Oriole Company began operations on January 1, 2019, adopting the
conventional retail inventory system. None of the company’s
merchandise was marked down in 2019 and, because there was no
beginning inventory, its ending inventory for 2019 of $38,300 would
have been the same under either the conventional retail system or
the LIFO retail system.
On December 31, 2020, the store management considers adopting the
LIFO retail system and desires to know how the December 31, 2020,
inventory would appear under both systems. All pertinent data
regarding purchases, sales, markups, and markdowns are shown below.
There has been no change in the price level.
|
Cost |
Retail |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Inventory, Jan. 1, 2020 |
$38,300 | $59,400 | ||||
|
Markdowns (net) |
13,300 | |||||
|
Markups (net) |
21,900 | |||||
|
Purchases (net) |
132,900 | 179,100 | ||||
|
Sales (net) |
169,500 | |||||
Determine the cost of the 2020 ending inventory under both (a) the
conventional retail method and (b) the LIFO retail method.
(Round ratios for computational purposes to 2 decimal
place, e.g. 78.72% and final answers to 0 decimal places, e.g.
28,987.)
| (a) |
Ending inventory using conventional retail method |
$enter a dollar amount rounded to 0 decimal places |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (b) |
Ending inventory LIFO retail method |
$enter a dollar amount rounded to 0 decimal places |
In: Accounting
Sheridan Company began operations on January 1, 2019, adopting
the conventional retail inventory system. None of the company’s
merchandise was marked down in 2019 and, because there was no
beginning inventory, its ending inventory for 2019 of $37,500 would
have been the same under either the conventional retail system or
the LIFO retail system.
On December 31, 2020, the store management considers adopting the
LIFO retail system and desires to know how the December 31, 2020,
inventory would appear under both systems. All pertinent data
regarding purchases, sales, markups, and markdowns are shown below.
There has been no change in the price level.
|
Cost |
Retail |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Inventory, Jan. 1, 2020 |
$37,500 | $59,600 | ||||
|
Markdowns (net) |
13,000 | |||||
|
Markups (net) |
21,700 | |||||
|
Purchases (net) |
128,400 | 175,600 | ||||
|
Sales (net) |
170,100 | |||||
Determine the cost of the 2020 ending inventory under both (a) the
conventional retail method and (b) the LIFO retail method.
(Round ratios for computational purposes to 2 decimal
place, e.g. 78.72% and final answers to 0 decimal places, e.g.
28,987.)
| (a) |
Ending inventory using conventional retail method |
$enter a dollar amount rounded to 0 decimal places |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (b) |
Ending inventory LIFO retail method |
$enter a dollar amount rounded to 0 decimal places |
In: Accounting
The following tables summarizes the 2019 income statement and end-year balance sheet of Drake’s Bowling Alleys. Drake’s financial manager forecasts a 10% increase in sales and costs in 2020. The ratio of sales to average assets is expected to remain at 0.40. Interest is forecasted at 5% of debt at the start of the year.
| INCOME STATEMENT, 2019 | ||||
| (Figures in $ thousands) | ||||
| Sales | $ | 1,480 | (40% of average assets)a | |
| Costs | 1,110 | (75% of sales) | ||
| Interest | 31 | (5% of debt at start of year)b | ||
| Pretax profit | $ | 339 | ||
| Tax | 136 | (40% of pretax profit) | ||
| Net income | $ | 203 | ||
a Assets at the end of 2018 were $3,600,000.
b Debt at the end of 2018 was $620,000.
| BALANCE SHEET, YEAR-END | ||||||||||
| (Figures in $ thousands) | ||||||||||
| Assets | $ | 3,800 | Debt | $ | 620 | |||||
| Equity | 3,180 | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 3,800 | $ | 3,800 | ||||||
a. What is the implied level of assets at the end of 2020? (Do not round your intermediate calculations. Enter your answer in thousands.)
b. If the company pays out 50% of net income as dividends, how much cash will Drake's need to raise in the capital markets in 2020? (Do not round your intermediate calculations. Enter your answer in thousands.)
c. If Drake's is unwilling to make an equity issue, what will be the debt ratio at the end of 2020? (Do not round your intermediate calculations. Round your answer to 2 decimal places.)
