For the past
112112
years, a certain state suffered
2828
direct hits from major (category 3 to 5) hurricanes. Assume that this was typical and the number of hits per year follows a Poisson distribution. Complete parts (a) through (d).
(a) What is the probability that the state will not be hit by any major hurricanes in a single year?
The probability is
1-The number of hits to a website follows a Poisson process. Hits occur at the rate of
1.0 per minute1.0 per minute
between 7:00 P.M. and
99:00
P.M. Given below are three scenarios for the number of hits to the website. Compute the probability of each scenario between
8 : 27 P.M.8:27 P.M.
and
88:3535
P.M. Interpret each result.
(a) exactly fivefive
(b) fewer than fivefive
(c) at least fivefive
2-Determine the required value of the missing probability to make the distribution a discrete probability distribution. x P(x) 3 0.35 0.35 4 ? 5 0.16 0.16 6 0.27 0.27 P(4) =
In: Statistics and Probability
Homework Assignment 4 Instructions: Class name must be: HW4_yourName For example: Michael will name the class of homework assignment 4 as HW4_Michael Grading Rubric: Code running and as per the required conditions and giving expected output = 10 points File named as per instructions = 1 point Comments in code = 4 points Problem: Average calculation for a list Write a program that reads a text file named test_scores.txt to read the name of the student and his/her scores for 3 tests. The program should display class average for first test (average of scores of test 1) and average (average of 3 tests) for each student. Expected Output: ['John', '25', '26', '27'] ['Michael', '24', '28', '29'] ['Adelle', '23', '24', '20'] [['John', '25', '26', '27'], ['Michael', '24', '28', '29'], ['Adelle', '23', '24', '20']] Class average for test 1 is: 24.0 Average for student John is 26.00 Average for student Michael is 27.00 Average for student Adelle is 22.33
In: Computer Science
Sales-Related and Purchase-Related Transactions Using Periodic Inventory System
The following were selected from among the transactions
completed by Essex Company during July of the current
year:
| July 3. | Purchased merchandise on account from Hamling Co., list price $72,000, trade discount 15%, terms FOB shipping point, 2/10, n/30, with prepaid freight of $1,450 added to the invoice. |
| 5. | Purchased merchandise on account from Kester Co., $33,450, terms FOB destination, 2/10, n/30. |
| 6. | Sold merchandise on account to Parsley Co., $36,000, terms n/15. The cost of the merchandise sold was $25,000. |
| 7. | Returned $6,850 of merchandise purchased on July 5 from Kester Co. |
| 13. | Paid Hamling Co. on account for purchase of July 3. |
| 15. | Paid Kester Co. on account for purchase of July 5, less return of July 7. |
| 21. | Received cash on account from sale of July 6 to Parsley Co. |
| 21. | Sold merchandise on MasterCard, $108,000. The cost of the merchandise sold was $64,800. |
| 22. | Sold merchandise on account to Tabor Co., $16,650, terms 2/10, n/30. The cost of the merchandise sold was $10,000. |
| 23. | Sold merchandise for cash, $91,200. The cost of the merchandise sold was $55,000. |
| 28. | Paid Parsley Co. a cash refund of $2,500 for damaged merchandise from sale of July 6. Parsley Co. kept the merchandise. |
| 31. | Paid MasterCard service fee of $1,650. |
Required:
Journalize the entries to record the transactions of Essex Company for July using the periodic inventory system. If an amount box does not require an entry, leave it blank.
