I cannot get this code to run on my python compiler. It gives me an expected an indent block message. I do not know what is going on.

#ask why this is now happenning. (Create employee description)
class employee:
def__init__(self, name, employee_id, department, title):
self.name = name
self.employee_id = employee_id
self.department = department
self.title = title

def __str__(self):
return '{} , id={}, is in {} and is a {}.'.format(self.name, self.employee_id, self.department, self.title)

  
def main():
# Create employee list
emp1 = Employee(name='Susan Meyers', employee_id='47899', department='Accounting', title='Vice President')
emp2 = Employee(name='Mark Jones', employee_id='39119', department='IT', title='Programmer')
emp3 = Employee(name='Joy Rogersr', employee_id='81774', department='Manufacturing', title='Engineer')

print(emp1, sep='/n/n')
print(emp2, sep='/n/n')
print(emp3, sep='/n/n')
  
if __name__=="__main__":
main()

1. A and B purchase unimproved land as cotenants. In each of the following alternatives, determine whether A and B have created an “entity” for tax purposes: a. They hold the land for appreciation; b. They lease the land to Z who uses the land for farming; c. They construct a motel on the land and hire C to manage the motel for them. 2. A, B and C have decided to leave their current positions as software designers in a large company and to start up their own firm. A and B have been very successful and are now quite wealthy. C, on the other hand, is a brilliant young programmer who is still paying off student loans. Although A and B both plan to invest capital in the new firm, they hope to eventually attract additional outside investors. They have come to you for advice in setting up their new venture. What are their options in choosing a business entity, and what considerations should they take into account in making that choice?

1. Face-to-face interaction in negotiations has been found to:

2. The most critical barrier to a creative decision is:

3. How can a sure loss be presented in a less unattractive way?

4. What explanation does the book provide for the fact that people are loss-averse, but still accept the sure loss of paying insurance?

5. A product’s transactional utility is contingent upon:

6. A rational valuation of an asset is based on:

7. A software company is looking to recruit a new programmer. There are two candidates for the position. The candidates’ Grade Point Averages are given, along with the number of programs each of them has written.  

1. Candidate X has a GPA of 4.0. His experience consists of writing 10 programs.
2. Candidate Y has a GPA of 3.2. His experience consists of writing 70 programs.

According to the evaluability hypothesis, which of the candidates will be preferred in case they are evaluated separately, and why?

Hi, I need the HTML5 code for the below.

About Me

**Would like to add a image of a plane or something related to travel here.

Mia Jo

I am taking this class to earn my Computer programmer CL1.

Things I Like to Do:

• Spend time with family
• Traveling
• People Watch

Places I Want to Go or Have Visited:

Dubai- December'18 Enjoyed shopping and the desert safari the most.

Cuba- August '18 Enjoyed learning about the culture and history.

China- plan to visited next year!!! I can't wait to see the Great Wall of China!

Iceland- At the top of my bucket list.

Education:

I am a second semester student at Star College.

My Goals:

• To earn my AAS degree.
• See as much of the world as possible

Favorite Website:

https://www.travelchannel.com

Contact Information:

555 on my way st • Houston, TX 77339 • (218) 555-1212

JAVA

Write a Java console application that prompts the user to enter the radius of a circle, then prints its radius, diameter, circumference, and area.

The Console Output

Enter the radius of the circle: 1.2

The radius is 1.2
The diameter is 2.4
The circumference is 7.5398223686155035
The area is 4.523893421169302

Programmer Notes

• Write and document your program per class coding conventions.
• Add an instance variable double radius. Generate its get/set methods.
• Manually type the methods getDiameter(), getCircumference(), and getArea(). To calculate the circumference and area, use 3.14159 or the Java defined constant Math.PI
• In main method, create a new instance of Assign3: Assign3 circle = new Assign3();
• Create an instance of Scanner. Call print() to prompt the user to enter the radius. Call input.nextDouble() to get the user input. Call circle.setRadius() to set the radius.
• Then call println() 4 times, each with the value of getRadius, getDiameter, getCircumference, getArea, respectively.

C++ language

Using classes (OOD), design a system that will support lending various types of media starting with books. Program should be able to handle a maximum of 500 books. Program should meet at least the following requirements:

1. Define a base media class with a book class derived from it. (Specific class names determined by programmer.)

2. The classes should contain at least the following information: title, up to four authors, ISBN.

3. Define a collection class that will hold up to 500 books.

4. The program should be able to perform the following operations supported by the class definitions:

a) Load data from a drive

b)Sort and display the books by title

c)Sort and display the books by author

d)Add and remove books

Programming requirements: Must include examples of inheritance and composition

~~~Function/Class comments (Description, pre and post conditions)

