreading, and Mr. Jackson believes the firm is in a good position to expand its customer base rapidly. But he is not sure that the firm has the financing in place to support that rapid growth.

Tech Tune-Ups’ main capital investments are its own powerful computers, and its major operating expense is salary for its consultants. To a reasonably good approximation, both of these factors grow in proportion to the number of clients the firm serves.

Currently, the firm is a privately held corporation. Mr. Jackson and his partners, two classmates from his undergraduate days, have contributed $250,000 in equity capital, largely raised from their parents and other family members. The firm has a line of credit with a bank that allows it to borrow up to $400,000 at an interest rate of 8%. So far, the firm has used $200,000 of its credit line. If and when the firm reaches its borrowing limit, it will need to raise equity capital and will probably seek funding from a venture capital firm. The firm is growing rapidly, requiring continual investment in additional computers, and Mr. Jackson is concerned that it is approaching its borrowing limit faster than anticipated.

Mr. Jackson thumbs through past financial statements and estimates that each of the firm’s computers, costing $10,000, can support revenues of $80,000 per year but that the salary and benefits paid to each consultant using one of the computers is $70,000. Sales revenue in 2014 was $1.2 million, and sales are expected to grow at a 20% annual rate in the next few years. The firm pays taxes at a rate of 35%. Its customers pay their bills with an average delay of 3 months, so accounts receivable at any time are usually around 25% of that year’s sales.

Mr. Jackson and his co-owners receive minimal formal salary from the firm, instead taking 70% of profits as a “dividend,” which accounts for a substantial portion of their personal incomes. The remainder of the profits are reinvested in the firm. If reinvested profits are not sufficient to support new purchases of computers, the firm borrows the required additional funds using its line of credit with the bank.

Mr. Jackson doesn’t think Tech Tune-Ups can raise venture funding until after 2016. He decides to develop a financial plan to determine whether the firm can sustain its growth plans using its line of credit and reinvested earnings until then. If not, he and his partners will have to consider scaling back their hoped-for rate of growth, negotiate with their bankers to increase the line of credit, or consider taking a smaller share of profits out of the firm until further financing can be arranged.

Mr. Jackson wiped the last piece of jelly from the keyboard and settled down to work.

Can you help Mr. Jackson develop a financial plan? Do you think his growth plan is feasible?

Please provide balance sheet, income statements, and cash flow statements for 2013-2018. Please explain

In: Accounting

Garnett Jackson, the founder, and CEO of Tech Tune-Ups, stared out the window as he finished...

Garnett Jackson, the founder, and CEO of Tech Tune-Ups, stared out the window as he finished his customary peanut butter and jelly sandwich, contemplating the dilemma currently facing his firm. Tech Tune-Ups is a start-up firm, offering a wide range of computer services to its clients, including online technical assistance, remote maintenance, and backup of client computers through the Internet, and virus prevention and recovery. The firm has been successful in the 2 years since it was founded; its reputation for fair pricing and good service is spreading, and Mr. Jackson believes the firm is in a good position to expand its customer base rapidly. But he is not sure that the firm has the financing in place to support that rapid growth.

Tech Tune-Ups’ main capital investments are its own powerful computers, and its major operating expense is salary for its consultants. To a reasonably good approximation, both of these factors grow in proportion to the number of clients the firm serves.

Currently, the firm is a privately held corporation. Mr. Jackson and his partners, two classmates from his undergraduate days, have contributed $250,000 in equity capital, largely raised from their parents and other family members. The firm has a line of credit with a bank that allows it to borrow up to $400,000 at an interest rate of 8%. So far, the firm has used $200,000 of its credit line. If and when the firm reaches its borrowing limit, it will need to raise equity capital and will probably seek funding from a venture capital firm. The firm is growing rapidly, requiring continual investment in additional computers, and Mr. Jackson is concerned that it is approaching its borrowing limit faster than anticipated.

