How then can we reconcile the problems with assessment and diagnosis that are presented by Conrad &Stults, Matthew, and Neighbors and colleagues? Should we discard assessment and diagnoses as fundamentally flawed methods and tools? Should we (the public) press mental health professionals to be clearer about the limits and bias that appear to exist in assessment and diagnosis? Should we embrace assessment and diagnosis as our best tools for understanding mental health conditions, regardless of their flaws, since there is unlikely to be a perfect method.

Your post is a a 400 - 650 word brief essay in which you state your perspective (thesis) and use the assigned literature to support your argument. You may also draw upon other source though you must provide an appropriate citation and reference for any work you include that is not part of the posted readings.

Result: Hiking trails with more human foot traffic have less woody vegetation (e.g, trees) than hiking trails with less human traffic.

a. Form a discussion section. (two paragraphs or so would be sufficient). This section should:

i.   Cite at least one peer-reviewed journal article that discusses this topic with a properly formatted parenthetical citation

ii.    Interpret and discuss the biological significance of your result (using the citation(s) for support)

iii.    Discusses future directions for research

b.    Develop a references section containing properly formatted full citation(s) for the journal article(s) cited in your discussion section.

Result: Hiking trails with more human foot traffic have less woody vegetation (e.g, trees) than hiking trails with less human traffic.

a. Form a discussion section. (two paragraphs or so would be sufficient). This section should:

i.   Cite at least one peer-reviewed journal article that discusses this topic with a properly formatted parenthetical citation

ii.    Interpret and discuss the biological significance of your result (using the citation(s) for support)

iii.    Discusses future directions for research

b.    Develop a references section containing properly formatted full citation(s) for the journal article(s) cited in your discussion section.

1. Short, not many times its diameter
The tube is called a nozzle and is pressurized
How to determine the fall?
2. The value of the velocity coefficient φ
can you explain
3. Explain the Torricell equation?
4. Hole flow coefficients and
Explain the Reynolds number relationship.
5. Fluid flow through a hole submerged in a liquid
how to find speed
6. Appears when measuring flow rate through the diaphragm
What instrument is used to determine the pressure difference?
7. A lot when jumping through holes and ditches
the gas flow that creates the pressure difference
not as a non-shrinking liquid. Flow it
What is the change in thermodynamic state
to be classified as a process?
8. Explain the meaning of the number of meats?
9. Which nozzle to generate a flow faster than the speed of sound
to use?
10. Explain the velocity distribution of submerged flows.

Consider the following hypothesis test:

H ₀:   50

H _a:  > 50

A sample of 50 is used and the population standard deviation is 7. Use the critical value approach to state your conclusion for each of the following sample results. Use  = .05.

a. With x (with line over top of x) = 52.5, what is the value of the test statistic (to 2 decimals)?

b. With x = 51, what is the value of the test statistic (to 2 decimals)?

c. With x = 51.8, what is the value of the test statistic (to 2 decimals)?

A researcher is testing a new painkiller that claims to relieve pain in less than 15 minutes, on average. A random sample of 49 painkillers were tested and the mean time was 13 minutes. Suppose the population standard deviation is 7 and the test is conducted at α=0.05.

1. State the null and alternate hypothesis

2. Test this hypothesis
   1. Use the critical value approach

Conclusion:

2. Use the p value approach

3. What is your conclusion?

4. What is a type 1 error?

5. What is a type 2 error?

The calculations for a factorial experiment involving four levels of factor A, three levels of factor B, and three replications resulted in the following data: SST = 275, SSA = 26, SSB = 22, SSAB = 174. Set up the ANOVA table. (Round your values for mean squares and F to two decimal places, and your p-values to three decimal places.)

Test for any significant main effects and any interaction effect. Use α = 0.05.

Find the value of the test statistic for factor A. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)___

Find the p-value for factor A. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)

p-value = ___

State your conclusion about factor A.

Because the p-value > α = 0.05, factor A is significant.

Because the p-value ≤ α = 0.05, factor A is not significant.    

Because the p-value ≤ α = 0.05, factor A is significant.

Because the p-value > α = 0.05, factor A is not significant.

Find the value of the test statistic for factor B. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)___

Find the p-value for factor B. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)

p-value = ___

State your conclusion about factor B.

Because the p-value > α = 0.05, factor B is significant.

Because the p-value > α = 0.05, factor B is not significant.    

Because the p-value ≤ α = 0.05, factor B is significant.

Because the p-value ≤ α = 0.05, factor B is not significant.

Find the value of the test statistic for the interaction between factors A and B. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)___

Find the p-value for the interaction between factors A and B. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)

p-value = _____

State your conclusion about the interaction between factors A and B.

Because the p-value ≤ α = 0.05, the interaction between factors A and B is not significant.

Because the p-value > α = 0.05, the interaction between factors A and B is not significant.    

Because the p-value > α = 0.05, the interaction between factors A and B is significant.

Because the p-value ≤ α = 0.05, the interaction between factors A and B is significant

For the Simon Property group:

Discuss how the firm’s demand is changing. Why? What factors affecting consumer choice and demand shifters are responsible for the change? How do changes in demand affect company’s revenue (support with the revenue figures). Sketch changes in firm’s demand and revenue using demand graphs.

what more detail do you need can you explain so more please

For this discussion, you will explain the role of management professionals with regard to accounting and analysis ethics, and you will detail any challenges managers may face in ensuring ethical accounting practices. Review the codes of ethics and professional standards in the module resources and then address the following questions:

What is the manager’s responsibility regarding ethical financial reporting?

What challenges might a manager face in ensuring ethical accounting and financial analysis practices?

1. What’s weird about the reproductive strategy of the Striped Texas Lizards?

2. What are 3 disadvantages or costs of sex?

3. What is the Red Queen Hypothesis?

4. Summarize how the guppies demonstrated that variation is the key to “why sex.”

5. How did sex start?

6. What’s “the war between the sexes” refer to?

7. Why did the idea of female choice driving sexual selection take so long to be accepted?

8. You don’t have to write this down, but be sure you understand the peacock experiment.

9. What percentage of songbird chicks in a typical nest are fathered by different parents? Why do the female birds risk this? And why do they bother with “monogamy” in the first place?

10. What’s different about the Jacanas?

11. Bonobo troops behave in a rather dramatically different fashion than troops of chimps. What’s the explanation for that?