~~~Internal comments for all functions

3. One of the most controversial issues in the field of Marketing is the long-run impact that advertising has on brand awareness. That is, while a short-term impact is commonly observed (i.e. increased awareness of the advertised brand within a one-two week time frame of the ad appearing), the longer-term impact is less well understood. To this end, the Marketing Research Firm (MRF) conducted a study to assess the longer-term impact of advertising on his newly launched brand of detergent, clean-so-good (CSG). The way MRF conducted the study for CSG was as follows:

i. MRF split the population into families without children (FWTC) and families with children (FWC).

ii. From each of these two populations MRF selected a random sample of 50 households without replacement from phone company records.

iii. Before any advertising occurred, MRM asked each of the households to check off from a provided list of all major brands of detergents (of which CSG is one of them) which brands they were aware of. (The BEFORE data)

iv. The results of the BEFORE study indicated that 12 out of 50 FWTC were aware of CSG while 18 out of 50 FWC were aware.

v. For a one-week period CSG ran a set of national advertisements in all major markets.

vi. Six months later MRF collected data in an identical fashion to step (iii), but now AFTER the advertising campaign.

vii. The results of the AFTER study, obtained from a new random sample (without replacement) from the FWTC and FWC populations indicated that 14 out of 50 FWTC and 28 out of 50 FWC were aware of CSG.

Based on this information provided, please answer the following questions.

a) State an appropriate null and alternative hypothesis to test that the awareness BEFORE the advertising was the same in the FWTC and FWC groups versus the alternative that it was not the same in the FWTC and FWC group.

b) Test the null versus alternative hypothesis from previous part at the =0.05 significance level. Be sure to support your conclusion with the appropriate test statistic and p-value.

c) Suppose that you wanted to test the null versus alternative hypothesis that the overall fraction of people before the advertising that were aware of CSG was the same as that after the advertising. What additional information would you need to make this assessment? (Hint: the people before the advertising includes both FWTC and FWC groups. How should we combine the two groups in our test so it would be representative of population?)

d) Test separately at the =0.05 significance level, for both the FWTC and FWC groups, that the fraction of people who were aware of CSG BEFORE the advertising is the same as the fraction of people AFTER the advertising, versus the alternative that advertising changed the awareness.

e) What can you conclude about the long-run effectiveness of advertising? f) Do you think that the impact of advertising, as measured here, may be different if an established product (as compared to a new one) was studied? If yes, how? If no, why not?

Monsanto Rounds Up $80 Million in Accounting Violations

ST. LOUIS (FEBRUARY 9, 2016)

BY MICHAEL COHN, Accounting today

The Securities and Exchange Commission said Tuesday that St. Louis-based agribusiness Monsanto Company has agreed to pay an $80 million penalty ….. to settle charges that it violated accounting rules and misstated company earnings pertaining to its flagship product Roundup.

An SEC investigation found Monsanto had insufficient internal accounting controls to properly account for millions of dollars in rebates offered to retailers and distributors of its herbicide Roundup after generic competition had undercut Monsanto’s prices and resulted in a significant loss of market share for Roundup. Monsanto booked substantial amounts of revenue resulting from sales incentivized by the rebate programs, but failed to recognize all of the related program costs at the same time. Therefore, Monsanto materially misstated its consolidated earnings in corporate filings during a three-year period….

The agribusiness giant has attracted controversy over the years for pressuring farms to buy its Roundup-resistant seeds every year and suing them if they re-use the seeds. The company has even sued farms where Roundup-resistant crops were found to be growing because the genetically modified seeds had blown over from neighboring farms. Monsanto has also faced lawsuits of its own for hiding the carcinogenic effects of a key ingredient in Roundup. Accounting violations are a relatively new area for Monsanto, however…

According to the SEC’s order instituting a settled administrative proceeding against Monsanto, accounting executives … and sales executives…began telling U.S. retailers in 2009 that if they “maximized” their Roundup purchases in the fourth quarter they could participate in a new rebate program in 2010. Executives developed talking points for Monsanto’s sales force to use when encouraging retailers to take advantage of the new rebate program and purchase significant amounts of Roundup in the fourth quarter of the company’s 2009 fiscal year….Approximately one-third of Monsanto’s U.S. sales of Roundup for the year occurred during that quarter.

The SEC contended that … U.S. GAAP required the company to record in 2009 a portion of Monsanto’s costs related to the rebate program, but Monsanto improperly delayed recording these costs until 2010.

Monsanto also offered rebates to distributors who met agreed-upon volume targets. However, late in the fiscal year, Monsanto reversed approximately $57.3 million of rebate costs that had been accrued under these agreements because certain distributors did not achieve their volume targets (at the urging of Monsanto). Monsanto then created a new rebate program to allow distributors to “earn back” the rebates they failed to attain in 2009 by meeting new targets in 2010. Under this new program, Monsanto paid $44.5 million in rebates to its two largest distributors as part of side agreements arranged by management, in which they were promised late in fiscal year 2009 that they would be paid the maximum rebate amounts regardless of target performance. Because the side agreements were reached in 2009, Monsanto was required under GAAP to record these rebates in 2009. But the company improperly deferred recording the rebate costs until 2010.

