Questions
Western Europe emerged slowly out of Feudalism. As early nation states formed, it was the smaller...

Western Europe emerged slowly out of Feudalism. As early nation states formed, it was the smaller states that had the advantage, such as Holland.   Eventually a larger England eclipsed Holland yet maintain a long-term advantage over the larger France and Spain. Ultimately, after many centuries the very large United States become the model of a successful modern, capitalist economy. If trade and population are so important, why did it take almost 1,000 years to develop a very large capitalist nation state?  

Need a few pages to write about this so as much information as possible would be nice

References and sources if possible, or any site that would help answer

In: Economics

Subway, the fast food restaurant franchise, announced in early 2018 it planned to bring back the...

Subway, the fast food restaurant franchise, announced in early 2018 it planned to bring back the “$5 Footlong” promotion. Hundreds of Subway franchise owners protested the promotion saying that they cannot afford to sell the footlong sub sandwiches for $5. You'll want to review the Subway webpage featured in the Chapter 8 module.

Assume that the costs related to a Subway footlong and a Subway franchise include the following

Cost Item

Details

Cost per sandwich

Meats, cheeses, toppings

Per footlong

$2.25

Sub roll bread

Per footlong

$.29

Labor cost per footlong

$15.00/hour wage rate and each worker can make 10 sandwiches per hour

$1.50

Credit card transaction fee

1.0% + $.10 per transaction

$0.15

Electricity

$360 per month dividend by 4,000 orders per month

$0.09

Rent

Rent $1,200 per month divided by 4,000 orders per month

$0.30

Franchise fee amortization

Franchise and startup fees $36,000 divided by 180 months (15 years) divided by 4,000 orders per month

$0.05

Royalty fee

8.0% of sales

$0.40

Advertising fee

4.5% of sales

$0.23

Equipment leasing cost

$600 per month divided by 4,000 orders

$0.15

Cost per footlong sandwich

$5.41

NOTE: Assume all subs are paid for with a credit card

Discussion Questions:

Question #1:  Bob owns a subway franchise and he is furious at the thought of offering $5.00 footlongs. His comment was “they cost us $5.41 each so we will be upside down on each sub sold. I’ll lose my shirt!”. Do you agree or disagree with Bob that this idea should be immediately rejected without any further analysis? If you don’t agree with Bob, why do you think further analysis is required?  

Question #2: What are the relevant and irrelevant costs in this pricing decision? (hint: there are 6 relevant costs)

Question #3: Can you think of any other reasons/factors besides the costs listed above that might be relevant to the pricing decision to offer the $5.00 footlongs? Use your imagination

In: Accounting

Brookdale Hospital hired an inexperienced controller early in 20X4. Near the end of 20X4, the board...

Brookdale Hospital hired an inexperienced controller early in 20X4. Near the end of 20X4, the board of directors decided to conduct a major fund-raising campaign. They wished to have the December 31, 20X4, statement of financial position for Brookdale fully conform with current generally accepted principles for hospitals. The trial balance prepared by the controller at December 31, 20X4, follows:

Cash

$

101,000

Investment in Short-Term Marketable Securities

201,600

Investment in Long-Term Marketable Securities

301,400

Interest Receivable

16,400

Accounts Receivable

55,600

Inventory

35,200

Land

121,600

Buildings & Equipment

935,700

Allowance for Depreciation

$

259,400

Accounts Payable

40,200

Mortgage Payable

321,300

Fund Balance

1,147,600

Total

$

1,768,500

$

1,768,500

Your analysis of the contribution’s receivable as of December 31, 20X4, determined that there were unrecognized contributions for the following:

Unrestricted use$40,300 Cancer research 10,800 Purchase of equipment 20,500 Permanently restricted endowment principal 32,000 Total$103,600

  1. Short-term investments at year-end consist of $151,600 of funds without donor restrictions and $50,000 of funds restricted for future cancer research. All of the long-term investments are held in the permanently restricted endowment fund.
  2. Land is carried at its current market value of $121,600. The original owner purchased the land for $70,500, and at the time of donation to the hospital, it had an appraised value of $97,000.
  3. Buildings purchased 11 years ago for $610,500 had an estimated useful life of 30 years. Equipment costing $152,400 was purchased 7 years ago and had an expected life of 10 years. The controller had improperly increased the reported values of the buildings and equipment to their current fair value of $935,700 and had incorrectly computed the accumulated depreciation.
  4. The board of directors voted on December 29, 20X4, to designate $101,700 of funds without donor restrictions invested in short-term investments for developing a drug rehabilitation center.

Answer is not complete.

