Assignment 8: Recruitment (Selection) need a different answers

For the same job description from Assignment 7, please create interview questions. Interview questions should target key attributes that are important to the role. There should be questions for the following aspects:

Cultural fitTechnical expertiseBehavioural attributes

While you may google to get ideas of interview questions, do not directly copy and paste interview questions from the internet, please use the web as resources to supplement your learning in the course and tailor questions to the job description.

10-15 questions total should be created for marking. The expectation is that the questions submitted for marking is the full question set that you, as an HR professional would use to interview candidates for the role.

Marks Assigned (10 total):

Grammar (1)HR Legislation Compliance (2)Content (Cultural, Technical and Behavioural) (7)

You are a Health & safety Specialist. The date is March 12th 2020 and the world Health Organization has just announced that COVID-19 is a world pandemic the day before. The CEO of the company you work at has called you into her office and requested that you come up with a plan to deal with this issue. She has been hearing about staff complaining that the company is not doing enough to protect them. She asks you to come up with a policy to take care of these trouble makers . She wants you to have something in place to deal with the virus problem and with the complaints. You go back to your office and ponder what to do. State what your course of action would be. How would you go about addressing this request? What are the issues you need to think about as you come up with your policy recommendation? Do not create the policy; just state all the factors you need to consider. Keep in mind that you have CHRP and CRSP designations. The CEO does not.

500 words for this case study.

On 1 July 2018 Fraser Ltd acquired an item of equipment with an acquisition cost of $400,000. The equipment can be used for 8 years. On 30 June 2019, the end of financial year, the fair value of the equipment was $357,000. The equipment was sold for $330,000 on 1 January 2020. Non-current asset is depreciated evenly over the useful life and has no residual value. The company uses the revaluation model to record non-current asset. The income tax rate is 30%. Ignore GST.

Required: Prepare relevant journal entries to record non-current asset in 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 financial years in accordance with AASB 116 and AASB 136. (Narrations are required, tax effect entries are required.)

In early 2001, Ride Along Corporation (Ride Along or the “Company”), a domestic company that does not meet the definition of a public business entity, began manufacturing and selling bicycles to retail stores nationally. Ride Along’s fiscal year ends on December 31, and it has been experiencing growth over the past decade. Ride Along is required to prepare and issue annual consolidated financial statements to its shareholders and the local bank. These financial statements are to be prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Ride Along is 75 percent owned by a private equity firm and 25 percent owned by its founder. The founder and private equity firm plan to either take Ride Along public in an initial public offering (IPO) or sell it to an existing public company in five years. Ride Along tests goodwill for impairment annually on November 30 and has determined that each of its goodwill reporting units is a legal entity. On February 1, 2012, Ride Along acquired 100 percent ownership of a bicycle tire manufacturer, Mini Tires Company (Mini). The purposes of the acquisition were to reduce the cost associated with buying bicycle tires from third-party suppliers and for Ride Along to expand its operations by selling tires directly to retail stores. Mini met the definition of a business1 but did not meet the definition of a public business entity (PBE). The founder of Mini will work as an employee of Ride Along and has signed a two-year noncompete agreement. Ride Along paid cash of $20 million (purchase price), which resulted in goodwill of $6 million and an intangible asset (a customer list) of $2 million. During 2013, Ride Along continued to gain market share in the bicycle industry and determined it wanted to own retail stores. On June 1, 2013, Ride Along acquired 100 percent ownership of 10 independently owned retail stores and recorded $10 million of goodwill as part of the acquisitions. In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-02, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Accounting for Goodwill — a consensus of the Private Company Council. During 2014, the founder of Mini resigned from Ride Along and started a new business after his noncompete agreement expired. With his departure, 45 percent of the customers on Mini’s original customer list, which was classified as an intangible asset on Ride Along’s statement of financial condition, provided notice that they would no longer do business with Ride Along. This migration resulted in an impairment of the customer list intangible. These customers represent 35 percent of total future revenue for the Tire reporting unit and the loss of these customers reduced the fair value of Mini by 35 percent. No other management changes are expected. Even with the loss of Mini’s customers, Ride Along performed well because of the strength of the retail stores and strong bicycle sales leading to results that exceeded expectations. Therefore, Ride Along increased its revenue and operating income in its five-year forecast; cash flows continue to be positive.

