In SUMMER 2018 session, Sonia Buchanan, took four final exams. The exam mean and standarddeviation for each course (class) along with Sonia’s score on each exam are listed in table below.Assume that the grades on each exam are NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED.
|
Exam |
Mean for cohort (class) |
Standard deviation for cohort (class) |
Daniel’s score |
|
Introduction to Sociology Life and Teachings of Christ Principles of Psychology Freshman Composition II |
75 85.6 83 70.4 |
4.2 6.7 4.9 6.4 |
79 91 88 76 |
Discuss the importance of the normal distribution curve in the Behavioural Sciences
With respect to the normal curve what is a percentile rank? Give an example using a diagram
Calculate Sonia's percentile rank for the Life and Teachings of Christ
On which exam did Sonia do best relative to the other students in the class
In: Statistics and Probability
In an effort to get a better understanding of the factors affecting a high school student choice of college selection, 600 students were reported to apply for college admission from Sacramento county and they were asked to provide information on SAT scores and parent’s income. Portion of that data is reported in the table below. Use Chi-square test to examine how the categorical variable parent’s income affects the choice of professional degree among those who have applied for admission. Run the Chi square test and answer the three parts.
|
Income Attribute |
Liberal Arts |
Business Administration |
Law and Engineering |
Total |
|
<65,000 |
67 |
38 |
55 |
160 |
|
65,001-90,000 |
35 |
88 |
67 |
190 |
|
90,001> |
33 |
177 |
40 |
250 |
|
Total |
135 |
303 |
162 |
600 |
| Income | University Choice | Count |
| less than 65000 | CSU Sacramento | 67 |
| 65001 to 90,000 | CSU Sacramento | 35 |
| 90001 and above | CSU Sacramento | 33 |
| less than 65000 | UC Davis | 38 |
| 65001 to 90,000 | UC Davis | 88 |
| 90001 and above | UC Davis | 177 |
| less than 65000 | San Francisco Univ | 55 |
| 65001 to 90,000 | San Francisco Univ | 67 |
| 90001 and above | San Francisco Univ | 40 |
In: Statistics and Probability
In: Accounting
Describe the similarities and differences between
A. A prospective cohort study and a retrospective cohort study
B. A prospective cohort study and a case control study
C A case control study and retrospective cohort study
D. Is a case control study always retrospective? Why or why not?
In: Math
Which option below best represents the main difference between cohort studies and clinical trials?
a. The investigator and other study staff are blinded in a cohort study but not in a clinical trial
b. Cohort studies are conducted with humans and clinical trials are conducted with animals
c. Study investigators control the participant’s exposure in clinical trial, but not in a cohort study
d. Study investigators follow up participants over time in clinical trials, but not in cohort studies
In: Nursing
1) Determine the potential at a point 35 cm from;
a) a +15 x10-6C charge point b) at a 12 uC charge point
2) Determine the minimum work to be done by an external force that has a charge q = 300 uC from a distance (not defined) to a point 50 cm with a load of 20 x 10-6 C.
3) We have 2 charging points, where Q1 = -25.0 uC and the other
has Q2 = +50.0 uC are separated by 12 cm (see image). If the
electric field at point P is zero (0).
Determine the distance at which we can find Q1 from point P. Note:
u = micro
In: Physics
Is the SAT Really the Problem? Family breakdown causes serious disadvantages when it comes to college. By William McGurn May 25, 2020 12:32 pm ET When the University of California announced it will stop using the SAT and ACT for admissions, it sent tremors through the world of higher education. If only because of its sheer size—the UC system covers 285,000 students over several campuses—others are bound to follow. Thursday’s decision by the Board of Regents was taken, as are so many decisions in academia these days, in the name of equity and diversity. Requiring SAT scores, the argument goes, discriminates against low-income, black and Latino children who perform poorly on the tests because they lack advantages such as prep courses. To amp up the pressure, a coalition of students and activist groups filed suit in November against the Board of Regents, challenging the SAT requirement on these grounds. Undeniably wealth is a big advantage. But if the idea is to address what’s keeping children from a college degree, instead of papering over the achievement gap, it might be better to address the elephant in the room: family. It’s taboo to raise it, but for all the invocations of “science” and “data-driven decisions,” seldom is any recognition given to what the data tell us about the most privileged kids of all: those living with their biological parents under the same roof. “Family structure is about as important as family income in predicting who graduates from college today,” says W. Bradford Wilcox, a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, professor of sociology at the University of Virginia and a senior fellow at the Institute for Family Studies. “In the absence of SAT scores, which can pinpoint kids from difficult family backgrounds with great academic potential, family stability is likely to loom even larger in determining who makes it past the college finish line in California.” The data are pretty conclusive. The more intact the family, the better the education outcomes. In a new IFS study (Links to an external site.) released Monday, research psychologist Nicholas Zill reports that when it comes to graduation from top colleges, “students from intact families are twice as likely to do so as those from all other family types combined.” By dropping SATs, UC hopes to produce a student body that includes higher percentages of blacks and Latinos. This requires discrediting the SATs as an indicator of college performance (a point contested by the UC Academic Senate). It also requires finding a way to make room for the students it wants by reducing the number of Asian-Americans (13.6% of California’s population but 29.5% of UC undergraduates). This is why the Asian American Coalition for Education warned the regents that, without the SAT, Asian-American applicants will “become easy victims of various radical acts of racial balancing.” Wenyuan Wu, who addressed the regents on the coalition’s behalf, tells me she cringes whenever the anti-SAT crowd invokes the “racial/socioeconomic biases argument.” She asks: “What about those Chinatown kids whose parents toil in ethnic enclaves with low incomes and tremendous language barriers?” Which raises a further indelicate question: Is it a coincidence that Asian-Americans, who disproportionately earn entry into UC, disproportionately come from intact families? If it’s unjust that rich kids get test prep from their parents, why doesn’t the university simply come up with a good prep course and provide it free to anyone who wants it? If the rejoinder is that the wealthy kids enjoy the further advantage of better schools, why do so many SAT opponents also reject measures that might help level the playing field—vouchers and charter schools come to mind—by giving underserved kids the opportunity of going to a good school too? The modern American university isn’t afraid to weigh in when it comes to issues outside its direct purview. Two days before UC announced its decision on the SAT, it boasted of having completely divested from fossil fuels. But when it comes to addressing a major factor keeping students out of its system and thus widening the achievement gap—crickets. As Charles Murray noted in “Coming Apart” (2012), the data showing the advantage to children of living with their biological parents across a range of outcomes are broadly accepted by social scientists. But those data are “resolutely” ignored by “network news programs, editorial writers for the major newspapers, and politicians of both major political parties.” Not to mention the UC regents. “Given the science,” Mr. Wilcox says, “why can’t universities bring themselves to tell the truth that if you’d like your kids to get a college degree—especially from a selective college—you’d do well to get and stay married?” COMMENT
In: Economics
In: Economics
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In: Math
Briefly describe the steps involved in the initiation of a contraction in a skeletal muscle fibre. List the steps in the order that they occur. Start with an action potential on the sarcolemma and end with a description about how cross-bridges form. Include details about the intracellular structures and ion/s involved. You should provide 8 pieces of relevant information to obtain 8 marks.
In: Anatomy and Physiology