Nealon Energy Corporation engages in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of natural gas and oil in the continental United States. The company has grown rapidly over the last 5 years as it has expanded into horizontal drilling techniques for the development of the massive deposits of both gas and oil in shale formations. The company's operations in the Haynesville shale (located in northwest Louisiana) have been so significant that it needs to construct a natural gas gathering and processing center near Bossier City, Louisiana, at an estimated cost of $60 million. To finance the new facility, Nealon has $10 million in profits that it will use to finance a portion of the expansion and plans to sell a bond issue to raise the remaining $50 million. The decision to use so much debt financing for the project was largely due to the argument by company CEO Douglas Nealon Sr. that debt financing is relatively cheap relative to common stock (which the firm has used in the past). Company CFO Doug Nealon Jr. (son of the company founder) did not object to the decision to use all debt but pondered the issue of what cost of capital to use for the expansion project. There was no doubt that the out-of-pocket cost of financing was equal to the new interest that must be paid on the debt. However, the CFO also knew that by using debt for this project the firm would eventually have to use equity in the future if it wanted to maintain the balance of debt and equity it had in its capital structure and not become overly dependent on borrowed funds. The following balance sheet, LOADING..., reflects the mix of capital sources that Nealon has used in the past. Although the percentages would vary over time, the firm tended to manage its capital structure back toward these proportions. The firm currently has one issue of bonds outstanding. The bonds have a par value of $1,000 per bond, carry a coupon rate of 11 percent, have 15 years to maturity, and are selling for $1,045. Nealon's common stock has a current market price of $ 41, and the firm paid a $2.80 dividend last year that is expected to increase at an annual rate of 4 percent for the foreseeable future.
|
SOURCE OF FINANCING |
TARGET CAPITAL STRUCTURE WEIGHTS |
|
|
Bonds |
30% |
|
|
Common stock |
70% |
a. What is the yield to maturity for Nealon's bonds under current market conditions?
b. What is the cost of new debt financing to Nealon based on current market prices after both taxes (you may use a marginal tax rate of 35 percent for your estimate) and flotation costs of $30 per bond have been considered? Note: Use Nequals15 for the number of years until the new bond matures.
c. What is the investor's required rate of return for Nealon's common stock? If Nealon were to sell new shares of common stock, it would incur a cost of $2.00 per share. What is your estimate of the cost of new equity financing raised from the sale of common stock?
d. Compute the weighted average cost of capital for Nealon's investment using the weights reflected in the actual financing mix (that is, $10 million in retained earnings and $50 million in bonds).
e. Compute the weighted average cost of capital for Nealon where the firm maintains its target capital structure by reducing its debt offering to 30 percent of the $60 million in new capital, or $18 million, using $10 million in retained earnings and raising $32 million through a new equity offering.
f. If you were the CFO for the company, would you prefer to use the calculation of the cost of capital in part (d) or (e) to evaluate the new project? Why?
In: Finance
Nealon Energy Corporation engages in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of natural gas and oil in the continental United States. The company has grown rapidly over the last 5 years as it has expanded into horizontal drilling techniques for the development of the massive deposits of both gas and oil in shale formations. The company's operations in the Haynesville shale (located in northwest Louisiana) have been so significant that it needs to construct a natural gas gathering and processing center near Bossier City, Louisiana, at an estimated cost of $80 million. To finance the new facility, Nealon has $20 million in profits that it will use to finance a portion of the expansion and plans to sell a bond issue to raise the remaining $60 million. The decision to use so much debt financing for the project was largely due to the argument by company CEO Douglas Nealon Sr. that debt financing is relatively cheap relative to common stock (which the firm has used in the past). Company CFO Doug Nealon Jr. (son of the company founder) did not object to the decision to use all debt but pondered the issue of what cost of capital to use for the expansion project. There was no doubt that the out-of-pocket cost of financing was equal to the new interest that must be paid on the debt. However, the CFO also knew that by using debt for this project the firm would eventually have to use equity in the future if it wanted to maintain the balance of debt and equity it had in its capital structure and not become overly dependent on borrowed funds. The following balance sheet, Bonds = 30% Common Stock = 70% reflects the mix of capital sources that Nealon has used in the past. Although the percentages would vary over time, the firm tended to manage its capital structure back toward these proportions. The firm currently has one issue of bonds outstanding. The bonds have a par value of $1,000 per bond, carry a coupon rate of 8 percent, have 14 years to maturity, and are selling for $1,070. Nealon's common stock has a current market price of $ 36, and the firm paid a $2.60 dividend last year that is expected to increase at an annual rate of 6 percent for the foreseeable future. a. What is the yield to maturity for Nealon's bonds under current market conditions? b. What is the cost of new debt financing to Nealon based on current market prices after both taxes (you may use a marginal tax rate of 34 percent for your estimate) and flotation costs of $30 per bond have been considered? Note: Use N= 14 for the number of years until the new bond matures. c. What is the investor's required rate of return for Nealon's common stock? If Nealon were to sell new shares of common stock, it would incur a cost of $3.50 per share. What is your estimate of the cost of new equity financing raised from the sale of common stock? d. Compute the weighted average cost of capital for Nealon's investment using the weights reflected in the actual financing mix (that is, $20 million in retained earnings and $60 million in bonds). e. Compute the weighted average cost of capital for Nealon where the firm maintains its target capital structure by reducing its debt offering to 30 percent of the $80 million in new capital, or $24 million, using $20 million in retained earnings and raising $36 million through a new equity offering. f. If you were the CFO for the company, would you prefer to use the calculation of the cost of capital in part (d) or (e) to evaluate the new project? Why?
In: Finance
Describe the purpose of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) and the benefits that these rules provide.
In: Accounting
In: Statistics and Probability
What impact do you think a stronger dollar (A higher exchange rate value of the dollar - an appreciation of the dollar) would have on the relative price of U.S. exports and imports and therefore the amount of U.S. exports and imports? Would this push the U.S. in the direction of a trade deficit or trade surplus?
In: Economics
Robert Solow once jokingly noted, “I have a chronic [trade] deficit with my barber, who doesn’t buy a darned thing from me.” Is this a problem? Why or why not? How does this relate to the U.S.–China, U.S.–Mexico, and U.S.–Japan trade deficits? EXPLAIN
In: Economics
62% of U.S. adults have very little confidence in newspapers. You randomly select 10 U.S. adults. Find the probability that the number of U.S. adults who have very little confidence in newspapers is (a) exactly five, (b) at least six, and (c) less than four.
In: Math
The dollar is said to depreciate against the euro if
Select one:
a. the exchange rate falls. Other things the same, it will cost fewer euros to buy U.S. goods.
b. the exchange rate falls. Other things the same, it will cost more euros to buy U.S. goods.
c. the exchange rate rises. Other things the same, it will cost fewer euros to buy U.S. goods.
d. the exchange rate rises. Other things the same, it will cost more euros to buy U.S. goods.
In: Economics
In: Economics
The owners of a country’s abundant factors gain from trade while the owners of scarce factors lose. Given this theory, U.S. workers can lose from the growth of Chinese industry since the U.S. is capital abundant and labor scarce compared to China. Some say that based on the theory presented. China becoming the world’s manufacturer can be beneficial to the U.S. because U.S. consumers can purchase products more cheaply. Please elaborate on these two arguments. How can you reconcile them?
In: Economics