QUESTION THREE (PART A)
Aussie Furniture Removals Limited provides furniture removal services in Australia. The following transactions relate to the purchase of a new delivery truck. Aussie Furniture Removals Limited is registered for GST and the GST rate is 10%.
|
1 July 2019 |
On 1 July 2019, a new delivery truck was purchased. The delivery truck had a recommended retail price of $165,000 (excluding GST), but after careful negotiation, it was purchased for $158,000 (excluding GST). The company also paid stamp duty of $5,000 (GST exempt) and $4,000 (excluding GST) to paint the company’s logo on the delivery truck. The delivery truck was purchased on credit, but the painting and stamp duty were all paid in cash. The delivery truck is depreciated using the straight-line depreciation method and company management estimates the delivery truck to have a useful life of 5 years with a residual value of $17,000. |
REQUIRED:
(3 + 2 = 5 marks)
PART B
Timber Merchants Limited supplies fencing materials and landscaping products in Australia. The following transactions relate to a fencing machine that was purchased by the company on 1 July 2017. Timber Merchants Limited is registered for GST and the GST rate is 10%.
|
1 July 2017 |
On 1 July 2017, a new fencing machine was purchased for $88,000 (including GST). The fencing machine is depreciated using the straight-line depreciation method and the fencing machine has an estimated useful life of 4 years with a residual value of $4,000. |
|
1 July 2018 1 July 2020 |
On 1 July 2018, a special digging tool was installed to the fencing machine at a cost of $9,900 (including GST) to improve its productivity. With the installation of the digging tool, the company estimates that the residual value of the fencing machine at the end of its useful life will be $7,000, with no change to its estimated useful life. The fencing machine was sold for $27,500 (including GST). |
REQUIRED:
c) Prepare the journal entries to record the installation of the digging tool on 1 July 2018.
d) Prepare the journal entry to record the sale of the fencing machine on 1 July 2020.
(3 + 3 = 6 marks)
In: Accounting
Sandhill Holdings Inc., a publicly listed company in Canada,
ventured into construction of a mega-shopping mall in Edmonton,
which is rated as the largest shopping mall in North America. The
company’s board of directors, after much market research, decided
that instead of selling the shopping mall to a local investor who
had approached them several times with excellent offers that he
steadily increased during the year of construction, the company
would hold this property for the purposes of capital appreciation
and earning rental income from mall tenants. Sandhill Holdings
retained the services of a real estate company to find and attract
many important retailers to rent space in the shopping mall, and
within months of completion at the end of 2017, the shopping mall
was fully occupied.
According to the company’s accounting department, the total
construction cost of the shopping mall was $50 million. The company
used an independent appraiser to determine the mall’s fair value
annually. According to the appraisal, the fair values of the
shopping mall at December 31, 2017, and at each subsequent year end
were:
| 2017 | $50 million | |
| 2018 | $60 million | |
| 2019 | $65 million | |
| 2020 | $61 million |
The independent appraiser felt that the useful life of the shopping
mall was 20 years and its residual value was $8 million.
Note that the mall’s rental income and expenses would be the same
and thus can be omitted from the analysis for this exercise.
Prepare the necessary journal entries for 2018, 2019, and 2020 if it decides to treat the shopping mall as an investment property under IAS 40: Use fair value model. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when the amount is entered. Do not indent manually. If no entry is required, select "No Entry" for the account titles and enter 0 for the amounts. Record journal entries in the order presented in the problem.)
|
Date |
Account Titles and Explanation |
Debit |
Credit |
__________
___________
_____________
Prepare the necessary journal entries for 2018, 2019, and 2020
if it decides to treat the shopping mall as an investment property
under IAS 40: Use Cost model. (Credit account titles
are automatically indented when the amount is entered. Do not
indent manually. If no entry is required, select "No Entry" for the
account titles and enter 0 for the amounts. Record journal entries
in the order presented in the problem.)
|
Date |
Account Titles and Explanation |
Debit |
Credit |
_________________
__________________
___________________
In: Accounting
Based on the Case below, Write a brief explanation that explains why the case represents its particular ACHE competency domain. (Be sure that the explanation justifies the assigned competency domain based upon the facts and circumstances of the case.)