Mr. Jackson thumbs through past financial statements and estimates that each of the firm’s computers, costing $10,000, can support revenues of $80,000 per year but that the salary and benefits paid to each consultant using one of the computers is $70,000. Sales revenue in 2014 was $1.2 million, and sales are expected to grow at a 20% annual rate in the next few years. The firm pays taxes at a rate of 21%. Its customers pay their bills with an average delay of 3 months, so accounts receivable at any time are usually around 25% of that year’s sales.

Mr. Jackson and his co-owners receive minimal formal salary from the firm, instead taking 70% of profits as a “dividend,” which accounts for a substantial portion of their personal incomes. The remainder of the profits are reinvested in the firm. If reinvested profits are not sufficient to support new purchases of computers, the firm borrows the required additional funds using its line of credit with the bank.

Mr. Jackson doesn’t think Tech Tune-Ups can raise venture funding until after 2016. He decides to develop a financial plan to determine whether the firm can sustain its growth plans using its line of credit and reinvested earnings until then. If not, he and his partners will have to consider scaling back their hoped-for rate of growth, negotiate with their bankers to increase the line of credit, or consider taking a smaller share of profits out of the firm until further financing can be arranged.

Mr. Jackson wiped the last piece of jelly from the keyboard and settled down to work.

Can you help Mr. Jackson develop a financial plan? Do you think his growth plan is feasible?

In: Finance

John Rigas (founder and CEO of Adelphia Communications Corporation) was an extraordinary man. Throughout his professional...

John Rigas (founder and CEO of Adelphia Communications Corporation) was an extraordinary man. Throughout his professional career, he was honored for his entrepreneurial achievements and his humanitarian service. Among other awards, he received three honorable doctorate degrees from distinguished universities, was named Entrepreneur of the Year by Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (his college alma mater) and was inducted into the Cable Television Hall of Fame by Broadcasting and Cable magazine. He worked hard to acquire wealth and status. But a $2.3 billion financial fraud eventually cost Rigas everything. Rigas and his company, Adelphia Communications, started out small. With $72,000 of borrowed money, he began his business career in 1950 by purchasing a movie theater in Coudersport, Pennsylvania. Two years later, he overdrew his bank account to buy the town cable franchise with $300 of his own money. Through risky debt-financing, Rigas continued to acquire assets until, in 1972, he and his brother created Adelphia Communications Corporation. The company grew quickly, eventually becoming the sixth largest cable company in the world with over 5.6 million subscribers. From its inception, Adelphia had always been a family business, owned and operated by the Rigas clan. During the 1990s, the company was run by John Rigas, his three sons, and his son-in-law. Altogether, members of the Rigas family occupied a majority five of the nine seats on Adelphia’s board of directors and held the following positions: John Rigas, CEO and chairman of the board (father); Tim Rigas, CFO and board member (son); Michael Rigas, executive vice president and board member (son); James Rigas, executive vice president and board member (son); Peter Venetis, board member (son-in-law). This family dominance in the company was maintained through stock voting manipulation. The company issued two types of stock: Class A stock, which held one vote each, and Class B stock, which held 10 votes each. When shares of stock were issued, however, the Rigas family kept all Class B shares to themselves, giving them a majority ruling when company voting occurred. With a majority presence on the board of directors and an effectual influence among voting shareholders, the Rigas family was able to control virtually every financial decision made by the company. However, exclusive power led to corruption and fraud. The family established a cash management system, an enormous account of commingled revenues from Adelphia, other Rigas entities, and loan proceeds. Although funds from this account were used throughout all the separate entities, none of their financial statements were ever consolidated. The family members began to dip into the cash management account, using these funds to finance their extravagant lifestyle and to hide their crimes. The company paid $4 million to buy personal shares of Adelphia stock for the family. It paid for Tim Rigas’s $700,000 membership at the Golf Club at Briar’s Creek in South Carolina. With company funds, the family bought three private jets, maintained several vacation homes (in Cancun, Beaver Creek, Hilton Head, and Manhattan), and began construction of a private world-class golf course. In addition, Adelphia financed, with $3 million, the production of Ellen Rigas’s (John Rigas’s daughter) movie Song Catcher. John Rigas was honored for his large charitable contributions. But these contributions also likely came from company proceeds. In the end, the family had racked up approximately $2.3 billion in fraudulent off-balance-sheet loans. The company manipulated its financial statements to conceal the amount of debt it was accumulating. False transactions and phony companies were created to inflate Adelphia’s earnings and to hide its debt. When the family fraud was eventually caught, it resulted in an SEC investigation, a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, and multiple indictments and heavy sentences. The perpetrators (namely, John Rigas and his sons) were charged with the following counts: Violation of the RICO Act Breach of fiduciary duties Waste of corporate assets Abuse of control Breach of contract Unjust enrichment Fraudulent conveyance Conversion of corporate assets Until he was convicted of serious fraud, everybody loved John Rigas. He was trusted and respected in the small town of Coudersport and famous for his charitable contributions and ability to make friends. He had become a role model for others to follow. With a movie theater and a $300 cable tower, he had built one of the biggest empires in the history of cable television. From small beginnings, he became a multimillion-dollar family man who stressed good American values. But his goodness only masked the real John Rigas, and in the end, it was his greed and deceit that ultimately cost him and his family everything.