Monsanto repeated the program the following year and improperly accounted for $48 million in rebate costs in 2011 that should have been recorded in 2010, according to the SEC. Monsanto also improperly accounted for more than $56 million in rebates in 2010 and 2011 in Canada, France and Germany. They were booked as selling, general and administrative expenses rather than rebates, which boosted gross profits from Roundup in those countries…..

Monsanto said it cooperated with the SEC settlement…” (It) neither admitted nor denied the SEC’s allegations. Today’s announced settlement does not require any changes to the company’s historical financial statements due to our proactive efforts to restate our financials for the period at the center of the SEC’s investigation.”

She pointed out that that the $80 million civil penalty was fully reserved for and previously disclosed in the company’s financial statements for fiscal year 2015.

Miller also objected to how Monsanto has been characterized. “We do not pressure farmers into buying our products. Farmers have lots of choices and we must earn their business every year….. Additionally, Monsanto has never sued a farmer when trace amounts of our patented seeds or traits were present in the farmer’s field as an accident or as a result of inadvertent means. …

Despite lawsuits against Monsanto over its ingredients, Miller contended that glyphosate (a key ingredient in Roundup) does not cause cancer. “Glyphosate is a vital tool for agriculture with a more than 40-year history of safe use,” she said. “Glyphosate has been the subject of hundreds of detailed health and safety studies – making it one of the most thoroughly studied herbicides on the market….”

…(Executives) agreed to pay penalties of $55,000, $50,000 and $30,000 respectively, and agreed to be suspended from appearing and practicing before the SEC as an accountant (for a period of time)….

The SEC’s investigation found no personal misconduct by Monsanto CEO …who reimbursed the company $3,165,852 and $728,843, respectively, for cash bonuses and certain stock awards they received during the period when the company committed accounting violations. Therefore, it wasn’t necessary for the SEC to pursue a clawback action under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

1)     Audit theory says that the risk of material misstatement is a component of inherent risk and control risk. Assume you are the auditor for Monsanto for 2009. Discuss ways in which the auditors could have been become aware of inherent risks of material misstatement during the planning stage. Identify key inherent risks as evidenced in the reading.

2)     What accounts (based on what is described in the narrative) are over or understated? Where do the accounts fit within the scope of these accounting elements – current assets, long-term assets, current liabilities, long-term liabilities, contributed capital, accumulated other comprehensive income and retained earnings?   Indicate the account, its position in the elements, whether or not it is over or understated, and discuss the specific financial statement assertion violated.

3)     Discuss what happened in terms of the fraud triangle.

4)     What do you think about the PCAOB’s role in this matter?

23) All of the following are true about the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 EXCEPT that ________.

A) individuals cannot be denied health insurance because of a pre-existing condition

B) insurance companies cannot cancel a policy if the insured becomes sick

C) individuals who do not purchase health insurance will be fined

D) children over 21 cannot remain on their parents' policy

29) Most union organizers will NOT continue their organizing efforts unless at least ________ percent of the workers in the workgroup sign authorization cards.

A) 30

B) 40

C) 70

D) 100

30) In conducting a legal campaign to discourage employees from voting for the union, management would most likely ________.

A) tell workers the benefits of remaining union-free

B) threaten workers with loss of their jobs to influence the votes

C) incite racial or religious prejudice by making inflammatory campaign appeals

D) give workers a paid holiday on the day of the vote

31) Mandatory bargaining issues are those which ________.

A) fall within the definition of wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment

B) may be raised, but neither side may insist that they bargained over

C) are outlawed, such as the closed shop

D) involve company goals and strategies

35) If union members should reject the proposed labor agreement, ________.

A) the labor contract is void

B) the union's status is in jeopardy

C) it is a clear sign of management victory

D) a new round of negotiations must begin

37) Which of the following is an exception made by courts regarding the employment-at-will doctrine?

A) prohibiting termination on the grounds of public policy

B) permitting claims based on good faith and fair dealing

C) permitting employees to bring claims based on statements made in employment handbooks

D) all of the above

In 2019, Pharoah Enterprises issued, at par, 60 $1,000, 8% bonds, each convertible into 100 shares of common stock. Pharoah had revenues of $18,800 and expenses other than interest and taxes of $8,000 for 2020. (Assume that the tax rate is 20%.) Throughout 2020, 1,800 shares of common stock were outstanding; none of the bonds was converted or redeemed.

(a) Compute diluted earnings per share for 2020. (Round answer to 2 decimal places, e.g. $2.55.)

(b) Assume the same facts as those assumed for part (a), except that the 60 bonds were issued on September 1, 2020 (rather than in 2019), and none have been converted or redeemed. Compute diluted earnings per share for 2020. (Round answer to 2 decimal places, e.g. $2.55.)

(c) Assume the same facts as assumed for part (a), except that 20 of the 60 bonds were actually converted on July 1, 2020. Compute diluted earnings per share for 2020. (Round answer to 2 decimal places, e.g. $2.55.)