Case:
Case 1: Communication and Relationship Management Memorial Hospital was moving rapidly to finalize its plans for new multiple-specialty outpatient center located 15 miles from the hospital campus. Strategically this was exactly what the health system needed to do. First, it would provide a presence in a community that traditionally was served by one of Memorial’s major competitors. And second, increased the ambulatory care services of the health system that lagged behind other health systems in this regard. The plan called for seven specializations to provide services to the patient and community population of this new area and to help channel patients that needed more intense treatment and care to the hospital itself. Six departments had agreed to this arrangement and were actively developing their budgets and management resources to cover this new location. But the Department of Psychiatry, although an initial service slated for the ambulatory facility, was now backing out of the agreement suggesting that they could not adequately resource the operation and felt it would significantly increase their overall patient volume. The CEO of the hospital understood that Psychiatry needed to be part of the service mix in order for this new facility to succeed. The market research conducted a year earlier to provide information on community needs, clearly suggested this service would be well received and perceived by people as a value addition to the other medical specialties being offered. With this sense of urgency in mind, the CEO arranged to meet with the Chair of Psychiatry and discuss the issue. The meeting took place within the next week and it was not a comfortable exchange according to the Chair. He felt pressured by the CEO to come on-board and develop the necessary budgetary and operational plans to be part of the new ambulatory center. From the perspective of the CEO, the meeting was equally non-productive. He reported that the Chair seemed to miss the critical points of why Psychiatry was needed as part of the service mix. Two subsequent meetings took place by both individuals with significant ‘back and forth’ between the two men until an agreement was met. The Chair of Psychiatry agreed that his department would join the other services, but that it needed to be phased-in process. The CEO, although disappointed that Psychiatry would require six to eight months for full implementation into the facility, understood that this was the most reasonable approach he could expect. The final agreement allowed Memorial Hospital to eventually offer all six services to its targeted community. It did require modifying some public relations materials and gaining the support of the other five services that this special arrangement was necessary to achieve the ultimate complement of services. The Department of Psychiatry gained the time it felt it needed to align its resources to add this service to its roster. The result was that Psychiatry actually achieved its adjusted operational program for the new facility in four and a half months, a good two months ahead of its original target date to begin operations. It is difficult to know exactly why the CEO and the Chair of Psychiatry arrived at their agreement. Both individuals did not appear too pleased with their initial exchange. Each seemed to have his own agenda without much interest in understanding the expectations of needs of the other party. It took two more projected meetings for a final agreement to be outlined. It is not clear either, what if any, long term affect this had for either the hospital administration or the leadership of the Department of Psychiatry. The general opinion throughout the administration and medical officers of the health system was the CEO paid a heavy political price for getting Psychiatry on board.
In: Nursing
Based on the Case below, Write a brief explanation that explains why the case represents its particular ACHE competency domain. (Be sure that the explanation justifies the assigned competency domain based upon the facts and circumstances of the case.)
Case:
Case 1: Communication and Relationship Management
Memorial Hospital was moving rapidly to finalize its plans for new multiple-specialty outpatient center located 15 miles from the hospital campus. Strategically this was exactly what the health system needed to do. First, it would provide a presence in a community that traditionally was served by one of Memorial’s major competitors. And second, increased the ambulatory care services of the health system that lagged behind other health systems in this regard.
The plan called for seven specializations to provide services to the patient and community population of this new area and to help channel patients that needed more intense treatment and care to the hospital itself. Six departments had agreed to this arrangement and were actively developing their budgets and management resources to cover this new location. But the Department of Psychiatry, although an initial service slated for the ambulatory facility, was now backing out of the agreement suggesting that they could not adequately resource the operation and felt it would significantly increase their overall patient volume.
The CEO of the hospital understood that Psychiatry needed to be part of the service mix in order for this new facility to succeed. The market research conducted a year earlier to provide information on community needs, clearly suggested this service would be well received and perceived by people as a value addition to the other medical specialties being offered. With this sense of urgency in mind, the CEO arranged to meet with the Chair of Psychiatry and discuss the issue. The meeting took place within the next week and it was not a comfortable exchange according to the Chair. He felt pressured by the CEO to come on-board and develop the necessary budgetary and operational plans to be part of the new ambulatory center. From the perspective of the CEO, the meeting was equally non-productive. He reported that the Chair seemed to miss the critical points of why Psychiatry was needed as part of the service mix.
Two subsequent meetings took place by both individuals with significant ‘back and forth’ between the two men until an agreement was met. The Chair of Psychiatry agreed that his department would join the other services, but that it needed to be phased-in process. The CEO, although disappointed that Psychiatry would require six to eight months for full implementation into the facility, understood that this was the most reasonable approach he could expect.