Questions

4.) Based on the facts of the case, do you think this case has led to civil litigation, criminal prosecution, or both? Explain your answer. 5.) Suppose you were an expert witness in this case. What would be some of the facts to which you would pay special attention?

In: Accounting

John Rigas (founder and CEO of Adelphia Communications Corporation) was an extraordinary man. Throughout his professional...

John Rigas (founder and CEO of Adelphia Communications Corporation) was an extraordinary
man. Throughout his professional career, he was honored for his entrepreneurial achievements
and his humanitarian service. Among other awards, he received three honorable doctorate
degrees from distinguished universities, was named Entrepreneur of the Year by Rensselaer
Polytechnic Institute (his college alma mater) and was inducted into the Cable Television Hall of
Fame by Broadcasting and Cable magazine. He worked hard to acquire wealth and status. But a
$2.3 billion financial fraud eventually cost Rigas everything.


Rigas and his company, Adelphia Communications, started out small. With $72,000 of borrowed
money, he began his business career in 1950 by purchasing a movie theater in Coudersport,
Pennsylvania. Two years later, he overdrew his bank account to buy the town cable franchise
with $300 of his own money. Through risky debt-financing, Rigas continued to acquire assets
until, in 1972, he and his brother created Adelphia Communications Corporation. The company
grew quickly, eventually becoming the sixth largest cable company in the world with over 5.6
million subscribers.


From its inception, Adelphia had always been a family business, owned and operated by the
Rigas clan. During the 1990s, the company was run by John Rigas, his three sons, and his son-in-
law. Altogether, members of the Rigas family occupied a majority five of the nine seats on
Adelphia’s board of directors and held the following positions:
John Rigas, CEO and chairman of the board (father); Tim Rigas, CFO and board member (son);
Michael Rigas, executive vice president and board member (son); James Rigas, executive vice
president and board member (son); Peter Venetis, board member (son-in-law).
This family dominance in the company was maintained through stock voting manipulation. The
company issued two types of stock: Class A stock, which held one vote each, and Class B stock,
which held 10 votes each. When shares of stock were issued, however, the Rigas family kept all
Class B shares to themselves, giving them a majority ruling when company voting occurred.
With a majority presence on the board of directors and an effectual influence among voting
shareholders, the Rigas family was able to control virtually every financial decision made by the
company. However, exclusive power led to corruption and fraud. The family established a cash
management system, an enormous account of commingled revenues from Adelphia, other Rigas
entities, and loan proceeds. Although funds from this account were used throughout all the
separate entities, none of their financial statements were ever consolidated.


The family members began to dip into the cash management account, using these funds to
finance their extravagant lifestyle and to hide their crimes. The company paid $4 million to buy
personal shares of Adelphia stock for the family. It paid for Tim Rigas’s $700,000 membership at
the Golf Club at Briar’s Creek in South Carolina. With company funds, the family bought three
private jets, maintained several vacation homes (in Cancun, Beaver Creek, Hilton Head, and
Manhattan), and began construction of a private world-class golf course. In addition, Adelphia
financed, with $3 million, the production of Ellen Rigas’s (John Rigas’s daughter) movie Song
Catcher. John Rigas was honored for his large charitable contributions. But these contributions
also likely came from company proceeds.