Furthermore, general economic conditions are stable for all reporting units, including debt and equity markets. Ride Along is a private company that does not actively trade its shares; however, because of stable economic conditions and the Company’s increasing revenue and operating income, had Ride Along traded its shares, the value of these shares would have steadily increased. Labor costs and material for each reporting unit have increased in line with inflation and are expected to do so for the foreseeable future. As of December 31, 2014, before considering the departure of Mini’s founder, the fair value of Ride Along was $210 million (fair value by reporting unit is as follows: Bicycle, Tire, and Retail stores were 55 percent, 10 percent, and 35 percent, respectively) and the carrying value, including goodwill, was $145 million (carrying value by reporting unit is as follows: Bicycle, Tire, and Retail stores were $65 million, $20 million, and $60 million, respectively). Required 1. ASU 2014-02 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. What should Ride Along consider before deciding whether to adopt the private-company alternative in ASU 2014-02? 2. Assuming Ride Along adopts the goodwill alternative in ASU 2014-02, may Ride Along subsequently change its accounting for goodwill and revert to PBE GAAP? If so, how would Ride Along account for this change and what disclosures must it include in the consolidated financial statements? For the questions below, assume Ride Along early adopted ASU 2014-02 in 2014. 3. For the year ended December 31, 2014, describe (in detail) the analysis that Ride Along would perform to support whether its goodwill is recoverable or impaired as well as the accounting conclusion reached assuming it elected to test goodwill at the entity level. If the Company concludes that its goodwill is impaired, what would it record as the amount of the goodwill impairment? In addition, provide a separate analysis and related accounting conclusion (including the amount of the goodwill impairment charge if goodwill is impaired) assuming Ride Along elected to test goodwill at the reporting unit level. 4. Assume Ride Along (or one of its reporting units) has zero or negative equity. How would Ride Along perform its goodwill impairment assessment?

Case 18-5 Ride Along

In early 2001, Ride Along Corporation (Ride Along or the “Company”), a domestic company that does not meet the definition of a public business entity, began manufacturing and selling bicycles to retail stores nationally. Ride Along’s fiscal year ends on December 31, and it has been experiencing growth over the past decade. Ride Along is required to prepare and issue annual consolidated financial statements to its shareholders and the local bank. These financial statements are to be prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Ride Along is 75 percent owned by a private equity firm and 25 percent owned by its founder. The founder and private equity firm plan to either take Ride Along public in an initial public offering (IPO) or sell it to an existing public company in five years. Ride Along tests goodwill for impairment annually on November 30 and has determined that each of its goodwill reporting units is a legal entity.

On February 1, 2012, Ride Along acquired 100 percent ownership of a bicycle tire manufacturer, Mini Tires Company (Mini). The purposes of the acquisition were to reduce the cost associated with buying bicycle tires from third-party suppliers and for Ride Along to expand its operations by selling tires directly to retail stores. Mini met the definition of a business1 but did not meet the definition of a public business entity (PBE). The founder of Mini will work as an employee of Ride Along and has signed a two-year noncompete agreement. Ride Along paid cash of $20 million (purchase price), which resulted in goodwill of $6 million and an intangible asset (a customer list) of $2 million.

During 2013, Ride Along continued to gain market share in the bicycle industry and determined it wanted to own retail stores. On June 1, 2013, Ride Along acquired 100 percent ownership of 10 independently owned retail stores and recorded $10 million of goodwill as part of the acquisitions.

In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-02, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Accounting for Goodwill — a consensus of the Private Company Council.

During 2014, the founder of Mini resigned from Ride Along and started a new business after his noncompete agreement expired. With his departure, 45 percent of the customers on Mini’s original customer list, which was classified as an intangible asset on Ride Along’s statement of financial condition, provided notice that they would no longer do business with Ride Along. This migration resulted in an impairment of the customer list intangible. These customers represent 35 percent of total future revenue for the Tire reporting unit and the loss of these customers reduced the fair value of Mini by 35 percent. No other management changes are expected. Even with the loss of Mini’s customers, Ride Along performed well because of the strength of the retail stores and strong bicycle sales leading to results that exceeded expectations. Therefore, Ride Along increased its revenue and operating income in its five-year forecast; cash flows continue to be positive.

Furthermore, general economic conditions are stable for all reporting units, including debt and equity markets. Ride Along is a private company that does not actively trade its shares; however, because of stable economic conditions and the Company’s increasing revenue and operating income, had Ride Along traded its shares, the value of these shares would have steadily increased. Labor costs and material for each reporting unit have increased in line with inflation and are expected to do so for the foreseeable future.

As of December 31, 2014, before considering the departure of Mini’s founder, the fair value of Ride Along was $210 million (fair value by reporting unit is as follows: Bicycle, Tire, and Retail stores were 55 percent, 10 percent, and 35 percent, respectively) and the carrying value, including goodwill, was $145 million (carrying value by reporting unit is as follows: Bicycle, Tire, and Retail stores were $65 million, $20 million, and $60 million, respectively).

Required

1. ASU 2014-02 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. What should Ride Along consider before deciding whether to adopt the private-company alternative in ASU 2014-02?