The final agreement allowed Memorial Hospital to eventually offer all six services to its targeted community. It did require modifying some public relations materials and gaining the support of the other five services that this special arrangement was necessary to achieve the ultimate complement of services. The Department of Psychiatry gained the time it felt it needed to align its resources to add this service to its roster. The result was that Psychiatry actually achieved its adjusted operational program for the new facility in four and a half months, a good two months ahead of its original target date to begin operations. It is difficult to know exactly why the CEO and the Chair of Psychiatry arrived at their agreement. Both individuals did not appear too pleased with their initial exchange. Each seemed to have his own agenda without much interest in understanding the expectations of needs of the other party. It took two more projected meetings for a final agreement to be outlined. It is not clear either, what if any, long term affect this had for either the hospital administration or the leadership of the Department of Psychiatry. The general opinion throughout the administration and medical officers of the health system was the CEO paid a heavy political price for getting Psychiatry on board.
In: Nursing
Course:Business Law
Frontier Entertainment Pty Ltd is a company that trades under the name “Concert Connections” (CC). In January of 2019, CC negotiated and arranged for three international acts to tour Australia in 2020 and 2021. The three artists, their Australian concert locations and dates were as follows:
Taylor Swifty Sydney / Melbourne / Adelaide Brisbane / Perth / Hobart November – December 2020
Ed Shearer Brisbane / Perth / Hobart January – February 2021
Lady Gaggle Sydney / Canberra / Darwin August – September 2021
In April of 2020, those consumer concert goers who purchased tickets to one or more of the Taylor Swifty concerts received notice from CC that due to the COVID- 19 pandemic, Taylor’s arranged concerts had been cancelled. The notification further stated that CC would be cancelling all ticket purchase contracts and retaining the full $550.00 ticket purchase price previously paid by concert goers in accordance with Clause 10 of the contract entered when the ticket(s) were originally purchased. Clause 11 of the same contract also states that in the event of CC exercising its rights in relation to clause 10, ticket purchasers are prohibited from taking any legal action for recovery of their money previously paid.
Samuel purchased 5 tickets for his family to attend the Taylor Swifty concert in Sydney on 02 November 2020. Samuel comes to see you and says that despite CC’c clearly expressed contractual right to retain his $2,700.00, their refusal not to refund him his money is unfair. Samuel wants to know if the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) can assist his cause.
Advise Samuel
In: Accounting
Tamarisk Dairy leases its milking equipment from Vaughn Finance Company under the following lease terms.
1.The lease term is 10 years, noncancelable, and requires equal rental payments of $27,900 due at the beginning of each year starting January 1, 2020.
2.The equipment has a fair value at the commencement of the lease (January 1, 2020) of $211,081 and a cost of $263,000 on Vaughn Finance's books. It also has an estimated economic life of 15 years and an expected residual value of $12,700, though Tamarisk Dairy has guaranteed a residual value of $19,200 to Vaughn Finance.
3.The lease contains no renewal options, and the equipment reverts to Vaughn Finance upon termination of the lease. The equipment is not of a specialized use.
4.Tamarisk Dairy's incremental borrowing rate is 8% per year. The implicit rate is also 8%.
5.Tamarisk Dairy depreciates similar equipment that it owns on a straight-line basis.
6.Collectibility of the payments is probable.
Prepare the journal entries for the lessee and lessor at January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020 (the lessee's and lessor's year-end). Assume no reversing entries.
What would have been the amount of the initial lease liability recorded by the lessee upon the commencement of the lease if:
The residual value of $19,200 had been guaranteed by a third party, not the lessee?
The residual value of $19,200 had not been guaranteed at all?
On the lessor's books, what would be the amount recorded as the lease receivable at the commencement of the lease, assuming:
The residual value of $19,200 had been guaranteed by a third party?
The residual value of $19,200 had not been guaranteed at all?
In: Accounting
Summit Energy is an alternative energy producer. Your hedge fund is interested in investing into the company. As an analyst, you need to estimate firm value and its price per share using the NPV method and report it to the energy portfolio manager. So far you’ve partially forecasted its earnings for 2020-2022 (numbers are in millions).
| Actual earnings | Forecasted earnings | |||||
| 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
| Revenues | 25,137 | 25,650 | 24,368 | 25,220 | 26,481 | 26,746 |
| Cost of goods sold | 18,375 | 17,894 | 19,750 | 21,230 | 20,381 | 19,973 |
| Gross Profit | 6,762 | 7,756 | 4,618 | 3,990 | 6,101 | 6,773 |
| SG&A | 2,235 | 2,110 | 2,050 | 2,200 | 2,200 | 2,200 |
| Depreciation | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 |
| EBIT | ||||||
| Tax expense (25%) | ||||||
| Net income | ||||||
Assume that annual net working capital represents 10% of revenues. In 2021 Summit plans to purchase new equipment for its new generation of wind mills for $200 million. No other purchases are planned in 2020 or 2022.