In: Finance
Sweet Company began operations on January 1, 2019, adopting the
conventional retail inventory system. None of the company’s
merchandise was marked down in 2019 and, because there was no
beginning inventory, its ending inventory for 2019 of $38,100 would
have been the same under either the conventional retail system or
the LIFO retail system.
On December 31, 2020, the store management considers adopting the
LIFO retail system and desires to know how the December 31, 2020,
inventory would appear under both systems. All pertinent data
regarding purchases, sales, markups, and markdowns are shown below.
There has been no change in the price level.
|
Cost |
Retail |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Inventory, Jan. 1, 2020 |
$38,100 | $59,000 | ||||
|
Markdowns (net) |
13,000 | |||||
|
Markups (net) |
21,800 | |||||
|
Purchases (net) |
132,200 | 176,200 | ||||
|
Sales (net) |
166,800 | |||||
Determine the cost of the 2020 ending inventory under both (a) the
conventional retail method and (b) the LIFO retail method.
(Round ratios for computational purposes to 2 decimal
place, e.g. 78.72% and final answers to 0 decimal places, e.g.
28,987.)
| (a) |
Ending inventory using conventional retail method |
$enter a dollar amount rounded to 0 decimal places |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (b) |
Ending inventory LIFO retail method |
$enter a dollar amount rounded to 0 decimal places |
In: Accounting
The following tables summarizes the 2019 income statement and end-year balance sheet of Drake’s Bowling Alleys. Drake’s financial manager forecasts a 15% increase in sales and costs in 2020. The ratio of sales to average assets is expected to remain at 0.40. Interest is forecasted at 3% of debt at the start of the year.
| INCOME STATEMENT, 2019 | ||||
| (Figures in $ thousands) | ||||
| Sales | $ | 1,080 | (40% of average assets)a | |
| Costs | 540 | (50% of sales) | ||
| Interest | 26 | (5% of debt at start of year)b | ||
| Pretax profit | $ | 514 | ||
| Tax | 103 | (20% of pretax profit) | ||
| Net income | $ | 411 | ||
a Assets at the end of 2018 were $2,600,000.
b Debt at the end of 2018 was $520,000.
| BALANCE SHEET, YEAR-END | ||||||||||
| (Figures in $ thousands) | ||||||||||
| Assets | $ | 2,800 | Debt | $ | 520 | |||||
| Equity | 2,280 | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 2,800 | $ | 2,800 | ||||||
a. What is the implied level of assets at the end of 2020? (Do not round your intermediate calculations. Enter your answer in thousands.)
b. If the company pays out 50% of net income as dividends, how much cash will Drake's need to raise in the capital markets in 2020? (Do not round your intermediate calculations. Enter your answer in thousands.)
c. If Drake's is unwilling to make an equity issue, what will be the debt ratio at the end of 2020? (Do not round your intermediate calculations. Round your answer to 2 decimal places.)
In: Finance
Tamarisk Company began operations on January 1, 2019, adopting
the conventional retail inventory system. None of the company’s
merchandise was marked down in 2019 and, because there was no
beginning inventory, its ending inventory for 2019 of $38,900 would
have been the same under either the conventional retail system or
the LIFO retail system.
On December 31, 2020, the store management considers adopting the
LIFO retail system and desires to know how the December 31, 2020,
inventory would appear under both systems. All pertinent data
regarding purchases, sales, markups, and markdowns are shown below.
There has been no change in the price level.
|
Cost |
Retail |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Inventory, Jan. 1, 2020 |
$38,900 | $61,100 | ||||
|
Markdowns (net) |
12,900 | |||||
|
Markups (net) |
21,600 | |||||
|
Purchases (net) |
129,600 | 177,000 | ||||
|
Sales (net) |
170,100 | |||||
Determine the cost of the 2020 ending inventory under both (a) the
conventional retail method and (b) the LIFO retail method.