2. Assuming Ride Along adopts the goodwill alternative in ASU 2014-02, may Ride Along subsequently change its accounting for goodwill and revert to PBE GAAP? If so, how would Ride Along account for this change and what disclosures must it include in the consolidated financial statements?

For the questions below, assume Ride Along early adopted ASU 2014-02 in 2014.

3. For the year ended December 31, 2014, describe (in detail) the analysis that Ride Along would perform to support whether its goodwill is recoverable or impaired as well as the accounting conclusion reached assuming it elected to test goodwill at the entity level. If the Company concludes that its goodwill is impaired, what would it record as the amount of the goodwill impairment? In addition, provide a separate analysis and related accounting conclusion (including the amount of the goodwill impairment charge if goodwill is impaired) assuming Ride Along elected to test goodwill at the reporting unit level.

4. Assume Ride Along (or one of its reporting units) has zero or negative equity. How would Ride Along perform its goodwill impairment assessment?

On 1 July 2019, Gail Ltd acquired all the issued shares of Ray Ltd for $90 000. The financial statements of Ray Ltd showed the equity of Ray Ltd at that date to be:
Share capital-10000 $5 50,000
General reserve 25000
Retained earning 15000
All the assets and liabilities of Ray Ltd were recorded at amounts equal to their fair values at that date.
During the year ending 30 June 2020, Ray Ltd undertook the following actions.
• On 1 January 2020, transferred $5 000 from the general reserve existing at 1 July 2019 to retained earnings.
Required:
(a) Prepare the pre-acquisition entries at 1 July 2019.
(b) Prepare the pre-acquisition entries at 30 June 2020.

Describe what sets an entrepreneur apart from a business founder and discuss how entrepreneurship can be a catalyst to social good

Pearl Corporation is a publicly traded company that follows IFRS. On December 31, 2019, Pearl’ financial records indicated the following information related to the company’s defined benefit pension plan:

On July 1, 2020, Pearl acquired the operations of Trap Ltd. As one of the conditions of the purchase, Pearl agreed that Trap’s employees would be included in Pearl’s defined benefit pension plan, and would be granted credit for the past service of Trap’s employees. The actuary estimated the value of the prior service amount granted on July 1, 2020 to be $193,000.

Pearl’ actuary provided the following information on December 31, 2020:

Prepare a pension worksheet for Pearl Corporation for the year ending December 31, 2020.
Prepare the journal entry to record the pension expense for 2020.

Scenario

Pigs R Us is a second generation, family-owned Richmond-based company with about 400 employees. It slaughters, manufactures, and sells pork food products.  Pigs R Us (PRU) is a low-tech, hands-on, “bricks and mortar” type of company with solid brand recognition, an impeccable reputation for high quality and ethical standards. The processes used in manufacturing are with the highest ISO20002 standards, and the plant is maintained immaculately. The personnel are comprised of an older work force (average employee age is late 40s). There is little staff turnover, though lately there have been a diverse group of younger workers joining the company. There has been an impressive record of speedy state and federal new-product approvals, and solid working relationships with their large and small customers.

The company prides itself on the close "southern family," culture of the business. The company logo features a pig with a smile on its face surrounded by small pictures of some of its oldest serving employees. The organization's structure is “old-fashioned”. It is hierarchical with rigid management divisions and reporting policies. Research, manufacturing, and sales and marketing operate in traditional fashion, with employees reporting to supervisors or mid-level managers. By the 1990s, sales and distribution grew from Richmond into a regional market, establishing a competitive advantage throughout the US South. Despite downward economic times in the US and the South, the pork business does well. This is due largely to the fact that Pork is one of the cheaper meat products and there is a variety of ways it can be prepared.

Owned by the Morris family for the last 60 years, Pigs R Us is a key player in the Richmond based food industry. Various Morris family members sit on the board of charities throughout the city and it is not unusual to see the name at society events. Further, the Company sponsors its own Little League Team and has built a recreation center and assisted living facility for the elderly, guaranteeing space for all former 20+ year veteran workers of the company for free. So, it was no surprise, that the whole community was devastated when it was announced by the Morris family that Vance Morris the CEO of Pigs R Us was killed while driving back from a Pigs R US board meeting. The plant closed for a week to show respect and to determine how it would function until the family could make its succession decisions.

Vance Morris was the only son of James and Kathleen Morris. Vance took over the business 10 years before when his father had a heart attack and died. Fresh out of graduate school when his father died. He took over the business that he had known well much to the pleasure and keen eye of the workers. Vance made some marketing changes that allowed for the growth of the company and with the help of the employees brought the plant into its current state. Vance had just gotten married the year before to a young Richmond artist he had met at one of his charity benefits. He had no heirs and no plans for succession as he was in his mid-thirties and had just gotten married. While Vance had cousins in the area they were all professional people who knew nothing about business or pork. The workers could only surmise that the company would be sold, but speculation as to whom it might be did not include someone from out of the city.