In the end, the family had racked up approximately $2.3 billion in fraudulent off-balance-sheet
loans. The company manipulated its financial statements to conceal the amount of debt it was
accumulating. False transactions and phony companies were created to inflate Adelphia’s
earnings and to hide its debt. When the family fraud was eventually caught, it resulted in an SEC
investigation, a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, and multiple indictments and heavy sentences. The
perpetrators (namely, John Rigas and his sons) were charged with the following counts:


Violation of the RICO Act

Breach of fiduciary duties

Waste of corporate assets

Abuse of control

Breach of contract

Unjust enrichment

Fraudulent conveyance

Conversion of corporate assets

Until he was convicted of serious fraud, everybody loved John Rigas. He was trusted and respected in the small town of Coudersport and famous for his charitable contributions and abilityto make friends. He had become a role model for others to follow. With a movie theater and a $300 cable tower, he had built one of the biggest empires in the history of cable television. From small beginnings, he became a multimillion-dollar family man who stressed good American values. But his goodness only masked the real John Rigas, and in the end, it was his greed and deceit that ultimately cost him and his family everything.

Read this as a fraud examiner hired by the prosecution as an expert witness. What are some of the facts of the case that you would pay special attention to and advise the prosecutor to pursue for further investigation? Identify three (3) items and explain why they are significant to a fraud examiner.

In: Accounting

Garnett Jackson, the founder, and CEO of Tech Tune-Ups, stared out the window as he finished...

Garnett Jackson, the founder, and CEO of Tech Tune-Ups, stared out the window as he finished his customary peanut butter and jelly sandwich, contemplating the dilemma currently facing his firm. Tech Tune-Ups is a start-up firm, offering a wide range of computer services to its clients, including online technical assistance, remote maintenance, and backup of client computers through the Internet, and virus prevention and recovery. The firm has been successful in the 2 years since it was founded; its reputation for fair pricing and good service is spreading, and Mr. Jackson believes the firm is in a good position to expand its customer base rapidly. But he is not sure that the firm has the financing in place to support that rapid growth. Tech Tune-Ups’ main capital investments are its own powerful computers, and its major operating expense is salary for its consultants. To a reasonably good approximation, both of these factors grow in proportion to the number of clients the firm serves. Currently, the firm is a privately held corporation. Mr. Jackson and his partners, two classmates from his undergraduate days, have contributed $250,000 in equity capital, largely raised from their parents and other family members. The firm has a line of credit with a bank that allows it to borrow up to $400,000 at an interest rate of 8%. So far, the firm has used $200,000 of its credit line. If and when the firm reaches its borrowing limit, it will need to raise equity capital and will probably seek funding from a venture capital firm. The firm is growing rapidly, requiring continual investment in additional computers, and Mr. Jackson is concerned that it is approaching its borrowing limit faster than anticipated. Mr. Jackson thumbs through past financial statements and estimates that each of the firm’s computers, costing $10,000, can support revenues of $80,000 per year but that the salary and benefits paid to each consultant using one of the computers is $70,000. Sales revenue in 2014 was $1.2 million, and sales are expected to grow at a 20% annual rate in the next few years. The firm pays taxes at a rate of 35%. Its customers pay their bills with an average delay of 3 months, so accounts receivable at any time are usually around 25% of that year’s sales. Mr. Jackson and his co-owners receive minimal formal salary from the firm, instead taking 70% of profits as a “dividend,” which accounts for a substantial portion of their personal incomes. The remainder of the profits are reinvested in the firm. If reinvested profits are not sufficient to support new purchases of computers, the firm borrows the required additional funds using its line of credit with the bank. Mr. Jackson doesn’t think Tech Tune-Ups can raise venture funding until after 2016. He decides to develop a financial plan to determine whether the firm can sustain its growth plans using its line of credit and reinvested earnings until then. If not, he and his partners will have to consider scaling back their hoped-for rate of growth, negotiate with their bankers to increase the line of credit, or consider taking a smaller share of profits out of the firm until further financing can be arranged. Mr. Jackson wiped the last piece of jelly from the keyboard and settled down to work. Can you help Mr. Jackson develop a financial plan and Do you think his growth plan is feasible? financial statement (income statement & balance sheet)

In: Finance

Hi, my name is Peter Metcalf. I'm the CEO and lead founder of Black Diamond. Very...

