Case:
Forty years ago, Starbucks was a single store in Seattle’s Pike Place Market selling premium roasted coffee. Today, it is a global roaster and retailer of coffee with some 21,536 stores, 43 percent of which are in 63 countries outside the United States. China (1,716 stores), Canada (1,330 stores),
Japan (1,079 stores), and the United Kingdom (808 stores) are large markets internationally for Starbucks. Starbucks set out on its current course in the 1980s when the company’s director of marketing, Howard Schultz, came back from a trip to Italy enchanted with the Italian coffeehouse experience. Schultz, who later became CEO, persuaded the company’s owners to experiment with the coffeehouse format—and the Starbucks experience was born. The strategy was to sell the company’s own premium roasted coffee and freshly brewed espressostyle coffee beverages, along with a variety of pastries, coffee accessories, teas, and other products, in a tastefully designed coffeehouse setting. From the outset, the company focused on selling “a third place experience,” rather than just the coffee. The formula led to spectacular success in the United States, where Starbucks went from obscurity to one of the best-known brands in the country in a decade. Thanks to Starbucks, coffee stores became places for relaxation, chatting with friends, reading the newspaper, holding business meetings, or (more recently) browsing the web. In 1995, with 700 stores across the United States, Starbucks began exploring foreign market opportunities. The first target market was Japan. The company established a joint venture with a local retailer, Sazaby Inc. Each company held a 50 percent stake in the venture, Starbucks Coffee of Japan. Starbucks initially invested $10 million in this venture, its first foreign direct investment. The Starbucks format was then licensed to the venture, which was charged with taking over responsibility for growing Starbucks’ presence in Japan.
To make sure the Japanese operations replicated the “Starbucks experience” in North America, Starbucks transferred some employees to the Japanese operation. The licensing agreement required all Japanese store managers and employees to attend training classes similar to those given to U.S. employees. The agreement also required that stores adhere to the design parameters established in the United States. In 2001, the company introduced a stock option plan for all Japanese employees, making it the first company in Japan to do so. Skeptics doubted that Starbucks would be able to replicate its North American success overseas, but by June 2015, Starbucks had some 1,079 stores and a profitable business in Japan. After Japan, the company embarked on an aggressive foreign investment program. In 1998, it purchased Seattle Coffee, a British coffee chain with 60 retail stores, for $84 million. An American couple originally from Seattle had started Seattle Coffee with the intention of establishing a Starbucks-like chain in Britain. In the late 1990s, Starbucks opened stores in Taiwan, Singapore, Thailand, New Zealand, South Korea, Malaysia, and—most significantly— China. In Asia, Starbucks’ most common strategy was to license its format to a local operator in return for initial licensing fees and royalties on store revenues. As in Japan, Starbucks insisted on an intensive employee-training program and strict specifications regarding the format and layout of the store. By 2002, Starbucks was pursuing an aggressive expansion in mainland Europe. As its first entry point, Starbucks chose Switzerland. Drawing on its experience in Asia, the company entered into a joint venture with a Swiss company, Bon Appetit Group, Switzerland’s largest food service company. Bon Appetit was to hold a majority stake in the venture, and Starbucks would license its format to the Swiss company using a similar agreement to those it had used successfully in Asia. This was followed by a joint venture in other countries. The United Kingdom leads the charge in Europe with 808 Starbucks stores. By 2014, Starbucks emphasized the rapid growth of its operations in China, where it had 1,716 stores and planned to roll out another 500 in three years. The success of Starbucks in China has been attributed to a smart partnering strategy. China is not one homogeneous market; the culture of northern China is very different from that of the east, and consumer spending power inland is not on par with that of the big coastal cities. To deal with this complexity, Starbucks entered into three different joint ventures: in the north with Beijong Mei Da coffee, in the east with Taiwan-based UniPresident, and in the south with Hong Kong-based Maxim’s Caterers. Each partner brought different strengths and local expertise that helped the company gain insights into the tastes and preferences of local Chinese customers, and to adapt accordingly. Starbucks now believes that China will become its second-largest market after the United States by 2020.
Question:
2. Many would argue that Starbucks coffee is expensive, and yet customers get “value” for their money. How do you think Starbucks has been able to transfer this business model and value proposition to international markets?
