Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company’s estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes and nonroutine work such as removing asbestos-contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine work and should bear higher customer charges. The estimator sums up his position in this way: “My job is to measure the area to be cleared of asbestos. As directed by top management, I simply multiply the square footage by $3.10 to determine the bid price. Since our average cost is only $2.85 per square foot, that leaves enough cushion to take care of the additional costs of nonroutine work that shows up. Besides, it is difficult to know what is routine or not routine until you actually start tearing things apart.”
To shed light on this controversy, the company initiated an activity-based costing study of all of its costs. Data from the activity-based costing system follow:
| Activity Cost Pool | Activity Measure | Total Activity | |||
| Removing asbestos | Thousands of square feet | 800 | thousand squarefeet | ||
| Estimating and job setup | Number of jobs | 500 | jobs | ||
| Working on nonroutine jobs | Number of nonroutine jobs | 100 | nonroutine jobs | ||
| Other (costs of
idle capacity and organization-sustaining costs) |
None | ||||
Note: The 100 nonroutine jobs are included in the total of 500 jobs. Both nonroutine jobs and routine jobs require estimating and setup.
| Costs for the Year | |||
| Wages and salaries | $ | 450,000 | |
| Disposal fees | 820,000 | ||
| Equipment depreciation | 110,000 | ||
| On-site supplies | 65,000 | ||
| Office expenses | 350,000 | ||
| Licensing and insurance | 550,000 | ||
| Total cost | $ | 2,345,000 | |
Distribution of Resource Consumption Across Activities
| Removing Asbestos | Estimating and Job Setup | Working on Nonroutine Jobs | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||
| Wages and salaries | 60 | % | 10 | % | 20 | % | 10 | % | 100 | % | |||||||||||
| Disposal fees | 60 | % | 0 | % | 40 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | |||||||||||
| Equipment depreciation | 40 | % | 5 | % | 25 | % | 30 | % | 100 | % | |||||||||||
| On-site supplies | 70 | % | 20 | % | 10 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | |||||||||||
| Office expenses | 10 | % | 40 | % | 15 | % | 35 | % | 100 | % | |||||||||||
| Licensing and insurance | 25 | % | 0 | % | 60 | % | 15 | % | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Required:
1. Perform the first-stage allocation of costs to the activity cost pools.
2. Compute the activity rates for the activity cost pools.
3. Using the activity rates you have computed, determine the total
cost and the average cost per thousand square feet of each of the
following jobs according to the activity-based costing system.
(Round the "Average cost" to 2 decimal
places.)
a. A routine 1,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
In: Accounting
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company’s estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos-contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine work and should bear higher customer charges. The estimator sums up his position in this way: “My job is to measure the area to be cleared of asbestos. As directed by top management, I simply multiply the square footage by $2.50 to determine the bid price. Since our average cost is only $2.235 per square foot, that leaves enough cushion to take care of the additional costs of nonroutine work that shows up. Besides, it is difficult to know what is routine or not routine until you actually start tearing things apart.”
To shed light on this controversy, the company initiated an activity-based costing study of all of its costs. Data from the activity-based costing system follow:
| Activity Cost Pool | Activity Measure | Total Activity | |
| Removing asbestos | Thousands of square feet | 800 | thousand square feet |
| Estimating and job setup | Number of jobs | 500 | jobs |
| Working on nonroutine jobs | Number of nonroutine jobs | 100 | nonroutine jobs |
| Other (organization-sustaining costs and idle capacity costs) | None | ||
| Note: The 100 nonroutine jobs are included in the total of 500 jobs. Both nonroutine jobs and routine jobs require estimating and setup. | |||
| Costs for the Year | ||
| Wages and salaries | $ | 317,000 |
| Disposal fees | 712,000 | |
| Equipment depreciation | 97,000 | |
| On-site supplies | 55,000 | |
| Office expenses | 220,000 | |
| Licensing and insurance | 420,000 | |
| Total cost | $ | 1,821,000 |
| Distribution of Resource Consumption Across Activities | ||||||||||||||||
| Removing Asbestos | Estimating and Job Setup | Working on Nonroutine Jobs | Other | Total | ||||||||||||
| Wages and salaries | 50 | % | 15 | % | 20 | % | 15 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Disposal fees | 60 | % | 0 | % | 40 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Equipment depreciation | 50 | % | 10 | % | 15 | % | 25 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| On-site supplies | 60 | % | 25 | % | 15 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Office expenses | 10 | % | 40 | % | 15 | % | 35 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Licensing and insurance | 30 | % | 0 | % | 60 | % | 10 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
Required:
1. Perform the first-stage allocation of costs to the activity cost pools.
2. Compute the activity rates for the activity cost pools.
3. Using the activity rates you have computed, determine the total cost and the average cost per thousand square feet of each of the following jobs according to the activity-based costing system.