Hi, my name is Peter Metcalf. I'm the CEO and lead founder of Black Diamond. Very early on in the beginning of the company, the sports of climbing, mountaineering [inaudible] skiing were relatively small at that time. They've grown dramatically. However, if you aggregated the global demand for that product, then you could have a fairly meaningful business. I recognize that to be competitive, to do what we really wanted to do, we had to think globally. It was going to be about finding these global markets through finding other people who shared our passion, who were young, embryonic businesspeople in many cases who wanted to get into the business because they shared that passion, they knew the markets, they knew the space, and could develop a business as a distributer for us. And as time went on, we did begin to recognize that nobody really cares about Black Diamond as much as Black Diamond people do. And for that reason, we would have to take charge ultimately of the businesses that we were, the business we were conducting overseas through independent distributers. And there was also a recognition that, to be the same brand in Europe or in Asia as we were in North America, we would have to be something slightly different because of cultural values, cultural interpretations.

>> My name is Thomas Hodel. I'm from Switzerland. Born in Lausen. Doing outdoor sports were, was always a big part of my life, so a big passion of me, and that's why I'm here working at Black Diamond sharing that passion. And I have two roles at the moment. On a global view, I'm responsible for all the ski categories, so together with team here, we define strategies and directions for all the categories which belong to the ski side. And then, in Europe, I'm the European category director, so the role there is to make sure whatever we do here works also in Europe and the European needs are covered. It takes a long time to really figure out the differences in Europe, and it's, every country has a different culture, mentality. Having that European perspective, I think that that's definitely asset I can bring into this company and help this company to become more global, to address those needs better.

>> My name is Wim de Jager. Actually pronounced as Wim de Jager, but that's difficult. So Wim de Jager. I go with Wim de Jager. I'm the VP of manufacturing here at Black Diamond. Our business is really global. Our customers are global. And our manufacturing is definitely global as well. So, yeah, we own our own factory in Zhuhai. Products that we assemble and produce in the factory in Zhuhai are also part of this protective products that we use that are being used in climbing and in mountaineering, so the quality needs to be good. But also, we want to ensure that's being done in a good way. So we control it from start to finish, which means how we treat the people, how we manufacture, and how we run the organization, that we ensure that everything is done in the right way.

>> But more importantly, we have a certification and compliance process. We have auditors that go into these factories. We have a very strict guideline of ethical sourcing requirements. So we check these factories. We're not at some sweatshop. Factories that we're in, like, I think an apparel factory we're in in Bangladesh, the people get three meals a day. There's health care. There's English language. There's money for additional education. It's well ventilated, well lit. It's clean. It's safe. Because that's very important to us and 
what our values are.

1. When CEO says their manufacturing operations aren’t sweatshops, Black Diamond is exhibiting

A. Uncertainty avoidance

B. Global perspective

C. Social responsibility

D. Globalization

2. Peter Metcalf founded Black Diamond which creates, produces, and sells outdoor equipment. This is an example of

A. Manufacturing Organization

B. Service Organization

C. A tiered workforce

D. Outsourcing

3. Assume you are the CEO of Black Diamond, a global organization. You realize that some of the people in your organization are more comfortable working in a strong hierarchy while others prefer to work more like colleagues with their managers than as leaders. You have a project that requires highly structured reporting relationships with a clear hierarchy because it is a joint venture project. You believe people from some cultures may not feel comfortable with such a strong hierarchical relationship. In this case, you might seek to put people on the project who are from a (BLANK) country.