BROOKDALE HOSPITAL

Balance Sheet

December 31, 20X4

Assets

Current Assets:

Cash

$101,000 correct

Contributions receivable

103,600 correct

Investments in marketable securities

201,600 correct

Interest receivable

16,400 correct

Accounts receivable

55,600 correct

Inventory

35,200 correct

Total current assets

$513,400

Long-term assets:

Building & equipment

WRONG

Accumulated depreciation

WRONG

Net investment in buildings and equipment

$0

Land

97,000 correct

Investments in marketable securities

301,400 correct

Total long-term assets

398,400

Total assets

$911,800

Liabilities

Accounts payable

$40,200 correct

Mortgage payable

321300 correct

Total liabilities

$361,500

Net assets:

Without donor restriction

WRONG

With donor restriction

WRONG

Total net assets

WRONG

Total liabilities and net assets

WRONG

In: Accounting

In early 2001, Ride Along Corporation (Ride Along or the “Company”), a domestic company that does...

In early 2001, Ride Along Corporation (Ride Along or the “Company”), a domestic company that does not meet the definition of a public business entity, began manufacturing and selling bicycles to retail stores nationally. Ride Along’s fiscal year ends on December 31, and it has been experiencing growth over the past decade. Ride Along is required to prepare and issue annual consolidated financial statements to its shareholders and the local bank. These financial statements are to be prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Ride Along is 75 percent owned by a private equity firm and 25 percent owned by its founder. The founder and private equity firm plan to either take Ride Along public in an initial public offering (IPO) or sell it to an existing public company in five years. Ride Along tests goodwill for impairment annually on November 30 and has determined that each of its goodwill reporting units is a legal entity. On February 1, 2012, Ride Along acquired 100 percent ownership of a bicycle tire manufacturer, Mini Tires Company (Mini). The purposes of the acquisition were to reduce the cost associated with buying bicycle tires from third-party suppliers and for Ride Along to expand its operations by selling tires directly to retail stores. Mini met the definition of a business1 but did not meet the definition of a public business entity (PBE). The founder of Mini will work as an employee of Ride Along and has signed a two-year noncompete agreement. Ride Along paid cash of $20 million (purchase price), which resulted in goodwill of $6 million and an intangible asset (a customer list) of $2 million. During 2013, Ride Along continued to gain market share in the bicycle industry and determined it wanted to own retail stores. On June 1, 2013, Ride Along acquired 100 percent ownership of 10 independently owned retail stores and recorded $10 million of goodwill as part of the acquisitions. In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-02, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Accounting for Goodwill — a consensus of the Private Company Council. During 2014, the founder of Mini resigned from Ride Along and started a new business after his noncompete agreement expired. With his departure, 45 percent of the customers on Mini’s original customer list, which was classified as an intangible asset on Ride Along’s statement of financial condition, provided notice that they would no longer do business with Ride Along. This migration resulted in an impairment of the customer list intangible. These customers represent 35 percent of total future revenue for the Tire reporting unit and the loss of these customers reduced the fair value of Mini by 35 percent. No other management changes are expected. Even with the loss of Mini’s customers, Ride Along performed well because of the strength of the retail stores and strong bicycle sales leading to results that exceeded expectations. Therefore, Ride Along increased its revenue and operating income in its five-year forecast; cash flows continue to be positive.

Furthermore, general economic conditions are stable for all reporting units, including debt and equity markets. Ride Along is a private company that does not actively trade its shares; however, because of stable economic conditions and the Company’s increasing revenue and operating income, had Ride Along traded its shares, the value of these shares would have steadily increased. Labor costs and material for each reporting unit have increased in line with inflation and are expected to do so for the foreseeable future. As of December 31, 2014, before considering the departure of Mini’s founder, the fair value of Ride Along was $210 million (fair value by reporting unit is as follows: Bicycle, Tire, and Retail stores were 55 percent, 10 percent, and 35 percent, respectively) and the carrying value, including goodwill, was $145 million (carrying value by reporting unit is as follows: Bicycle, Tire, and Retail stores were $65 million, $20 million, and $60 million, respectively). Required 1. ASU 2014-02 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. What should Ride Along consider before deciding whether to adopt the private-company alternative in ASU 2014-02? 2. Assuming Ride Along adopts the goodwill alternative in ASU 2014-02, may Ride Along subsequently change its accounting for goodwill and revert to PBE GAAP? If so, how would Ride Along account for this change and what disclosures must it include in the consolidated financial statements? For the questions below, assume Ride Along early adopted ASU 2014-02 in 2014. 3. For the year ended December 31, 2014, describe (in detail) the analysis that Ride Along would perform to support whether its goodwill is recoverable or impaired as well as the accounting conclusion reached assuming it elected to test goodwill at the entity level. If the Company concludes that its goodwill is impaired, what would it record as the amount of the goodwill impairment? In addition, provide a separate analysis and related accounting conclusion (including the amount of the goodwill impairment charge if goodwill is impaired) assuming Ride Along elected to test goodwill at the reporting unit level. 4. Assume Ride Along (or one of its reporting units) has zero or negative equity. How would Ride Along perform its goodwill impairment assessment?

In: Accounting

Following a pilot programme in Waitemata, a national screening programme to detect bowel cancer early is...

