Note: We suggest you use ray diagrams to qualitatively understand these questions. A candle 6.10 cm high is placed in front of a thin converging lens of focal length 33.0 cm. What is the image distance i when the object is placed 93.0 cm in front of the same lens?

What is the size of the image? (Note: an inverted image will have a `negative' size.)

Is the image real(R) or virtual(V); upright(U) or inverted(I); larger(L) or smaller(S) or unchanged(UC); in front of the lens(F) or behind the lens(B)? Answer these questions in the order that they are posed. (for example, if the image is real, inverted, larger and behind the lens then enter `RILB'.)

The object is now moved to 41.0 cm in front of the lens, what is the new image distance i?

What is the new size of the image?

Is the new image real(R) or virtual(V); upright(U) or inverted(I); larger(L) or smaller(S) or unchanged(UC); in front of the lens(F) or behind the lens(B)? Answer these questions in the order that they are posed. (for example, if the image is real, inverted, larger and behind the lens then enter `RILB'.)

The object is now moved to 21.0 cm in front of the lens, what is the new image distance i?

What is the new size of the image?

Is the new image real(R) or virtual(V); upright(U) or inverted(I); larger(L) or smaller(S) or unchanged(UC); in front of the lens(F) or behind the lens(B)? Answer these questions in the order that they are posed. (for example, if the image is real, inverted, larger and behind the lens then enter 'RILB'.)

The object is now moved to 6.5 cm in front of the lens, what is the new image distance i?

What is the new size of the image?

Is the new image real(R) or virtual(V); upright(U) or inverted(I); larger(L) or smaller(S) or unchanged(UC); In front of the lens(F) or behind the lens(B)? Answer these questions in the order that they are posed. (for example, if the image is real, inverted, larger and behind the lens then enter 'RILB'.)

The following adjusted trial balance contains the accounts and year-end balances of Cruz Company as of December 31.

1. Prepare the December 31, closing entries for Cruz Company. Assume the account number for Income Summary is 901.
2. Prepare the December 31, post-closing trial balance for Cruz Company. Note: A. Cruz, Capital was $46,630 on December 31 of the prior year.

repare the December 31, closing entries for Cruz Company. Assume the account number for Income Summary is 901.

Journal entry worksheet

• Record the entry to close revenue accounts.

Note: Enter debits before credits.

Complete this questions by entering your answers in the tabs below.

• Required 1
• Required 2

Prepare the December 31, post-closing trial balance for Cruz Company. Note: A. Cruz, Capital was $46,630 on December 31 of the prior year.

BUSINESS LAW CASE ANALYSIS.

Morales-Cruz v. University of Puerto Rico

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit, 676 F.3d 220 (2012).

Background and Facts

In 2003, Myrta Morales-Cruz began a tenure-track teaching position at the University of Puerto Rico School of Law. During Morales-Cruz’s probationary period, one of her co-teachers in a law school clinic had an affair with one of their students, and it resulted in a pregnancy. In 2008, Morales-Cruz wanted the university’s administrative committee to approve a one-year extension for her tenure review. The law school’s dean asked Morales-Cruz about her co-teacher's affair and criticized her for failing to report it. He later recommended granting the extension but called Morales-Cruz insecure, immature, and fragile. Similarly, a law school committee recommended granting the extension, but a dissenting professor commented that Morales-Cruz had shown poor judgment, in regard to the co-teacher's affair, had personality flaws, and had trouble with complex and sensitive situations.

Morales-Cruz learned about these comments and complained in writing to the university’s chancellor. As a result, the dean then recommended denying the one-year extension, and the administrative committee ultimately did just that. When her employment was terminated, Morales-Cruz sued the university under Title VII. Among other things, she asserted that the dean had retaliated against her for complaining to the chancellor. The district court found that Morales-Cruz had not stated a proper retaliation claim under Title VII.

In the Words of the Court …

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

* * * *

The amended complaint alleges that various officials described the plaintiff as “fragile,” “immature,” “unable to handle complex and sensitive issues,” * * * and exhibiting “lack of judgment.” These descriptors are admittedly unflattering—but they are without exception gender-neutral. All of them apply equally to persons of either gender * * * .

