INTRO
Jones stormed into McMillan’s office. “I’ve had it! We’ve been here three months and nothing changes. Why aren’t they listening? Why do they keep leaving? What’s wrong?”
BACKGROUND
NewForm IT, founded in 2012 by four friends, provides IT consulting services to small businesses in the local and regional area. Three of the founders left the firm in 2014/2015, selling their interests at a handsome profit. The remaining founder and former CHRO, James Stanton, left nine months ago after clashing with the second owner, Rodney Collier, who purchased the company in 2015.
Sheila Jones and Ronnie McMillan recently purchased NewForm; Jones became its third CEO.
Three of the founders loved playing with computers and systems. While in college and in the early years of their careers, they created websites, developed computer games, played with mainframes, and made spare cash by solving individual and corporate IT problems. Systems and IT came easily for them, and they discovered that what other people feared were simple problems to them. They knew that they could make money by doing what they knew best. Their vision was to help small organizations solve their IT problems, and they discovered that they could charge exorbitant fees for doing so.
• The first founder to leave sold to her partners in 2014.
• Two founders—including the CEO—sold their shares to a group led by Collier in 2015 and left at that time.
• Stanton also sold his shares to Collier in 2015 but remained at his job.
• All four founders became multimillionaires when they sold the company.
• At the time of the 2015 sale, the company employed 53 IT consultants, most working 60-hour weeks and earning large bonuses.
Stanton and Collier had problems with each other from the outset. They differed on how to price consulting jobs, how to pay consultants, work hours, benefits (401k, leave policy, health insurance, etc.), among other things. Stanton saw little need to change what was successfully working; Collier wanted a fresh new corporate image. Corporate culture slowly began to move away from its original entrepreneurial style. Stanton and Collier continued to clash until nine months ago when Stanton walked away. Collier and his group sold NewForm six months later to a group led by Jones.
Jones is a senior executive with 23 years of industry experience, mostly with large, high- tech firms. When the founders formed the company they had asked her to join their team as a partner, but she declined. She had neither the time nor the inclination to do so. Today is different; she has made money in the industry, and her newly earned Ph.D. in leadership dynamics has given her the spirit and the insight to run the show. Because Collier wanted to sell and get out, Jones bought into NewForm at a discount and was ready to roll up her sleeves and get to work. McMillan, a long-term colleague, joined her as an equal partner and CHRO.
NewForm employs 83 people today, 61 of whom are IT consultants. These are highly skilled professionals, well paid and sought after in their field. While most have significant corporate experience, 49 have been with NewForm less than three years. Only four have been with NewForm for five years, and two have been with NewForm since its inception.
YOUR HRM CONSULTING FIRM
As a recent graduate, you have joined a 15-month-old startup HRM Consulting firm. You are excited about the opportunity this presents. Some of your team members are recent HRM graduates just like you, while others are SHRM-certified senior leaders who serve as mentors to the recent grads. The senior leaders, led by Patrick Conroy, have a financial stake in the firm and have established a plan that allows junior leaders to eventually earn the right to purchase a percentage of the firm and become a partner.
Early Monday mornings are set aside for virtual corporate meetings. This is when the partners and employees meet to focus on the firm no matter where they are in the world. These meetings are a combination of strategic think tanks, corporate planning sessions with problem analysis, mentoring, financial discussions, and discussions of any strategic decision that needs to be made. After 15 months, it is apparent that that these Monday meetings are the key that is leading to the team’s success.
This Monday morning is no different. Last week Conroy received a message from a company called NewForm IT and spent 30 minutes on the phone with McMillan, it’s CHRO. Conroy prepared an internal memo for the firm describing NewForm’s problems, and the group is prepared to discuss the issue at length.
As the conversation begins you consider your role in the firm. You know you try to do your best for your clients, yet one of your colleagues called you in for a brief but intense conversation about a recent client. Yes, you recognize that you may have missed a few social cues, might not have found the right words and advice for the client, and did not leave the client completely satisfied. But their challenge was particularly tough, and you probably should have had help from someone else in the firm. That job had been underbid, and the fee did not leave enough room for two consultants. You begin to wonder if this is the right career for you, or whether the senior team will ask you to leave. Your mind wanders.
While you muse on this, barely hearing the conversation in the room, Conroy looks directly at you and says, “You’ve worked with IT people, what do you think about the situation?” Panic sets in.