a. A routine 1,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
b. A routine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
c. A nonroutine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
In: Accounting
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company’s estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos-contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine work and should bear higher customer charges. The estimator sums up his position in this way: “My job is to measure the area to be cleared of asbestos. As directed by top management, I simply multiply the square footage by $3.20 to determine the bid price. Since our average cost is only $2.75 per square foot, that leaves enough cushion to take care of the additional costs of nonroutine work that shows up. Besides, it is difficult to know what is routine or not routine until you actually start tearing things apart.” To shed light on this controversy, the company initiated an activity-based costing study of all of its costs. Data from the activity-based costing system follow: Activity Cost Pool Activity Measure Total Activity Removing asbestos Thousands of square feet 800 thousand square feet Estimating and job setup Number of jobs 500 jobs Working on nonroutine jobs Number of nonroutine jobs 100 nonroutine jobs Other (organization-sustaining costs and idle capacity costs) None Note: The 100 nonroutine jobs are included in the total of 500 jobs. Both nonroutine jobs and routine jobs require estimating and setup. Costs for the Year Wages and salaries $ 470,000 Disposal fees 801,000 Equipment depreciation 110,000 On-site supplies 68,000 Office expenses 370,000 Licensing and insurance 570,000 Total cost $ 2,389,000 Distribution of Resource Consumption Across Activities Removing Asbestos Estimating and Job Setup Working on Nonroutine Jobs Other Total Wages and salaries 60 % 10 % 20 % 10 % 100 % Disposal fees 60 % 0 % 40 % 0 % 100 % Equipment depreciation 50 % 10 % 15 % 25 % 100 % On-site supplies 60 % 25 % 15 % 0 % 100 % Office expenses 10 % 40 % 15 % 35 % 100 % Licensing and insurance 30 % 0 % 50 % 20 % 100 % Required: 1. Perform the first-stage allocation of costs to the activity cost pools. 2. Compute the activity rates for the activity cost pools. 3. Using the activity rates you have computed, determine the total cost and the average cost per thousand square feet of each of the following jobs according to the activity-based costing system. a. A routine 1,000-square-foot asbestos removal job. b. A routine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job. c. A nonroutine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
In: Accounting
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company’s estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos-contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine work and should bear higher customer charges. The estimator sums up his position in this way: “My job is to measure the area to be cleared of asbestos. As directed by top management, I simply multiply the square footage by $2.50 to determine the bid price. Since our average cost is only $2.435 per square foot, that leaves enough cushion to take care of the additional costs of nonroutine work that shows up. Besides, it is difficult to know what is routine or not routine until you actually start tearing things apart.”
To shed light on this controversy, the company initiated an activity-based costing study of all of its costs. Data from the activity-based costing system follow:
| Activity Cost Pool | Activity Measure | Total Activity | |
| Removing asbestos | Thousands of square feet | 1,000 | thousand square feet |
| Estimating and job setup | Number of jobs | 500 | jobs |
| Working on nonroutine jobs | Number of nonroutine jobs | 100 | nonroutine jobs |
| Other (organization-sustaining costs and idle capacity costs) | None | ||
| Note: The 100 nonroutine jobs are included in the total of 500 jobs. Both nonroutine jobs and routine jobs require estimating and setup. | |||
| Costs for the Year | ||
| Wages and salaries | $ | 406,000 |
| Disposal fees | 793,000 | |
| Equipment depreciation | 96,000 | |
| On-site supplies | 58,000 | |
| Office expenses | 280,000 | |
| Licensing and insurance | 502,000 | |
| Total cost | $ | 2,135,000 |
| Distribution of Resource Consumption Across Activities | ||||||||||||||||
| Removing Asbestos | Estimating and Job Setup | Working on Nonroutine Jobs | Other | Total | ||||||||||||
| Wages and salaries | 60 | % | 10 | % | 20 | % | 10 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Disposal fees | 60 | % | 0 | % | 40 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Equipment depreciation | 40 | % | 5 | % | 20 | % | 35 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| On-site supplies | 70 | % | 20 | % | 10 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Office expenses | 10 | % | 35 | % | 25 | % | 30 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Licensing and insurance | 30 | % | 0 | % | 50 | % | 20 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
Required:
1. Perform the first-stage allocation of costs to the activity cost pools.
2. Compute the activity rates for the activity cost pools.
3. Using the activity rates you have computed, determine the total cost and the average cost per thousand square feet of each of the following jobs according to the activity-based costing system.
a. A routine 1,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
b. A routine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
c. A nonroutine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
In: Accounting
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company’s estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos-contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine work and should bear higher customer charges. The estimator sums up his position in this way: “My job is to measure the area to be cleared of asbestos. As directed by top management, I simply multiply the square footage by $2.50 to determine the bid price. Since our average cost is only $2.46 per square foot, that leaves enough cushion to take care of the additional costs of nonroutine work that shows up. Besides, it is difficult to know what is routine or not routine until you actually start tearing things apart.”