* * * *

* * * Title VII makes it unlawful for an employer to take materially adverse action against an employee “because he has opposed any practice made an unlawful employment practice by this subchapter.” To state a cause of action under this portion of the statute, the pleading must contain plausible allegations indicating that the plaintiff opposed a practice prohibited by Title VII and suffered an adverse employment action as a result of that opposition. [Emphasis added.]

The plaintiff alleges that she was retaliated against for writing to the Chancellor to complain about the “discriminatory” comments made in the course of her request for an extension. In support of this allegation, she points out that after she sent her letter the Dean reversed his position on her extension. This construct suffers from a fatal flaw: her factual allegations do not support a reasonable inference that she was engaging in protected conduct when she opposed the remarks made.

* * * The facts alleged * * * provide no reasonable basis for inferring that the comments cited reflected gender-based discrimination. Those comments were unarguably gender-neutral and do not afford an objectively reasonable foundation for a retaliation action.

Decision and Remedy

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that Morales-Cruz could not bring a retaliation claim under Title VII. It therefore affirmed the district court’s judgment for the University of Puerto Rico.

The Ethical Dimension

Could Morales-Cruz’s dean have had legitimate reasons for changing his mind about the one-year extension? If so, what might they have been?

The Legal Environment Dimension

What steps should employers take to reduce the likelihood that supervisors will retaliate against employees who make or support discrimination claims?

Harassment by Co-Workers and Nonemployees

When the harassment of co-workers, rather than supervisors, creates a hostile working environment, an employee may still have a cause of action against the employer. Normally, though, the employer will be held liable only if the employer knew, or should have known, about the harassment and failed to take immediate remedial action.

Occasionally, a court may also hold an employer liable for harassment by nonemployees if the employer knew about the harassment and failed to take corrective action.

1. What is the legal issue of the case?

2. How did the court decide on the issues?

3. What reasoning did the court use to substantiate their findings?

4. Do you agree or disagree with how the finding by the court in this matter? and why?

A +7.05 uC charge is placed 2.10 m directly below a +9.00 uC charge. At a point 1.75 m to the right of the +9.00 uC, find

a) the magnitude and direction of the electric field.

b) the electric potential.

c) the magnitude and direction of a +2.00 uC place at that point.

d) the amount of work required for an external force to bring the +2.00 uC charge from infinity to that point.

The following adjusted trial balance contains the accounts and year-end balances of Cruz Company as of December 31.

1. Prepare the December 31, closing entries for Cruz Company. Assume the account number for Income Summary is 901.
2. Prepare the December 31, post-closing trial balance for Cruz Company. Note: A. Cruz, Capital was $42,739 on December 31 of the prior year.

Managerial Epidemiology

When conducting a study, patients occasionally “crossover” to other portions of the study.

List one intervention that may impact the patient after this crossover,

how it might affect the results of the study, and which (if any) precautions need to be considered

when finding crossover data. Additionally, explain a cohort study, and what types of diseases are best to study using a cohort.

Managerial Epidemiology Cases and Concepts - 180 Day Option, 3rd Edition
Steven T. Fleming 2014

The current stock price of Cruz Inc. is $50 per share. The company’s management believes that the current price is fair and there is nothing else they can do to increase shareholder value. Another company just announced that it wants to buy Cruz Inc. and will pay $65 per share to acquire all the outstanding shares of Cruz. Cruz management immediately begins fighting off this hostile bid. There are no other potential buyers. Do you agree with the action taken by Cruz’s management? Provide your answer and state your reasoning.

In a famous prospective cohort investigation, the population to be studied encompassed all physicians listed in the British Medical Register and resident in England and Wales as of October 1951. Information about present and past smoking habits was obtained by questionnaire. Information about lung cancer came from death certificates and other mortality data recorded during ensuing years.

1. What makes this study prospective? List two advantages and two disadvantages of this approach.
2. What advantages and disadvantages come with selecting physicians as a cohort for follow-up?