| July 3 | fill in the blank 2 | fill in the blank 3 | |
| fill in the blank 5 | fill in the blank 6 | ||
| fill in the blank 8 | fill in the blank 9 | ||
| July 5 | fill in the blank 11 | fill in the blank 12 | |
| fill in the blank 14 | fill in the blank 15 | ||
| July 6 | fill in the blank 17 | fill in the blank 18 | |
| fill in the blank 20 | fill in the blank 21 | ||
| July 7 | fill in the blank 23 | fill in the blank 24 | |
| fill in the blank 26 | fill in the blank 27 | ||
| July 13 | fill in the blank 29 | fill in the blank 30 | |
| fill in the blank 32 | fill in the blank 33 | ||
| fill in the blank 35 | fill in the blank 36 | ||
| July 15 | fill in the blank 38 | fill in the blank 39 | |
| fill in the blank 41 | fill in the blank 42 | ||
| fill in the blank 44 | fill in the blank 45 | ||
| July 21 | fill in the blank 47 | fill in the blank 48 | |
| fill in the blank 50 | fill in the blank 51 | ||
| July 21 | fill in the blank 53 | fill in the blank 54 | |
| fill in the blank 56 | fill in the blank 57 | ||
| July 22 | fill in the blank 59 | fill in the blank 60 | |
| fill in the blank 62 | fill in the blank 63 | ||
| July 23 | fill in the blank 65 | fill in the blank 66 | |
| fill in the blank 68 | fill in the blank 69 | ||
| July 28 | fill in the blank 71 | fill in the blank 72 | |
| fill in the blank 74 | fill in the blank 75 | ||
| July 31 | fill in the blank 77 | fill in the blank 78 | |
| fill in the blank 80 | fill in the blank 81 |
In: Accounting
Rusty Williams, the owner and CEO of The Rusty Bicycle Company, a small manufacturer and distributer of recreational bikes, has dejectedly watched sales of his company’s flagship bike, the WindRunner, decline precipitously over the past 7 years. Believing that the trend is irreversible, Rusty has taken the drastic step of shutting down the operation of his firm in an effort to reduce costs while he tries to figure out how to rescue the firm he has spent the bulk of his life building.
Rusty asks his brother John, the head design engineer at his firm to design and build a prototype of a new bicycle that might be able to save the company. Rusty tells John to forget about conventional bicycle design and to “think big” and come up with something truly revolutionary.
After about 6 weeks of intense work, John comes back to Rusty with a proposal for the “WindRunner 2.0”, a bicycle unlike anything else on the market today. John believes that the specialty nature of the new bicycle suggests that, while unit sales volume may be relatively low, the bicycle should command a premium sales price. Specifically, he thinks that customers would be willing to pay upwards of $845 per bike.
Rusty, intrigued by the new design, hires a market research consultant, Sandy Frazier, to study the potential demand for the WindRunner 2.0. As projecting demand for a completely new product is notoriously difficult, she limits her prediction to a 5 year horizon. Sandy gives the following forecast to Rusty in exchange for her customary fee of $45,000.
|
Year |
Sales Volume |
|
1 |
7,000 |
|
2 |
7,000 |
|
3 |
7,000 |
|
4 |
7,000 |
|
5 |
7,000 |
Rusty is optimistic that the expected sales revenue will be enough to save his company. Deciding to move forward on the evaluation of this project, he asks John what new manufacturing capacity will be needed to begin production. John thinks that he could reconfigure the firm’s current manufacturing facility to produce the new model bicycle, although the current production machinery, purchased over 20 years ago, is woefully inadequate. He estimates that the necessary new equipment could be purchased for $2.5 million and that the whole manufacturing process will incur fixed operating costs of $3 million per year. Additionally, he estimates the variable costs of production to run $260 per bike produced.
John further thinks that the existing production equipment, which will no longer be needed, could be sold for $400,000. The existing equipment was classified for tax purposes under the 15 year MACRS category. As a result of a recent exemption given to small businesses, Rusty will not have to use the MACRS depreciation schedules for new capital assets acquired. Instead, the new equipment will be depreciated straight-line to zero over the 5 year planning horizon. John thinks that the new production equipment will be worthless and scrapped at the end of 5 years.
Finally, John tells Rusty that he will need about $300,000 in raw materials (i.e. parts and supplies) for the bicycles to begin production. This expenditure will not be recovered at the end of the project. Rusty, worried about spending so much cash on parts, calls a supplier, Rodney Murdock, to see about short-term credit options. Unfortunately, due to the precarious position Rusty finds his company in, the supplier is unable to offer any credit terms and will insist upon cash on delivery payment for raw materials.
Recently, a federal government economic stimulus measure was enacted. As a result of this effort, small businesses, like Rusty, will have their business income tax rate cut to zero percent for the next 10 years. The intent is to stimulate the formation of new small businesses throughout the country. Since this project is a last ditch effort to save the company, Rusty plans to let the project run for the 5 year forecast horizon. After that, he plans to dissolve the business and retire. Due to the desperation involved in this project, Rusty estimates that a 20% required rate of return is appropriate.
