The Tax Cut and Jobs Act, 2017 The changes made by the Tax Cut and Jobs Act, 2017 to the tax provisions have changed tax rate for 2018 and people are getting a first hand experience of what it means to them. Go over the Act and address the questions below in full paragraphs: If you had the power to revise the Act, what changes would you make? How have the changes in taxes affected you personally? Many articles have been written analyzing the Tax Cut and Jobs Act, 2017. Infuse these expert opinions with your own.
In: Economics
In: Finance
The time taken by an automobile mechanic to complete an oil change is random with mean 29.5 minutes and standard deviation 3 minutes.
a. What is the probability that 50 oil changes take more than 1500 minutes?
b. What is the probability that a mechanic can complete 80 or more oil changes in 40 hours?
c. The mechanic wants to reduce the mean time per oil change so that the probability is 0.99 that 80 or more oil changes can be completed in 40 hours. What does the mean time need to be? Assume the standard deviation remains 3 minutes.
In: Math
4. Suppose that investment demand increases by $100. Assume that
households have a marginal propensity to consume of 80 percent.
Compute the first three rounds of multiplier effects as
follows:
a) What are the first cycle changes in spending? Total cumulative
change equals?
b) What are the second cycle changes in spending? Total cumulative
change equals?
c) What are the third cycle changes in spending? Total cumulative
change equals?
5. If a balanced budget government passes a new fiscal stimulus or restraint, it can lead to a deficit or surplus. In order to avoid an imbalance, how much of a tax hike or tax cut would be required? In the event of an extra $50 Billion of government purchases, $30 Billion of transfer payments, what should be the offsetting tax package?
|
5. If a balanced budget government passes a new fiscal stimulus or restraint, it can lead to a deficit or surplus. In order to avoid an imbalance, how much of a tax hike or tax cut would be required? In the event of an extra $50 Billion of government purchases, $30 Billion of transfer payments, what should be the offsetting tax packaing pleas answer them by typing |
In: Economics
Contribution Margin Analysis
Mathews Company manufactures only one product. For the year ended December 31, the contribution margin increased by $10,864 from the planned level of $464,436. The president of Mathews Company has expressed some concern about this increase and has requested a follow-up report.
The following data have been gathered from the accounting records for the year ended December 31:
Actual |
Planned |
Difference—Increase (Decrease) | ||||
| Sales | $911,800 | $895,698 | $16,102 | |||
| Variable costs: | ||||||
| Variable cost of goods sold | $349,200 | $364,914 | $(15,714) | |||
| Variable selling and administrative expenses | 87,300 | 66,348 | 20,952 | |||
| Total variable costs | $436,500 | $431,262 | $(5,238) | |||
| Contribution margin | $475,300 | $464,436 | $10,864 | |||
| Number of units sold | 9,700 | 11,058 | ||||
| Per unit: | ||||||
| Sales price | $94 | $81 | ||||
| Variable cost of goods sold | 36 | 33 | ||||
| Variable selling and administrative expenses | 9 | 6 | ||||
Required:
1. Prepare a contribution margin analysis report for the year ended December 31.
| Mathews Company | ||
| Contribution Margin Analysis | ||
| For the Year Ended December 31 | ||
| Planned contribution margin | $ | |
| Effect of changes in sales: | ||
| Sales quantity factor | $ | |
| Unit price factor | ||
| Total effect of changes in sales | ||
| Effect of changes in variable cost of goods sold: | ||
| Variable cost quantity factor | $ | |
| Unit cost factor | ||
| Total effect of changes in variable cost of goods sold | ||
| Effect of changes in selling and administrative expenses: | ||
| Variable cost quantity factor | $ | |
| Unit cost factor | ||
| Total effect of changes in selling and administrative expenses | ||
| Actual contribution margin | ||
In: Accounting
Mathews Company manufactures only one product. For the year ended December 31, the contribution margin increased by $41,616 from the planned level of $764,784. The president of Mathews Company has expressed some concern about this increase and has requested a follow-up report.
