Questions
The Tax Cut and Jobs Act, 2017 The changes made by the Tax Cut and Jobs...

The Tax Cut and Jobs Act, 2017 The changes made by the Tax Cut and Jobs Act, 2017 to the tax provisions have changed tax rate for 2018 and people are getting a first hand experience of what it means to them. Go over the Act and address the questions below in full paragraphs: If you had the power to revise the Act, what changes would you make? How have the changes in taxes affected you personally? Many articles have been written analyzing the Tax Cut and Jobs Act, 2017. Infuse these expert opinions with your own.

In: Economics

The process for the cost of debt assumes the times interest earned is a good proxy...

  1. The process for the cost of debt assumes the times interest earned is a good proxy for measuring credit risk, what other financial variable if any should be considered? Does this assumption limit the results? ( each time the level of debt changes. Will this occur and does this limit the applicability of your results?
  2. The base level of interest rates, the risk free rate, changes over time. Is this important in calculating the optimal level. Since the estimate is based on the current environment does it matter if this changes?
  3. The beta may change over time, does keeping it constant limit your results or is that an acceptable assumption?

In: Finance

The time taken by an automobile mechanic to complete an oil change is random with mean...

The time taken by an automobile mechanic to complete an oil change is random with mean 29.5 minutes and standard deviation 3 minutes.

a. What is the probability that 50 oil changes take more than 1500 minutes?

b. What is the probability that a mechanic can complete 80 or more oil changes in 40 hours?

c. The mechanic wants to reduce the mean time per oil change so that the probability is 0.99 that 80 or more oil changes can be completed in 40 hours. What does the mean time need to be? Assume the standard deviation remains 3 minutes.

In: Math

4. Suppose that investment demand increases by $100. Assume that households have a marginal propensity to...


4. Suppose that investment demand increases by $100. Assume that households have a marginal propensity to consume of 80 percent. Compute the first three rounds of multiplier effects as follows:

a) What are the first cycle changes in spending? Total cumulative change equals?

b) What are the second cycle changes in spending? Total cumulative change equals?

c) What are the third cycle changes in spending? Total cumulative change equals?  

5. If a balanced budget government passes a new fiscal stimulus or restraint, it can lead to a deficit or surplus. In order to avoid an imbalance, how much of a tax hike or tax cut would be required? In the event of an extra $50 Billion of government purchases, $30 Billion of transfer payments, what should be the offsetting tax package?


4. Suppose that investment demand increases by $100. Assume that households have a marginal propensity to consume of 80 percent. Compute the first three rounds of multiplier effects as follows:

a) What are the first cycle changes in spending? Total cumulative change equals?

b) What are the second cycle changes in spending? Total cumulative change equals?

c) What are the third cycle changes in spending? Total cumulative change equals?  

5. If a balanced budget government passes a new fiscal stimulus or restraint, it can lead to a deficit or surplus. In order to avoid an imbalance, how much of a tax hike or tax cut would be required? In the event of an extra $50 Billion of government purchases, $30 Billion of transfer payments, what should be the offsetting tax packaing pleas answer them by typing

In: Economics

Contribution Margin Analysis Mathews Company manufactures only one product. For the year ended December 31, the...

Contribution Margin Analysis

Mathews Company manufactures only one product. For the year ended December 31, the contribution margin increased by $10,864 from the planned level of $464,436. The president of Mathews Company has expressed some concern about this increase and has requested a follow-up report.

The following data have been gathered from the accounting records for the year ended December 31:



Actual


Planned
Difference—Increase (Decrease)
Sales $911,800 $895,698 $16,102
Variable costs:
Variable cost of goods sold $349,200 $364,914 $(15,714)
Variable selling and administrative expenses 87,300 66,348 20,952
Total variable costs $436,500 $431,262 $(5,238)
Contribution margin $475,300 $464,436 $10,864
Number of units sold 9,700 11,058
Per unit:
Sales price $94 $81
Variable cost of goods sold 36 33
Variable selling and administrative expenses 9 6

Required:

1. Prepare a contribution margin analysis report for the year ended December 31.

Mathews Company
Contribution Margin Analysis
For the Year Ended December 31
Planned contribution margin $
Effect of changes in sales:
Sales quantity factor $
Unit price factor
Total effect of changes in sales
Effect of changes in variable cost of goods sold:
Variable cost quantity factor $
Unit cost factor
Total effect of changes in variable cost of goods sold
Effect of changes in selling and administrative expenses:
Variable cost quantity factor $
Unit cost factor
Total effect of changes in selling and administrative expenses
Actual contribution margin

In: Accounting

Mathews Company manufactures only one product. For the year ended December 31, the contribution margin increased...

Mathews Company manufactures only one product. For the year ended December 31, the contribution margin increased by $41,616 from the planned level of $764,784. The president of Mathews Company has expressed some concern about this increase and has requested a follow-up report.

