19. Flash Crash of May 6, 2010
Describe the flash crash of May 6, 2010, and explain why it caused so much concern among investors and regulators
In: Accounting
2) A bank lends money to a firm on 01/01/2010. According to the lending agreement, the bank will receive the following payments:
06/30/2010 - $2,300,000
12/31/2010 - $1,300,000
06/30/2011 - $5,700,000
12/31/2011 - $3,400,000
06/30/2012 - $360,000
12/31/2012 - $560,000
If the annual interest rate on the loan is 3.80%, how much did the firm borrow?
In: Finance
4. Suppose you are interested in the impact of minimum wages on employment. You collect the following data on two jurisdictions:
|
Jurisdiction |
Year |
Employment (million) |
Minimum wage |
|
1 |
2005 |
2.6 |
15 |
|
1 |
2010 |
2.4 |
15 |
|
1 |
2015 |
2.1 |
16 |
|
2 |
2005 |
1.3 |
16 |
|
2 |
2010 |
1.4 |
16 |
|
2 |
2015 |
1.5 |
16 |
5. Consider the same data on minimum wages and employment from the
previous question. You’re going to use this data to check whether
the two jurisdictions had different trends in employment before the
2010-2015 period. In particular, imagine that the increase in the
minimum wage in jurisdiction 1 happened between 2005 and 2010, not
between 2010 and 2015. Continue to assume that there is no change
in the minimum wage in jurisdiction 2. The “before and after”
approach using the 2005 and 2010 data, with the imagined change in
the minimum wage during this period, would show:
a) none of the listed options.
b) a negative relationship between the change in the minimum wage and the change in employment.
c) no relationship between the change in the minimum wage and the change in employment.
d) a positive relationship between the change in the minimum wage and the change in employment.
In: Economics
A) Topic :
Elaborate the China-U.S. Trade War and the impact to China Business Environment as follows:
i) Briefly elaborate the trade practices and their effects which the current U.S. President, Donald J. Trump claims are unfair such as the growing trade deficit, the theft of intellectual property, and the forced transfer of American technology to China from 2010 to present.
ii) Analyze the outcomes of the China-U.S. Trade War and U.S.’s subsequent policies impacts to current China Business Environment in terms of Political, Economic, Social and Technological (PEST) aspects.
iii) In your opinion, how to deploy Porter’s Five Forces model to predict the Trade War impacts on the near future China Hi-Tech industries’ challenges and opportunities?
iv) If you are the CEO of a Hong Kong Hi-Tech Firm with extensive business cooperation with Chinese Hi-Tech partners, what strategies would you like to propose to the Board of Directors? And why?
In: Economics
1. An increase in saving that leads to more capital accumulation ________ labor productivity.
|
decreases |
||
|
increases |
||
|
does not change |
||
|
probably changes but in an ambiguous direction |
2. In 2010, of the following ________ had the highest real GDP per person.
|
the Europe Big 4 countries |
||
|
the United States |
||
|
Canada |
||
|
Japan |
3. Moving along the aggregate production function shows the relationship between ________, holding all else constant.
|
capital input and real GDP |
||
|
labor input, capital input and real GDP |
||
|
technology and real GDP |
||
|
labor input and real GDP |
4. Greater labor force participation for households at higher real wage rate is one reason that
|
the demand for labor curve is upward sloping. |
||
|
the demand for labor curve is downward sloping. |
||
|
the supply of labor curve is downward sloping. |
||
|
the supply of labor curve is upward sloping. |
5. The supply of labor curve is
|
downward sloping. |
||
|
upward sloping. |
||
|
horizontal at the equilibrium wage rate. |
||
|
vertical at potential GDP. |
In: Economics
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current Ratio | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Current Assets / Current Liabilities | 8.54 | (478250/56000) | 6.86 | (329150/48000) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Strengths and Weaknesses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current Ratio is calculated by dividing the company's total current assets by the company's total current liabilities. This ratio is a widely used measure of a firm's ability to meet it's current obligations & to have funds available for use in daily operations. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| A generally accepted rule of thumb is that the current ratio should be 2:1, indicating that a company should maintain twice the dollar amount of current assets as was needed to satisfy it's current liabilities. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011's current ratio was better than 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| PART 6 B. | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Quick Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash & cash equivalents + short term investments + Accts Recievable) / | 3.15 | (176200+238850)/56000 | 5.94 | (253100+31850)/48000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Current Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Strengths and Weaknesses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Quick ratio reveals the relationship between the company's Liquid Assets and it's Current Liabilities. It gives a more accurate picture of a company's ability to meet current obligations since the ratio ignores potentially illiquid inventory and prepaid expenses. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| The higher the ratio, the the more financially secure a company is in the short term. 2010 has the better ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| PART 6 C. | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Rate of Return on Total Assets | 0.026 | (27100/1049800) | 0.073 | (70100/963700) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net Income / Average Total Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Strengths and Weaknesses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| The rate of return on total assets reveals the rate of profit earned per dollar of assets under a firm's control. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Both 2011 and 2010 have poor ratios, but 2010 is slightly better. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| PART 6 D. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rate of Return on Common Stockholder's Equity | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (Net Income - Preferred Stock Dividends) / Average common stockholders equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Strengths and Weaknesses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| The return on common stockholder's equity measures the profitability of the ownership interest held by a company's common stockholders. The ratio shows the percentage of income available to common stockholders- that is, net income less any preferred stock dividends - for each dollar of common stockholder equity invested in a business. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| PART 6 E. | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings Per Share | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (net income-preferred dividends) / outstanding common shares | (27100-0) / | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Strengths and Weaknesses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| PART 6 F. | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Accounts Receivable Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Sales / Average Accts Recievable (Net) | 1.92 | (260000/135350) | 10.5 | (521000/49600) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Strengths and Weaknesses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Accounts Recievable Turnover measures the ability to collect cash from customers. A higher turnover indicates that the company is converting their recievables at a faster rate. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 is much higher than 2011. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average Collection Period | 190.01 | (365/1.921) | 34.76 | (365/10.50) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 365 / Accts Recievable Turnover (Net) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Strengths and Weaknesses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| The average collection period indicates how many days remain in accounts receivable. The lower the # of days, the quicker you are converting the recievables into cash. 2010 had the better average collection period. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
In: Accounting
Exercise 9-24
Larkspur Company began operations on January 1, 2019, adopting
the conventional retail inventory system. None of the company’s
merchandise was marked down in 2019 and, because there was no
beginning inventory, its ending inventory for 2019 of $37,700 would
have been the same under either the conventional retail system or
the LIFO retail system.
On December 31, 2020, the store management considers adopting the
LIFO retail system and desires to know how the December 31, 2020,
inventory would appear under both systems. All pertinent data
regarding purchases, sales, markups, and markdowns are shown below.
There has been no change in the price level.
|
Cost |
Retail |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Inventory, Jan. 1, 2020 |
$37,700 | $60,500 | ||||
|
Markdowns (net) |
13,000 | |||||
|
Markups (net) |
22,000 | |||||
|
Purchases (net) |
133,500 | 177,500 | ||||
|
Sales (net) |
168,600 | |||||
Determine the cost of the 2020 ending inventory under both (a) the
conventional retail method and (b) the LIFO retail method.
(Round ratios for computational purposes to 2 decimal
place, e.g. 78.72% and final answers to 0 decimal places, e.g.
28,987.)
|
Ending inventory LIFO retail method |
$enter a dollar amount rounded to 0 decimal places |
|---|
In: Accounting
Aida Jebat was hired as a clerk with Syarikat Manisan Sdn BHD on 1 July 2010 with a salary of RM1,200 per month. She was placed on six-month probation. On 1 October she informs the company that she is going on maternity leave. Her expected date of confinement is 1 December 2010, and she intends to commence her maternity leave on 1 November 2010. On 29 November 2010, she died from childbirth complications. The child was survived.
In: Finance
in 2010, the Maricopa Community College District's enrollment
data showed the following breakdown of students by ethnicity: 54.9%
White; 21.1% Hispanic; 7.9% Black; 4.5% Asian/Pacific Islander;
2.9% Native American; 8.8% Other. Information was collected from a
random sample 0f 300 students in 2017 to determine whether or not
the data has changed significantly. The sample data is given in the
table below. At the α=0.05 level of significance, test
the claim that the ethnic breakdown of students at MCCCD has not
changed significantly since 2010.
Which would be correct hypotheses for this test?
Ethnicity of students in sample:
| Ethnicity | Count |
|---|---|
| White | 137 |
| Hispanic | 71 |
| Black | 27 |
| Asian/Pacific Islander | 12 |
| Native American | 14 |
| Other | 39 |
Test Statistic:
Give the P-value:
Which is the correct result:
Which would be the appropriate conclusion?
In: Math
Exercise 10-15 Deferred payment purchase
Cardinals Corporation purchased a computer on December 31, 2019, for $105,000, paying $30,000 down and agreeing to pay the balance in five equal installments of $15,000 payable each December 31 starting in 2020. An assumed interest rate of 10% is implicit in the purchase price.
Instructions: Prepare journal entries relating to the equipment and notes payable for all 5 years.
|
Date |
Account |
Debit |
Credit |
In: Accounting