The following data have been gathered from the accounting records for the year ended December 31:
Actual |
Planned |
Difference—Increase (Decrease) | ||||
| Sales | $1,555,200 | $1,513,296 | $41,904 | |||
| Variable costs: | ||||||
| Variable cost of goods sold | $590,400 | $618,336 | $(27,936) | |||
| Variable selling and administrative expenses | 158,400 | 130,176 | 28,224 | |||
| Total variable costs | $748,800 | $748,512 | $(288) | |||
| Contribution margin | $806,400 | $764,784 | $41,616 | |||
| Number of units sold | 14,400 | 16,272 | ||||
| Per unit: | ||||||
| Sales price | $108 | $93 | ||||
| Variable cost of goods sold | 41 | 38 | ||||
| Variable selling and administrative expenses | 11 | 8 | ||||
Required:
1. Prepare a contribution margin analysis report for the year ended December 31.
| Mathews Company | ||
| Contribution Margin Analysis | ||
| For the Year Ended December 31 | ||
| Planned contribution margin | $ | |
| Effect of changes in sales: | ||
| Sales quantity factor | $ | |
| Unit price factor | ||
| Total effect of changes in sales | ||
| Effect of changes in variable cost of goods sold: | ||
| Variable cost quantity factor | $ | |
| Unit cost factor | ||
| Total effect of changes in variable cost of goods sold | ||
| Effect of changes in selling and administrative expenses: | ||
| Variable cost quantity factor | $ | |
| Unit cost factor | ||
| Total effect of changes in selling and administrative expenses | ||
| Actual contribution margin | $ | |
In: Accounting
Do a VECM analysis in STATA by using the variables FDI, GDP,
Trade openness, and Exchange rate. FDI is chosen as the dependent
variable.
Indicate the commands for the stationarity, lag choice, and model
stability.
Provide the Impulse Response Functions where FDI is the response
function.
| year | fdi_inflow | gdpcurrentus | exportimport | exneer | exchangerate | imf_gdpgrowth |
| 1980 | 18000000 | 6.88E+13 | 3,679,337 | 1177121 | 84.8 | -779 |
| 1981 | 95000000 | 7.10E+13 | 5,264,455 | 961635.3 | 81.88 | 4,365 |
| 1982 | 55000000 | 6.46E+13 | 6,498,011 | 745894.3 | 71.79 | 3,429 |
| 1983 | 46000000 | 6.17E+13 | 6,202,309 | 597710 | 73.95 | 4,758 |
| 1984 | 1.13E+11 | 6.00E+13 | 6,631,572 | 417444.8 | 67.54 | 6,823 |
| 1985 | 99000000 | 6.72E+13 | 7,015,557 | 315436.7 | 70.84 | 4,258 |
| 1986 | 1.25E+11 | 7.57E+13 | 6,714,885 | 204526 | 58.72 | 6,941 |
| 1987 | 1.15E+11 | 8.72E+13 | 7,197,477 | 144375.8 | 53.64 | 10,027 |
| 1988 | 3.54E+11 | 9.09E+13 | 8,135,124 | 85744.17 | 52.89 | 2,121 |
| 1989 | 6.63E+11 | 1.07E+14 | 736,106 | 61377.55 | 58.31 | 253 |
| 1990 | 6.84E+11 | 1.51E+14 | 5,810,786 | 46146.9 | 66.53 | 9,255 |
| 1991 | 8.10E+11 | 1.50E+14 | 6,458,618 | 29789.26 | 67.31 | 926 |
| 1992 | 8.44E+11 | 1.59E+14 | 6,433,734 | 17731.78 | 64.93 | 5,984 |
| 1993 | 6.36E+11 | 1.80E+14 | 5,214,379 | 12365.01 | 72.31 | 8,042 |
| 1994 | 6.08E+11 | 1.31E+14 | 7,780,772 | 4567.87 | 52.74 | -5,456 |
| 1995 | 8.85E+11 | 1.70E+14 | 6,059,266 | 2776.45 | 58.7 | 719 |
| 1996 | 7.22E+11 | 1.82E+14 | 5,323,459 | 1604.04 | 59.3 | 7,007 |
| 1997 | 8.05E+11 | 1.90E+14 | 5,408,106 | 944.86 | 63.34 | 7,528 |
| 1998 | 9.40E+11 | 2.69E+14 | 5,873,941 | 573.48 | 69.54 | 3,092 |
| 1999 | 7.83E+11 | 2.50E+14 | 6,537,102 | 365 | 71.77 | -3,389 |
| 2000 | 9.82E+11 | 2.67E+14 | 5,096,049 | 268.71 | 80.15 | 664 |
| 2001 | 3.35E+12 | 1.96E+14 | 7,568,819 | 142.44 | 63.98 | -5,962 |
| 2002 | 1.08E+12 | 2.33E+14 | 6,994,458 | 113.54 | 72.46 | 643 |
| 2003 | 1.70E+12 | 3.03E+14 | 6,814,688 | 100.74 | 78.94 | 5,608 |
| 2004 | 2.79E+12 | 3.92E+14 | 6,476,041 | 98.57 | 82.1 | 9,644 |
| 2005 | 1.00E+13 | 4.83E+14 | 6,292,181 | 104.17 | 91.65 | 901 |
| 2006 | 2.02E+13 | 5.31E+14 | 6,128,172 | 97.33 | 91.62 | 711 |
| 2007 | 2.21E+13 | 6.47E+14 | 6,307,776 | 100 | 100 | 503 |
| 2008 | 1.99E+13 | 7.30E+14 | 6,537,179 | 96.29 | 102.47 | 845 |
| 2009 | 8.59E+12 | 6.15E+14 | 7,247,836 | 85.41 | 95.73 | -4,704 |
| 2010 | 9.10E+12 | 7.31E+14 | 613,779 | 89.42 | 106.72 | 8,487 |
| 2011 | 1.62E+13 | 7.75E+14 | 5,601,475 | 76.8 | 94.67 | 11,113 |
| 2012 | 1.36E+13 | 7.89E+14 | 6,445,355 | 75.69 | 98.96 | 479 |
| 2013 | 1.29E+13 | 8.23E+14 | 6,032,023 | 71.08 | 97.88 | 8,491 |
| 2014 | 1.28E+13 | 7.99E+14 | 6,508,054 | 62.34 | 92.23 | 5,167 |
In: Economics
The data for the per capita demand for chicken ( pounds per household) in the United States from 1990 to 2013 is given in the table below.