In: Economics
Case:
Forty years ago, Starbucks was a single store in Seattle’s Pike Place Market selling premium roasted coffee. Today, it is a global roaster and retailer of coffee with some 21,536 stores, 43 percent of which are in 63 countries outside the United States. China (1,716 stores), Canada (1,330 stores),
Japan (1,079 stores), and the United Kingdom (808 stores) are large markets internationally for Starbucks. Starbucks set out on its current course in the 1980s when the company’s director of marketing, Howard Schultz, came back from a trip to Italy enchanted with the Italian coffeehouse experience. Schultz, who later became CEO, persuaded the company’s owners to experiment with the coffeehouse format—and the Starbucks experience was born. The strategy was to sell the company’s own premium roasted coffee and freshly brewed espressostyle coffee beverages, along with a variety of pastries, coffee accessories, teas, and other products, in a tastefully designed coffeehouse setting. From the outset, the company focused on selling “a third place experience,” rather than just the coffee. The formula led to spectacular success in the United States, where Starbucks went from obscurity to one of the best-known brands in the country in a decade. Thanks to Starbucks, coffee stores became places for relaxation, chatting with friends, reading the newspaper, holding business meetings, or (more recently) browsing the web. In 1995, with 700 stores across the United States, Starbucks began exploring foreign market opportunities. The first target market was Japan. The company established a joint venture with a local retailer, Sazaby Inc. Each company held a 50 percent stake in the venture, Starbucks Coffee of Japan. Starbucks initially invested $10 million in this venture, its first foreign direct investment. The Starbucks format was then licensed to the venture, which was charged with taking over responsibility for growing Starbucks’ presence in Japan.
To make sure the Japanese operations replicated the “Starbucks experience” in North America, Starbucks transferred some employees to the Japanese operation. The licensing agreement required all Japanese store managers and employees to attend training classes similar to those given to U.S. employees. The agreement also required that stores adhere to the design parameters established in the United States. In 2001, the company introduced a stock option plan for all Japanese employees, making it the first company in Japan to do so. Skeptics doubted that Starbucks would be able to replicate its North American success overseas, but by June 2015, Starbucks had some 1,079 stores and a profitable business in Japan. After Japan, the company embarked on an aggressive foreign investment program. In 1998, it purchased Seattle Coffee, a British coffee chain with 60 retail stores, for $84 million. An American couple originally from Seattle had started Seattle Coffee with the intention of establishing a Starbucks-like chain in Britain. In the late 1990s, Starbucks opened stores in Taiwan, Singapore, Thailand, New Zealand, South Korea, Malaysia, and—most significantly— China. In Asia, Starbucks’ most common strategy was to license its format to a local operator in return for initial licensing fees and royalties on store revenues. As in Japan, Starbucks insisted on an intensive employee-training program and strict specifications regarding the format and layout of the store. By 2002, Starbucks was pursuing an aggressive expansion in mainland Europe. As its first entry point, Starbucks chose Switzerland. Drawing on its experience in Asia, the company entered into a joint venture with a Swiss company, Bon Appetit Group, Switzerland’s largest food service company. Bon Appetit was to hold a majority stake in the venture, and Starbucks would license its format to the Swiss company using a similar agreement to those it had used successfully in Asia. This was followed by a joint venture in other countries. The United Kingdom leads the charge in Europe with 808 Starbucks stores. By 2014, Starbucks emphasized the rapid growth of its operations in China, where it had 1,716 stores and planned to roll out another 500 in three years. The success of Starbucks in China has been attributed to a smart partnering strategy. China is not one homogeneous market; the culture of northern China is very different from that of the east, and consumer spending power inland is not on par with that of the big coastal cities. To deal with this complexity, Starbucks entered into three different joint ventures: in the north with Beijong Mei Da coffee, in the east with Taiwan-based UniPresident, and in the south with Hong Kong-based Maxim’s Caterers. Each partner brought different strengths and local expertise that helped the company gain insights into the tastes and preferences of local Chinese customers, and to adapt accordingly. Starbucks now believes that China will become its second-largest market after the United States by 2020.
Question:
1. Starbucks prefers a combination approach to foreign market entry: the use of joint ventures and licensing. Do you agree with this approach? Why or why not?
