Directions: Use the Bivatiate Correlation function and the Options submenu to answer each of the questions based on the above scenario.
The superintendent has continued the examination of data by examining the relationship between attendance rate and percent of students eligible for free or reduced priced lunch. The district data used for the analysis are contained below.
|
|
51.97 free or reduced
94.16 attendance
15.68 free or reduced
1.71 attendance
Note: The table must be created using your word processing program. Tables that are copied and pasted from SPSS are not acceptable.
In: Math
QUESTION 1
Jason is applying for a job. A pre-employment assessment indicates that he is generally helpful, considerate, cooperative, and trusting of others. Jason has a high level of…
|
Agreeableness |
||
|
Openness to experience |
||
|
Extraversion |
||
|
Conscientiousness |
QUESTION 7
Julio is generally happy and content with his job. He enjoys his salary and gets along well with his coworkers. He is not energetic or enthusiastic about his work though. Julio is showing high _____________ and low _______________.
| A. |
Organizational commitment; job satisfaction |
|
| B. |
Organizational citizenship; employee engagement |
|
| C. |
Employee engagement; job satisfaction |
|
| D. |
Job satisfaction; employee engagement |
QUESTION 8
Suppose you are looking to hire engineers. ___________________ refer to “can do” or “competence”-related factors that influence their performance. ________________ refer to the “will do” or “character” factors that influence their performance.
| A. |
Conscientiousness and integrity; knowledge and skill in engineering |
|
| B. |
Conscientiousness and integrity; extraversion and agreeableness |
|
| C. |
Knowledge and skill in engineering; conscientiousness and integrity |
|
| D. |
Knowledge and skill in engineering; intelligence |
QUESTION 10
Charles stays at his job because he feels obligated. He would feel guilty about leaving, with all that his coworkers and supervisor have done for him. Which type of commitment is this demonstrating?
| A. |
Affective commitment |
|
| B. |
Continuance commitment |
|
| C. |
Group commitment |
|
| D. |
Normative commitment |
QUESTION 11
A teacher has discovered over a period of time that, even though her school has treated her well and she has a positive view of the school and the organization’s mission, she does not really like to teach and the task of teaching is not really for her. This is most likely to result in low levels of…
| A. |
Affective commitment |
|
| B. |
Continuance commitment |
|
| C. |
Normative commitment |
|
| D. |
Job satisfaction |
In: Operations Management
1. Suppose a random sample of 100 Utah families yields a total fertility rate (the average number of children born per woman) of 2.71. Given what the Central Limit Theorem tells us about the relationship between sample statistics and population parameters, we can assume the total fertility rate for all Utah families is
Exactly 2.71. No more, no less.
Less than 2.71, as the sampling distribution for the TFR is always negatively skewed
likely close to 2.71, though not necessarily EXACTLY 2.71
Far too high relative to the number of students our public education system can realistically support (this is NOT the correct answer)
2. Suppose you're interested in tracking Americans' church attendance. A sample of 900 Americans finds that 22 percent of respondents report attending church at least once per week. If this poll has a margin of error of plus/minus three percent, we can be fairly certain that the percentage of all Americans who attend church at least once per week falls between _______ percent and _______ percent.
Group of answer choices
19; 25
21.7; 22.3
16; 28
There's simply no way of knowing because everyone lies about how often they go to church (this is not the correct answer, although it's probably true).
3. Suppose weights of high school wrestlers are normally distributed with a mean of 145 pounds and a standard deviation of 15 pounds. Approximately what percent of wrestlers weigh between 135 and 150 pounds?
Group of answer choices
37.81 percent
74.75 percent
25.25 percent
0.3781 percent
4. Suppose weights of high school wrestlers are normally distributed with a mean of 145 pounds and a standard deviation of 15 pounds. What weight (approximately) corresponds with the 75th percentile?
Group of answer choices
134.883
140.22
149.78
155.117
In: Math
Previous info: Cost Is No Object is a car rental service that specializes in lending antique and luxury cars to clients on a short-term basis. A typical customer might rent a vintage convertible to transport out-of-town clients to a business meeting, or rent a luxury car to transport a wedding party. The service currently has three employees and ten vehicles that it rents.