Rusty has asked for your help in addressing the following questions.
Prepare a 5 year forecast of cash flow from assets (CFA) for the WindRunner 2.0 project.
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
Sales Volume |
|||||
|
Price |
|||||
|
Revenue |
|||||
|
Fixed Costs |
|||||
|
Variable Costs per unit |
|
Income Statement |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Sales |
|||||
|
Expenses |
|||||
|
Depreciation |
|||||
|
EBIT |
|||||
|
Taxes |
|||||
|
Net Income |
|
Cash Flows |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Operating Cash Flows |
||||||
|
Net Working Capital |
||||||
|
Capital Expenditure |
||||||
|
Salvage |
||||||
|
Cash Flow from Assets |
Calculate the Net Present Value (NPV) of the WindRunner 2.0 project.
Since the future of his company rests on the success or failure of this project, Rusty is understandably concerned about risks to his forecasts and expectations for the project. To get a better picture of the risk involved, Rusty again asks you to conduct the following scenario analyses.
With your previous work being used as the ‘base case’ scenario, estimate the net present value of the project under a pessimistic scenario. Specifically, Rusty wants to consider the project’s NPV if both sales volume and the sales price are 10% below the base case scenario, while variable costs are 10% above the base case scenario estimates. All other variables will remain the same.
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
Sales Volume |
|||||
|
Price |
|||||
|
Revenue |
|||||
|
Fixed Costs |
|||||
|
Variable Costs per unit |
|
Income Statement |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Sales |
|||||
|
Expenses |
|||||
|
Depreciation |
|||||
|
EBIT |
|||||
|
Taxes |
|||||
|
Net Income |
|
Cash Flows |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Operating Cash Flows |
||||||
|
Net Working Capital |
||||||
|
Capital Expenditure |
||||||
|
Salvage |
||||||
|
Cash Flow from Assets |
Now, to look at the optimistic case, reevaluate the project NPV where sales volume and sales price are 10% above the base case estimates, while variable costs are 10% below base case estimates. Again, all other variables are presumed to remain the same.
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
Sales Volume |
|||||
|
Price |
|||||
|
Revenue |
|||||
|
Fixed Costs |
|||||
|
Variable Costs per unit |
|
Income Statement |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Sales |
|||||
|
Expenses |
|||||
|
Depreciation |
|||||
|
EBIT |
|||||
|
Taxes |
|||||
|
Net Income |
|
Cash Flows |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Operating Cash Flows |
||||||
|
Net Working Capital |
||||||
|
Capital Expenditure |
||||||
|
Salvage |
||||||
|
Cash Flow from Assets |
Finally, Rusty would like to know what minimum quantity of the WindRunner 2.0 models will have to be sold in order to produce a zero NPV (i.e. the financial breakeven point). That is, he would like to know what level of sales volume would leave him indifferent between undertaking the project versus shelving the project.
In: Finance
Xania Inc. uses a normal job-order costing system. Currently, a plantwide overhead rate based on machine hours is used. Xania's plant manager has heard that departmental overhead rates can offer significantly better cost assignments than a plantwide rate can offer. Xania has the following data for its two departments for the coming year:
|
Department A |
Department B |
|
|
Overhead costs (expected) |
$750,000 |
$330,000 |
|
Normal activity (machine hours) |
6,000 |
10,000 |
|
Normal activity (direct labor hours) |
2,000 |
1,000 |
Required:
1. Compute a predetermined overhead rate for the plant as a whole based on machine hours.
2. Compute predetermined overhead rates for each department using machine hours for Department A and direct labor hours for Department B. (Note: Carry your calculations out to the nearest dollar.)