To shed light on this controversy, the company initiated an activity-based costing study of all of its costs. Data from the activity-based costing system follow:
| Activity Cost Pool | Activity Measure | Total Activity | |
| Removing asbestos | Thousands of square feet | 1,000 | thousand square feet |
| Estimating and job setup | Number of jobs | 500 | jobs |
| Working on nonroutine jobs | Number of nonroutine jobs | 100 | nonroutine jobs |
| Other (organization-sustaining costs and idle capacity costs) | None | ||
| Note: The 100 nonroutine jobs are included in the total of 500 jobs. Both nonroutine jobs and routine jobs require estimating and setup. | |||
| Costs for the Year | ||
| Wages and salaries | $ | 407,000 |
| Disposal fees | 800,000 | |
| Equipment depreciation | 96,000 | |
| On-site supplies | 56,000 | |
| Office expenses | 300,000 | |
| Licensing and insurance | 490,000 | |
| Total cost | $ | 2,149,000 |
| Distribution of Resource Consumption Across Activities | ||||||||||||||||
| Removing Asbestos | Estimating and Job Setup | Working on Nonroutine Jobs | Other | Total | ||||||||||||
| Wages and salaries | 50 | % | 10 | % | 30 | % | 10 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Disposal fees | 70 | % | 0 | % | 30 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Equipment depreciation | 40 | % | 5 | % | 20 | % | 35 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| On-site supplies | 60 | % | 25 | % | 15 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Office expenses | 15 | % | 35 | % | 20 | % | 30 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Licensing and insurance | 25 | % | 0 | % | 60 | % | 15 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
Required:
1. Perform the first-stage allocation of costs to the activity cost pools.
2. Compute the activity rates for the activity cost pools.
3. Using the activity rates you have computed, determine the total cost and the average cost per thousand square feet of each of the following jobs according to the activity-based costing system.
a. A routine 1,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
b. A routine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
c. A nonroutine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
In: Accounting
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company’s estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos-contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine work and should bear higher customer charges. The estimator sums up his position in this way: “My job is to measure the area to be cleared of asbestos. As directed by top management, I simply multiply the square footage by $3.60 to determine the bid price. Since our average cost is only $2.845 per square foot, that leaves enough cushion to take care of the additional costs of nonroutine work that shows up. Besides, it is difficult to know what is routine or not routine until you actually start tearing things apart.”
To shed light on this controversy, the company initiated an activity-based costing study of all of its costs. Data from the activity-based costing system follow:
| Activity Cost Pool | Activity Measure | Total Activity | |
| Removing asbestos | Thousands of square feet | 750 | thousand square feet |
| Estimating and job setup | Number of jobs | 400 | jobs |
| Working on nonroutine jobs | Number of nonroutine jobs | 100 | nonroutine jobs |
| Other (organization-sustaining costs and idle capacity costs) | None | ||
| Note: The 100 nonroutine jobs are included in the total of 400 jobs. Both nonroutine jobs and routine jobs require estimating and setup. | |||
| Costs for the Year | ||
| Wages and salaries | $ | 460,000 |
| Disposal fees | 862,000 | |
| Equipment depreciation | 104,000 | |
| On-site supplies | 66,000 | |
| Office expenses | 360,000 | |
| Licensing and insurance | 560,000 | |
| Total cost | $ | 2,412,000 |
| Distribution of Resource Consumption Across Activities | ||||||||||||||||
| Removing Asbestos | Estimating and Job Setup | Working on Nonroutine Jobs | Other | Total | ||||||||||||
| Wages and salaries | 50 | % | 15 | % | 20 | % | 15 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Disposal fees | 70 | % | 0 | % | 30 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Equipment depreciation | 50 | % | 10 | % | 15 | % | 25 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| On-site supplies | 60 | % | 30 | % | 10 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Office expenses | 15 | % | 35 | % | 20 | % | 30 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Licensing and insurance | 25 | % | 0 | % | 60 | % | 15 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
Required:
1. Perform the first-stage allocation of costs to the activity cost pools.
2. Compute the activity rates for the activity cost pools.
3. Using the activity rates you have computed, determine the total cost and the average cost per thousand square feet of each of the following jobs according to the activity-based costing system.