Case Projects CH.4 Case: Cost Is No Object
In earlier chapters, you developed classes needed for Cost Is No Object—a car rental service that specializes in lending antique and luxury cars to clients on a short-term basis. The rental service produces computerized paychecks for its employees every week. Write a program that gets data for each of the following:
An employee ID number
A first name
A last name
A street address
A zip code
An hourly pay rate
Number of hours worked this week
An insurance plan code
Create an application that prompts the user for employee data; the application continues to accept data for new employees until the user enters 0 for an ID number to quit. While the ID number is not zero, prompt the user for a value for each field in turn. Any time the user enters an invalid value, continue to reprompt the user for the same data. Continue with the next data item only when the previous item is valid, as follows:
An employee ID must be between 100 and 999 inclusive.
A zip code must not be greater than 99999.
An hourly pay rate must be between $6.00 and $25.00 inclusive.
The number of hours worked in a week cannot be negative or more than 70.
An insurance plan code must be 1 or 2.
When all the needed data has been entered correctly for an employee, display a copy of all the data fields for the employee as well as the following:
Gross pay, calculated as hours worked times pay rate
Income tax, which is calculated as 15% of the gross pay if the gross pay is $400 or less; otherwise, it is 20% of the gross pay
An insurance premium, which is $60 for insurance plan code 1 and $100 for insurance plan code 2
Net pay, which is calculated as gross pay minus income tax, minus insurance premium; if the net pay is negative (the employee did not earn enough to cover the tax and insurance), then the net pay should be $0
In: Computer Science
1. A researcher claims that the mean rate of Infant mortality in the City of Chicago is below 9.3 %. Based on the data represented for the years 2005 – 2011, perform a hypothesis test to test his claim using a significance level of α= 0.10.
2.Would your conclusion change for question 1 if you used a significance level of α= 0.05? Explain.
Data:
| community Area Name | Infant Mortality Rate |
| Rogers Park | 6.4 |
| West Ridge | 5.1 |
| Uptown | 6.5 |
| Lincoln Square | 3.8 |
| North Center | 2.7 |
| Lake View | 2.2 |
| Lincoln park | 2.4 |
| Near North Side | 6.5 |
| Edison Park | 4.6 |
| Norwood Park | 4.4 |
| Jefferson Park | 8.3 |
| Forest Glen | 3.8 |
| North Park | 5.4 |
| Albany Park | 4.9 |
| Portage Park | 4.7 |
| Irving Park | 5.3 |
| Dunning | 4.9 |
| Montclaire | 4.6 |
| Belmont Cragin | 5.6 |
| Hermosa | 9.3 |
| Avondale | 5.7 |
| Logan Square | 4.3 |
| Humboldt Park | 9.8 |
| West town | 5.1 |
| Austin | 13.3 |
| West Garfield Park | 19 |
| East Garfield Park | 11 |
| Near West side | 9.1 |
| North Lawndale | 14.1 |
| South Lawndale | 5.9 |
| Lower West Side | 5.4 |
| Loop | 5.7 |
| Near South Side | 4.8 |
| Armour Square | 1.5 |
| Douglas | 13.4 |
| Oakland | 8.2 |
| Fuller Park | 22.6 |
| Grand Boulevard | 12.1 |
| Kenwood | 8.9 |
| Washington Park | 19.3 |
| Hyde Park | 10.4 |
| Woodlawn | 11.5 |
| South Shore | 11.4 |
| Chatham | 10.9 |
| Avalon Park | 11.4 |
| South Chicago | 17.7 |
| Burnside | 13 |
| Calumet Heights | 13.9 |
| Roseland | 9.6 |
| Pullman | 13.6 |
| South Deering | 11.8 |
| East Side | 3.7 |
| West Pullman | 11.9 |
| Riverdale | 8.7 |
| Hegewisch | 8.4 |
| Garfield Ridge | 4.5 |
| Archer Heights | 5.2 |
| Brighton Park | 5.9 |
| McKinley Park | 7.3 |
| Bridgeport | 8 |
| New City | 7.9 |
| West Elsdon | 8.1 |
| Gage Park | 5.4 |
| Clearing | 6.7 |
| West Lawn | 8.4 |
| Chicago Lawn | 11.1 |
| West Englewood | 13.3 |
| Englewood | 13.4 |
| Greater Grand Crossing | 14.2 |
| Ashburn | 10.2 |
| Auburn Gresham | 15.6 |
| Beverly | 10 |
| Washington Heights | 11.2 |
| Mount Greenwood | 3.3 |
| Morgan Park | 13.1 |
| O'Hare | 2 |
| Edgewater | 6.9 |
Please show work. Thank you :)
In: Statistics and Probability
Back in Boston, Steve has been busy creating and managing his new company, Teton Mountaineering (TM), which is based out of a small town in Wyoming. In the process of doing so, TM has acquired various types of assets. Below is a list of assets acquired during 2016: Exhibit 10-8 (Use MACRS Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5.) (Round intermediate calculations and final answer to the nearest whole dollar amount.)
