Questions
A common tactic to manage earnings is to “stuff the channels”, that is, to ship product...

A common tactic to manage earnings is to “stuff the channels”, that is, to ship product prematurely to dealers and customers, thereby inflating sales for the period. A case in point is Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (BMS), a multinational pharmaceutical company headquartered in New York. In August 2004, the SEC announced a $150 million penalty levied against BMS. This was part of an agreement to settle charges by the SEC that the company had engaged in a fraudulent scheme to inflate sales and earnings in order to meet analysts’ earnings forecasts.

The scheme involved recognition of revenue on pharmaceutical products shipped to its wholesalers in excess of the amounts demanded by them. These shipments amounted to $1.5 billion U.S. during 2001-2002. To persuade its wholesalers to accept this excess inventory, BMS agreed to cover their carrying costs, amounting to millions of dollars per quarter. In addition, BMS understated its accruals for rebates and discounts allowed to its large customers.

According to the SEC, the company also engaged in “cookie jar” accounting. That is, it created phony reserves for disposals of unneeded plants and divisions during high-profit quarters. These would be transferred to reduce operating expenses in low-profit quarters when BMS’s earnings still fell short of amounts needed to meet forecasts.

Required:

  1. Give reasons why managers would resort to extreme earnings management tactics such as these.

[4 marks]

  1. Evaluate the effectiveness of stuffing the channels as an earnings management device. Consider both from the standpoint of a single year and over a series of years.

[5 marks]

  1. Evaluate the effectiveness of cookie jar accounting as an earnings management device.

In: Accounting

The following six (4) questions are based on the following data: Year Rp Rm Rf 2000...

The following six (4) questions are based on the following data:

Year Rp Rm Rf
2000 18.1832 -24.9088 5.112
2001 -3.454 -15.1017 5.051
2002 47.5573 20.784 3.816
2003 28.7035 9.4163 4.2455
2004 29.8613 8.7169 4.2182
2005 11.2167 16.3272 4.3911
2006 32.2799 14.5445 4.7022
2007 -41.0392 -36.0483 4.0232
2008 17.6082 9.7932 2.2123
2009 14.1058 16.5089 3.8368
2010 16.1978 8.0818 3.2935
2011 11.558 15.1984 1.8762
2012 42.993 27.1685 1.7574
2013 18.8682 17.2589 3.0282
2014 -1.4678 5.1932 2.1712
2015 9.2757 4.4993 2.2694
2016 8.5985 23.624 2.4443

When performing calculations in the following problems, use the numbers in the table as-is. I.e., do NOT convert 8.5985 to 8.5985% (or 0.085985). Just use plain 8.5985.

1. Using the basic market model regression, R p = α + β R m + ϵ, what is the beta of this portfolio? Yes, this is an opportunity to practice regression analysis. You can use Excel or other tool of choice.

2. For precision, find the portfolio beta using the excess return market model:

R p − R f = α + β ∗ ( R m − R f ) + ϵ

[Hint: compute annual excess returns first, then run regression.]

3. Using the excess return beta β ∗ from the previous problem, what is Jensen's alpha for the portfolio?

[Hint: use Equation (17.6) from Moore (2015)]

4. What is the portfolio's M2 measure?

In: Finance

The following data set provides information on the lottery sales, proceeds, and prizes by year in...

The following data set provides information on the lottery sales, proceeds, and prizes by year in Iowa.

FYI Sales Proceeds Prizes
1986 $85,031,584 $27,631,613 $39,269,612
1987 $98,292,366 $31,157,797 $47,255,945
1988 $128,948,560 $40,090,157 $65,820,798
1989 $172,488,594 $49,183,227 $92,563,898
1990 $168,346,888 $50,535,644 $90,818,207
1991 $158,081,953 $44,053,446 $86,382,329
1992 $166,311,122 $45,678,558 $92,939,035
1993 $207,192,724 $56,092,638 $116,820,274
1994 $206,941,796 $56,654,308 $116,502,450
1995 $207,648,303 $58,159,175 $112,563,375
1996 $190,004,182 $51,337,907 $102,820,278
1997 $173,655,030 $43,282,909 $96,897,120
1998 $173,876,206 $42,947,928 $96,374,445
1999 $184,065,581 $45,782,809 $101,981,094
2000 $178,205,366 $44,769,519 $98,392,253
2001 $174,943,317 $44,250,798 $96,712,105
2002 $181,305,805 $48,165,186 $99,996,233
2003 $187,829,568 $47,970,711 $104,199,159
2004 $208,535,200 $55,791,763 $114,456,963
2005 $210,669,212 $51,094,109 $113,455,673
2006 $339,519,523 $80,875,796 $122,258,603
2007 $235,078,910 $58,150,437 $133,356,860
2008 $249,217,468 $56,546,118 $144,669,575
2009 $243,337,101 $60,553,306 $138,425,341
2010 $256,255,637 $57,907,066 $150,453,787
2011 $271,391,047 $68,001,753 $158,961,078
2012 $310,851,725 $78,731,949 $182,442,447
2013 $339,251,420 $84,890,729 $200,801,768
2014 $314,055,429 $73,972,114 $186,948,985
2015 $324,767,416 $74,517,068 $196,882,289
2016 $366,910,923 $88,024,619 $221,767,401