(Round ratios for computational purposes to 2 decimal
place, e.g. 78.72% and final answers to 0 decimal places, e.g.
28,987.)
| (a) |
Ending inventory using conventional retail method |
$enter a dollar amount rounded to 0 decimal places |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (b) |
Ending inventory LIFO retail method |
$enter a dollar amount rounded to 0 decimal places |
In: Accounting
E5.16
(Preparation of Partial Statement of Cash Flows—Operating Activities)
(LO 8, 9) The statement of income of Kneale Transport Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2020, reported the following condensed information:
|
Kneale Transport Inc. Year Ended December 31, 2020 Statement of Income |
||
|
Service revenue |
$545,000 |
|
|
Operating expenses |
370,000 |
|
|
Income from operations |
175,000 |
|
|
Other revenues and expenses |
||
|
Gain on disposal of equipment |
$25,000 |
|
|
Interest expense |
10,000 |
15,000 |
|
Income before income tax |
190,000 |
|
|
Income tax |
42,000 |
|
|
Net income |
$148,000 |
|
Kneale's statement of financial position included the following comparative data at December 31:
|
2020 |
2019 |
|
|
Accounts receivable |
$50,000 |
$60,000 |
|
Prepaid insurance |
8,000 |
5,000 |
|
Accounts payable |
30,000 |
41,000 |
|
Interest payable |
2,000 |
750 |
|
Income tax payable |
8,000 |
4,500 |
|
Unearned revenue |
10,000 |
14,000 |
Additional information:
Operating expenses include $70,000 in depreciation expense. The company follows IFRS. Assume that interest is treated as an operating activity for purposes of the statement of cash flows.
Instructions
a.
Prepare the operating activities section of the statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2020, using the
1.indirect method and
2.direct method.
b.
From the perspective of an external user of Kneale Transport's financial statements, discuss the usefulness of the statement of cash flows prepared using either the indirect or the direct method.
In: Accounting
Viking InterWorks is one of many manufacturers that supplies
memory products to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) of
desktop systems. The CEO recently read an article in a trade
publication that reported the projected demand for desktop systems
to be:
Qddesktop = 1600 - 2Pdesktop + 0.6M (in
millions of units), where Pdesktop is the price of a
desktop system and M is consumer income.
The same article reported that the incomes of the desktop system’s
primary consumer demographic would increase 4.2 percent this year
to $61,300 and that the selling price of a desktop would decrease
to $980, both of which the CEO viewed favorably for Viking. In a
related article, the CEO read that the upcoming year’s projected
demand for 512 MB desktop memory modules is:
Qdmemory = 11,200 - 100Pmemory -
2Pdesktop (in thousands of units), where
Pmemory is the market price for a 512 MB memory module
and Pdesktop is the selling price of a desktop
system.
The report also indicated that five new, small start-ups entered
the 512 MB memory module market bringing the total number of
competitors to 100 firms. Furthermore, suppose that Viking’s CEO
commissioned an industry-wide study to examine the industry
capacity for 512 MB memory modules. The results indicate that when
the industry is operating at maximum efficiency, this competitive
industry supplies modules according to the following
function:
Qsmemory = 1000 + 25Pmemory + N where
Pmemory is the price of a 512 MB memory module and N is
the number of memory module manufacturers in the market.
Viking’s CEO provides you, the production manager, with the above
information and requests a report containing the market price for
memory modules and the number of units to manufacture in the
upcoming year based on the assumption that all firms producing 512
MB modules supply an equal share to the market.
Round to 2 decimals
A) Market Price for Memory Modules ($):
B) Number of units to manufacture (thousand):
How would your report change if the price of desktops were $1,080?
C) Market Price for Memory Modules ($):
D) Number of units to manufacture (thousand)
Please clearly indicate what number goes with what letter!