3. Job 73 used 25 machine hours from Department A and 50 machine hours from Department B; it used 30 direct labor hours from Department A and 20 direct labor hours from Department B. Job 74 used 40 machine hours from Department A and 15 machine hours from Department B; it used 20 direct labor hours from Department A and 50 direct labor hours from Department B. Compute the overhead cost assigned to each job using the plantwide rate computed in Requirement 1. Repeat the computation using the departmental rates found in
Requirement 2.
|
Job 73 Plantwide |
Job 73 Departmental |
|
Job 74 Plantwide |
Job 74 Departmental |
4. Using a Plantwide, if actual machine hours for the year were 17,000 hours and actual overhead costs were $1,100,000, how much was overhead under- or over-applied for the year and how would that affect Cost of Goods Sold when it is closed to that account. $$_________________________ over-applied/under-applied (circle one) $$_________________________ Cost of Goods Sold increased/decreased (circle one)
In: Accounting
| BodyTemp 97.6 99.4 99 98.8 98 98.9 99 97.8 96.8 99 98.4 98.8 97.8 98.9 98.4 96.9 99.5 98.8 97.6 97.9 97.7 98.3 97.4 100.8 98.3 98.2 98 97.8 97.2 98.2 97.4 97.5 98.2 98 98.4 99.3 98.2 98.1 97.7 99 98.5 98.6 98.8 98.4 98.7 96.4 98 97.7 98.2 98.7 |
Pulse 69 77 75 84 71 76 81 77 75 81 82 78 71 80 70 74 75 83 74 76 77 79 78 77 78 69 89 74 64 73 72 70 57 67 73 68 64 67 61 79 83 78 64 81 78 69 73 84 72 73 |
Gender 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 |
2. Download the BodyTemp.MTW file from Canvas. We will be comparing the body temperatures of men and women. [30 points]
A.Make a graph to compare the distributions of men and women’s body temperatures.
B. Use Minitab Express to determine if there is evidence that the mean body temperatures of men and women are different. The coding of gender is 0=man and 1=woman. Assume that the distribution of the body temperature data is normal. Use the five-step hypothesis testing procedure and remember to include all relevant Minitab Express output. You should not need to do any hand calculations.
Step 1:Check assumptions and write hypotheses
Step 2: Calculate the test statistic
Step 3:Identify the pvalue
Step 4:Make a decision
Step 5:State a “real world” conclusion
In: Statistics and Probability
|
Green Thumb Gardening is a small gardening service that uses activity-based costing to estimate costs for pricing and other purposes. The proprietor of the company believes that costs are driven primarily by the size of customer lawns, the size of customer garden beds, the distance to travel to customers, and the number of customers. In addition, the costs of maintaining garden beds depends on whether the beds are low maintenance beds (mainly ordinary trees and shrubs) or high maintenance beds (mainly flowers and exotic plants). Accordingly, the company uses the five activity cost pools listed below: |
| Activity Cost Pool | Activity Measure |
| Caring for lawn | Square feet of lawn |
| Caring for garden beds–low maintenance | Square feet of low maintenance beds |
| Caring for garden beds–high maintenance | Square feet of high maintenance beds |
| Travel to jobs | Miles |
| Customer billing and service | Number of customers |
|
The company has already completed its first stage allocations of costs and has summarized its annual costs and activity as follows: |
| Activity Cost Pool |
Estimated Overhead Cost |
Expected Activity | ||
| Caring for lawn | $ | 85,800 | 165,000 | square feet of lawn |
| Caring for garden beds–low maintenance | $ | 38,400 | 25,000 | square feet of low maintenance beds |
| Caring for garden beds–high maintenance | $ | 53,200 | 19,000 | square feet of high maintenance beds |
| Travel to jobs | $ | 3,600 | 16,000 | miles |
| Customer billing and service | $ | 7,500 | 38 | customers |
| Required: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Compute the activity rate for each of the activity cost pools. (Round your answers to 2 decimal places.) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
In: Accounting
Green Thumb Gardening is a small gardening service that uses activity-based costing to estimate costs for pricing and other purposes. The proprietor of the company believes that costs are driven primarily by the size of customer lawns, the size of customer garden beds, the distance to travel to customers, and the number of customers. In addition, the costs of maintaining garden beds depends on whether the beds are low maintenance beds (mainly ordinary trees and shrubs) or high maintenance beds (mainly flowers and exotic plants). Accordingly, the company uses the five activity cost pools listed below:
| Activity Cost Pool | Activity Measure |
| Caring for lawn | Square feet of lawn |
| Caring for garden beds–low maintenance | Square feet of low maintenance beds |
| Caring for garden beds–high maintenance | Square feet of high maintenance beds |
| Travel to jobs | Miles |
| Customer billing and service | Number of customers |
The company already has completed its first stage allocations of costs and has summarized its annual costs and activity as follows:
| Activity Cost Pool | Estimated Overhead Cost |
Expected Activity | ||
| Caring for lawn | $ | 81,800 | 175,000 | square feet of lawn |
| Caring for garden beds–low maintenance | $ | 34,400 | 22,000 | square feet of low maintenance beds |
| Caring for garden beds–high maintenance | $ | 43,360 | 16,000 | square feet of high maintenance beds |
| Travel to jobs | $ | 3,400 | 13,000 | miles |
| Customer billing and service | $ | 7,100 | 20 | customers |
Required:
Compute the activity rate for each of the activity cost pools. (Round your answers to 2 decimal places.)