Asset Cost Date Placed in Service Office furniture $ 10,000 02/03/2016
Machinery 560,000 07/22/2016
Used delivery truck* 15,000 08/17/2016
* Not considered a luxury automobile, thus not subject to the luxury automobile limitations. During 2016, TM had huge success (and had no §179 limitations) and Steve acquired more assets the next year to increase its production capacity.
These are the assets acquired during 2017: Date Placed Asset Cost in
Service Computers & info. system $ 40,000 03/31/2017
Luxury auto† 80,000 05/26/2017
Assembly equipment 475,000 08/15/2017
Storage building 400,000 11/13/2017
†Used 100% for business purposes.
TM generated taxable income in 2017 of $732,500 for purposes of computing the §179 expense.
a. Compute the maximum 2016 depreciation deductions including §179 expense (ignoring bonus depreciation).
b. Compute the maximum 2017 depreciation deductions including §179 expense (ignoring bonus depreciation).
c. Compute the maximum 2017 depreciation deductions including §179 expense, but now assume that Steve would like to take bonus depreciation on the 2017 assets.
d. Ignoring part c, now assume that during 2017, Steve decides to buy a competitor’s assets for a purchase price of $350,000.
Compute the maximum 2017 cost recovery including §179 expense (ignoring bonus depreciation). Steve purchased the following assets for the lump-sum purchase price. Date Placed Asset Cost in Service Inventory $ 20,000 09/15/2017
Office furniture 30,000 09/15/2017
Machinery 50,000 09/15/2017
Patent 98,000 09/15/2017
Goodwill 2,000 09/15/2017
Building 130,000 09/15/2017
Land 20,000 09/15/2017
In: Accounting
Back in Boston, Steve has been busy creating and managing his new company, Teton Mountaineering (TM), which is based out of a small town in Wyoming. In the process of doing so, TM has acquired various types of assets. Below is a list of assets acquired during 2015: (Use MACRS Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5.) (Round intermediate calculations and final answer to the nearest whole dollar amount.)
| Asset | Cost | Date Placed in Service | |
| Office furniture | $ | 10,000 | 02/03/2015 |
| Machinery | 560,000 | 07/22/2015 | |
| Used delivery truck* | 15,000 | 08/17/2015 | |
* Not considered a luxury automobile, thus not subject to the luxury automobile limitations.
During 2015, TM had huge success (and had no §179 limitations) and Steve acquired more assets the next year to increase its production capacity. These are the assets acquired during 2016:
| Date Placed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset | Cost | in Service | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Computers & info. system | $ | 40,000 | 03/31/2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Luxury auto† | 80,000 | 05/26/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assembly equipment | 475,000 | 08/15/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Storage building | 400,000 | 11/13/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
†Used 100% for business purposes. TM generated taxable income in 2016 before any §179 expense of $732,500. a. Compute the maximum 2015 depreciation deductions including §179 expense (ignoring bonus depreciation). b. Compute the maximum 2016 depreciation deductions including §179 expense (ignoring bonus depreciation). c. Compute the maximum 2016 depreciation deductions including §179 expense, but now assume that Steve would like to take bonus depreciation on the 2016 assets. d. Ignoring part (c), now assume that during 2016, Steve decides to buy a competitor’s assets for a purchase price of $350,000. Compute the maximum 2016 cost recovery including §179 expense (ignoring bonus depreciation). Steve purchased the following assets for the lump-sum purchase price.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In: Accounting
Back in Boston, Steve has been busy creating and managing his new company, Teton Mountaineering (TM), which is based out of a small town in Wyoming. In the process of doing so, TM has acquired various types of assets. Below is a list of assets acquired during 2016: Exhibit 10-8 (Use MACRS Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5.) (Round intermediate calculations and final answer to the nearest whole dollar amount.)