In: Economics
Viking InterWorks is one of many manufacturers that supplies
memory products to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) of
desktop systems. The CEO recently read an article in a trade
publication that reported the projected demand for desktop systems
to be:
Qddesktop = 1600 - 2Pdesktop + 0.6M (in
millions of units), where Pdesktop is the price of a
desktop system and M is consumer income.
The same article reported that the incomes of the desktop system’s
primary consumer demographic would increase 4.2 percent this year
to $61,300 and that the selling price of a desktop would decrease
to $980, both of which the CEO viewed favorably for Viking. In a
related article, the CEO read that the upcoming year’s projected
demand for 512 MB desktop memory modules is:
Qdmemory = 11,200 - 100Pmemory -
2Pdesktop (in thousands of units), where
Pmemory is the market price for a 512 MB memory module
and Pdesktop is the selling price of a desktop
system.
The report also indicated that five new, small start-ups entered
the 512 MB memory module market bringing the total number of
competitors to 100 firms. Furthermore, suppose that Viking’s CEO
commissioned an industry-wide study to examine the industry
capacity for 512 MB memory modules. The results indicate that when
the industry is operating at maximum efficiency, this competitive
industry supplies modules according to the following
function:
Qsmemory = 1000 + 25Pmemory + N where
Pmemory is the price of a 512 MB memory module and N is
the number of memory module manufacturers in the market.
Viking’s CEO provides you, the production manager, with the above
information and requests a report containing the market price for
memory modules and the number of units to manufacture in the
upcoming year based on the assumption that all firms producing 512
MB modules supply an equal share to the market.
Instructions: Enter your responses rounded to two
decimal places.
Market price for memory modules: $
Number of units to manufacture: thousand
How would your report change if the price of desktops were
$1,080?
Market price for memory modules: $
Number of units to manufacture: thousand
What does this indicate about the relationship between memory
modules and desktop systems?
In: Economics
1. In theory, what conditions must exist for a company to build a new factory? That is, what hurdles must a firm overcome in order to build a factory?
2. What are the five areas, or categories, of Total Spending? How large is each area, in terms of total dollars spent, and in percentage terms--- as a percent of Total Spending?
3. What are the four events that may cause a recession, in theory? What IS a recession, exactly? Are we in one right now? What has happened to Total Spending in 2020, as compared to 2019? Why?
4. Please list and discuss three features of business spending that make it unique--that set it apart form the other areas of total spending. Why is business spending so important to our economy?
here is the lecture:
THE
TOTAL SPENDING EQUATION AND THE IMPORTANCE OF “I”--- INVESTMENT ---
BUSINESS SPENDING: An introduction into the entire field of
Macroeconomics, in theory, may be expressed by the following
equation: Total Spending (as measured by the GDP) = C + I + G + (X
-M), that is, the concept of the total amount of money spent on
U.S. goods and services in any given year may be measured by
examining various areas of our economy: C, consumption, also known
as household spending, I, Investment, which is more accurately
described as business spending, G, government spending, X, exports,
and M, imports. We have examined C, consumption, in earlier
modules. We will now examine the concept of I, Investment, business
spending. Later in the course we will examine G, government
spending, along with tax collection, and the deficit and the debt,
along with X and M. Before March 2020, total spending was cruising
along at a level of about $21.5 trillion for the year---on an
annual basis. Owing to the recession of 2020, total spending will
probably drop to somewhere in the area of $20 trillion for the
year---or lower. In terms of a percentage breakdown, C, total
household spending, makes up about 68% of total spending, I,
Business Spending, comes in at a historical average of about 17%,
though it had been dropping for several months prior to March 2020,
G comes in at about 22% of the total--- much higher than just a few
years ago, while (exports minus imports) may vary between minus 3%
and minus 5% of total spending. We track exports and imports in
relationship to one another, which we call the ‘trade deficit”.