The following data have been gathered from the accounting records for the year ended December 31:



Actual


Planned
Difference—Increase (Decrease)
Sales $1,555,200 $1,513,296 $41,904
Variable costs:
Variable cost of goods sold $590,400 $618,336 $(27,936)
Variable selling and administrative expenses 158,400 130,176 28,224
Total variable costs $748,800 $748,512 $(288)
Contribution margin $806,400 $764,784 $41,616
Number of units sold 14,400 16,272
Per unit:
Sales price $108 $93
Variable cost of goods sold 41 38
Variable selling and administrative expenses 11 8

Required:

1. Prepare a contribution margin analysis report for the year ended December 31.

Mathews Company
Contribution Margin Analysis
For the Year Ended December 31
Planned contribution margin $
Effect of changes in sales:
Sales quantity factor $
Unit price factor
Total effect of changes in sales
Effect of changes in variable cost of goods sold:
Variable cost quantity factor $
Unit cost factor
Total effect of changes in variable cost of goods sold
Effect of changes in selling and administrative expenses:
Variable cost quantity factor $
Unit cost factor
Total effect of changes in selling and administrative expenses
Actual contribution margin $

In: Accounting

Do a VECM analysis in STATA by using the variables FDI, GDP, Trade openness, and Exchange...

Do a VECM analysis in STATA by using the variables FDI, GDP, Trade openness, and Exchange rate. FDI is chosen as the dependent variable.
Indicate the commands for the stationarity, lag choice, and model stability.
Provide the Impulse Response Functions where FDI is the response function.

year fdi_inflow gdpcurrentus exportimport exneer exchangerate imf_gdpgrowth
1980 18000000 6.88E+13 3,679,337 1177121 84.8 -779
1981 95000000 7.10E+13 5,264,455 961635.3 81.88 4,365
1982 55000000 6.46E+13 6,498,011 745894.3 71.79 3,429
1983 46000000 6.17E+13 6,202,309 597710 73.95 4,758
1984 1.13E+11 6.00E+13 6,631,572 417444.8 67.54 6,823
1985 99000000 6.72E+13 7,015,557 315436.7 70.84 4,258
1986 1.25E+11 7.57E+13 6,714,885 204526 58.72 6,941
1987 1.15E+11 8.72E+13 7,197,477 144375.8 53.64 10,027
1988 3.54E+11 9.09E+13 8,135,124 85744.17 52.89 2,121
1989 6.63E+11 1.07E+14 736,106 61377.55 58.31 253
1990 6.84E+11 1.51E+14 5,810,786 46146.9 66.53 9,255
1991 8.10E+11 1.50E+14 6,458,618 29789.26 67.31 926
1992 8.44E+11 1.59E+14 6,433,734 17731.78 64.93 5,984
1993 6.36E+11 1.80E+14 5,214,379 12365.01 72.31 8,042
1994 6.08E+11 1.31E+14 7,780,772 4567.87 52.74 -5,456
1995 8.85E+11 1.70E+14 6,059,266 2776.45 58.7 719
1996 7.22E+11 1.82E+14 5,323,459 1604.04 59.3 7,007
1997 8.05E+11 1.90E+14 5,408,106 944.86 63.34 7,528
1998 9.40E+11 2.69E+14 5,873,941 573.48 69.54 3,092
1999 7.83E+11 2.50E+14 6,537,102 365 71.77 -3,389
2000 9.82E+11 2.67E+14 5,096,049 268.71 80.15 664
2001 3.35E+12 1.96E+14 7,568,819 142.44 63.98 -5,962
2002 1.08E+12 2.33E+14 6,994,458 113.54 72.46 643
2003 1.70E+12 3.03E+14 6,814,688 100.74 78.94 5,608
2004 2.79E+12 3.92E+14 6,476,041 98.57 82.1 9,644
2005 1.00E+13 4.83E+14 6,292,181 104.17 91.65 901
2006 2.02E+13 5.31E+14 6,128,172 97.33 91.62 711
2007 2.21E+13 6.47E+14 6,307,776 100 100 503
2008 1.99E+13 7.30E+14 6,537,179 96.29 102.47 845
2009 8.59E+12 6.15E+14 7,247,836 85.41 95.73 -4,704
2010 9.10E+12 7.31E+14 613,779 89.42 106.72 8,487
2011 1.62E+13 7.75E+14 5,601,475 76.8 94.67 11,113
2012 1.36E+13 7.89E+14 6,445,355 75.69 98.96 479
2013 1.29E+13 8.23E+14 6,032,023 71.08 97.88 8,491
2014 1.28E+13 7.99E+14 6,508,054 62.34 92.23 5,167

In: Economics

The data for the per capita demand for chicken ( pounds per household) in the United...