a. A routine 1,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
b. A routine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
c. A nonroutine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
In: Accounting
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company’s estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos-contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine work and should bear higher customer charges. The estimator sums up his position in this way: “My job is to measure the area to be cleared of asbestos. As directed by top management, I simply multiply the square footage by $2.50 to determine the bid price. Since our average cost is only $2.155 per square foot, that leaves enough cushion to take care of the additional costs of nonroutine work that shows up. Besides, it is difficult to know what is routine or not routine until you actually start tearing things apart.” To shed light on this controversy, the company initiated an activity-based costing study of all of its costs. Data from the activity-based costing system follow: Activity Cost Pool Activity Measure Total Activity Removing asbestos Thousands of square feet 1,000 thousand square feet Estimating and job setup Number of jobs 400 jobs Working on nonroutine jobs Number of nonroutine jobs 100 nonroutine jobs Other (organization-sustaining costs and idle capacity costs) None Note: The 100 nonroutine jobs are included in the total of 400 jobs. Both nonroutine jobs and routine jobs require estimating and setup. Costs for the Year Wages and salaries $ 328,000 Disposal fees 706,000 Equipment depreciation 90,000 On-site supplies 53,000 Office expenses 230,000 Licensing and insurance 430,000 Total cost $ 1,837,000 Distribution of Resource Consumption Across Activities Removing Asbestos Estimating and Job Setup Working on Nonroutine Jobs Other Total Wages and salaries 60 % 10 % 20 % 10 % 100 % Disposal fees 60 % 0 % 40 % 0 % 100 % Equipment depreciation 40 % 5 % 20 % 35 % 100 % On-site supplies 70 % 20 % 10 % 0 % 100 % Office expenses 10 % 35 % 25 % 30 % 100 % Licensing and insurance 35 % 0 % 50 % 15 % 100 % Required: 1. Perform the first-stage allocation of costs to the activity cost pools. 2. Compute the activity rates for the activity cost pools. 3. Using the activity rates you have computed, determine the total cost and the average cost per thousand square feet of each of the following jobs according to the activity-based costing system. a. A routine 1,000-square-foot asbestos removal job. b. A routine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job. c. A nonroutine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
In: Finance
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company’s estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos-contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine work and should bear higher customer charges. The estimator sums up his position in this way: “My job is to measure the area to be cleared of asbestos. As directed by top management, I simply multiply the square footage by $4.20 to determine the bid price. Since our average cost is only $2.90 per square foot, that leaves enough cushion to take care of the additional costs of nonroutine work that shows up. Besides, it is difficult to know what is routine or not routine until you actually start tearing things apart.”
To shed light on this controversy, the company initiated an activity-based costing study of all of its costs. Data from the activity-based costing system follow:
| Activity Cost Pool | Activity Measure | Total Activity | |
| Removing asbestos | Thousands of square feet | 500 | thousand square feet |
| Estimating and job setup | Number of jobs | 400 | jobs |
| Working on nonroutine jobs | Number of nonroutine jobs | 100 | nonroutine jobs |
| Other (organization-sustaining costs and idle capacity costs) | None | ||
| Note: The 100 nonroutine jobs are included in the total of 400 jobs. Both nonroutine jobs and routine jobs require estimating and setup. | |||
| Costs for the Year | ||
| Wages and salaries | $ | 431,000 |
| Disposal fees | 713,000 | |
| Equipment depreciation | 104,000 | |
| On-site supplies | 63,000 | |
| Office expenses | 330,000 | |
| Licensing and insurance | 530,000 | |
| Total cost | $ | 2,171,000 |
| Distribution of Resource Consumption Across Activities | ||||||||||||||||
| Removing Asbestos | Estimating and Job Setup | Working on Nonroutine Jobs | Other | Total | ||||||||||||
| Wages and salaries | 60 | % | 10 | % | 20 | % | 10 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Disposal fees | 60 | % | 0 | % | 40 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Equipment depreciation | 50 | % | 10 | % | 15 | % | 25 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| On-site supplies | 70 | % | 20 | % | 10 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Office expenses | 10 | % | 35 | % | 25 | % | 30 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Licensing and insurance | 20 | % | 0 | % | 50 | % | 30 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
Required:
1. Perform the first-stage allocation of costs to the activity cost pools.
2. Compute the activity rates for the activity cost pools.
3. Using the activity rates you have computed, determine the total cost and the average cost per thousand square feet of each of the following jobs according to the activity-based costing system.
a. A routine 1,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
b. A routine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
c. A nonroutine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
In: Accounting
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company’s estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos-contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine work and should bear higher customer charges. The estimator sums up his position in this way: “My job is to measure the area to be cleared of asbestos. As directed by top management, I simply multiply the square footage by $3.20 to determine the bid price. Since our average cost is only $2.745 per square foot, that leaves enough cushion to take care of the additional costs of nonroutine work that shows up. Besides, it is difficult to know what is routine or not routine until you actually start tearing things apart.”