| Asset | Cost | Date Placed in Service | |
| Office furniture | $ | 10,000 | 02/03/2016 |
| Machinery | 560,000 | 07/22/2016 | |
| Used delivery truck* | 15,000 | 08/17/2016 | |
* Not considered a luxury automobile, thus not subject to the luxury automobile limitations.
During 2016, TM had huge success (and had no §179 limitations) and Steve acquired more assets the next year to increase its production capacity. These are the assets acquired during 2017:
| Date Placed | |||
| Asset | Cost | in Service | |
| Computers & info. system | $ | 40,000 | 03/31/2017 |
| Luxury auto† | 80,000 | 05/26/2017 | |
| Assembly equipment | 475,000 | 08/15/2017 | |
| Storage building | 400,000 | 11/13/2017 | |
†Used 100% for business purposes.
TM generated taxable income in 2017 of $732,500 for purposes of computing the §179 expense.
a. Compute the maximum 2016 depreciation deductions including §179 expense (ignoring bonus depreciation).
b. Compute the maximum 2017 depreciation deductions including §179 expense (ignoring bonus depreciation).
c. Compute the maximum 2017 depreciation deductions including §179 expense, but now assume that Steve would like to take bonus depreciation on the 2017 assets.
d. Ignoring part c, now assume that during 2017, Steve decides to buy a competitor’s assets for a purchase price of $350,000. Compute the maximum 2017 cost recovery including §179 expense (ignoring bonus depreciation). Steve purchased the following assets for the lump-sum purchase price.
| Date Placed | |||
| Asset | Cost | in Service | |
| Inventory | $ | 20,000 | 09/15/2017 |
| Office furniture | 30,000 | 09/15/2017 | |
| Machinery | 50,000 | 09/15/2017 | |
| Patent | 98,000 | 09/15/2017 | |
| Goodwill | 2,000 | 09/15/2017 | |
| Building | 130,000 | 09/15/2017 | |
| Land | 20,000 | 09/15/2017 | |
In: Accounting
Can someone please complete the following code(Java). The stuff in comments are the things you need to look at and code that
package mini2;
import static mini2.State.*;
/**
* Utility class containing the key algorithms for moves in the
* a yet-to-be-determined game.
*/
public class PearlUtil
{
private PearlUtil()
{
// disable instantiation
}
/**
* Replaces all PEARL states with EMPTY state between indices
* start and end, inclusive.
* @param states
* any array of States
* @param start
* starting index, inclusive
* @param end
* ending index, inclusive
*/
public static void collectPearls(State[] states, int start, int end)
{
// TODO
}
/**
* Returns the index of the rightmost movable block that is at or
* to the left of the given index start. Returns -1 if
* there is no movable block at start or to the left.
* @param states
* array of State objects
* @param start
* starting index for searching
* @return
* index of first movable block encountered when searching towards
* the left, starting from the given starting index; returns -1 if there
* is no movable block found
*/
public static int findRightmostMovableBlock(State[] states, int start)
{
// TODO
return 0;
}
/**
* Creates a state array from a string description, using the character
* representations defined by State.getValue. (For invalid
* characters, the corresponding State will be null, as determined by
* State.getValue.)
* Spaces in the given string are ignored; that is, the length of the returned
* array is the number of non-space characters in the given string.
