Questions
1)    Use the below table of share price for TSLA and index level for the S&P 500...

1)    Use the below table of share price for TSLA and index level for the S&P 500 for the CAPM questions that follow related to TSLA. You can copy this table and paste it completely into Excel to avoid typing it out. Calculate the beta of TSLA.  

Date TSLA S&P 500
10/1/2018 67.464 2711.74
11/1/2018 70.096 2760.17
12/1/2018 66.56 2506.85
1/1/2019 61.404 2704.1
2/1/2019 63.976 2784.49
3/1/2019 55.972 2834.4
4/1/2019 47.738 2945.83
5/1/2019 37.032 2752.06
6/1/2019 44.692 2941.76
7/1/2019 48.322 2980.38
8/1/2019 45.122 2926.46
9/1/2019 48.174 2976.74
10/1/2019 62.984 3037.56
11/1/2019 65.988 3140.98
12/1/2019 83.666 3230.78
1/1/2020 130.114 3225.52
2/1/2020 133.598 2954.22
3/1/2020 104.8 2584.59
4/1/2020 156.376 2912.43
5/1/2020 167 3044.31
6/1/2020 215.962 3100.29
7/1/2020 286.152 3271.12
8/1/2020 498.32 3500.31
9/1/2020 424.23 3236.92

2) Using the beta you just calculated above, a risk free rate of 0.70%, and a market return of 5.5%, what is the required rate of return for TSLA?

3) If the current share price of TSLA is $380, it pays no dividend, and the consensus estimated share price in one year is $400, what is the estimated return for this stock? Should you invest in it based on comparing the estimated return you just calculated to its required return?  

In: Finance

Jen and Larry’s Frozen Yogurt Company      In 2019, Jennifer (Jen) Liu and Larry Mestas founded...

Jen and Larry’s Frozen Yogurt Company

     In 2019, Jennifer (Jen) Liu and Larry Mestas founded Jean and Larry’s Frozen Yogurt Company, which was based on the idea of applying the microbrew or microbatch strategy to the production and sale of frozen yogurt. Jen and Larry began producing small quantities of unique flavors and blends in limited editions. Revenues were $600,000 in 2019 and were estimated to be $1.2 million in 2020.

     Because Jen and Larry were selling premium frozen yogurt containing premium ingredients, each small cup of yogurt sold for $3, and the cost of producing the frozen yogurt averaged $1.50 per cup. Administrative expenses, including Jen and Larry’s salary and expenses for an accountant and two other administrative staff, were estimated at $180,000 in 2020. Marketing expenses, largely in the form of behind-the-counter workers, in-store posters, and advertising in local newspapers, were projected to be $200,000 in 2020.

     An investment in bricks and mortar was necessary to make and sell the yogurt. Initial specialty equipment and the renovation of an old warehouse building in lower downtown (known as LoDo) occurred at the beginning of 2019. Additional equipment needed to make the amount of yogurt forecasted to be sold in 2020 was purchased at the beginning of 2020. As a result, depreciation expenses were expected to be $50,000 in 2020. Interest expenses were estimated at $15,000 in 2020. The average tax rate was expected to be 25% of taxable income.

  1. Refer to the Mini Case above involving Jen and Larry’s Frozen Yogurt Company.
    1. Calculate the dollar amount of NOPAT if Jen and Larry’s venture achieves the forecasted $1.2 million in sales in 2020. What would NOPAT be as a percent of sales?
    2. Calculate the NOPAT breakeven point for 2020 in terms of NOPAT breakeven revenues for Jen and Larry’s venture. How many cups of frozen yogurt would have to be sold to reach NOPAT breakeven?

In: Finance

Below table2 shows monthly closing share prices (adjusted to include dividends) of 5 companies, and the...

Below table2 shows monthly closing share prices (adjusted to include dividends) of 5 companies, and the adjusted closing prices for the ASX200 index. Table 1 is the dividends per share of the 5 companies in the past 5 years.

Calculate the average annual growth in dividends over the last five years. Use this information, along with Gordon’s Growth Model to estimate the implied expected return for each REIT at the current market price(use past 12 months as an example). Show your analysis process.