Please enter the answer in the following format: XX,XXX
A. Calculate Summit's free cash flow in 2022.
B. Summit Energy’s beta is 1.7. Calculate its expected rate of return if the market portfolio return is 12% and the risk free rate is 4%
C. Calculate Summit’s terminal value if free cash flows are expected to grow 2% perpetually starting 2023. Use its expected rate of return from question B as a discount rate.
D. Calculate Summit’s NPV as of 2020. Use its expected rate of return from question B as a discount rate
In: Accounting
In: Accounting
Marigold Beauty Corporation manufactures cosmetic products that are sold through a network of sales agents. The agents are paid a commission of 22% of sales. The income statement for the year ending December 31, 2020, is as follows.
|
MARIGOLD BEAUTY CORPORATION |
||||
| Sales | $75,100,000 | |||
| Cost of goods sold | ||||
| Variable | $32,293,000 | |||
| Fixed | 8,870,000 | 41,163,000 | ||
| Gross margin | $33,937,000 | |||
| Selling and marketing expenses | ||||
| Commissions | $16,522,000 | |||
| Fixed costs | 10,380,000 | 26,902,000 | ||
| Operating income | $7,035,000 | |||
The company is considering hiring its own sales staff to replace
the network of agents. It will pay its salespeople a commission of
7% and incur additional fixed costs of $11,265,000.
PART 1: Calculate the company’s break-even point in sales
dollars for the year 2020 if it hires its own sales force to
replace the network of agents.
|
Break-even point $_____________ |
PART 2: Calculate the degree of operating leverage at sales of $75,100,000 if (1) Marigold Beauty uses sales agents, and (2) Marigold Beauty employs its own sales staff. (Round answers to 2 decimal places, e.g. 1.25.)
|
Degree of operating leverage |
||||
| (1) | Marigold Beauty uses sales agents |
_______________ |
||
| (2) |
Marigold Beauty employs its own sales staff |
PART 3: Calculate the estimated sales volume in sales dollars that would generate an identical net income for the year ending December 31, 2020, regardless of whether Marigold Beauty Corporation employs its own sales staff and pays them an 7% commission or continues to use the independent network of agents.
| Estimated sales volume |
$__________________ |
In: Accounting
Recording and Preparing Schedule Using Sum-of-theYears’-Digits Method Depreciation, Partial Year
An asset was purchased October 1, 2020, costing $30,000, with a residual value of $6,000 and an estimated three-year useful life.
Required
a. Prepare a schedule of depreciation that shows annual depreciation expense and year-end accumulated depreciation and book value over the useful life of the asset assuming that the company depreciated the asset using the sum-of-the-years’-digits method.
Note: Round each amount to the nearest dollar.
| For the Period | End of Period | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Reporting Period |
Depreciation Expense |
Accumulated Depreciation |
Book Value |
| 2020 | Answer | Answer | Answer |
| 2021 | Answer | Answer | Answer |
| 2022 | Answer | Answer | Answer |
| 2023 | Answer | Answer | Answer |
b. Record the entry to recognize depreciation in 2020.
| Date | Account Name | Dr. | Cr. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec. 31, 2020 | AnswerCashInventoryPropertyBuildingEquipmentAccumulated DepreciationCost of Oil ReserveRetained Earnings—Prior Period AdjustmentSalesCost of Goods SoldDepreciation ExpenseExploration ExpenseRepairs ExpenseGain on Reversal of Impairment LossLoss on ImpairmentLoss on DisposalN/A | Answer | Answer |
| AnswerCashInventoryPropertyBuildingEquipmentAccumulated DepreciationCost of Oil ReserveRetained Earnings—Prior Period AdjustmentSalesCost of Goods SoldDepreciation ExpenseExploration ExpenseRepairs ExpenseGain on Reversal of Impairment LossLoss on ImpairmentLoss on DisposalN/A | Answer | Answer |
c. Record the entry to recognize depreciation in 2021.
| Date | Account Name | Dr. | Cr. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec. 31, 2021 | AnswerCashInventoryPropertyBuildingEquipmentAccumulated DepreciationCost of Oil ReserveRetained Earnings—Prior Period AdjustmentSalesCost of Goods SoldDepreciation ExpenseExploration ExpenseRepairs ExpenseGain on Reversal of Impairment LossLoss on ImpairmentLoss on DisposalN/A | Answer | Answer |
| AnswerCashInventoryPropertyBuildingEquipmentAccumulated DepreciationCost of Oil ReserveRetained Earnings—Prior Period AdjustmentSalesCost of Goods SoldDepreciation ExpenseExploration ExpenseRepairs ExpenseGain on Reversal of Impairment LossLoss on ImpairmentLoss on DisposalN/A | Answer | Answer |
In: Accounting