TODAY’S ISSUES AT NEWFORM
From 2012 until 2015, NewForm IT grew to 53 consultants. It had virtually no turnover during that time; two consultants were terminated for cause, one for discipline, and two left voluntarily when their spouses received out-of-state job offers. Stability was one of NewForm’s strengths; many consultants worked numerous jobs with one client, making it easier to produce quality results because they understood their clients’ needs and nuances; clients were satisfied. Employee compensation was higher than the market, and NewForm was making money for everyone.
The 2015 sale brought shock and change. As the only remaining founder, Stanton attempted to reassure everyone that nothing would change, but consultants identified subtle variations from the beginning. In the midst of changing internal rules, Stanton tried to maintain the status quo. Yet he had no real authority, and his suggestions fell on deaf ears. Early in 2018, he commissioned the Gallup Company to do its formal twelve question engagement survey. The results confirmed what he already knew: morale was suffering, and employees were no longer engaged. He wished he had done the survey and received baseline data 3-5 years ago.
Metrics are also down. Repeat clients, one of the company’s strengths, fell from a high of 57 percent (that is, 57 percent of clients engaged NewForm for a second job) in 2014 to 31 percent in 2017. Billable hours per consultant have also dropped, from 54 to 37 hours per week. 2018 numbers are not yet available but are trending a similar direction to 2017. NewForm is barely making a profit.
Stanton did what he knows best. With 17 years of HR experience, including 10 at the senior level, he thought he had seen it all. His techie friends had known that he was the perfect one to join them when they began the company, and no one was disappointed. In the early years at NewForm, he did everything that he wanted to do without anyone looking over his shoulder. Life changed when they sold the company, but he couldn’t imagine how wrong things would go or how fast. After commissioning the Gallup Survey, he believed he had the ammunition to return to the previous climate. But Collier had other ideas and a different perspective on how to view the survey results. Nine months ago Stanton decided to leave the firm.
Six months later, Collier, willing to take a small loss, decided to sell. Jones and McMillan, long-time friends of Stanton and the other founders, became willing buyers. They opened the books, spoke to Stanton, found a strong employee base, identified initial problems and saw nothing severe. This became their opportunity of a lifetime. Opportunity? Or endless problems?
THE MEETING
When Jones stormed into McMillian’s office, they had a long conversation about what was really going on. They decided to meet with Stanton to get his perspective. Stanton was more than happy to provide his views.
Stanton: Let me reiterate what I told you when you were deciding to purchase NewForm. This is a great company. When we founded it, we hired the best of the best. I used my contacts, years of experience and friends I knew in the recruitment field to hire great talent. The other owners did the same. We brought in people who loved the work, were independent and understood clients. When we gave them a job, we left them alone to do it. And they did it well.
Jones: How did the rest of the executive team fit in?
Stanton: We all (owners/executive team) bid on contracts, sometimes individually, sometimes in pairs. Since I was in charge of staffing, they looked to me both for scheduling needs and for identifying specific talent. Many of our clients had unique needs, and we sought to find that perfect match. Whoever the key bidder was oversaw our consultant and was ultimately responsible for results. After a while, each owner had built relationships with individual consultants; these relationships made reporting and bidding easier. While this may seem like an unrealistic utopia, it really worked here. Our productivity and turnover figures bear this out.
McMillan: What happened?
Stanton: My three very close friends decided to head for new challenges— it was as simple as that. It was cost prohibitive for me to buy them out, so I decided to sell at that point. The offer was great, I would be set for life, and although I would no longer have any controlling interest, I would retain my title and the ability to do my job. I loved…I STILL love…this company, and in 2015, I couldn’t see any other place to go. I was a little concerned about how I would get along with Rodney Collier, but we had a few good meetings, and I thought he would listen and was open to keeping the company as it was. Employees met him, we vetted him and his associates as carefully as we could, and we decided to do the deal. I knew that things would change, but we didn’t really see any red flags.
Jones: I know from my own experience that a lot can be hidden when you look to buy a company. What did……
Stanton: (Interrupting) I’ll say. He came in with two senior vice presidents and within a week everything was different. For the first time in my NewForm career, people came in to my office and closed the door; we NEVER had the need for a closed-door meeting. I can’t begin to describe the nature of the complaints; some were style, some were content; some were specific, some were general. I did my best to calm them down, give them platitudes of “things change, and we couldn’t have this forever,” or “we all have to get used to a new way of doing things,” and “I’ve spoken to Rodney and I can see that it’s already getting better.” Sometimes I found myself simply listening for half an hour.