Dividends per Share ($) FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
GMG 0.240 0.259 0.280 0.300 0.300
CHC 0.269 0.300 0.318 0.337 0.357
DXS 0.435 0.455 0.478 0.502 0.503
MGR 0.099 0.104 0.110 0.116 0.091
SGP 0.245 0.255 0.265 0.276 0.241
Date AXJO GMG CHC DXS MGR SGP
2019/10/1 6663.400 14.093 10.923 11.419 3.108 4.611
2019/11/1 6846.000 14.514 10.449 11.667 3.263 4.762
2019/12/1 6684.100 13.094 10.710 11.161 3.079 4.357
2020/1/1 7017.200 14.744 12.623 12.414 3.355 4.773
2020/2/1 6441.200 14.833 12.250 11.867 3.000 4.569
2020/3/1 5076.800 11.981 6.733 8.871 2.062 2.454
2020/4/1 5522.400 13.021 7.509 8.939 2.210 2.794
2020/5/1 5755.700 15.219 9.511 8.783 2.319 3.463
2020/6/1 5897.900 14.704 9.511 8.978 2.141 3.211
2020/7/1 5927.800 16.930 10.520 8.510 2.090 3.190
2020/8/1 6060.500 18.310 12.510 8.830 2.110 3.960
2020/9/1 5815.900 17.940 12.430 8.890 2.180 3.780

In: Finance

From inception of operations to December 31, 2020, Metlock Corporation provided for uncollectible accounts receivable under...

From inception of operations to December 31, 2020, Metlock Corporation provided for uncollectible accounts receivable under the allowance method. The provisions are recorded, based on analyses of customers with different risk characteristics. Bad debts written off were charged to the allowance account; recoveries of bad debts previously written off were credited to the allowance account, and no year-end adjustments to the allowance account were made. Metlock’s usual credit terms are net 30 days.

The balance in Allowance for Doubtful Accounts was $114,400 (Cr.) at January 1, 2020. During 2020, credit sales totaled $7,920,000, the provision for doubtful accounts was determined to be $158,400, $79,200 of bad debts were written off, and recoveries of accounts previously written off amounted to $13,200. Metlock installed a computer system in November 2020, and an aging of accounts receivable was prepared for the first time as of December 31, 2020. A summary of the aging is as follows.

Classification by
Month of Sale

Balance in
Each Category

Estimated %
Uncollectible

November–December 2020 $950,400 2%
July–October 572,000 10%
January–June 369,600 25%
Prior to 1/1/20 132,000 80%
$2,024,000


Based on the review of collectibility of the account balances in the “prior to 1/1/20” aging category, additional receivables totaling $52,800 were written off as of December 31, 2020. The 80% uncollectible estimate applies to the remaining $79,200 in the category. Effective with the year ended December 31, 2020, Metlock adopted a different method for estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts at the amount indicated by the year-end aging analysis of accounts receivable.

Prepare a schedule analyzing the changes in Allowance for Doubtful Accounts for the year ended December 31, 2020. Show supporting computations in good form. (Hint: In computing the 12/31/20 allowance, subtract the $52,800 write-off.)

In: Accounting

Prepare the necessary entries to clear the Intangible Assets account and to set up separate accounts...

Prepare the necessary entries to clear the Intangible Assets account and to set up separate accounts for distinct types of intangibles. Make the entries as of December 31, 2018, recording any necessary amortization and reflecting all balances accurately as of that date. (Ignore income tax effects.)

P12-2 (LO1,2,4,5) EXCEL (Accounting for Patents) Fields Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of air pollution. Fields does not manufacture or sell the products and processes it develops. Instead, it conducts research and develops products and processes which it patents, and then assigns the patents to manufacturers on a royalty basis. Occasionally it sells a patent. The history of Fields patent number 758-6002-1A is as follows.

Date Activity Cost
2008–2009 Research conducted to develop precipitator

$384,000

Jan. 2010 Design and construction of a prototype

87,600

March 2010 Testing of models

42,000

Jan. 2011 Fees paid engineers and lawyers to prepare patent application; patent granted June 30, 2011

59,500

Nov. 2012 Engineering activity necessary to advance the design of the precipitator to the manufacturing stage

81,500

Dec. 2013 Legal fees paid to successfully defend precipitator patent

42,000

April 2014 Research aimed at modifying the design of the patented precipitator

43,000

July 2018 Legal fees paid in unsuccessful patent infringement suit against a competitor

34,000

Fields assumed a useful life of 17 years when it received the initial precipitator patent. On January 1, 2016, it revised its useful life estimate downward to 5 remaining years. Amortization is computed for a full year if the cost is incurred prior to July 1, and no amortization for the year if the cost is incurred after June 30. The company's year ends December 31.