The data for the per capita demand for chicken ( pounds per household) in the United States from 1990 to 2013 is given in the table below.

Daily information

QUANITITY DEMANDED (Qd)

PRICE OF CHICKEN FAMILY MEAL (Pc)

INCOME (I)

ADVERTISING EXPIDENTURE

(Ad)

PRICE OF 10gallon jug of (Pj)

1990

27.8

42.2

Xxxxxxxx

65.8

78.3

1991

29.9

38.1

413.3

66.9

79.2

1992

29.8

40.3

439.2

67.8

79.2

1993

30.8

39.5

459.7

69.6

79.2

1994

31.2

37.3

492.9

68.7

77.4

1995

33.3

38.1

528.6

73.6

80.2

1996

35.6

39.3

560.3

76.3

80.4

1997

36.4

37.8

624.6

77.2

83.9

1998

36.7

38.4

666.4

78.1

85.5

1999

38.4

40.1

717.8

84.7

93.7

2000

40.4

38.6

768.2

93.3

106.1

2001

40.3

39.8

843.3

89.7

104.8

2002

41.8

39.7

911.6

100.7

114

2003

40.4

52.1

931.1

113.5

124.1

2004

40.7

48.9

1021.5

115.3

127.6

2005

40.1

58.3

1165.9

136.7

142.9

2006

42.7

57.9

1349.6

139.2

143.6

2007

44.1

56.5

1449.4

132.0

139.2

2008

46.7

63.7

1575.5

132.1

165.5

2009

50.6

61.6

       1759.1

154.4

203.3

2010

50.1

58.9

1994.2

174.9

219.6

2011

51.7

66.4

2258.1

180.8

221.6

2012

52.9

70.4

2478.7

189.4

232.6

2013

52.8

            70.3

2478.6

189.3

232.5

AVG

         

475 = unique initial income number.

AVG = AVERAGE

The data suggests that the per capita demand for chicken (Qd) depends on the following factors:

Pc = Price of chicken ( $ per capita)

I = real disposable income per capita ($)

Ad = Advertising dollars per capita

Pj = price of juice – ( a related product) per capita ($)

Using regression analysis, the attached data and a linear functional form, estimate the demand for CHICKEN.

Include the computation and explanation of the following in your report:

  1. Write your regression equation i.e. demand function
  2. Enter data provided into excel or statplus as per instructions attached and run your regression / derive your coefficient estimates. Interpret all the coefficients in % ( .i.e if PC = - 0.06768, interpret as: - 6.77%
  3. Use the average values for the independent variables and your estimated demand function, compute the demand for CHICKEN in a typical market.
  4. Define and interpret the standard error of the estimate AND estimate the range within which actual demand for Chicken is expected to fall with a 95% confidence level.
  5. Define the coefficient of determination (R-squared). What percentage of demand variation is explained by this model?
  6. Define and explain the usefulness of the F-Statistics
  7. Are the coefficient’s statistically significant? i.e. does each of the independent variables have a significant effect on the dependent variable? Explain using t-stats.
  8. Calculate and interpret the point price, cross price, point advertising and point income elasticity of demand for CHICKEN.

In: Economics

The Russell 1000 is a stock market index consisting of the largest U.S. companies. The Dow...

The Russell 1000 is a stock market index consisting of the largest U.S. companies. The Dow Jones industrial Average is based on 30 large companies. The data giving the annual percentage returns for each of these stock indexes for 25 years are contained in the Excel Online file below. Construct a spreadsheet to answer the following questions.

 
Year DJIA % Return Russell 1000 % Return
1988 8.82 12.33
1989 26.59 26.44
1990 -3.68 -4.57
1991 16.04 28.88
1992 5.38 1.66
1993 18.58 7.69
1994 6.29 1.76
1995 30.62 37.10
1996 21.49 17.49
1997 19.04 28.68
1998 12.83 29.46
1999 29.15 15.89
2000 -3.01 -6.42
2001 -9.85 -13.16
2002 -15.56 -25.79
2003 27.78 29.69
2004 7.71 10.82
2005 -4.84 8.73
2006 13.34 13.72
2007 8.12 7.04
2008 -31.04 -42.92
2009 20.72 22.47
2010 8.76 9.59
2011 2.80 -3.13
2012 8.40 11.02

a. Which of the following scatter diagrams accurately represents the data set?

#1

Russell 1000

DJIA

#2

Russell 1000

DJIA

#3

Russell 1000

DJIA

#4

Russell 1000

DJIA

_________Scatter diagram #1Scatter diagram #2Scatter diagram #3Scatter diagram #4

b. Compute the sample mean and standard deviation for each index (to 2 decimals).

sample mean standard deviation
DJIA:
Russell 1000:

c. Compute the sample correlation coefficient for these data (to 3 decimals).

d. Discuss similarities and differences in these two indexes.