Prior to March 2020, exports tended to represent about 12% of the
U.S. economy, in terms of total spending, and imports represented
about 15% of total spending. Here, a little humility is in order:
WE DO NOT KNOW with any degree of precision what will happen to
these numbers--- exports and imports--- in the next year or two. We
have a global recession on our hands, and estimates are changing
week to week. It is a very daunting time to come up with the next
edition of an Econ text! Obviously, it is my job to present you
with the latest numbers and the latest news in all matters
involving the study of macroeconomics. As you may imagine, I am
very busy these days! The category of total spending known as “I”,
which stands for Investment, also known as Business Spending (sorry
about all the terms!) is particularly compelling. I believe it is
safe to say that the area of the economy known as “I” is MUCH MORE
IMPORTANT THAN JUST 17% OF OUR ECONOMY. This sounds a little odd,
since an area representing 17% of our economy should be worth 17%
of our time---right? Well… it is ‘worth more than that’, one may
argue. WHY? WHAT IS SO DARN SPECIAL ABOUT BUSINESS SPENDING???
Well, it is the only category of the ‘big three’--- C, I, and G ---
that can rise or fall by 20% in one year. In fact, it would not
surprise me if business spending DID IN FACT DROP BY 20%----OR MORE
--- IN THE YEAR 2020. C will not drop 20% (THANK GOODNESS), and G
SURELY WILL NOT DROP THIS YEAR---IN FACT, IT IS RISING AT A RATE
NOT SEEN SINCE WORLD WAR TWO--- this rise in G will be studied for
decades, if not centuries. The EXTRA $2.2 trillion in stimulus
spending so far in 2020 is just the start. MUCH MORE ON THIS LATER!
We may describe the area of business spending as follows:
“businesses… spending money… hiring workers… to BUILD”---what we
are really talking about here is CONSTRUCTION VOLUME, or
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY! So… why not just call it CONSTRUCTION
spending?? I do not know. That is what I would call it. It is more
descriptive. A warning: the word “Investment” means something
distinct and different inside this course: it is used to represent
this area of the economy. Outside this course, this very slippery,
malleable word means something else. The phrase: “we ‘invested’
$10,000 by buying Apple stock today” has a different meaning---
related to our definition, but not the same. Let me explain:
“investment” in this course stands for the construction of new
factories, (new plant and equipment and office buildings), the
construction of new housing units (homes, condos, apartment units,
ADUs, mobile homes) and the addition of new inventories—more on
this later. What is so special and unique about Investment, also
known as business spending? It involves BUILDING SOMETHING NEW: in
1932, it was zero for the year. C and G would NEVER be zero for the
year. In 1932, we were three years in to the Great Depression.
Unemployment (U) reached 25% AND STAYED THERE. U may hit 20 or 25%
later in 2020, but IT WILL NOT STAY THERE. In 1932, there was no
demand for new factories, or new homes, and businesses were busy
drawing down inventories—not adding to them. Let’s look at one
selfish firm deciding whether or not to build a new factory on U.S.
soil in the next 12 months . This is the essence of business
spending. It must proceed through four steps, or see four “green
lights’, before it will start down this path. STEP #1: GREAT
EXPECTATIONS! The decision to build this new factory is an ALL OR
NOTHING decision. Let’s say it is April, 2019, and we are deciding
whether or not to build the new factory. If we build the factory,
we will start construction in Jan, 2020 and finish in Dec, 2020.
The factory will cost $100 million to build in calendar year 2020
if we build it, and $0 if we do not build it. All or nothing. This
is a small factory! The Tesla – Panasonic battery plant outside
Sparks, Nevada may end up with a cost of about $5 billion when it
is finally completed. Regardless of the size of the factory, a firm
must have ‘the green light’ in order to build a new factory---an
“all or nothing” decision. IT MUST GET EXCITED ABOUT THIS PROJECT!
THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT DECISION THIS FIRM WILL MAKE IN THE NEXT
THREE YEARS! This project will most likely have to ‘beat out’ other
projects inside the firm competing for scarce resources. I want you
to visualize a healthy firm that is doing so well THAT IT WANTS TO
EXPAND. It has MORE IDEAS THAN MONEY. Thus, there is a
‘competition’ inside the firm for which project to pursue and which
factory to build. Jobs and careers are at stake. ONCE WE HAVE THE
GREEN LIGHT, then we have to line up FINANCING—whether it is
generated in equity markers or in debt markets. More on this later,
but let me introduce you to the idea that THERE IS A FINITE AMOUNT
OF MONEY available for projects such as this one. We will have to
‘beat out’ other firms who are competing for the same pot of money.
Our government does not help all of this by BORROWING A TREMENDOUS
AMOUNT OF MONEY EACH YEAR. This is known as the deficit. Obviously,
the deficit is skyrocketing this year as our government is
borrowing over $2.2 trillion MORE THAN BEFORE in its efforts to
save our economy and reduce the scale of human misery that comes
with tens of millions of workers losing their jobs. Every major
economist I have seen and heard this year has said “let’s not worry
about the debt and the deficit right now”---and that is fine. We
MUST worry about it LATER! MUCH more on this later! If the firm can
secure financing, it must also clear regulatory hurdles: it must
apply for, and be granted BUILDING PERMITS --- from local, state
and federal government agencies. Thus, this area of spending in our
economy is no “slam dunk”--- many pieces must fall into place in
order for a construction project to move forward. Looking at the
equation Total Spending = C + I + G + (X – M) we may ask this
question: what possible events may occur that would start a
recession? Now, there is a very precise definition of a recession,
but an introductory look at this suggests that a recession occurs
when total spending drops for two business quarters in a row—six
months. In fact, there is a commission that “calls” recessions.
There is NO doubt that we are in one right now. Recessions have
occurred in: 1981-2, 1990-1, 2001, 2008-9, and, of course, 2020.
WHAT FOUR EVENTS MAY CAUSE A RECESSION? In theory, we may see: 1. A
drop in G 2. A drop in X 3. A drop in C 4. A drop in I. Let’s look
at each possible event: in terms of the historical norm, a drop in
G does not happen from year to year. I suppose that G, government
spending, may well drop from its INCREDIBLY HIGH levels in 2020,
back down to its ‘normal’ level in 2021---we certainly hope so. We
hope and pray that the current recession is short. Normally, G
rises by about 4% per year, for various reasons—much more on this
later. If G must rise by 4% per year, or at least $160 billion per
year, then SOME OTHER AREA of total spending must REALLY DROP in
order to cause a recession. G does not drop from year to year in
normal times. A drop in X may occur this year, but a
once-in-a-century pandemic is not normal. In a normal year, export
sales will rise as the global economy grows. Obama came in to the
presidency in early 2009 promising to preside over a doubling of
export sales--- and he just about got us there. The global economy
tends to rise about 2 to 3% per year. Not so this year, obviously.
We have a great record of producing products and services that are
sold to households, businesses and governments in other countries:
planes with weapons on them, planes without weapons on them, food,
entertainment products and services, financial services, and MANY
other products and services. Prior to March 2020, export sales
accounted for over ten percent of our economy, and our jobs. In
theory, let’s say that one of our trading partners is suffering a
drop in total spending, and thus will be cutting back on the volume
of products and services that they may buy from U.S. businesses. We
have some of our best and brightest people in positions of power to
try to make sure this does not happen: our trade representatives,
the IMF, the World Bank, and many other institutions may act so to
help that country’s economy. We also have “foreign aid”. While
foreign aid represents a TINY portion of overall government
spending, there is a false impression of it among many Americans.