|
Daily information |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
475 = unique initial income number.
AVG = AVERAGE
The data suggests that the per capita demand for chicken (Qd) depends on the following factors:
Pc = Price of chicken ( $ per capita)
I = real disposable income per capita ($)
Ad = Advertising dollars per capita
Pj = price of juice – ( a related product) per capita ($)
Using regression analysis, the attached data and a linear functional form, estimate the demand for CHICKEN.
Include the computation and explanation of the following in your report:
In: Economics
The Russell 1000 is a stock market index consisting of the largest U.S. companies. The Dow Jones industrial Average is based on 30 large companies. The data giving the annual percentage returns for each of these stock indexes for 25 years are contained in the Excel Online file below. Construct a spreadsheet to answer the following questions.
| Year | DJIA % Return | Russell 1000 % Return |
| 1988 | 8.82 | 12.33 |
| 1989 | 26.59 | 26.44 |
| 1990 | -3.68 | -4.57 |
| 1991 | 16.04 | 28.88 |
| 1992 | 5.38 | 1.66 |
| 1993 | 18.58 | 7.69 |
| 1994 | 6.29 | 1.76 |
| 1995 | 30.62 | 37.10 |
| 1996 | 21.49 | 17.49 |
| 1997 | 19.04 | 28.68 |
| 1998 | 12.83 | 29.46 |
| 1999 | 29.15 | 15.89 |
| 2000 | -3.01 | -6.42 |
| 2001 | -9.85 | -13.16 |
| 2002 | -15.56 | -25.79 |
| 2003 | 27.78 | 29.69 |
| 2004 | 7.71 | 10.82 |
| 2005 | -4.84 | 8.73 |
| 2006 | 13.34 | 13.72 |
| 2007 | 8.12 | 7.04 |
| 2008 | -31.04 | -42.92 |
| 2009 | 20.72 | 22.47 |
| 2010 | 8.76 | 9.59 |
| 2011 | 2.80 | -3.13 |
| 2012 | 8.40 | 11.02 |
a. Which of the following scatter diagrams accurately represents the data set?
| #1 |
Russell 1000 DJIA |
#2 |
Russell 1000 DJIA |
| #3 |
Russell 1000 DJIA |
#4 |
Russell 1000 DJIA |
_________Scatter diagram #1Scatter diagram #2Scatter diagram #3Scatter diagram #4
b. Compute the sample mean and standard deviation for each index (to 2 decimals).
| sample mean | standard deviation | |
| DJIA: | ||
| Russell 1000: |
c. Compute the sample correlation coefficient for these data (to 3 decimals).
d. Discuss similarities and differences in these two indexes.
_________There is a strong positive linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000There is a moderate positive linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000There is neither a positive nor a negative linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000There is a moderate negative linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000There is a strong negative linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000
The variance of the Russell 1000 is slightly _________largersmaller than that of the DJIA.
a. Which of the following scatter diagrams accurately represents the data set?
| #1 |
Russell 1000 DJIA |
#2 |
Russell 1000 DJIA |
| #3 |
Russell 1000 DJIA |
#4 |
Russell 1000 DJIA |
_________Scatter diagram #1Scatter diagram #2Scatter diagram #3Scatter diagram #4
b. Compute the sample mean and standard deviation for each index (to 2 decimals).
| sample mean | standard deviation | |
| DJIA: | ||
| Russell 1000: |
c. Compute the sample correlation coefficient for these data (to 3 decimals).
d. Discuss similarities and differences in these two indexes.