Instructions

Compute the carrying value of patent No. 758-6002-1A on each of the following dates:

(a)December 31, 2011.

(b)December 31, 2015.

(c)December 31, 2018.

In: Accounting

Rainmaker Environmental Consultants is just finishing its second year of operations. The company’s unadjusted trial balance...

Rainmaker Environmental Consultants is just finishing its second year of operations. The company’s unadjusted trial balance at October 31, 2011 follows:

Rainmaker Environmental Consultants

Unadjusted Trial Balance

October 31, 2011

Account

Debit

Credit

Cash

28,000

Accounts receivable

56,000

Interest receivable

0

Notes receivable

30,000

Supplies

4,600

Prepaid insurance

9,350

Prepaid rent

21,000

Office furniture

61,440

Accumulated depreciation, office furniture

20,480

Accounts payable

35,000

Wages payable

0

Unearned consulting fees

13,160

Jeff Moore, capital

60,000

Jeff Moore, withdrawals

16,450

Consulting fees earned

314,600

Interest revenue

1,400

Depreciation expense — office furniture

0

Wages expense

147,000

Insurance expense

0

Rent expense

64,000

Supplies expense

6,800

Totals

444,640

444,640

Rainmaker prepares adjustments each October 31. The following additional information is available on October 31, 2011:

a.It was determined that $12,000 of the unearned Consulting fees had not yet been earned.

b.It was discovered that $6,000 of the balance in consulting fees earned was for services to be performed in November.

c.The balance in the prepaid rent account represented three months of rent beginning September 1, 2011.

d.Accrued wages at October 31 totaled $6,800.

e.The office furniture was purchased on March 1, 2010, and has an estimated useful life of two years. After two years, it is expected that the furniture will be worthless.

f.Accrued consulting fees at year-end totaled $4,200.

g.Interest of $200 had accrued on the note receivable for the month of October.

h.The balance in the prepaid insurance account represents the remaining balance of a two-year policy purchased on April 1, 2010.

i.A count of the supplies on October 31 revealed a balance remaining of $900.

Required

Prepare adjusting journal entries on October 31, 2011 based on the above.

In: Accounting

Kaelea, Inc., has no debt outstanding and a total market value of $90,000. Earnings before interest...


Kaelea, Inc., has no debt outstanding and a total market value of $90,000. Earnings before interest and taxes, EBIT, are projected to be $8,000 if economic conditions are normal. If there is strong expansion in the economy, then EBIT will be 20 percent higher. If there is a recession, then EBIT will be 30 percent lower. The company is considering a $34,000 debt issue with an interest rate of 6 percent. The proceeds will be used to repurchase shares of stock. There are currently 3,600 shares outstanding. Assume the company has a market-to-book ratio of 1.0.

a. Calculate return on equity, ROE, under each of the three economic scenarios before any debt is issued, assuming no taxes.

b. Calculate the percentage changes in ROE when the economy expands or enters a recession, assuming no taxes.

Assume the firm goes through with the proposed recapitalization and no taxes.
c. Calculate return on equity, ROE, under each of the three economic scenarios after the recapitalization.

d. Calculate the percentage changes in ROE for economic expansion and recession.

Assume the firm has a tax rate of 35 percent.
e. Calculate return on equity, ROE, under each of the three economic scenarios before any debt is issued. Also, calculate the percentage changes in ROE for economic expansion and recession.

f. Calculate return on equity, ROE, under each of the three economic scenarios after the recapitalization. Also, calculate the percentage changes in ROE for economic expansion and recession, assuming the firm goes through with the proposed recapitalization.