_________There is a strong positive linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000There is a moderate positive linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000There is neither a positive nor a negative linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000There is a moderate negative linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000There is a strong negative linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000

The variance of the Russell 1000 is slightly _________largersmaller than that of the DJIA.

a. Which of the following scatter diagrams accurately represents the data set?

#1

Russell 1000

DJIA

#2

Russell 1000

DJIA

#3

Russell 1000

DJIA

#4

Russell 1000

DJIA

_________Scatter diagram #1Scatter diagram #2Scatter diagram #3Scatter diagram #4

b. Compute the sample mean and standard deviation for each index (to 2 decimals).

sample mean standard deviation
DJIA:
Russell 1000:

c. Compute the sample correlation coefficient for these data (to 3 decimals).

d. Discuss similarities and differences in these two indexes.

_________There is a strong positive linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000There is a moderate positive linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000There is neither a positive nor a negative linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000There is a moderate negative linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000There is a strong negative linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000

The variance of the Russell 1000 is slightly _________largersmaller than that of the DJIA.

In: Math

Below is a spreadsheet that has the annual return measured for 12 different stock investments. The...

Below is a spreadsheet that has the annual return measured for 12 different stock investments. The spreadsheet shows the average return and standard deviation of the return for the past 15 years. Use this spreadsheet and spreadsheet commands to do the following:

Compute the return for each year on a portfolio that contains an equal investment in all 12 securities.

Compute the 15-year average return and standard deviation of return for the portfolio that consists of all 12 securities with equally weighted investment.

Compute the correlation and covariance between the return on company #12 and the return on the equally-weighted portfolio. Hint: There is a spreadsheet command that does this calculation.

Compute the beta of Company #12 using the information you have collected.

Now using the beta you created for Company #12, compute the required rate of return using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), assuming that the average market return is the return of your equally-weighted portfolio and the risk-free rate of return is 2.5%.

If you were told analysts estimate that Company #12 will have a 5% rate of return next year, would you buy the stock? Why or why not?

COMPUTE ALL CALCULATIONS IN AN EXCEL SPREADSHEET AND POST IT HERE, THANK YOU

Comp. #1 Comp. #2 Comp. #3 Comp. #4 Comp. #5 Comp. #6 Comp. #7 Comp. #8 Comp. #9 Comp. #10 Comp. #11 Comp. #12
Return Return Return Return Return Return Return Return Return Return Return Return
2012 3.60% -10.04% -1.38% 5.25% -3.50% 0.14% 5.33% -2.55% 14.18% 14.76% -3.35% 0.10%
2011 54.44% 23.22% 0.55% 15.35% 0.22% 22.32% 23.55% 23.00% 36.36% 42.15% 9.90% -0.10%
2010 -29.30% -18.92% -44.54% -22.24% -17.66% 11.87% -1.93% -5.68% -39.86% 6.04% 5.36% -9.57%
2009 -37.57% -11.88% -6.00% -13.93% -16.09% 6.23% -15.42% -55.35% -5.78% 9.63% 13.75% 33.93%
2008 -11.00% -11.64% -9.39% -4.00% -2.80% 12.18% 3.33% -3.33% 4.18% -4.76% -7.85% -5.33%
2007 7.11% 13.59% 0.52% 26.35% -6.06% 23.92% 22.90% 4.23% -46.36% 59.17% 6.02% -37.79%
2006 20.91% 18.92% -44.54% 2.24% -17.66% 11.87% 1.93% -5.68% 39.86% 6.04% 5.36% 9.57%
2005 16.02% 11.88% -6.00% -13.93% 16.09% 6.23% 15.42% 55.35% -5.78% -9.63% 13.75% 33.93%
2004 55.35% 23.14% 43.33% 23.33% 0.33% -1.08% -1.44% 38.53% 35.44% 9.40% -15.05% 49.56%
2003 -11.56% 23.00% -38.30% -3.53% 5.07% -6.58% -5.12% -13.43% -12.18% -24.68% -7.69% -37.39%
2002 11.52% 39.67% -28.46% -20.72% -6.22% -8.25% 22.70% -2.60% -32.87% -13.16% -34.55% -20.56%
2001 -0.23% -1.48% -51.99% 7.35% 16.54% 1.83% 32.25% 47.38% 11.10% 2.96% -51.00% -14.48%
2000 3.10% 13.56% -7.33% -11.03% 17.69% 44.92% 0.93% -3.72% -9.20% -4.87% 298.67% 6.04%
1999 -3.43% -7.16% 47.74% 2.39% 4.27% 31.57% 19.44% -3.90% 12.12% 53.37% -19.46% 62.66%
1998 31.48% 45.52% 53.49% 29.15% 58.33% 67.99% 25.12% 0.44% 26.83% 50.67% 40.62% 6.72%

In: Finance