_________There is a strong positive linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000There is a moderate positive linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000There is neither a positive nor a negative linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000There is a moderate negative linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000There is a strong negative linear association between DJIA and Russell 1000
The variance of the Russell 1000 is slightly _________largersmaller than that of the DJIA.
In: Math
Below is a spreadsheet that has the annual return measured for 12 different stock investments. The spreadsheet shows the average return and standard deviation of the return for the past 15 years. Use this spreadsheet and spreadsheet commands to do the following:
Compute the return for each year on a portfolio that contains an equal investment in all 12 securities.
Compute the 15-year average return and standard deviation of return for the portfolio that consists of all 12 securities with equally weighted investment.
Compute the correlation and covariance between the return on company #12 and the return on the equally-weighted portfolio. Hint: There is a spreadsheet command that does this calculation.
Compute the beta of Company #12 using the information you have collected.
Now using the beta you created for Company #12, compute the required rate of return using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), assuming that the average market return is the return of your equally-weighted portfolio and the risk-free rate of return is 2.5%.
If you were told analysts estimate that Company #12 will have a 5% rate of return next year, would you buy the stock? Why or why not?
COMPUTE ALL CALCULATIONS IN AN EXCEL SPREADSHEET AND POST IT HERE, THANK YOU
| Comp. #1 | Comp. #2 | Comp. #3 | Comp. #4 | Comp. #5 | Comp. #6 | Comp. #7 | Comp. #8 | Comp. #9 | Comp. #10 | Comp. #11 | Comp. #12 | |
| Return | Return | Return | Return | Return | Return | Return | Return | Return | Return | Return | Return | |
| 2012 | 3.60% | -10.04% | -1.38% | 5.25% | -3.50% | 0.14% | 5.33% | -2.55% | 14.18% | 14.76% | -3.35% | 0.10% |
| 2011 | 54.44% | 23.22% | 0.55% | 15.35% | 0.22% | 22.32% | 23.55% | 23.00% | 36.36% | 42.15% | 9.90% | -0.10% |
| 2010 | -29.30% | -18.92% | -44.54% | -22.24% | -17.66% | 11.87% | -1.93% | -5.68% | -39.86% | 6.04% | 5.36% | -9.57% |
| 2009 | -37.57% | -11.88% | -6.00% | -13.93% | -16.09% | 6.23% | -15.42% | -55.35% | -5.78% | 9.63% | 13.75% | 33.93% |
| 2008 | -11.00% | -11.64% | -9.39% | -4.00% | -2.80% | 12.18% | 3.33% | -3.33% | 4.18% | -4.76% | -7.85% | -5.33% |
| 2007 | 7.11% | 13.59% | 0.52% | 26.35% | -6.06% | 23.92% | 22.90% | 4.23% | -46.36% | 59.17% | 6.02% | -37.79% |
| 2006 | 20.91% | 18.92% | -44.54% | 2.24% | -17.66% | 11.87% | 1.93% | -5.68% | 39.86% | 6.04% | 5.36% | 9.57% |
| 2005 | 16.02% | 11.88% | -6.00% | -13.93% | 16.09% | 6.23% | 15.42% | 55.35% | -5.78% | -9.63% | 13.75% | 33.93% |
| 2004 | 55.35% | 23.14% | 43.33% | 23.33% | 0.33% | -1.08% | -1.44% | 38.53% | 35.44% | 9.40% | -15.05% | 49.56% |
| 2003 | -11.56% | 23.00% | -38.30% | -3.53% | 5.07% | -6.58% | -5.12% | -13.43% | -12.18% | -24.68% | -7.69% | -37.39% |
| 2002 | 11.52% | 39.67% | -28.46% | -20.72% | -6.22% | -8.25% | 22.70% | -2.60% | -32.87% | -13.16% | -34.55% | -20.56% |
| 2001 | -0.23% | -1.48% | -51.99% | 7.35% | 16.54% | 1.83% | 32.25% | 47.38% | 11.10% | 2.96% | -51.00% | -14.48% |
| 2000 | 3.10% | 13.56% | -7.33% | -11.03% | 17.69% | 44.92% | 0.93% | -3.72% | -9.20% | -4.87% | 298.67% | 6.04% |
| 1999 | -3.43% | -7.16% | 47.74% | 2.39% | 4.27% | 31.57% | 19.44% | -3.90% | 12.12% | 53.37% | -19.46% | 62.66% |
| 1998 | 31.48% | 45.52% | 53.49% | 29.15% | 58.33% | 67.99% | 25.12% | 0.44% | 26.83% | 50.67% | 40.62% | 6.72% |
In: Finance