|
In: Accounting
Green Thumb Gardening is a small gardening service that uses activity-based costing to estimate costs for pricing and other purposes. The proprietor of the company believes that costs are driven primarily by the size of customer lawns, the size of customer garden beds, the distance to travel to customers, and the number of customers. In addition, the costs of maintaining garden beds depends on whether the beds are low maintenance beds (mainly ordinary trees and shrubs) or high maintenance beds (mainly flowers and exotic plants). Accordingly, the company uses the five activity cost pools listed below:
| Activity Cost Pool | Activity Measure |
| Caring for lawn | Square feet of lawn |
| Caring for garden beds–low maintenance | Square feet of low maintenance beds |
| Caring for garden beds–high maintenance | Square feet of high maintenance beds |
| Travel to jobs | Miles |
| Customer billing and service | Number of customers |
The company already has completed its first stage allocations of costs and has summarized its annual costs and activity as follows:
| Activity Cost Pool | Estimated Overhead Cost |
Expected Activity | ||
| Caring for lawn | $ | 87,400 | 175,000 | square feet of lawn |
| Caring for garden beds–low maintenance | $ | 40,000 | 29,000 | square feet of low maintenance beds |
| Caring for garden beds–high maintenance | $ | 62,330 | 23,000 | square feet of high maintenance beds |
| Travel to jobs | $ | 3,400 | 20,000 | miles |
| Customer billing and service | $ | 7,100 | 28 | customers |
Required:
Compute the activity rate for each of the activity cost pools. (Round your answers to 2 decimal places.)
Caring for lawn (per sq ft of laawn)
Caring for garden bed-low maintenance (per sq ft of low maintenance bed)
Caring for garden bed-high maintenance (per sq ft of high maintenance bed)
Travel to jobs (per mile)
Customer billing service (per customer)
In: Accounting
Greg’s Bicycle Shop has the following transactions related to its top-selling Mongoose mountain bike for the month of March. Greg's Bicycle Shop uses a periodic inventory system.
| Date | Transactions | Units | Unit Cost | Total Cost | ||||||||||||
| March | 1 | Beginning inventory | 20 | $ | 175 | $ | 3,500 | |||||||||
| March | 5 | Sale ($250 each) | 15 | |||||||||||||
| March | 9 | Purchase | 10 | 195 | 1,950 | |||||||||||
| March | 17 | Sale ($300 each) | 8 | |||||||||||||
| March | 22 | Purchase | 10 | 205 | 2,050 | |||||||||||
| March | 27 | Sale ($325 each) | 12 | |||||||||||||
| March | 30 | Purchase | 8 | 225 | 1,800 | |||||||||||
| $ | 9,300 | |||||||||||||||
For the specific identification method, the March 5 sale consists of bikes from beginning inventory, the March 17 sale consists of bikes from the March 9 purchase, and the March 27 sale consists of four bikes from beginning inventory and eight bikes from the March 22 purchase.
Calculate ending inventory and cost of goods sold at March 31, using the specific identification method.
|
Using FIFO, calculate ending inventory and cost of goods sold at
March 31.
|
Using LIFO, calculate ending inventory and cost of goods sold at March 31.
|
Using weighted-average cost, calculate ending inventory and cost of goods sold at March 31. (Round your intermediate and final answers to 2 decimal places.)
|
Calculate sales revenue and gross profit under each of the four methods. (Round weighted-average cost amounts to 2 decimal places.)
|
7. If Greg’s Bicycle Shop chooses to report inventory using LIFO instead of FIFO, record the LIFO adjustment.
Journal entry worksheet
|
In: Accounting