You decided to find the linear equation that corresponds to sales and year. Create a graph using the sales and year. Add the linear equation to the graph. What is the y-intercept of the linear equation?

Round each value below to the nearest integer.

Provide your answer below: ____E+ ___

In: Statistics and Probability

Please Use R studio and show all the steps to answer this question NY Marathon 2013...

Please Use R studio and show all the steps to answer this question

NY Marathon 2013 the table below shows the winning times (in minutes) for men and women in the new york city marathon between 1978 and 2013. (the race was not run in 2012 because of superstorm sandy.) assuming that performances in the big apple resemble performances elsewhere, we can think of these data as a sample of performance in marathon competitions. Create a 90% confidence interval for the mean difference in winning times for male and female marathon competitors.

Year

Men

Women

Year

Men

Women

1978

132.2

152.5

1996

129.9

148.3

1979

131.7

147.6

1997

128.2

148.7

1980

129.7

145.7

1998

128.8

145.3

1981

128.2

145.5

1999

129.2

145.1

1982

129.5

147.2

2000

130.2

145.8

1983

129.0

147.0

2001

127.7

144.4

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

134.9

131.6

131.1

131.0

128.3

128.0

132.7

129.5

129.5

130.1

131.4

131.1

149.5

148.6

148.1

150.3

148.1

145.5

150.8

147.5

144.7

146.4

147.6

148.1

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

128.1

130.5

129.5

129.5

130.0

129.1

128.7

129.3

128.3

125.1

Cancelled

128.4

145.9

142.5

143.2

144.7

145.1

143.2

143.9

148.9

148.3

143.3

Cancelled

140.1

In: Statistics and Probability

Please Use R studio to answer this question NY Marathon 2013 the table below shows the...

Please Use R studio to answer this question

NY Marathon 2013 the table below shows the winning times (in minutes) for men and women in the new york city marathon between 1978 and 2013. (the race was not run in 2012 because of superstorm sandy.) assuming that performances in the big apple resemble performances elsewhere, we can think of these data as a sample of performance in marathon competitions. Create a 90% confidence interval for the mean difference in winning times for male and female marathon competitors.