To shed light on this controversy, the company initiated an activity-based costing study of all of its costs. Data from the activity-based costing system follow:
| Activity Cost Pool | Activity Measure | Total Activity | |
| Removing asbestos | Thousands of square feet | 800 | thousand square feet |
| Estimating and job setup | Number of jobs | 500 | jobs |
| Working on nonroutine jobs | Number of nonroutine jobs | 100 | nonroutine jobs |
| Other (organization-sustaining costs and idle capacity costs) | None | ||
| Note: The 100 nonroutine jobs are included in the total of 500 jobs. Both nonroutine jobs and routine jobs require estimating and setup. | |||
| Costs for the Year | ||
| Wages and salaries | $ | 470,000 |
| Disposal fees | 801,000 | |
| Equipment depreciation | 110,000 | |
| On-site supplies | 68,000 | |
| Office expenses | 370,000 | |
| Licensing and insurance | 570,000 | |
| Total cost | $ | 2,389,000 |
| Distribution of Resource Consumption Across Activities | ||||||||||||||||
| Removing Asbestos | Estimating and Job Setup | Working on Nonroutine Jobs | Other | Total | ||||||||||||
| Wages and salaries | 60 | % | 10 | % | 20 | % | 10 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Disposal fees | 60 | % | 0 | % | 40 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Equipment depreciation | 50 | % | 10 | % | 15 | % | 25 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| On-site supplies | 60 | % | 25 | % | 15 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Office expenses | 10 | % | 40 | % | 15 | % | 35 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
| Licensing and insurance | 30 | % | 0 | % | 50 | % | 20 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
Required:
1. Perform the first-stage allocation of costs to the activity cost pools.
2. Compute the activity rates for the activity cost pools.
3. Using the activity rates you have computed, determine the total cost and the average cost per thousand square feet of each of the following jobs according to the activity-based costing system.
a. A routine 1,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
b. A routine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
c. A nonroutine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
In: Accounting
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company’s estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos-contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine work and should bear higher customer charges. The estimator sums up his position in this way: “My job is to measure the area to be cleared of asbestos. As directed by top management, I simply multiply the square footage by $2.50 to determine the bid price. Since our average cost is only $2.01 per square foot, that leaves enough cushion to take care of the additional costs of nonroutine work that shows up. Besides, it is difficult to know what is routine or not routine until you actually start tearing things apart.” To shed light on this controversy, the company initiated an activity-based costing study of all of its costs. Data from the activity-based costing system follow: Activity Cost Pool Activity Measure Total Activity Removing asbestos Thousands of square feet 850 thousand square feet Estimating and job setup Number of jobs 400 jobs Working on nonroutine jobs Number of nonroutine jobs 100 nonroutine jobs Other (organization-sustaining costs and idle capacity costs) None Note: The 100 nonroutine jobs are included in the total of 400 jobs. Both nonroutine jobs and routine jobs require estimating and setup. Costs for the Year Wages and salaries $ 308,000 Disposal fees 706,000 Equipment depreciation 90,000 On-site supplies 50,000 Office expenses 210,000 Licensing and insurance 410,000 Total cost $ 1,774,000 Distribution of Resource Consumption Across Activities Removing Asbestos Estimating and Job Setup Working on Nonroutine Jobs Other Total Wages and salaries 60 % 10 % 20 % 10 % 100 % Disposal fees 70 % 0 % 30 % 0 % 100 % Equipment depreciation 40 % 5 % 25 % 30 % 100 % On-site supplies 70 % 20 % 10 % 0 % 100 % Office expenses 15 % 35 % 20 % 30 % 100 % Licensing and insurance 25 % 0 % 50 % 25 % 100 % Required: 1. Perform the first-stage allocation of costs to the activity cost pools. 2. Compute the activity rates for the activity cost pools. 3. Using the activity rates you have computed, determine the total cost and the average cost per thousand square feet of each of the following jobs according to the activity-based costing system. a. A routine 1,000-square-foot asbestos removal job. b. A routine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job. c. A nonroutine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
In: Accounting