Many people believe that we just ‘hand out’ money to other
countries. Let’s take Egypt as an example. As the most populous
Arab nation, Egypt is just INCREDIBLY important in terms of U.S.
interests. Ever since they signed a peace agreement with Israel---
President Carter’s greatest foreign policy achievement---our
government has been ‘giving’ them a lot of money each year--- but
it is NOT a ‘handout”. We tell Egypt, for example: “here is $3
billion—now, WHAT U.S. PRODUCTS AND SERVICES ARE YOU BUYING WITH
THIS MONEY? Food? Weapons?” If we drill down more deeply, we see
that this is a U.S. JOBS PROGRAM. Why does Turkey receive so much
aid from the U.S.? Could it be that we have a military base on
their soil? That they are a member of NATO? Our nation has a very
good record of preventing event #2 from occurring. A
once-in-a-century pandemic does not change this fact. EVENT #3: a
drop in C. Now, obviously, it was a drop in C that caused this
recession. Well, that is a bit simplistic… when many of our 30.2
million small business CLOSED SHOP, NEVER TO REOPEN, and over 20
million workers LOST THEIR JOBS OVERNIGHT… we will see a drop In C.
Let’s say this is unusual. The events of 2020 will be studied 100
years from now. In normal times, obviously, a drop in C may cause a
recession--- but that is not normally how it works, in terms of the
‘timing’---the initial cause of a recession. C, household spending,
drops DURING a recession (usually) as a ‘fifth-in-time’ event. We
may recall the story of Tom Green: he lost his job, and yes, as a
direct result, his family will cut back on household spending. Here
is how the sequence may transpire: 1. FOR SOME REASON, total
spending drops. 2. Businesses see a drop in sales volume. 3.
Businesses react by cutting back on production volume. 3. In doing
so, they cut the hours of some workers and terminate the employment
of others (when I get fired, my hours get cut, obviously, to zero)
4. Workers see a drop in wage income. 5. In response to the drop in
income, most workers will cut back on household spending levels ---
as income drops, household spending drops, albeit not
dollar-for-dollar. YET… WHAT WAS THE INITIAL CAUSE OF THE DROP IN
TOTAL SPENDING! What event “started’ the recession? In most cases,
it is a drop in I, business spending. Not all cases, but most.
Leading up to March 2020, economists were getting more and more
concerned that this area of the economy was ALREADY DROPPING,
partly in part to Trump’s erratic trade policies. Businesses need
‘GREAT EXPECTATIONS’ to build that new factory on U.S. soil ---(at
least in theory)--- and Trump is not good at creating and
maintaining great expectations. Then, the pandemic invaded our
country, and both C and I dropped in a dramatic fashion. In the
months leading up to the recession of 1981-1982, the volume of
business spending dropped… and dropped… and dropped more… and
more…. And, finally, the drop in business spending “dragged down”
total spending. The drop I--- business spending---- OVERWHELMED the
rise in government spending, and, as a result, the recession was
inevitable. The recession started in Jan. 1981 – just as Reagan
came in to office. By the time he was running for reelection in
November, 1984, the economy had completely rebounded. Nice timing!
The Fed had pursued ‘contractionary monetary policy’ from March
1979 to March 1980, in order to battle high rates of inflation,
raising interest rates to a modern-day high. A home loan cost about
18% interest. VERY few homes were purchased, or sold, or BUILT
during this time. Sellers of homes often had to PERSONALLY LEND
buyers some of the money! If the new home buyers could not pay the
monthly mortgage, the home seller, in theory, would have to hire an
attorney and foreclose on the house. Thus, even though C and G are
LARGER AREAS of total spending, I, that is, business spending, is
by far THE MOST VOLATILE --- THE QUICKEST TO CHANGE, and BY A GREAT
MAGNITUDE. Home construction and sales volume DROPPED BY HALF
during the Great Recession which ran from Dec. 2007 to June 2009.
The entire category of business spending can drop by 20% in one
year. It may be doing just that right now in 2020. Our government
is AGGRESSIVELY trying to minimize the drop in C, household
spending, during this turbulent time. We will study some of the
programs involved later in the course. Yet, business spending
continues to drop this year as MANY firms delay planned
construction projects. Thus, it is clear to see that business
spending is quite unique and special, and deserves ‘more than 17%’
of our time. Later in the course, we will examine the role of our
government in attempting to cause a rise in business spending—not
just for one year, but for the next 20 years.
In: Economics