* @param text
* given string
* @return
* State array constructed from the string
*/
public static State[] createFromString(String text)
{
// TODO
return null;
}
/**
* Determines whether the given state sequence is valid for the moveBlocks
* method. A state sequence is valid for moveBlocks if
*
*
*
*
* of the array
*
* Boundary states are defined by the method State.isBoundary, and
* are defined differently based on whether there is any movable block in the array.
* @param states
* any array of States
* @return
* true if the array is a valid state sequence, false otherwise
*/
public static boolean isValidForMoveBlocks(State[] states)
{
// TODO
return false;
}
/**
* Updates the given state sequence to be consistent with shifting the
* "player" to the right as far as possible. The starting position of the player
* is always index 0. The state sequence is assumed to be valid
* for movePlayer, which means that the sequence could have been
* obtained by applying moveBlocks to a sequence that was valid for
* moveBlocks. That is, the validity condition is the same as for moveBlocks,
* except that
*
*
*
* no movable blocks
*
*
* The player's new index, returned by the method, will be one of the following:
*
*
* first movable block in the array;
*
* the last position in the array;
*
*
* Note the last state of the array is always treated as a boundary for the
* player, even if it is OPEN_GATE or PORTAL.
* All pearls in the sequence are changed to EMPTY and any open gates passed
* by the player are changed to CLOSED_GATE by this method. (If the player's new index
* is on an open gate, its state remains OPEN_GATE.)
* @param states
* a valid state sequence
* @return
* the player's new index
*/
public static int movePlayer(State[] states)
{
// TODO
return 0;
}
/**
* Updates the given state sequence to be consistent with shifting all movable
* blocks as far to the right as possible, replacing their previous positions
* with EMPTY. Adjacent movable blocks
* with opposite parity are "merged" from the right and removed. The
* given array is assumed to be valid for moveBlocks in the sense of
* the method validForMoveBlocks. If a movable block moves over a pearl
* (whether or not the block is subsequently removed
* due to merging with an adjacent block) then the pearl is also replaced with EMPTY.
*
* Note that merging is logically done from the right.
* For example, given a cell sequence represented by ".+-+#", the resulting cell sequence
* would be "...+#", where indices 2 and 3 as move to index 3 and disappear
* and position 1 is moved to index 3.
* @param states
* a valid state sequence
*/
public static void moveBlocks(State[] states)
{
// TODO
}
}
Here's the class where you can check your code
package mini2;
/**
* Possible cell states for a certain puzzle game.
*/
public enum State
{
// WARNING: if we change these, be sure to update the TEXT array
too!
EMPTY,
WALL,
PEARL,
OPEN_GATE,
CLOSED_GATE,
MOVABLE_POS,
MOVABLE_NEG,
SPIKES_LEFT,
SPIKES_RIGHT,
SPIKES_DOWN,
SPIKES_UP,
SPIKES_ALL,
PORTAL;
public static boolean isMovable(State s)
{
return s == MOVABLE_POS || s == MOVABLE_NEG;
}
public static boolean canMerge(State s1, State s2)
{
return s1 == MOVABLE_POS && s2 == MOVABLE_NEG ||
s2 == MOVABLE_POS && s1 == MOVABLE_NEG;
}
public static boolean isBoundary(State s, boolean
containsMovable)
{
if (!containsMovable)
{
return s == CLOSED_GATE ||
s == SPIKES_LEFT ||
s == SPIKES_RIGHT ||
s == SPIKES_DOWN ||
s == SPIKES_UP ||
s == SPIKES_ALL ||
s == WALL;
}
else
{
return s == CLOSED_GATE ||
s == SPIKES_LEFT ||
s == SPIKES_RIGHT ||
s == SPIKES_DOWN ||
s == SPIKES_UP ||
s == SPIKES_ALL ||
s == WALL ||
s == OPEN_GATE ||
s == PORTAL;
}
}
public static final char[] TEXT = {
'.', // EMPTY,
'#', // WALL,
'@', // PEARL,
'o', // OPEN_GATE,
'x', // CLOSED_GATE,
'+', // MOVABLE_POS,
'-', // MOVABLE_NEG,
'<', // SPIKES_LEFT,
'>', // SPIKES_RIGHT,
'v', // SPIKES_DOWN,
'^', // SPIKES_UP,
'*', // SPIKES_ALL,
'O'// PORTAL;
};
public static final char NULL_CHAR = 'n';
public static char getChar(State s)
{
if (s == null)
{
return NULL_CHAR;
}
else
{
return TEXT[s.ordinal()];
}
}
public static State getValue(char c)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < TEXT.length; ++i)
{
if (TEXT[i] == c)
{
break;
}
}
if (i < TEXT.length)
{
return State.values()[i];
}
else if (c >= 'A' && c <= 'Z')
{
return State.PORTAL;
}
else return null;
}
public static String toString(State[] arr)
{
return toString(arr, true);
}
public static String toString(State[] arr, boolean addSpaces)
{
String text = "";
for (int col = 0; col < arr.length; ++col)
{
State s = arr[col];
char ch = getChar(s);
text += ch;
if (addSpaces && col < arr.length - 1)
{
text += " ";
}
}
return text;
}
}
In: Computer Science
Chris Gumede was recently hired by S&S Air to assist the company with its financial planning and to evaluate the company’s performance. Chris graduated from university five years ago with a finance degree.