Year

Men

Women

Year

Men

Women

1978

132.2

152.5

1996

129.9

148.3

1979

131.7

147.6

1997

128.2

148.7

1980

129.7

145.7

1998

128.8

145.3

1981

128.2

145.5

1999

129.2

145.1

1982

129.5

147.2

2000

130.2

145.8

1983

129.0

147.0

2001

127.7

144.4

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

134.9

131.6

131.1

131.0

128.3

128.0

132.7

129.5

129.5

130.1

131.4

131.1

149.5

148.6

148.1

150.3

148.1

145.5

150.8

147.5

144.7

146.4

147.6

148.1

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

128.1

130.5

129.5

129.5

130.0

129.1

128.7

129.3

128.3

125.1

Cancelled

128.4

145.9

142.5

143.2

144.7

145.1

143.2

143.9

148.9

148.3

143.3

Cancelled

140.1

In: Statistics and Probability

3300 Econometric HW obs RWAGES PRODUCT 1959 59.87100 48.02600 1960 61.31800 48.86500 1961 63.05400 50.56700 1962...

3300 Econometric HW

obs RWAGES PRODUCT
1959 59.87100 48.02600
1960 61.31800 48.86500
1961 63.05400 50.56700
1962 65.19200 52.88200
1963 66.63300 54.95000
1964 68.25700 56.80800
1965 69.67600 58.81700
1966 72.30000 61.20400
1967 74.12100 62.54200
1968 76.89500 64.67700
1969 78.00800 64.99300
1970 79.45200 66.28500
1971 80.88600 69.01500
1972 83.32800 71.24300
1973 85.06200 73.41000
1974 83.98800 72.25700
1975 84.84300 74.79200
1976 87.14800 77.14500
1977 88.33500 78.45500
1978 89.73600 79.32000
1979 89.86300 79.30500
1980 89.59200 79.15100
1981 89.64500 80.77800
1982 90.63700 80.14800
1983 90.59100 83.00100
1984 90.71200 85.21400
1985 91.91000 87.13100
1986 94.86900 89.67300
1987 95.20700 90.13300
1988 96.52700 91.50600
1989 95.00500 92.40800
1990 96.21900 94.38500
1991 97.46500 95.90300
1992 100.00000 100.00000
1993 99.71200 100.38600
1994 99.02400 101.34900
1995 98.69000 101.49500
1996 99.47800 104.49200
1997 100.51200 106.47800
1998 105.17300 109.47400
1999 108.04400 112.82800
2000 111.99200 116.11700
2001 113.53600 119.08200
2002 115.69400 123.94800
2003 117.70900 128.70500
2004 118.94900 132.39000
2005 119.69200 135.02100
2006 120.44700 136.40000

Problem 2.

Use the data in the “Autocorrelation” tab to test

  1. For Autocorrelation using the Durbin Watson Test

  2. Graph the Residuals and determine whether they are distributed normally or whether they are biased

In: Math

USING MATLAB: Using the data from table below fit a fourth-order polynomial to the data, but...

USING MATLAB:

Using the data from table below fit a fourth-order polynomial to the data, but use a label for the year starting at 1 instead of 1872. Plot the data and the fourth-order polynomial estimate you found, with appropriate labels. What values of coefficients did your program find? What is the LMS loss function value for your model on the data?

Year Built SalePrice
1885 122500
1890 240000
1900 150000
1910 125500
1912 159900
1915 149500
1920 100000
1921 140000
1922 140750
1923 109500
1925 87000
1928 105900
1929 130000
1930 138400
1936 123900
1938 119000
1939 134000
1940 119000
1940 244400
1942 132000
1945 80000
1948 129000
1950 128500
1951 141000
1957 149700
1958 172000
1959 128950
1960 215000
1961 105000
1962 84900
1963 143000
1964 180500
1966 142250
1967 178900
1968 193000
1970 149000
1971 149900
1972 197500
1974 170000
1975 120000
1976 130500
1977 190000
1978 206000
1980 155000
1985 212000
1988 164000
1990 171500
1992 191500
1993 175900
1994 325000
1995 236500
1996 260400
1997 189900
1998 221000
1999 333168
2000 216000
2001 222500
2002 320000
2003 538000
2004 192000
2005 220000
2006 205000
2007 306000
2008 262500
2009 376162
2010 394432

In: Computer Science

Number Year Gross Income Price Index Adjusted Price Index Real Income 1 1991 50,599 136.2 1.362...

Number Year Gross Income Price Index Adjusted Price Index Real Income
1 1991 50,599 136.2 1.362 37150.51
2 1992 53,109 140.3 1.403 37853.88
3 1993 53,301 144.5 1.445 36886.51
4 1994 56,885 148.2 1.482 38383.94
5 1995 56,745 152.4 1.524 37234.25
6 1996 60,493 156.9 1.569 38555.13
7 1997 61,978 160.5 1.605 38615.58
8 1998 61,631 163.0 1.630 37810.43
9 1999 63,297 166.6 1.666 37993.40
10 2000 66,531 172.2 1.722 38635.89
11 2001 67,600 177.1 1.771 38170.53
12 2002 66,889 179.9 1.799 37181.21
13 2003 70,024 184.0 1.840 38056.52
14 2004 70,056 188.9 1.889 37086.29
15 2005 71,857 195.3 1.953 36793.14

The data from Exhibit 3 is also in the Excel file income.xls on the course website. Use Excel, along with this file, to determine Mrs. Bella’s real income for the last fifteen years. Do this by first converting each price index from percent by dividing by 100. Then, divide gross income by your converted (adjusted) price index. Using Excel, find the mean, median, standard deviation, and variance of her past real income. Explain the meaning of these statistics. Can you use mean income to forecast future earnings? Take into account both statistical and non-statistical considerations.

In: Math

What are the key benefits and risks for Petrobras in acquiring Pecom in 2002? Harvard Case:...

What are the key benefits and risks for Petrobras in acquiring Pecom in 2002?

Harvard Case: Drilling South: Petrobras Evaluates Pecom

In: Finance

What is the Homeland Secuirty Act of 2002? How did it come about, and what did...

What is the Homeland Secuirty Act of 2002? How did it come about, and what did it do? Explain in FULL detail.

In: Economics