And then the parade started. Slowly at first, but it was clear. Our best people started leaving. They would come into my office carrying a wrapped bottle of scotch for me. After a while they would just walk in, put my present on my desk, and sit down…. and tell me about their new opportunity. Some took pay cuts, some left the area, but it was clear. Their career here was no longer what they wanted it to be. I have a great collection of scotch…but I don’t want it.
McMillan: Is that when you went to Gallup?
Stanton: I had to do something. Collier wasn’t listening to me. He couldn’t HEAR me. When we would meet, he seemed to get angrier and angrier, wondering why I couldn’t do anything about the turnover, as if it were my fault. I know that he’s a data guy, so I thought that good information about the lack of engagement would help him see some of the issues. But by then it was too late. I didn’t want to be fired, so I left.
Jones: Thank you, this is very helpful. Ronnie and I already understood that employees suffered under the previous regime, but your insight helps clarify the situation. Ronnie, did we know what we were getting into? Maybe we want to sell it to you, James?
Stanton: Oh, I’ve moved on. But I love many of those people and can help wherever you need me.
Jones: You have already been more than kind. Ronnie, your thoughts?
McMillan: James, do you know that new HRM consulting firm across the river? They have a great group of senior and junior people. I’m thinking of contacting them. What do you think?
Stanton: Yes, I’ve known a few of them for years, and they’ve got some bright young kids working for them. I’m sure they’ll have some ideas for you.
ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
In: Operations Management
1. Describe the differences between bottleneck effect and founder effect. What are their impacts on genetic diversity in a population? How is their impact on a population reversed over time?
2. Define sympatric and allopatric speciation and give an example of each type
3. Describe three key differences between phyletic gradualism and punctuated equilibrium.
In: Biology
Mark res9gned as CEO of Hewlett Packard amid accusations of sexual harassment and faked expense reports, thereby violating the company's ethical standards. before he did this, he attempted to negotiate to retain his position and compensate the company for cost related to legal disputes pertaining to his actions. His compensation package including stock was over $40 million, due to the success the company saw under his leadership. What ways did Mark's resignation hurt Hewlett Packard?
In: Accounting
In 2020, Melinda is a resident of Quebec and earns a gross salary of $100,000 from Bombardier. In her investment portfolio she sold 1,000 of her Spotify shares for $15,000 (she had originally purchased 2,000 shares a few years back for $8,000). She also received taxable dividends of $15,000 (eligible dividends). On October 1, 2020, Melinda made a Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP) contribution of $10,500 which she will claim on her 2020 tax return. On the same day, she also made a contribution to her Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA) for $2,000. Which statement is false?
a.Melinda’s dividends have been grossed-up and are eligible for a dividend tax credit on the $15,000 Melinda has capital gain of $7,000
b.Melinda has a taxable capital gain of $5,500
c.Melinda’s total income is $120,500
d.Melinda’s taxable income is $110,000
In: Finance
What trends will shape the Global Gig Economy from 2020 on?
In: Economics
An Australia mining company, QMC is thinking about opening a new gold mine in South Africa. The mine is expected to produce 100,000 ounces of gold per year for 5 years. The current price of gold is US$1700 per ounce and the company will hedge its sales at this price for the 5-year period. The mine is expected to cost A$ 100,000,000 to set up and extraction costs are expected to be US$1350 per ounce for the life of the mine. The appropriate discount rate is 0.15. The current exchange rate is US$ 0.73 /A$. Profits are taxed at 30%. In order to decide the viability of this project, QMC needs to know the NPV. Calculate the NPV to the nearest dollar.
In: Finance
A company paid the $1,350 premium on a three-year insurance policy on April 1, 2020. The policy gave protection beginning on that date. How many dollars of the premium will appear as an expense on the calendar year 2020 income statement assuming the accrual basis of accounting? Assuming the cash basis of accounting?
In: Accounting
Bogart is a listed company that reports using IFRS and has a reporting date of 30 September 2020. Bogart purchased 18% of Lupin’s 100 million $1 ordinary shares for $43 million cash on 1 October 2018, gaining significant influence. Lupin had retained earnings of $85 million and no other components of equity, on the date of purchase.
The investment in Lupin was accounted for correctly in Bogart’s individual financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2019, when Lupin had retained earnings of $150 million and no other components of equity.
Bogart acquired control over Lupin on 1 October 2019, purchasing a further 67% of its ordinary shares. Cash consideration of $160 million was correctly included in calculating goodwill. Purchase consideration included 3 million of Bogart’s own $1 ordinary shares, with a fair value of $1.40 each. No accounting entries were posted for this share consideration.