A. High Assertiveness

B. High Collectivism

C. High Power Distance

D. High uncertainty avoidance

In: Operations Management

Q.1. The Acme Medical Equipment Company has used the Last-In First-Out (LIFO) inventory method for the...

Q.1. The Acme Medical Equipment Company has used the Last-In First-Out (LIFO) inventory method for the 15 years they have existed. Acme's operation has grown substantially, and the CEO believes that the company should now use the FIFO inventory method for this coming year end. This action meets the requirements for consistency.

True

False

Q.2. If the euro is trading at 1.2500 in U.S. dollars (this exchange rate is for illustration only), and you were spending your U.S. dollar in Europe in part of the “euro area,” then to buy products priced in euros, it would take:

A.

one-third again as much (1.33) in U.S. dollars.

B.

one-quarter again as much (1.25) in U.S. dollars.

C.

three-quarters again as much (.75) in U.S. dollars.

D.

None of these is correct.

Q.3. True or False? The line chart is one of four basic chart styles.

True

False

In: Finance

On March 1, 2020, the XYZ Company acquired 40% of the voting stock of KLM Company...

  1. On March 1, 2020, the XYZ Company acquired 40% of the voting stock of KLM Company for 6 million. The net worth of KLM book value is 10 million. The fair market value of the KLM assets and liabilities are equal except for a building with book value of 3 million has a fair value of 5 million.

KLM reported net income of 2 million and made dividend distributions of 1 million during the year ending 12/31/2020

Assuming XYZ is using the EQUITY METHOD for this investment

  1. Was there any good will in this transaction? How much?
  2. Make the journal entries to reflect the above transactions by XYZ company during 2020
  3. Assume XYZ uses straight line depreciation and 10 years economic life. Show the general ledger of “Investment” account and ending balance by XYZ company on 12/31/2020

In: Accounting

On January 1, 2020, Wondersome Company acquired a 70% interest in Philmore Company for a purchase...

On January 1, 2020, Wondersome Company acquired a 70% interest in Philmore Company for a purchase price that was $240,000 over the book value of the Philmore’s Stockholders’ Equity on the acquisition date. Wondersome uses the equity method to account for its investment in Philmore. Wondersome assigned the acquisition-date AAP as follows:

AAP Initial FV Useful Life (in years)
PPE, net $90,000 20
Patent $50,000 10
$240,000

Philmore sells inventory to Wondersome (upstream) which includes that inventory in products that it, ultimately, sells to customers outside of the controlled group. You have compiled the following data for the years ending 2022 and 2023:

2022 2023
Transfer price, Inventory sale $94,500 $70,000
COGS -64,500 -45,000
Gross Profit $30,000 $25,000
% inventory remain 30% 20%
GP deferred $9,000 $5,000
EOY Receivable/Payable $32,000 $29,500

The inventory not remaining at the end of the year has been sold outside of the controlled group.

The parent and the subsidiary report the following financial statements at December 31, 2023:

Income Statement

Wondersome Philmore

Sales

2,400,00 602,400
COGS -1,580,000 -465,398
Gross Profit 820,000 137,002
Income (loss) from subsidiary 45,851
Operating expenses -711,200 -56,000
Net income $154,651 $81,002

Statement of Retained Earnings

Wondersome Philmore
BOY Retained earnings 3,500,000 608,000
Net income 154,651 81,002
Dividends -85,000 -15,000
EOY Retained earnings $3,569,651 $674,002

Balance Sheet

Wondersome Philmore
Assets:
Cash 450,000 84,700
Accounts receivable 425,000 113,200
Inventory 654,000 142,100
Equity investment 803,251
PPE, net 4,438,400 1,000,002
TOTAL Assets $6,770,651 $1,340,002
Liabilities & Stockholders' Equity:
Current liabilities 505,900 99,500
Long-term liabilities 703,500 250,00
Common stock 402,000 75,300
APIC 1,589,600 241,200
Retained earnings 3,569,651 674,002
TOTAL L & SE $6,770,651 $1,340,002

Required:

  1. Compute the EOY noncontrolling interest equity balance
  2. Prepare the consolidation journal entries.

In: Accounting