Following a pilot programme in Waitemata, a national screening programme to detect bowel cancer early is being introduced in New Zealand. People aged 60-74 years will be invited to take part in the bowel screening programme, starting from 2017.

(a) An anticipated benefit of the screening programme is a reduction in deaths from bowel cancer among people who take part in the screening programme. This benefit is more likely to occur if the programme is of high quality. Discuss how the programme should be evaluated, including the key factors you would measure in the evaluation of the screening programme.

(b) Screening programmes are known to have potential harms as well as benefits. It is important that people are given information about these potential harms and benefits before they decide whether to take part in screening. What information would you provide to people about the screening programme?

In: Nursing

Read the article, Interculturalism: Addressing Diversity in the Early Childhood Classroom and answer the following questions:...

Read the article, Interculturalism: Addressing Diversity in the Early Childhood Classroom and answer the following questions:

List at least two attributes of an intercultural classroom:

1.

2.

List at least two learning materials or practices you would find in an intercultural classroom or space:

1.

2.

List at least three teaching strategies you would find in an intercultural classroom:

1.

2.

3.

Please answer the following questions with a minimum of three sentences:

1. Does your childcare program reflect any of these developmentally appropriate practices? Which ones?

2. Describe one thing your center could be doing better to reflect more intercultural practices. (If you do not work in a childcare setting, you can reflect on any interaction, practice, or space where children are.)

In: Nursing

In the early 1990s, fusion involving hydrogen dissolved in palladium at room temperature, or cold fusion,...

In the early 1990s, fusion involving hydrogen dissolved in palladium at room temperature, or cold fusion, was proposed as a new source of energy. This process relies on the diffusion of H2 into palladium. The diffusion of hydrogen gas through a 0.005-cm-thick piece of palladium foil with a cross section of 0.780 cm2 is measured. On one side of the foil, a volume of gas maintained at 298 K and 1 atm is applied, while a vacuum is applied to the other side of the foil. After 24 h, the volume of hydrogen has decreased by 14.2 cm3 . What is the diffusion coefficient of hydrogen gas in palladium?

In: Chemistry

In the early 1970s, the U.S. Government had a two-tiered system for crude oil prices.

In the early 1970s, the U.S. Government had a two-tiered system for crude oil prices. Oil that came from older wells (drilled a few years before) was given an approved price per barrel that was considerably lower than the price allowed for crude oil that came from "new" or more-recently dug oil wells. The idea behind the scheme was to keep gasoline prices low by making the main input into gasoline -- crude oil -- less expensive than would be oil sold to U.S. refineries that came from wells in other countries.

One oil executive, Marc Rich, came up with a scheme in which the "old oil" was secretly converted into "new oil" through false bookkeeping entries, which meant that some of the oil Rich sold to refineries had a price attached that was higher than U.S. law permitted at that time. According to the government, these "overcharges" ultimately drove the price of gasoline higher than it would have been otherwise.

However, some economists have argued that Rich's scheme actually could have resulted in lower gasoline prices for consumers. What would have needed to be the case for that scenario to have occurred? Is it plausible, economically speaking? Explain.

In: Economics

Q6) In early 2012, the spot exchange rate between the Swiss Franc and U.S. dollar was...

Q6) In early 2012, the spot exchange rate between the Swiss Franc and U.S. dollar was 1.0404 ($ per franc). Interest rates in the U.S. and Switzerland were 0.25% and 0% per annum, respectively, with continuous compounding. The three-month forward exchange rate was 1.0300 ($ per franc).

What arbitrage strategy was possible?

In: Finance

In early January 2020, Novak Inc., a private enterprise that applies ASPE, purchased 40% of the...

In early January 2020, Novak Inc., a private enterprise that applies ASPE, purchased 40% of the common shares of Washi Corp. for $402,000. Novak was now able to exercise considerable influence in decisions made by Washi’s management. Washi Corp.’s statement of financial position reported the following information at the date of acquisition:

Assets not subject to being amortized $201,000
Assets subject to depreciation (10 years average life remaining) 608,000
Liabilities 113,000

Additional information:

1. Both the carrying amount and fair value are the same for non-depreciable assets and for liabilities.
2. The fair value of the assets subject to depreciation is $735,000.
3. The company depreciates its capital assets on a straight-line basis.
4.

Washi reported net income of $160,000 and declared and paid dividends of $110,000 in 2020.

Prepare the journal entry to record Novak’s investment in Washi Corp. Assume that any unexplained payment is goodwill.

Investment In Associate 402000
Cash 402000

Assuming Novak applies the equity method to account for its investment in Washi, prepare the journal entries to record Novak’s equity in the net income and the receipt of dividends from Washi Corp. in 2020.

Account Titles Debit Credit
Cash
Investment in Associate
(To record collection of dividend)
Investment In Associate
Investment Income or Loss
(To record investment income)
(To record depreciation of fair value difference)

In: Accounting