Bogart derecognised the carrying amount of the existing 18% holding in Lupin and included it in calculating the goodwill of the business combination. The carrying amount of the net assets of Lupin was also used in calculating goodwill. The fair value of the existing 18% holding was $73 million at 1 October 2019 and the fair value of the identifiable net assets of Lupin was $285 million. The excess of the fair value of net assets over the carrying amount was due to equipment with a remaining useful life of ten years. The fair value of the non-controlling interest in Lupin on 1 October 2019 was $63.8 million and was included in calculating goodwill.
On 30 September 2020, Bogart purchased an additional 5% of the ordinary shares of Lupin. Consideration transferred for these additional shares was $19 million cash, which was expensed to the consolidated statement of profit or loss. On 30 September 2020, Lupin had retained earnings of $185 million and no other components of equity.
Required:
Discuss, with calculations, how the purchase of the additional share capital in Lupin should be accounted for in the consolidated financial statements. Show the accounting entry required to correct any error.
In: Accounting
Bogart is a listed company that reports using IFRS and has a reporting date of 30 September 2020. Bogart purchased 18% of Lupin’s 100 million $1 ordinary shares for $43 million cash on 1 October 2018, gaining significant influence. Lupin had retained earnings of $85 million and no other components of equity, on the date of purchase.
The investment in Lupin was accounted for correctly in Bogart’s individual financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2019, when Lupin had retained earnings of $150 million and no other components of equity.
Bogart acquired control over Lupin on 1 October 2019, purchasing a further 67% of its ordinary shares. Cash consideration of $160 million was correctly included in calculating goodwill. Purchase consideration included 3 million of Bogart’s own $1 ordinary shares, with a fair value of $1.40 each. No accounting entries were posted for this share consideration.
Bogart derecognised the carrying amount of the existing 18% holding in Lupin and included it in calculating the goodwill of the business combination. The carrying amount of the net assets of Lupin was also used in calculating goodwill. The fair value of the existing 18% holding was $73 million at 1 October 2019 and the fair value of the identifiable net assets of Lupin was $285 million. The excess of the fair value of net assets over the carrying amount was due to equipment with a remaining useful life of ten years. The fair value of the non-controlling interest in Lupin on 1 October 2019 was $63.8 million and was included in calculating goodwill.
On 30 September 2020, Bogart purchased an additional 5% of the ordinary shares of Lupin. Consideration transferred for these additional shares was $19 million cash, which was expensed to the consolidated statement of profit or loss. On 30 September 2020, Lupin had retained earnings of $185 million and no other components of equity.
Required:
Discuss, with calculations, how the purchase of the additional share capital in Lupin should be accounted for in the consolidated financial statements. Show the accounting entry required to correct any error.
In: Accounting
Bogart is a listed company that reports using IFRS and has a reporting date of 30 September 2020. Bogart purchased 18% of Lupin’s 100 million $1 ordinary shares for $43 million cash on 1 October 2018, gaining significant influence. Lupin had retained earnings of $85 million and no other components of equity, on the date of purchase.
The investment in Lupin was accounted for correctly in Bogart’s individual financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2019, when Lupin had retained earnings of $150 million and no other components of equity.
Bogart acquired control over Lupin on 1 October 2019, purchasing a further 67% of its ordinary shares. Cash consideration of $160 million was correctly included in calculating goodwill. Purchase consideration included 3 million of Bogart’s own $1 ordinary shares, with a fair value of $1.40 each. No accounting entries were posted for this share consideration.
Bogart derecognised the carrying amount of the existing 18% holding in Lupin and included it in calculating the goodwill of the business combination. The carrying amount of the net assets of Lupin was also used in calculating goodwill. The fair value of the existing 18% holding was $73 million at 1 October 2019 and the fair value of the identifiable net assets of Lupin was $285 million. The excess of the fair value of net assets over the carrying amount was due to equipment with a remaining useful life of ten years. The fair value of the non-controlling interest in Lupin on 1 October 2019 was $63.8 million and was included in calculating goodwill.
On 30 September 2020, Bogart purchased an additional 5% of the ordinary shares of Lupin. Consideration transferred for these additional shares was $19 million cash, which was expensed to the consolidated statement of profit or loss. On 30 September 2020, Lupin had retained earnings of $185 million and no other components of equity.
Required:
Discuss, with calculations, how the purchase of the additional share capital in Lupin should be accounted for in the consolidated financial statements. Show the accounting entry required to correct any error.
In: Accounting