S&S Air was founded 10 years ago by friends Mark and Thandi. The company has manufactured and sold light aeroplanes over this period and the company’s products have received high reviews for safety and reliability. The company has a niche market in that it sells primarily to individuals who own and fly their own aeroplanes. The company has two models, the Birdie which sells for R2 530 000 and the Eagle which sells for R5 780 000.
While the company manufactures aircraft, its operations are different from commercial aircraft companies. S&S Air builds aircraft to order. By using prefabricated parts, the company is able to complete the manufacture of an aeroplane in only five weeks. The company also receives a deposit on each order, as well as another partial payment before the order is complete. In contrast, a commercial aeroplane may take one and a half to two years to manufacture once the order is placed.
Mark and Thandi have provided the following financial statements. Chris has gathered the industry ratios for the light aeroplane manufacturing industry.
S&S Air
2018 Financial Statements
| Income Statement | |
| Sales | R128 700 000 |
| Cost of goods sold | 90 700 000 |
| Other expenses | 15 380 000 |
| Depreciation | 4 200 000 |
| PBIT | 18 420 000 |
| Interest | 2 315 000 |
| PBT | 16 105 000 |
| Tax (40%) | 6 442 000 |
| NPAT | R 9 663 000 |
| Dividends | 2 898 900 |
| Add to retained profits | 6 764 100 |
| 2018 Balance sheet | |||||
| Ordinary shares | 1 000 000 | Net non-current assets | R72 280 000 | ||
| Retained profits | 41 570 000 | ||||
| Shareholders equity | R42 570 000 | Inventory | 4 720 000 | ||
| Long-term debt | R25 950 000 | Accounts receivable | 4 210 000 | ||
| Cash | 2 340 000 | ||||
| Accounts payable | 4 970 000 | Current assets | R11 270 000 | ||
| Short-term debt | 10 060 000 | ||||
| Current liabilities | R15 030 000 | ||||
| R83 550 000 | R83 550 000 | ||||
Light Aeroplane Industry Ratios
| Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | |
| Current ratio | 0,50 | 1,43 | 1,89 |
| Quick ratio | 0,21 | 0,38 | 0,62 |
| Cash ratio | 0,08 | 0,21 | 0,39 |
| Total asset turnover | 0,68 | 0,85 | 1,38 |
| Inventory days | 74,6 | 59,3 | 33,5 |
| Receivables days | 58,2 | 37,2 | 25,9 |
| Total debt ratio | 0,44 | 0,52 | 0,61 |
| Debt-equity ratio | 0,79 | 1,08 | 1,56 |
| Equity multiplier | 1,79 | 2,08 | 2,56 |
| Times interest earned | 5,18 | 8,06 | 9,83 |
| Cash coverage ratio | 5,84 | 8,43 | 10,27 |
| Profit margin | 4,05% | 6,98% | 9,87% |
| Return on assets (after tax) | 6,05% | 10,53% | 13,21% |
| Return on equity | 9,93% | 16,54% | 26,15% |
Questions
In: Accounting