Before the deal was announced publicly, John’s widow, Arleen, reported to the workers that a Chinese company, Shanghou (SHU), would be buying Pigs R US. Mrs. Morris assured the workers that the SHU promised not to cut workers' wages and benefits, and to keep the current management team in place. She said that SHU also promised to keep Pork R US headquarters in Richmond. Arleen assured the workers that SHU promised that there would be no changes for the first year and that almost everything would remain the same. From her talks with SHU, Arleen is a bit worried about future changes that SHU may implement.

SHU is a large manufacturer and distributor of food and beverages with, headquarters in Hong Kong. Manufacturing plants operate in mainland China, and the company has additional offices in Europe and Australia. By acquiring the smaller, well-respected Pork R US, SHU aims to diversify and expand its consumer base by including tailor-made pork products globally to meet market projections of a customer upsurge in sustainable, non-beef meats in the next decade. Given SHU’s current availability of telecommunications software and hardware, the deployment of the Pigs R US refrigeration trucks should not be an insurmountable issue.

Many PRU employees, especially the older workers and some of the older managers, are dispirited about the acquisition, and anxious about working for foreigners, downsizing, less face-to-face interaction, language differences, and more electronic systems that are to be put in place. Some of the of the more experienced workers are considering a move or an early retirement due to the ongoing rumors about the acquisition. To make matters worse, recent news media have printed stories about tainted food made by other companies in China. Employees fear loss of product quality and damage to PRU’s reputation as well as the loss of the family southern culture that was their pride and joy.

SHU has told PRU workers that for now, most employees will be retained. However, all employees will be evaluated, and reassigned to teams as the new flat structure is put in place. The new CEO is Harvard-educated Daniel Chinn. He supports increasing the company's competitive edge by discovering and developing existing individual potential through group collaboration and team synergy. Ever since his days as a brilliant, hard-driving MBA student; he has been known to be an enthusiastic supporter of job training and career growth. Like many of SHU’s employees, David is in his early thirties. He speaks four languages and is ambitious, self-directed, tech-savvy, accustomed to working remotely, and experienced with a culturally diverse staff. David is eager to make his newest acquisition a success. He wants to move forward on the integration of "Pork R US’ workers into SHU because Chinn believes they are the “greatest asset have a rich knowledge base and experience can be tapped into to bring the company success." Chinn is concerned about the mix of culture and how his ideas of incorporating artificial intelligence and more robotics into the manufacturing processes will be received by management and the workers at the newly acquired plant.

Daniel Chinn is anxious to keep the “southern family” culture of Pigs R Us but at the same time wants to use the most modern of manufacturing techniques. He decided that the best way to do this was to start a pilot change operation in the packaging area to demonstrate to the workers the effectiveness of technology. He bought and set up for use 3D printers in the packaging room. The printers were able to create reusable shipping materials and operate in conjunction with the product conveyor for fast and easy packaging. He brought in two trained 3D printer operators from China to handle the work along with two robots that would move the package material and create shrink-wrapped pallets for loading on to the trucks.

The current packaging department employs 5 workers on day shift and 3 newer workers on the night shift. All the day shift workers are in their early fifties and have been working for Pigs R Us all their lives. John Mellon, the lead line man, exemplifies the group. He is 53 years old. He has a family of three children most all are grown. One works in the business with him as the manager of accounting department having gotten a college degree unlike his father. John rarely travels out of state and has never been abroad. He is not terribly familiar with technology. He has a Smart TV but his children have set it up for him to use Netflix.

When the new employees arrived, the packaging staff tried to get to know them but had little in common and found it hard to communicate with them. The new workers ate together at lunch and always with food they brought with them despite offers of food brought in by the older employees to show their “southern roots”. Things are strained between the groups because the older employees thought they were being snubbed and many are uncertain as to the customs and language unable to communicate their real feelings. This all operated to create a schism among the workers which escalated into job performance and employment commitment issues when the six-month results from the 3D/Robot pilot showed the following success in favor of new technology.

The results showed such a marked process improvement with the added benefit of creating materials that were sustainable. The immediate reaction among the older workers was fear for their jobs. The new workers suddenly were the enemy. Chinn was pleased with the new process and indicated that the 3D printing approach would be continued. The word of the decision spread among the families in the company and the “southern family” culture was now closing ranks on the newcomers both in the packaging room and in the other departments thus confirming their fears when news of the buyout surfaced.

1. Write SWOT analysis

2. Write the current state of the company as supported by the SWOT and its relevance to the scenario.

3. Identifie the OD challenges in the case.

4. Recommend and describe the quantitative approach for diagnosing the situation at Pinyin Foods.