In: Operations Management
Problem 14-5A (Part Level Submission) Empire Company is a manufacturer of smart phones. Its controller resigned in October 2017. An inexperienced assistant accountant has prepared the following income statement for the month of October 2017. EMPIRE COMPANY Income Statement For the Month Ended October 31, 2017 Sales revenue $ 780,000 Less: Operating expenses Raw materials purchases $ 264,000 Direct labor cost 190,000 Advertising expense 90,000 Selling and administrative salaries 75,000 Rent on factory facilities 60,000 Depreciation on sales equipment 45,000 Depreciation on factory equipment 31,000 Indirect labor cost 28,000 Utilities expense 12,000 Insurance expense 8,000 803,000 Net loss $( 23,000 ) Prior to October 2017, the company had been profitable every month. The company’s president is concerned about the accuracy of the income statement. As her friend, you have been asked to review the income statement and make necessary corrections. After examining other manufacturing cost data, you have acquired additional information as follows. 1. Inventory balances at the beginning and end of October were: October 1 October 31 Raw materials $ 18,000 $ 29,000 Work in process 20,000 14,000 Finished goods 30,000 50,000 2. Only 75% of the utilities expense and 60% of the insurance expense apply to factory operations. The remaining amounts should be charged to selling and administrative activities. Collapse question part (a) Prepare a schedule of cost of goods manufactured for October 2017. (Round answers to 0 decimal places, e.g. 125.) EMPIRE COMPANY Cost of Goods Manufactured Schedule $ $ : $ : $
In: Accounting
Problem 21-6A Hamilton Processing Company uses a weighted-average process cost system and manufactures a single product—an industrial carpet shampoo and cleaner used by many universities. The manufacturing activity for the month of October has just been completed. A partially completed production cost report for the month of October for the Mixing and Cooking department is as follows. Prepare a schedule that shows how the equivalent units were computed so that you can complete the “Quantities: Units accounted for” equivalent units section shown in the production cost report, and compute October unit costs. (Round unit costs to 2 decimal places, e.g. 2.25.) HAMILTON PROCESSING COMPANY Mixing and Cooking Department Production Cost Report For the Month Ended October 31 Equivalent Units Quantities Physical Units Materials Conversion Costs Units to be accounted for Work in process, October 1 (all materials, 70% conversion costs) 22,400 Started into production 168,000 Total units 190,400 Units accounted for Transferred out 134,400 134400 134400 Work in process, October 31 (60% materials, 40% conversion costs) 56,000 80640 53760 Total units accounted for 190,400 Costs Materials Conversion Costs Total Unit costs Total Costs $268,800 $117,600 $386,400 Equivalent units Unit costs $ $ $ Costs to be accounted for Work in process, October 1 $33,600 Started into production 352,800 Total costs $386,400 Complete the “Cost Reconciliation Schedule” part of the production cost report below. Cost Reconciliation Schedule Costs accounted for Transferred out $ Work in process, October 31 Materials $ Conversion costs Total costs $
In: Accounting
Bob's Chocolate Chips and More, a bakery specializing in gourmet pizza and chocolate chip cookies, started business October 1, 2017. The following transactions occurred during the month of October.
a.Common stock of $90,000 was sold at par to start the business.
b. Equipment consisting of mixers and ovens was acquired October 1 for $30,000 cash. The equipment is expected to last five years, after which it is expected to be sold for $5,000. Management uses the straight-line method to calculate depreciation expense.
c. Ingredients costing $15,000 were purchased on account during the month and all but $5,000 was paid for by the end of the month.
d. Rent is $500 a month. October, November, and December’s rent was paid October 5.
e. A payment of $800 for utilities was made during the month
f. Sixty percent of the ingredients purchased in part c were prepared and sold for $35,000 on account; $26,000 was collected on accounts receivable during the month.
g. Wages of $5,200 were paid during the month. Moreover, wages for the last three days of the month amounted to $400 and will be paid during the first week of November.
h. Borrowed $12,000 from the bank for additional working capital requirements, and $3,000 was repaid by month-end. Interest on the unpaid loan balance amounted to $450 at the end of October and was paid on November 5.
Required:
Prepare the required journal entries and adjusting entries as well as an October income statement and a balance sheet as of October 31, 2017 for Bob's Chocolate Chips and More. (Hint: You may want to consider using T-accounts to classify and accumulate the preceding transactions before preparing the statements.)
In: Accounting
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In: Accounting
What are the steps to calculate deferred income tax liability? Thanks
The Sample Corporation prepared the following income statements and income tax returns for Year 1 through Year 4.
| Income Statement | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | $1,000 | $1,000 | $1,000 | $1,000 |
| Operating expenses | 650 | 650 | 650 | 650 |
| Pretax net income | $350 | $350 | $350 | $350 |
| Provisions for income taxes | 140 | 140 | 140 | 140 |
| Net income | $210 | $210 | $210 | $210 |
| Income Tax Return | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | $1,000 | $1,000 | $1,000 | $1,000 |
| Operating expenses | 900 | 900 | 400 | 400 |
| Taxable income | $100 | $100 | $600 | $600 |
| Income tax payable | 40 | 40 | 240 | 240 |
| After-tax net income | $60 | $60 | $360 | $360 |
Calculate the balance in the company’s deferred income tax liability account at the end of each year.
Assume that the time value of money is 10% per year; calculate
the implicit value of the company’s tax deferral strategy.
Round your answer to the nearest whole number.
In: Accounting
explain the strategies which were employed in the South near the turn of the 20th century in attempts to thwart the migration of African Americans to the north? - This is for a Political Economy of Racism course
In: Economics
write a 4 pages report discussing the evaluation into south african coal export trends through the past25 years. Are the demands being met? guys as soon as possible.....
In: Other
A fishing boat had to travel 4 miles east and 9 miles south to avoid a storm. How much further did they travel than their original route?
In: Math