In: Finance

per company policy. 9-24 l!:IJ The auditor has provided a preliminary assessment of control risk of...

per company policy. 9-24 l!:IJ The auditor has provided a preliminary assessment of control risk of lo,v in the revenue cycle accounts of Acco, Inc. for each of the relevant assertions. The auditor selected a sample of sales transactions for control testing. Each of the following types of control or transaction- processing deficiencies uncovered in the sample was significant enough to cause the auditor to increase control risk assessment from lo,v to moderate. For each deficiency, labeled as (a) though (i), discuss the type of financia l statement misstatement that may result, the assertion(s) affected, and the effect on the nature, timing, and/or extent of related substantive tests. Consider each deficiency independently from the others. a. No evidence that price and quantity on the invoice ,vere compared ,vith the supporting documents b. Failure to approve customer credit before shipping the merchandise on open account c. Recording sales before they ,vere shipped d. Recording sales several days after they should have been recorded e. Recording sales several days before and several days after they should have been recorded f. Lack of customer orders; items ,vere shipped g. Lack of shipping documents; customer order ,vas found h. Incorrect invoice price i. Quantity shipped differed from the quantity billed

In: Accounting

A four-wheel cart of mass M = 95 kg is moving along a horizontal surface with...

A four-wheel cart of mass M = 95 kg is moving along a horizontal surface with a constant velocity V = 3.5 m/s relative to the ground. A person of mass m1 = 65 kg carrying a backpack of m2 = 8 kg runs and catches up to the cart, and then jumps onto the cart. Just before landing on the cart, the person is moving parallel to the ground and the velocity of the center of mass of the system including the person, backpack and cart is VCM = 5 m/s.

What is the speed of the person just before landing on the cart?

v0 = 5.3 m/s

v0 = 12 m/s

v0 = 0.45 m/s

v0 = 7 m/s

v0 = 8.8 m/s

2)

What is the horizontal momentum of the person after landing on the cart?

pf = 325 kg m/s

pf = 455 kg m/s

pf = 228 kg m/s

3)

Compare the total kinetic energy of the system including the person, backpack and cart before the person has landed on the cart to after.

KEbefore = KEafter

KEbefore > KEafter

KEbefore < KEafter

4)

The person now holds the backpack off the back of the cart and lets go. The backpack falls to the ground. What happens to the speed of the cart when the backpack is dropped?

increases

decreases

stays the same

(Note: Answers are D, A, B, C. Please show work and reasoning.)

In: Physics

On 1 November 2019 Pippen Ltd contacts Jordan Inc to enquire about US$20m worth of machinery...

  1. On 1 November 2019 Pippen Ltd contacts Jordan Inc to enquire about US$20m worth of machinery that Jordan Inc is manufacturing. By the 30 November the two companies have agreed sale terms after making extensive enquiries, including those on finance terms, exchange rates and forward rates. The eventual sale is concluded on 1 December 2019, whereby Jordan Inc of the USA sells machinery to Pippen Ltd of Portugal for the payment amount of €20m to be made on 1 March 2020.

On the sale date of 1 December, Jordan Inc also enters into a forward contract with its bank to sell €20m in exchange for US Dollars on 1 March 2020.

The relevant spot and forward exchange rates for the Euro/US$ on the various dates are as follows:

1-Dec-19: Spot €1=US$1 & Forward Rate to 1-Mar-20 €1=US$1.04

31-Dec-19: Spot €1=US$1.05 & Forward Rate to 1-Mar-20 €1=US$1.10

1-Mar-20: Spot €1=US$1.12

Jordan Inc’s incremental borrowing rate is 12 percent. The present value factor for two months at an annual interest rate of 12 percent (1 percent per month) is 0.9803.

Assume that the forward contract discount or premium is allocated on a straight-line basis.

  1. How many US$ does Jordan Inc expect to receive under the Forward Contract on 1 March 2020? [2 marks]
  1. Assuming that Jordan Inc designates the forward contract as a cash flow hedge of a foreign currency receivable, provide the journal entries for these transactions in US$ on each of the dates (1-Dec-19, 31-Dec-19 (year-end) and 1-Mar-20). [6 marks]
  1. Show the impact on Net Income for these transactions in 2019 and 2020 under Cash Flow Hedge accounting. [4 marks]
  1. Now assume that Jordan Inc designates the forward contract as a fair value hedge of a foreign currency receivable. In this case, prepare the journal entries for these transactions in US$ on each of the dates (1-Dec-19, 31-Dec-19 (year-end) and 1-Mar-20). [6 marks]
  1. Show the impact on Net Income for these transactions in 2019 and 2020 under Fair Value Hedge accounting. [4 marks]

In: Accounting